EXPLORING THE ROLE OF RELATIONSHIP MARKETING IN WINE TOURISM
Amanda Castray and Heather Francis
University of Tasmania Track: Market Orientation and Relationship Marketing Abstract Academic researchers have devoted considerable attention over the last two decades to developing a comprehensive theory of relationship marketing. Previous research has addressed several aspects of a relationship marketing orientation, such as the benefits of consumer loyalty, repeat purchase and positive word-of-mouth, to provide justification for its usefulness in both theory and practice for contemporary firms. However, these aspects of relationship marketing have attracted little research attention in the context of the wine tourism industry. Furthermore, previous empirical research in wine tourism has largely had a short-term focus, centered on shaping the marketing mix in an effort to attract consumers to a winery cellar door with little consideration to the elements of the wine tourism experience that may facilitate long-term relationships with consumers post-visit. This conceptual paper highlights the relevance of relationship marketing to wine tourism and proposes a research agenda by which gaps in extant literature may be empirically addressed. The growing importance of relationship marketing Traditional marketing theory has been grounded in a transactional framework, where there is a simple exchange of goods or services between a seller and a buyer in a context where ongoing interaction is given little, if any, consideration (Callaghan and Shaw 2001). Such theory focused on single transactional exchanges between the firm and the consumer often resulting in anonymous, price-based, automated purchasing (Day 2000). However, there is a growing consensus, by academics and practitioners alike, which questions the continuing relevance of this transactional approach to marketing given, among other things, the increasingly competitive marketplace and the growing power of consumers (Berry 2002; Gronroos 2000; Payne 1997). Current marketing research and theory highlights the importance of forming strong, ongoing relationships with customers for organisational success (Beverland 1999). The new paradigm of relationship marketing is defined by Gronroos (1994:9) as marketing to establish, maintain and enhance relationships with customersat a profit so that the objectives of the parties are met. This is achieved by mutual exchange and fulfilment of promises. In considering the scope of relationship marketing, it is often viewed as a whole of firm strategy which includes the development and management of relationships with a variety of markets (Veloustou, Saren and Tzokas 2002). It is apparent that in current theory and practice, customer markets are now placed at the core of relationship marketing (Christopher, Payne and Ballantyne 1991). Indeed, a relationship marketing strategy is designed to enhance the consumers chances of satisfaction, loyalty and repeat business through the development of interpersonal ties with the firm (Claycomb and Martin 2002). In this sense, Fournier, Dobscha and Mick (1998:44) argue that relationship marketing is the epitome of customer orientation. ANZMAC 2003 Conference Proceedings Adelaide 1-3 December 2003 1134 Sheth and Parvatiyar (1995) attribute the emergence of relationship marketing as a reaction to the loss of direct interaction between firms and their customers caused by mass production and the apparent separation of production and consumption activities formerly closely aligned in the pre-industrial era. Furthermore, it is acknowledged that the transactional approach to marketing has restricted our understanding of the role of the end user to acceptance or rejection of the offer made and precluded firms from considering the reasons underlying their decision or the formation of their preferences (Wikstrom 1996). As such, there has been a paradigm shift in marketing, re-focusing on the mutually satisfying, potentially ongoing, buyer-seller relationship as the fundamental approach to marketing strategy (Berry, 2002; Gummesson 2002; Hennig-Thurau, Gwinner and Gremler 2002; Palmer, 2002). There are many reasons provided in the literature for the emergence of the relationship focus, with the key drivers having foundation in competitive advantage, the growth of services in the economy, technological advancement and consumer empowerment (Faus and Quintano 2000; Gronroos 1994; Gummesson 1997; Morgan and Hunt, 1994; Sheth 2002). In combination, these drivers provide a compelling force demanding that marketing theorists and practitioners understand and engage in relationships of mutual benefit with a longer term focus. Relevance of relationship marketing to the wine tourism industry Recent decades have witnessed a dramatic increase in growth and competitive intensity of the tourism industry, which has, in turn, stimulated recognition of the importance of marketing in setting objectives and associated strategy. Indeed, recent findings published by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) have observed