Frequency Table

internet facility

Valid

1st Rank
2nd Rank
3rd Rank
4th Rank
5th Rank
th Rank
7th Rank
8th Rank
9th Rank
10th Rank
11th Rank
12th Rank
14th Rank
16th Rank
Total

Frequency
8
3
7
9
8
4
6
8
13
6
9
7
8
4
100

Percent
8.0
3.0
7.0
9.0
8.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
13.0
6.0
9.0
7.0
8.0
4.0
100.0

Valid Percent
8.0
3.0
7.0
9.0
8.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
13.0
6.0
9.0
7.0
8.0
4.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
8.0
11.0
18.0
27.0
35.0
39.0
45.0
53.0
66.0
72.0
81.0
88.0
96.0
100.0

internet facility
16th Rank

1st Rank

14th Rank

2nd Rank

12th Rank

11th Rank

3rd Rank

4th Rank

10th Rank

5th Rank

9th Rank

7th Rank

th Rank

8th Rank

Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (8%), 2nd rank (3%), 3rd rank (7%), 4th rank (9%),
5th rank (8%), 6th rank (4%), 7th rank (6%), 8th rank (8%), 9th rank (13%), 10th rank (6%),
11th rank (9%), 12th rank (7%), 14th rank ( 8%), 16th rank (4%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 4th rank to internet facility.

Digital facility

Valid

1st Rank
2nd Rank
3rd Rank
4th Rank
5th Rank
6th Rank
7th Rank
8th Rank
9th Rank
10th Rank
11th Rank
12th rank
13th Rank
14 th rank
15th rank
Total

Frequency
3
7
5
13
15
10
2
9
11
3
2
3
7
2
8
100

Percent
3.0
7.0
5.0
13.0
15.0
10.0
2.0
9.0
11.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
7.0
2.0
8.0
100.0

Valid Percent
3.0
7.0
5.0
13.0
15.0
10.0
2.0
9.0
11.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
7.0
2.0
8.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
3.0
10.0
15.0
28.0
43.0
53.0
55.0
64.0
75.0
78.0
80.0
83.0
90.0
92.0
100.0

Digital facility
15th rank
14 th rank
13th Rank

1st Rank
2nd Rank
3rd Rank

12th rank
11th Rank

4th Rank

10th Rank

9th Rank
5th Rank
8th Rank
7th Rank

6th Rank

Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (3%), 2nd rank (7%), 3rd rank (5%), 4th rank (13%),
5th rank (15%), 6th rank (10%), 7th rank (2%), 8th rank (9%), 9th rank (11%), 10th rank
(3%), 11th rank (2%), 12th rank (3%), 13th rank (7%), 14th rank ( 2%), 15th rank (8%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 4th rank to digital facility.

more specialization

Valid

1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
13th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total

Frequency
4
2
7
6
14
11
13
6
10
19
3
2
3
100

Percent
4.0
2.0
7.0
6.0
14.0
11.0
13.0
6.0
10.0
19.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
100.0

Valid Percent
4.0
2.0
7.0
6.0
14.0
11.0
13.0
6.0
10.0
19.0
3.0
2.0
3.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
4.0
6.0
13.0
19.0
33.0
44.0
57.0
63.0
73.0
92.0
95.0
97.0
100.0

more specialization
16th rank
15th rank
13th rank

11th rank

1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank

5th rank

10th rank

9th rank

6th rank

7th rank

Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (4%), 2nd rank (2%), 3rd rank (7%), 4th rank (6%),
5th rank (14%), 6th rank (11%), 7th rank (13%), 9th rank (6%), 10th rank (10%), 11th rank
(19%), 13th rank (3%), 15th rank (2%), 16th rank (3%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 5th rank to more specialization.

place or city

Valid

1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
16th rank
Total

Frequency
11
5
15
10
8
5
4
14
6
9
3
5
4
1
100

Percent
11.0
5.0
15.0
10.0
8.0
5.0
4.0
14.0
6.0
9.0
3.0
5.0
4.0
1.0
100.0

Valid Percent
11.0
5.0
15.0
10.0
8.0
5.0
4.0
14.0
6.0
9.0
3.0
5.0
4.0
1.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
11.0
16.0
31.0
41.0
49.0
54.0
58.0
72.0
78.0
87.0
90.0
95.0
99.0
100.0

place or city
16th rank
14th rank
13th rank
12th rank

1st rank
2nd rank

10th rank

9th rank

8th rank
7th rank

3rd rank

4th rank
5th rank

6th rank

Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (11%), 2nd rank (5%), 3rd rank (15%), 4th rank
(10%), 5th rank (8%), 6th rank (5%), 7th rank (4%), 8th rank (14%), 9th rank (6%), 10th rank
(9%), 12th rank (3%), 13th rank (5%), 14th rank ( 4%), 16th rank (1%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 3rd rank to Place or city.

