FROM ISOLATION 2 City Charter Middle School (City School) is a public charter school located in West Los Angeles. City School first opened its doors in 2012 and served 180 students in grades six and seven. By the end of City Schools first year of enrollment a new location was needed to meet the needs of a growing student population. City School is currently leasing a building on the corner of Pico and Barrington, but hopes to acquire a permanent location in the near future. Currently, City Schools staff consists of: one principal, twenty-two full time teachers, two part time teachers, two full-time clerical staff, and two paraprofessionals. City School is also made up of many parents that volunteer and support faculty members in a variety of ways such as: teaching a major or elective course, tutoring small groups of students, making copies for clerical staff and teachers, answering phone calls, and assisting teachers in ordering supplies that is needed for the classroom. Currently, there are 315 students enrolled at City School. The student enrollment consists of: 115 sixth graders, 115 seventh graders, and 85 eighth graders. City School is diverse with a population that includes about 35% Caucasian, 26% Hispanic, 21% African American, 10% Asian and 8% multiracial. City School offers small class sizes for both teachers and students. Although classes are smaller, many teachers have a minimum of four preps to teach which can be challenging and difficult. In the Language Arts and Math classes students are tracked according to their ability. All students are tested and either placed in a low, average, or advanced class. It is important to note that City School is a constructivist-based school. Classrooms are designed to be student-centered where students construct and create FROM ISOLATION 3 meaning and knowledge. Students collaborate with one another through various problem-based activities. I first identified a need for my leadership project through a survey. I wanted to know exactly what areas City School needed to improve upon. Surveys were given to teachers in October during a staff meeting and many teachers expressed specific areas of need. First, the need for effective professional development was desperately needed at City School. Teachers shared that professional development was not purposeful and intentional. Professional development was not focused on teacher and student needs. Second, teachers were not given opportunities to observe one another. Peer teacher observations were not practiced at City School. Teachers worked in isolation from one another and did not observe each other. My educational vision is that, Education is meant to equip students with the proper tools necessary to obtain and interpret information. Education is never meant to be limited to the school setting, but to extend beyond school walls and for a lifetime by instilling an ability and desire to learn and grow. In order for students to be equipped with the proper tools necessary to obtain and interpret information, teachers must receive effective professional development. Through effective professional development teachers can apply best teaching practices into their own classrooms, which will ultimately effect student performance. Students at City School will not be successful unless teachers at City School are receiving effective professional development that can be used in classrooms. The inquiry question to my project was, What impact does differentiated FROM ISOLATION 4 professional development have on teacher confidence? I wanted to know how confidence level of teachers plays an important role in teacher performance. Confidence level among teachers at City School varied and it was important to explore the idea of professional development and how that can improve teacher confidence. The research that was used for this leadership project came from various sources. One reliable source was using Pepperdines online database (ERIC). This database offered several research articles on how effective professional development and peer teacher observations are beneficial for both teachers and students. Also, coursework that was given through the ELA program was beneficial in reinforcing the benefit of effective professional development. In December the first workshop was given at City School. This workshop was on constructivism and how teachers can develop lessons that are constructivist based. Many teachers had expressed their lack of knowledge on what a constructivist lesson should look like. Also, many teachers were inexperienced and had not taught at a school that had a constructivist philosophy in education. This workshop was delivered during one of our staff meetings by Jeff, a member of my leadership team. Jeff is one of the founding teachers at City School and has many years of experience in constructivism. Through this workshop Jeff was able to discuss constructivism with teachers and share the significance of this philosophy to City School The second workshop was delivered in January. This workshop discussed the importance of home/school communication between teachers to parents and students. Teachers were given surveys and asked how often they communicate with parents and students and teacher responses varied. Some responded that they communicate daily, FROM ISOLATION 5 while others expressed that they communicate weekly, monthly, or as necessary. City School teachers also expressed the various methods used to communicate with parents and students. Through this workshop teachers shared their methods of communication whether by email, phone calls, or notes that were sent home. Teachers were able to discuss methods that they found to be effective with a colleague. After teachers participated in both workshops, opportunities were given for teachers to observe one another. The first round of teacher observations began in February and the second round followed in March. There were only a few teachers that refused to participate in observing or being observed. Most teachers were excited about the opportunity to observe another teacher. In order to assess teacher confidence, my participatory action research (PAR) team scheduled teacher observations. We gave teachers opportunities to observe one another. Teachers were provided coverage from their classes in order to observe their colleagues. My PAR team gave both observed teachers and teachers that were observing questionnaires and asked what their confidence level was on a scale from 1-5, 1 being low and 5 being high. According to the questionnaires that teachers filled out, observed teachers confidence level decreased slightly. Before the observation observed teachers rated themselves a 4.3 and after observing their confidence level was a 4.1. Teachers that observed may have felt intimidated or insecure after observing which may have led to their slight decrease in confidence level. Although confidence level in teachers slightly decreased for teachers that were observing, confidence level of teachers that were observed increased from 4 to 4.5. The FROM ISOLATION 6 increase may be a result of teachers receiving positive feedback from their peers. Also, each teacher that was observed expressed that they enjoyed having a peer come into their classroom to observe and provide feedback. The results of this leadership project were positive. Teachers and administration expressed that they learned from one another. Peer observations were welcomed and encouraged and challenged many teachers to improve in their pedagogy. The results of the project were measured through informal interviews I had with teachers, through data that was collected before and after observations, and through a formal interview that was given to Brett, a 7 th grade English teacher. Brett shared that through the observation she was able to implement a teaching strategy that she observed into her own classroom. She shared that students were receptive to being given a certain time limit to complete different tasks. She believes that using a time limit will benefit students and keep them on task, which will ultimately improve student achievement. After this project was completed, I was asked to continue it for the next school year. My principal saw the benefit of peer observations and wants me to establish a culture of peer teacher observations at City School. In order to sustain this practice of peer teacher observations, teachers will be required to observe other colleagues within their department at least twice a year. Personally, this leadership project challenged my confidence level as both a teacher and a leader. As a teacher I learned and gained more confidence in developing constructivist-based lessons. I lacked confidence in the ability to deliver constructivist- based lessons. FROM ISOLATION 7 As a leader I learned that relationship building is necessary in order for teachers to buy-in to the project. This was an important lesson that taught me how important it is to develop strong positive relationships with colleagues. Through strong relationships I was able to gain support from teachers. I learned that without a good relationship it is difficult to create any unity and collaboration among colleagues. Another lesson I learned was to be willing to take risks and be open to failure. I was hesitant to deliver workshops to teachers because this was my first year at City School. I did not know how they would feel receiving direction from a teacher that had just come to this school. This made me feel very uncomfortable, but I knew that I would have to risk exposing myself in order to grow as a leader. Also, through experiencing setbacks I have learned to be more resilient. Initially, I received resistance from administration during a staff meeting about having teachers engage in peer observations. After my principal saw the benefits of having teachers observe one another she thanked me and provided encouragement and support for this project. This project taught me that it is through setbacks and adversity that you truly learn and grow as an individual.