that tourism provides a strong contribution to our nations economy, with $31.8 billion generated from international and domestic tourism in Australia, accounting for 4.7% of GDP in 2001 (ABS 2003). Many regional areas are aiming to build upon the production of regional foods and wines to market new travel and destinational experiences in an attempt to lure domestic and international tourists (Carlsen, Getz and Dowling 1999). This practical engagement has been coupled with strong growth in the degree and sophistication of conceptual and empirical research into the field of tourism generally and, more specifically, a recent focus on wine tourism (Getz 1999; Hall, Johnson, Cambourne, Macionis, Mitchell and Sharples 2000). Of particular interest is the parallel growth in, and the complementary nature of, the wine industry and wine tourism and the effort which has been expended in determining the most effective manner by which one may promote the key elements of a winery experience to potential visitors (Getz, Dowling, Carlsen and Anderson 1999; Macionis 1998). For the tourism industry, wine is an important component of the attractiveness of a destination and can be a major motivating factor for visitors (Hall et al. 2000). For the wine industry, tourism is a very important way to build relationships with customers who can experience first hand the workings of a vineyard and gain wine education (Jago, Issaverdis and Graham 2000). It is recognised that substantial benefits are to be derived from increasing cooperation between the wine and tourism industries, at both regional and national levels (Carlsen and Dowling 1999). Wine tourism or visitation to vineyards, wineries, wine festivals and wine shows for the purpose of recreation (Johnson 1998 cited in Hall et al. 2000) is an essential element in the growth and success of many small wineries (Cambourne and Macionis 2000). Wine tourism is largely transient and experiential in nature, with wineries making popular daytrip destinations Market Orientation and Relationship Marketing Track 1135 involving visitors making a brief stay at a winery to taste the wine, tour the facility and/or eat at the winery restaurant (Getz 1999). Furthermore, historically, wine tourism has been viewed in practice from a transactional exchange perspective. Despite this interimistic nature, for small wineries, particularly in emerging wine regions, wine tourism is often an economic necessity to complement fundamental production activities, providing cash flow and assisting to achieve a better sales mix at a higher yield, while at the same time providing opportunities to brand both product and winery successfully (Cambourne and Macionis 2000). Dodd and Bigotte (1997) note that many smaller wineries in the United States rely primarily on tourism for their survival, reflecting the fact that income from tourists can be a major source of revenue and, further, that this interaction may provide excellent public relations opportunities which may in turn support the development of more enduring relationships. In their study of Margaret River wineries, King and Morris (1997) found that tourism is an important part of winery operations, reporting the average cellar door sales accounted for approximately 34 per cent of their total sales revenue. In addition to sales revenue, winery tourism offers benefits such as opportunities for market intelligence, the education of customers and the chance to encourage brand loyalty toward a winery to facilitate future purchase beyond the tourism experience (Dodd and Bigotte 1997; Getz 1999). Significantly, Mitchell and Orwig (2002) suggest that such consumer experience tourism forms an important part of a firms integrated marketing communications effort, cultivating greater personal involvement and bonding with a brand and subsequent brand loyalty and positive word-of-mouth promotion. The benefits associated with ongoing relationships with customers at the cellar door are explicitly noted as being likely to add exponentially to profitability (Sin, Tse, Yau, Lee and Chow 2002). This growing need of many wineries to become actively involved in tourism, combined with the growth in both the wine and tourism sectors in the Australian economy, has placed greater emphasis on marketing strategies and associated development of a successful wine tourism industry (Macionis 1999). Although recognised as an important area in wine marketing, it is apparent that researchers have given little attention to the benefits of retaining consumers beyond the initial visit. In practice, wine tourism marketing appears to have a short-term, largely transactional focus, with operational goals based on visitor numbers and sales with a limited commitment to understanding or meeting customer expectations in the long-term. This is consistent with the concentration of many researchers and practitioners on how to shape the marketing mix to acquire consumers rather than on how to retain them (Berry 1995). Indeed Dodd (1999) argues that it is mistakenly believed by many winery operators that the supply of