You are on page 1of 10

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Wills and Succession

I.

Laws governing Form

1. In re: Will of Abadia, 50 O.G, 39


p.4185...........
2. Fleumer v. Hix, Phil
610

3. Estate of Gibberson, 48 O.G. #7


2657
4. Dela Cerna v. Potot, 12 SCRA
576
5. Estate of Rodriguez, 46 O.G. #2
p.584

II.

Laws Governing Content

1. Estate of Christensen 610 O.G. #45


p.7302
2. Estate of Amos Bellis, 20 SCRA
458.
3. Cayetano v.
Leonides
.

III.

Who may succeed


1. Parish Priest of Victoria v. Rigor 89 SCRA
493

IV.

Object of Succession

1. Reyes v. CA, S.C.L-5620 July 31,


1954
2. Guinto v. Medina 50 O.G. #1 p.199, October
7,1953.

V.

Requisites for Transmission of Successional Rights

1. Uson v. Del Rosario, 92 Phil


530.
2. De Borja v. De Borja, 46 SCRA
577
3. Bonilla v. Barcena 71 SCRA
491..
4. Bough v. Modesto January 28, 1954, 94 Phil.
.
5. Borromeo-Herrera v. Borromeo, 152 SCRA
171.

VI.

Solemnities of Wills
1. Suroza v. Honrado 110 SCRA
388.
2. Garcia v. Lacuesta 90 Phil
489.
3. Balonan v. Abellana 109 Phil
358..
4. Nera v. Rimando 18 Phil
358
5. Taboado v. Rosal, 18 Phil
450..
6. Icasiano v. Icasiano 17 SCRA
422..
7. Cruz v. Villasor, 54 SCRA,
31.

8. Gabucan v. Manta 95 SCRA


752.
9. Javellana v. Ledesma, 97 Phil
258.

VII.

Witness to a Will
1. Gonzales v. CA, 90 SCRA
183
2. Garcia v. Vasquez 32 SCRA
489..

VIII.

Holographic Wills
1. Roxas v. De Jesus, 134 SCRA
245
2. Kalaw v. Relova, 132 SCRA
237..

IX.

Modes of Revocation
1. Gago v, Mamuyac, 48 Phil,
902..
2. Casiano v. CA 158 SCRA
451

X.

Doctrine of Dependent Relative Revocation


1. Molo v. Molo 90 Phil
37
..

XI.

Allowance of Will
1. De Borja v. De Borja 46 SCRA
577.
2. Gan v. Yap 104 Phil
509

3. Rodelas v. Aranza 119 SCRA


16..
4. Azaola v. Singson, 109 Phil.
103.
5. Codoy v. Calugay, 312 SCRA
333

XII.

Effect of allowance of wills


1. Gallanosa v. Arcangel, 83 SCRA
676
2. Dela Cerna v. Leonides, 129 SCRA
33.
3. Roberts v. Leonides, 129 SCRA
33.
4. Nepumoceno v. CA, 139 SCRA
206..

XIII.

Disallowance of Wills
1. Pascual v. Dela Cruz, 28 SCRA
421

XIV.

Legitime

1. Rosales v. Rosales 148 SCRA


69.

XV.

Collation

1. Dizon-Rivera v. Dizon, 33 SCRA


554
2. De Roma v. CA 152 SCRA
205..
3. Locsin v. CA 206 SCRA
205.

XVI.

Preterition
1. Aznar v. Duncan, 17 SCRA
596
2. Nuguid v. Nuguid, 17 SCRA
449.
3. Reyes v. Barreto-Datu, 19 SCRA
85.
4. Escuin v. Escuin 14 SCRA
332
5. Balanay v. Martinez 64 SCRA
452.
6. Solano v. CA 126 SCRA
122
7. Acain v. CA 155 SCRA
166..

XVII.

Reserva Troncal or Lineal


1. Edroso v. Sablan 25 Phil.
295
2. Sienes v. Esparcia 1 SCRA
750.
3. Florentino v. Florentino 40 Phil
480..
4. Padura v. Baldovino 104 SCRA
1065..

5. Chua v. CFI 78 SCRA


406
.
6. Gonzales v. CFI 104 SCRA
181.
7. De Papa v. Camacho 144 SCRA
281.

XVIII.

Reserva Adoptiva
1. Banawa v. Mirano, 97 SCRA
517
2. Teotica v. Del Val 13 SCRA
406

XIX.

Institution of Heirs
1. Austria v. Reyes 31 SCRA
754.

XX.

Substitution of Heirs
1. Palacios v. Ramirez, 111 SCRA
704.
2. Crisologo v. Singson, 49 SCRA
491

XXI.

Legacies and Devisees


1. Fernandez v. Dimagiba, 21 SCRA
428
2. Belen v. Bank of P.I. L-14474, October 31,
1960

XXII.

Legal or Intestate Succession


1. Rosales v. Rosales,
SUPRA
.
2. Delo Santos v. Dela Cruz, 37 SCRA
555.
3. Teotico v. Del Val,
SUPRA

4. Diaz v. IAC, 150 SCRA


645..
5. Delos Santos v. Ferraris-Borromeo, 14 SCRA
986..
6. Corpuz v. Corpuz, 85 SCRA
567..
7. Leonardo v. CA, 120 SCRA
890
8. Santillion v.Mirandan 14 SCRA
563.
9. Bicomong v. Almanza, 80 SCRA
421
10. Bacayo v. Borromeo, 14 SCRA
986..

XXIII.

Partition
1. Alsua Betts v. CA 92 SCRA
332.
2. Doromal v. CA L-36083, September 2,
1975.
3. Alonzo v. IAC, 150 SCRA
517.

4. Bautista v. Grino-Aquino, 166 SCRA


760.
5. Delos Santos v. Dela Cruz,
SUPRA.

XXIV.

Effects of Partition

1. Guilas v. Judge, L-026695, January 31, 1972.


.
2. Delos Santos v. Dela Cruz,
SUPRA
3. Agustines v. CFI, 45 O.G. Supp#9 p. 184 April 3,
1948

SAN SEBASTIAN COLLEGERECOLETOS


RECTO, MANILA
COLLEGE OF LAW

WILLS AND SUCCESSION


CASE DIGEST

SUBMITTED BY:
SUBMITTED TO: Atty. CRISOSTOMO
URIBE
SCHEDULE: day, 5-9pm
DATE: OCTOBER 19, 2013

CERTIFICATION
I, Richard Baker, Do hereby certify That;
1. The following case digest herein to be submitted in fulfilment of the requirements in
Wills and Succession are complete as listed in the course syllabus.

2. All of the digested cases contained herein are written in my own handwriting.

______________________________________
name

CONFORME:

____________________________

_____________________________

You might also like