placements

Valid

1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total

Frequency
12
29
7
2
6
14
6
7
1
3
4
4
2
3
100

Percent
12.0
29.0
7.0
2.0
6.0
14.0
6.0
7.0
1.0
3.0
4.0
4.0
2.0
3.0
100.0

Valid Percent
12.0
29.0
7.0
2.0
6.0
14.0
6.0
7.0
1.0
3.0
4.0
4.0
2.0
3.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
12.0
41.0
48.0
50.0
56.0
70.0
76.0
83.0
84.0
87.0
91.0
95.0
97.0
100.0

placements
16th rank
15th rank
13th rank
12th rank

1st rank

11th rank
10th rank
9th rank
7th rank

2nd rank

6th rank
5th rank

3rd rank
4th rank

Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (12%), 2nd rank (29%), 3rd rank (7%), 4th rank (2%),
5th rank (6%), 6th rank (14%), 7th rank (6%), 9th rank (7%), 10th rank (1%), 11th rank (3%),
12th rank (4%), 13th rank (4%), 15th rank ( 2%), 16th rank (3%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 2nd rank to Placements.

university

Valid

1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
12th rank
13th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total

Frequency
12
13
7
11
12
8
10
3
2
13
2
4
2
1
100

Percent
12.0
13.0
7.0
11.0
12.0
8.0
10.0
3.0
2.0
13.0
2.0
4.0
2.0
1.0
100.0

Valid Percent
12.0
13.0
7.0
11.0
12.0
8.0
10.0
3.0
2.0
13.0
2.0
4.0
2.0
1.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
12.0
25.0
32.0
43.0
55.0
63.0
73.0
76.0
78.0
91.0
93.0
97.0
99.0
100.0

university
16th rank
15th rank
13th rank
12th rank

1st rank

10th rank
2nd rank
9th rank
8th rank
3rd rank
7th rank
4th rank
6th rank
5th rank

Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (12%), 2nd rank (13%), 3rd rank (7%), 4th rank
(11%), 5th rank (12%), 6th rank (8%), 7th rank (10%), 8th rank (3%), 9th rank (2%), 10th
rank (13%), 12th rank (2%), 13th rank (4%), 15th rank ( 2%), 16th rank (1%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 2nd and 10th rank to university.

fee structure

Valid

1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
14th rank
15th rank
Total

Frequency
6
9
13
10
6
7
14
2
12
6
9
1
2
3
100

Percent
6.0
9.0
13.0
10.0
6.0
7.0
14.0
2.0
12.0
6.0
9.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
100.0

Valid Percent
6.0
9.0
13.0
10.0
6.0
7.0
14.0
2.0
12.0
6.0
9.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
6.0
15.0
28.0
38.0
44.0
51.0
65.0
67.0
79.0
85.0
94.0
95.0
97.0
100.0

fee structure
15th rank
14th rank
12th rank

1st rank

11th rank

2nd rank

10th rank
3rd rank

9th rank

8th rank

4th rank

7th rank

5th rank
6th rank

Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (6%), 2nd rank (9%), 3rd rank (13%), 4th rank (10%),
5th rank (6%), 6th rank (7%), 7th rank (14%), 8th rank (2%), 9th rank (12%), 10th rank (6%),
11th rank (9%), 12th rank (1%), 14th rank ( 2%), 15th rank (3%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 7th rank toffee structure.

infrastructure

Valid

1st rank
2nd rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total

Frequency
2
10
9
11
11
14
7
6
7
3
6
2
7
5
100

Percent
2.0
10.0
9.0
11.0
11.0
14.0
7.0
6.0
7.0
3.0
6.0
2.0
7.0
5.0
100.0

Valid Percent
2.0
10.0
9.0
11.0
11.0
14.0
7.0
6.0
7.0
3.0
6.0
2.0
7.0
5.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
2.0
12.0
21.0
32.0
43.0
57.0
64.0
70.0
77.0
80.0
86.0
88.0
95.0
100.0

infrastructure
16th rank

1st rank

15th rank

2nd rank

13th rank
12th rank

4th rank

11th rank
10th rank

5th rank

9th rank
8th rank

6th rank
7th rank

Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (2%), 2nd rank (10%), 4th rank (9%), 5th rank
(11%), 6th rank (11%), 7th rank (14%), 8th rank (7%), 9th rank (6%), 10th rank (7%), 11th
rank (3%), 12th rank (6%), 13th rank (2%), 15th rank ( 7%), 16th rank (5%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 7th rank to infrastructure.