new customers is endless. Hall et al. (2000) argue that there is a limited research base from which an understanding of wine tourism and its relationship to broader sales and profitability issues may be developed. Illustrating this point, in their study of wine tourism, Ali-Knight and Charters (1999: 8) suggest that research into the needs of wine tourists may enable wineries to see beyond increasing short-term sales towards ideas of brand awareness, relationship marketing and cementing opportunities for repeat sales. Highlighting the significance of this observation, in Longos (1999 cited in Hall et al. 2000) research of wine tourists in New Zealand, 88 per cent of visitors who had previously visited the winery expressed the opinion that they would definitely or were highly likely to make future purchases of that wine. This indicates the possibility of a continuing post-visit relationship between the winery and these consumers and an opportunity to develop brand ANZMAC 2003 Conference Proceedings Adelaide 1-3 December 2003 1136 loyalty. Interestingly, however, no work has been done to date to confirm, or otherwise, the findings of Longo's research in New Zealand or any other wine producing country (Hall et al. 2000). As identified, both in theory and practice, little attention has been given to considering the possible benefits of a relationship marketing orientation in the wine tourism context. The gap in the research is highlighted by Ali-Knight and Charters (1999:8), who suggest that the notion that cellar door sales lead to higher wine sales when the visitors return home has considerable scope for investigation. Furthermore, Jago et al. (2000) argue that more research is required to assess whether cellar door visitation leads to increased purchase of wines once the visitor returns home. Specifically, there is a need to identify the elements of the wine tourism experience that facilitate post-visit consumer behaviours such as repeat purchase of the wine, positive word-of-mouth and brand loyalty, in order to assist marketers to better shape the marketing mix at the cellar door (Charters and Ali-Knight 2002; Dodd and Gustafson 1997; ONeill and Charters 2000). These aspects of relationship marketing theory are equally as relevant to the wine tourism industry where it is argued that developing long- term relationships with visitors is an important part of the activities in a winery (Dodd 1999:139). However, it should be noted that the transient nature and experiential basis of wine tourism may prevent the formation of close, collaborative exchanges, often described as the ultimate aim of relationship marketing. Rather, marketing mix variables may be better developed within the framework of value-adding exchanges through tailored communications with an emphasis on retention and maximising lifetime value. Indeed, Hall, Binney and OMahony (2003) argue that the tangible nature of wine combined with the intangible aspects of the experience adds greater complexity to the marketing of wine tourism. Hence, there is greater relevance of a value-added marketing focus in the context of wine tourism, one that moves beyond the traditional transactional approach to marketing strategy. Given this, empirical research is required to determine what opportunities currently exist to provide such value- adding exchanges in the wine tourism experience. Formation of a research agenda: Identify elements of the wine tourism experience facilitating relationships It is proposed that research is required to determine the elements of the wine tourism experience that impact post-visit consumer motivations and behaviours towards building relationships. These elements are diverse and may include the existence and standard of such things as wine quality, complementary and supplementary products, service quality, temporal dimensions (pre and post visit), spatial dimensions (setting, atmosphere, facilities, cleanliness), a mailing list, value-added services such as tours and meeting the winemaker, accommodation availability and communications (including website). Clearly, this summary of product, service and experiential elements is not exhaustive and yet its complexity highlights the need to fully understand the influence of these factors, individually and collectively, upon the formation of customer relationships. Thus it is contended that research is required to inform the theory of relationship marketing in the context of wine tourism in practice by seeking to: Understand the marketing strategies wine tourism operators believe will assist them to build relationships, during the visiting experience and post-visit; Market Orientation and Relationship Marketing Track 1137 Identify the characteristics (demographic and psychographic) of wine tourists, particularly those that can be identified as having repeat purchased or spread positive word-of-mouth; Identify the elements of this wine tourism experience that most effectively contribute to customer satisfaction (through an assessment of the perceptions of both the wine tourism operator and the wine