This document summarizes key concepts in special torts, including acts contra bonus mores, abuse of rights, liability without fault, general sanction for acts contrary to law, and unjust enrichment. It provides examples and definitions of each concept. Acts contra bonus mores refer to legal acts that are contrary to morals, good customs, public order or policy and done with intent to injure. Abuse of rights involves exercising a legal right or duty in bad faith to prejudice or injure another. Liability without fault covers strict liability and product liability. The general sanction under Article 20 provides for indemnification for damages caused willfully or negligently in violation of law. Unjust enrichment requires returning anything acquired at another's expense without
This document summarizes key concepts in special torts, including acts contra bonus mores, abuse of rights, liability without fault, general sanction for acts contrary to law, and unjust enrichment. It provides examples and definitions of each concept. Acts contra bonus mores refer to legal acts that are contrary to morals, good customs, public order or policy and done with intent to injure. Abuse of rights involves exercising a legal right or duty in bad faith to prejudice or injure another. Liability without fault covers strict liability and product liability. The general sanction under Article 20 provides for indemnification for damages caused willfully or negligently in violation of law. Unjust enrichment requires returning anything acquired at another's expense without
This document summarizes key concepts in special torts, including acts contra bonus mores, abuse of rights, liability without fault, general sanction for acts contrary to law, and unjust enrichment. It provides examples and definitions of each concept. Acts contra bonus mores refer to legal acts that are contrary to morals, good customs, public order or policy and done with intent to injure. Abuse of rights involves exercising a legal right or duty in bad faith to prejudice or injure another. Liability without fault covers strict liability and product liability. The general sanction under Article 20 provides for indemnification for damages caused willfully or negligently in violation of law. Unjust enrichment requires returning anything acquired at another's expense without
1. There is a legal right or duty 1. There is an act which is legal
2. The right or duty is exercised in bad faith 2. But which is contrary to morals, good custom, 3. For the sole intent of prejudicing or injuring public order or public policy another 3. And it is done with intent to injure Damages are recoverable even if no positive law has been violated Accion In Rem Verso. It is an action for recovery of what has been paid without just cause. -a right that has been violated ceases to exist EXAMPLES OF ACTS CONTRA BONUS MORES: Art. 19. Every person must, in the exercise of his rights and in the performance of his duties, act with justice, give everyone his due, and observe honesty and good faith. Art. 20. Every person who, contrary to law, willfully or negligently causes damage to another, shall indemnify the latter for the same. Art. 21. Any person who willfully causes loss or injury to another in a manner that is contrary to morals, good customs or public policy shall compensate the latter for the damage. -only a subisdiary action For all other provisions of law which do not especially provide their own sanction a. In the exercise of his legal right or duty b. Willfully or negligently causes damage to another does not distinguish, the act may be done either willfully or negligently Common element under articles 19 and 21: the act must be intentional 1. BREACH OF A PROMISE TO MARRY GENERAL RULE: Breach of a promise to marry by itself is not actionable. EXCEPTION: In cases where there is another act independent of the breach of a promise to marry which gives rise to liability a. Cases where there was financial damage b. Social humiliation caused to one of the parties c. Where there was moral seduction d. If the breach was done in a manner that is clearly contrary to good morals Payment by mistake is an essential element Q: In view of the general sanction provided for under Art. 20, may a person have an absolute right to be indemnified? A: No. It is essential that some right of his be impaired. Without such, he is not entitled to indemnification. (Pineda, 2004) ACCION IN REMVERSO SOLUTIO INDEBITI Common element under articles 19 and 21: the act must be intentional Liability without Fault includes: a. Strict Liability there is strict liability if one is made independent of fault, negligence or intent after establishing certain facts specified by law. It includes liability for conversion and for injuries caused by animals, ultrahazardous activities and nuisance. b. Product Liability is the law which governs the liability of manufacturers and sellers for damages resulting from defective products. -LWF is different from Damnum Absque Injuria A person who only exercises his legal rights does no injury. If damages result from such exercise of legal rights, the consequences must be borne by the injured person alone. The law affords no remedy for damages resulting from an act which does not amount to a legal injury or wrong. Article 20 speaks of the general sanction for all other provisions of law which do not especially provide for their own sanction. Article 21 on the other hand, speaks of act which is legal but is contrary to morals, good custom, public order or public policy and is done with intent to injure. Nemo cum alteris detrimento locupletari potest or no one shall unjustly enrich himself at the expense of another. Coverage: the article applies only if: i. Someone acquires or comes into possession of something which means delivery or acquisition of things; and ii. Acquisition is undue and at the expense of another which means without any just or legal ground. NOTE: The government is not exempted from the principle of unjust enrichment. remedy for unjust enrichment: It is not necessary that payment be made by mistake rendition of services NOT included under Art. 22 '- If services were rendered by someone benefiting another, it does not mean that the latter is exempted from indemnifying the former. The liability will lie on quasicontract under Article 2146. Art. 22. Every person who through an act of performance by another, or any other means, acquires or comes into possession of something at the expense of the latter without just or legal ground, shall return the same to him. Abuse of Rights ACTS CONTRA BONUS MORES Liability Without Fault General Sanction / Acts contrary to Law Unjust Enrichment