faculty

Valid

1th rank
2th rank
3th rank
4th rank
5th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total

Frequency
28
5
4
8
4
10
10
2
9
3
1
8
3
3
2
100

Percent
28.0
5.0
4.0
8.0
4.0
10.0
10.0
2.0
9.0
3.0
1.0
8.0
3.0
3.0
2.0
100.0

Valid Percent
28.0
5.0
4.0
8.0
4.0
10.0
10.0
2.0
9.0
3.0
1.0
8.0
3.0
3.0
2.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
28.0
33.0
37.0
45.0
49.0
59.0
69.0
71.0
80.0
83.0
84.0
92.0
95.0
98.0
100.0

faculty
16th rank
15th rank
14th rank
13th rank
12th rank

1th rank

11th rank

10th rank
9th rank
8th rank

2th rank
3th rank
4th rank

7th rank

5th rank

Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (28%), 2nd rank (5%), 3rd rank (4%), 4th rank (8%),
5th rank (4%), 7th rank (10%), 8th rank (10%), 9th rank (2%), 10th rank (9%), 11th rank
(3%), 12th rank (1%), 13th rank (8%), 13th rank ( 2%), 15th rank (3%), 16th rank (2%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 1st rank to faculty.

collegereputation

Valid

1th rank
2th rank
3th rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total

Frequency
6
5
7
4
2
13
3
10
2
8
4
7
5
6
11
7
100

Percent
6.0
5.0
7.0
4.0
2.0
13.0
3.0
10.0
2.0
8.0
4.0
7.0
5.0
6.0
11.0
7.0
100.0

Valid Percent
6.0
5.0
7.0
4.0
2.0
13.0
3.0
10.0
2.0
8.0
4.0
7.0
5.0
6.0
11.0
7.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
6.0
11.0
18.0
22.0
24.0
37.0
40.0
50.0
52.0
60.0
64.0
71.0
76.0
82.0
93.0
100.0

collegereputation
16th rank

1th rank
2th rank

15th rank

14th rank

3th rank
4th rank
5th rank

13th rank
6th rank
12th rank
11th rank

7th rank

10th rank

8th rank

9th rank

Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (6%), 2nd rank (5%), 3rd rank (7%), 4th rank (4%),
5th rank (2%), 6th rank (13%), 7th rank (3%), 8th rank (10%), 9th rank (2%), 10th rank (8%),
11th rank (4%), 12th rank (7%), 13th rank (5%), 14th rank ( 6%), 15th rank (11%), 16th rank
(7%)..
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 15th rank to college reputation.

extracurricularactivities

Valid

2th rank
3th rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
Total

Frequency
2
3
2
4
4
2
10
9
6
7
15
12
12
12
100

Percent
2.0
3.0
2.0
4.0
4.0
2.0
10.0
9.0
6.0
7.0
15.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
100.0

Valid Percent
2.0
3.0
2.0
4.0
4.0
2.0
10.0
9.0
6.0
7.0
15.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
2.0
5.0
7.0
11.0
15.0
17.0
27.0
36.0
42.0
49.0
64.0
76.0
88.0
100.0

extracurricularactivities
2th rank
3th rank
4th rank
15th rank

5th rank
6th rank

14th rank

7th rank
8th rank

13th rank

9th rank

10th rank
12th rank

11th rank

Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 2nd rank (2%), 3rd rank (3%), 4th rank (2%), 5th rank (4%),
6th rank (4%), 7th rank (2%), 8th rank (10%), 9th rank (9%), 10th rank (6%), 11th rank (7%),
12th rank (15%), 13th rank (12%), 14th rank ( 12%), 15th rank (12%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 14th and 15th rank to extracurricular activities.

playground

Valid

4th rank
6th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total

Frequency
5
2
6
3
7
8
8
19
12
15
15
100

Percent
5.0
2.0
6.0
3.0
7.0
8.0
8.0
19.0
12.0
15.0
15.0
100.0

Valid Percent
5.0
2.0
6.0
3.0
7.0
8.0
8.0
19.0
12.0
15.0
15.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
5.0
7.0
13.0
16.0
23.0
31.0
39.0
58.0
70.0
85.0
100.0

playground
4th rank
6th rank
16th rank

8th rank
9th rank
10th rank

15th rank
11th rank

14th rank

12th rank

13th rank

Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 4th rank (5%), 6th rank (2%), 8th rank (6%), 9th rank (3%),
10th rank (7%), 11th rank (8%), 12th rank (8%), 13th rank (19%), 14th rank (12%), 15th rank
(15%), 16th rank (15%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 13th rank to playground.

canteen

Valid

1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
6th rank
7th rank
9th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total