tourist); and Determine which of these elements are important in influencing the relational behaviour of wine tourists (repeat purchase, positive word-of-mouth communication and generate positive feelings of loyalty to the brand and winery). Through pursuit of this research, consideration can then be given to what factors should be considered by wine tourism operators with respect to their product and service offering to assist in encouraging repeat purchase and building consumer loyalty and developing relationships. Wine tourism provides a valuable opportunity to study the tourist experience within a wider temporal and spatial context (Mitchell, Hall and McIntosh 2000). In this way, pre and post visit factors and experience both at home and in the winery should be considered when developing the marketing mix. Zaheer, Albert and Zaheer (1999) suggest the importance of considering time-scales and temporal intervals in research given that observations of a visitors experience during their visit may be different to the emotions remembered about the trip once the visit is over. This has particular relevance to the carriage of future research where the elements important to formation of long-term relationships between visitors and wineries can only be tested by considering behaviours and attitudes of consumers post-visit. As such, it is postulated that contrary to the majority of extant research in this area, empirical investigation must focus upon exploration of consumers perceptions of the wine tourism experience post-visit rather than in situ. Relationship marketing in wine tourism: A summary of implications and further research opportunities Much of the conceptual literature and empirical studies in the growing field of relationship marketing have focused on discovery and explanation of the constructs which constitute customer relationships. The research proposed aims to move beyond analysis of the subcomponents of the constructs to an exploratory focus, identifying those elements of a consumer experience that facilitate the establishment of a relationship with a firm in the wine tourism context. Further, it is observed that the relative importance of these elements to relationship marketing requires exploration in order to provide valuable contributions and insight into the applicability of relationship marketing strategies in wine tourism, both in theory and practice, and to assist in informing a wider research agenda. Specifically, there are extensive opportunities for further, complementary research to augment the program proposed. In particular, research is required to analyse the economic and other benefits of increased customer loyalty for wine tourism operators and to determine the potential value of relationship marketing for an entire wine region. As an extension of this, it is observed that explanatory research should be undertaken to determine the effect of a relationship marketing orientation on the overall performance of a winery. Furthermore, it has been acknowledged that limited research has been undertaken in ascertaining whether such relationships and loyalty can contribute to a firms long-term profitability in the wine tourism ANZMAC 2003 Conference Proceedings Adelaide 1-3 December 2003 1138 context. Dodd (2000) highlights this opportunity for research work stating that the development of loyal customers has been closely linked to profitabilityalthough no published studies have been reported concerning this link in winery tourism, it is expected to exist (2000:139). The findings from the preliminary research agenda outlined in this paper aim to underline the importance of this area of theory and, importantly, to provide the foundation upon which to undertake further causal research. The brief overview of the theoretical concepts underlying relationship marketing and its practical relevance in the context of wine tourism, illustrate the considerable value which may be gained from this program of investigation, a contribution in which the authors are actively engaged. References Ali-Knight, J. and Charters, S. 1999. Education in a West Australian wine tourism context. International Journal of Wine Marketing. 11(1): 7-17. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2003. Australian National Accounts: Tourism Satellite Account Catalogue No. 5249.0. Berry, L. 2002. Relationship marketing of services perspectives from 1983 and 2000. Journal of Relationship Marketing. 1(1): 59-77. Berry, L. 1995. Relationship marketing of services - growing interest, emerging perspectives. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 23(4): 236-245. Beverland, M. 1999. Are salespeople relationship oriented? (And do they need to be?) A study based on the NZ wine industry. International Journal of Wine Marketing. 11(1): 47-55. Callaghan, M and Shaw, R.N. 2001. Relationship Orientation: Towards an antecedent model of trust in marketing relationships. Australia & New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference 2001. http://130.195.95.71:8081/WWW/ ANZMAC2001/anzmac/AUTHORS/pdfs/Callaghan2.pdf Cambourne, B. and Macionis, N. 2000. Meeting the wine-maker: wine tourism product development in an emerging wine region. In C.M.Hall, L.Sharples, B.Cambourne, N. Macionis, R. Mitchell & G. Johnson. 