Frequency
2
1
4
2
5
5
7
6
10
8
26
6
18
100

Percent
2.0
1.0
4.0
2.0
5.0
5.0
7.0
6.0
10.0
8.0
26.0
6.0
18.0
100.0

Valid Percent
2.0
1.0
4.0
2.0
5.0
5.0
7.0
6.0
10.0
8.0
26.0
6.0
18.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
2.0
3.0
7.0
9.0
14.0
19.0
26.0
32.0
42.0
50.0
76.0
82.0
100.0

canteen
1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
6th rank
16th rank

7th rank
9th rank

15th rank

10th rank
11th rank

14th rank

12th rank
13th rank

Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (2%), 2nd rank (1%), 3rd rank (4%), 6th rank (2%),
7th rank (5%), 8th rank (5%), 9th rank (7%), 10th rank (7%), 11th rank (6%), 12th rank
(10%), 13th rank (8%), 14th rank ( 26%), 15th rank (6%), 16th rank (18%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 14th rank to canteen.

hostel facility

Valid

1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
8th rank
10th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total

Frequency
7
3
1
4
2
8
9
4
9
11
4
21
17
100

Percent
7.0
3.0
1.0
4.0
2.0
8.0
9.0
4.0
9.0
11.0
4.0
21.0
17.0
100.0

Valid Percent
7.0
3.0
1.0
4.0
2.0
8.0
9.0
4.0
9.0
11.0
4.0
21.0
17.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
7.0
10.0
11.0
15.0
17.0
25.0
34.0
38.0
47.0
58.0
62.0
83.0
100.0

hostel facility
1st rank
2nd rank
16th rank

3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
8th rank

15th rank
10th rank

11th rank
14th rank

12th rank

13th rank

Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (7%), 2nd rank (3%), 3rd rank (1%), 4th rank (4%),
5th rank (2%), 8th rank (8%), 9th rank (9%), 10th rank (9%), 11th rank (4%), 12th rank (9%),
13th rank (11%), 14th rank ( 4%), 15th rank (21%), 16th rank (17%)..
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 15th rank to hostel facility.

brand of the college

Valid

2nd rank
3rd rank
4th rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
9th rank
10thn rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total

Frequency
6
12
8
2
4
8
3
13
1
18
5
3
5
12
100

Percent
6.0
12.0
8.0
2.0
4.0
8.0
3.0
13.0
1.0
18.0
5.0
3.0
5.0
12.0
100.0

Valid Percent
6.0
12.0
8.0
2.0
4.0
8.0
3.0
13.0
1.0
18.0
5.0
3.0
5.0
12.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
6.0
18.0
26.0
28.0
32.0
40.0
43.0
56.0
57.0
75.0
80.0
83.0
88.0
100.0

brand of the college

16th rank

2nd rank
3rd rank

15th rank
14th rank
13th rank

4th rank
5th rank
6th rank

12th rank
7th rank
10thn rank

8th rank
9th rank

Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 2nd rank (6%), 3rd rank (12%), 4th rank (8%), 5th rank (2%),
6th rank (4%), 7th rank (8%), 8th rank (3%), 9th rank (1%), 10th rank (18%), 12th rank (5%),
13th rank (5%), 14th rank ( 3%), 15th rank (5%), 16th rank (.12%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 10th rank to brand of the college.

foreign tour or local visit by flight

Valid

1st rank
2nd rank
3rd rank
5th rank
6th rank
7th rank
8th rank
11th rank
12th rank
13th rank
14th rank
15th rank
16th rank
Total

Frequency
2
5
6
4
6
3
11
15
6
7
20
3
12
100

Percent
2.0
5.0
6.0
4.0
6.0
3.0
11.0
15.0
6.0
7.0
20.0
3.0
12.0
100.0

Valid Percent
2.0
5.0
6.0
4.0
6.0
3.0
11.0
15.0
6.0
7.0
20.0
3.0
12.0
100.0

Cumulative
Percent
2.0
7.0
13.0
17.0
23.0
26.0
37.0
52.0
58.0
65.0
85.0
88.0
100.0

foreign tour or local visit by flight

1st rank
16th rank

2nd rank
3rd rank

15th rank

5th rank
6th rank

14th rank

7th rank

8th rank

13th rank
12th rank

11th rank

Analysis : From the above graph it has been observed that out of 100 respondents, they
gave ranks to internet facility, 1st rank (2%), 2nd rank (5%), 3rd rank (6%), 5th rank (4%),
6th rank (6%), 7th rank (3%), 8th rank (11%), 11th rank (15%), 12th rank (6%), 13th rank
(7%), 14th rank ( 20%), 15th rank (3%), 16th rank (12%).
Interpretation : Most of respondents gave 20th rank to foreign tour or local visit by
flight.a.