2000. Wine Tourism Around the World. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann. Carlsen, J. and Dowling, R. 1998. The First Australian Wine Tourism Conference: An Introduction. Wine Tourism Perfect Partners. Proceedings of the first Australian Wine Tourism Conference, Margaret River, Western Australia. May 1998. Canberra: Bureau of Tourism Research. 1-5. Carlsen, J., Getz, D. and Dowling, R. 1999. The Wine Tourism Industry. Wine Tourism Perfect Partners. Proceedings of the first Australian Wine Tourism Conference, Margaret River, Western Australia. Canberra: Bureau of Tourism Research. 267-276. Charters, S. and Ali-Knight, J. 2002. Who is the wine tourist? Journal of Tourism Management. 23: 311-319. Christopher, M., Payne, A. and Ballantyne, D. 1991. Relationship Marketing: bringing quality, customer service and marketing together. Boston : Butterworth-Heinemann. Claycomb, C. and Martin, C.L. 2002. Building customer relationships: an inventory of service providers objectives and practices. Journal of Service Marketing. 16(7): 615-635. Day, G.S. 2000. Managing Market Relationships. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science. 28(1): 24-30. Dodd, T.H. 1999. Attracting repeat customers to wineries. International Journal of Wine Marketing. 11(2): 18-23. Market Orientation and Relationship Marketing Track 1139 Dodd, T.H. 2000. Influences on cellar door sales and determinants of wine tourism success: results from Texas wineries. In C.M. Hall, L. Sharples, B.Cambourne & N. Macionis. Wine Tourism around the World. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann. Dodd, T. and Bigotte, V. 1997. Perceptual differences among visitor groups to wineries. Journal of Travel Research. Winter 1997, 46-51. Dodd, T.H. and Gustafson, A.W. 1997. Product, environmental, and service attributes that influence consumer attitudes and purchases at wineries. Journal of Food Products Marketing. 4(3): 41-59. Faus, M.A. and Quintano, M. 2000. Evaluating Relationship Marketing through strategic trade-offs development: a conceptual framework. http://www.marketing-relacional.com/recursos/pdf/ EMAC%20Y2K.pdf. 21 March 2003. Fournier, S., Dobscha, S. and Mick, D.G. 1998. Preventing the premature death of relationship marketing. Harvard Business Review. January-February: 42-51. Getz, D. 1999. Wine Tourism: Global Overview and Perspectives on its Development. Wine Tourism Perfect Partners. Proceedings of the first Australian Wine Tourism Conference, Margaret River, Western Australia. Canberra: Bureau of Tourism Research. 13-33. Getz, D., Dowling, R., Carlsen, J. and Anderson, D. 1999. Critical success factors for wine tourism. International Journal of Wine Marketing. 11(3):20-30. Gronroos, C. 2000. Relationship marketing: the Nordic School perspective. Chapter 4, pp 95-117. In J.Sheth & A.Parvatiyar (Eds). Handbook of Relationship marketing. California: Sage Publications. Gronroos, C. 1994. From marketing mix to relationship marketing: towards a paradigm shift in marketing. Management Decision. 32(2): 4-20. Gummesson, E. 2002. Relationship Marketing in the New Economy. Journal of Relationship Marketing. 1(1): 37-57. Gummesson, E. 1997. Relationship marketing as a paradigm shift: some conclusions from the 30R approach. Management Decision. 35(4): 267-272 Hall, J., Binney, W. and OMahony, G. B. 2003. Wine Purchasing Behaviour in Hospitatlity Settings: Age-related market segments and their purchase motivations. Council for Australian University Tourism and Hopsitality Education National Research Conference 2003. Bureau of Tourism Research, Canberra. Hall, C.M., Johnson, G., Cambourne, B., Macionis, N., Mitchell, R. and Sharples, L. 2000. Wine tourism: an introduction. In C.M. Hall, L. Sharples, B.Cambourne & N. Macionis. Wine Tourism around the World. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann. Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. and Gremler, D. 2002. Understanding relationship marketing outcomes: an integration of relational benefits and relationship quality. Journal of Service Research. 4(3) February: 230-247. King, C. and Morris, R. 1997. Wine Tourism: A Western Australian Case Study. Wine Industry Journal. 12(3): 246-249. Jago, L.K., Issaverdis, J. and Graham, D. 2000. The Wine Tourist: Whats in a name? Council for Australian University Tourism and Hospitality Education National Research Conference 2000, Bureau of Tourism Research, Canberra. 64-71. Macionis, N. 1999. Wineries and Tourism: Perfect Partners or Dangerous Liaisons? Wine Tourism Perfect Partners. Proceedings of the first Australian Wine Tourism Conference, Margaret River, Western Australia. Canberra: Bureau of Tourism Research. 35-44. Macionis, N. 1998. Wine Tourism: Making it work for the long term. Wine Industry Journal, 13(2): 127-131. ANZMAC 2003 Conference Proceedings Adelaide 1-3 December 2003 1140 Mitchell, M.A. and Orwig, R.A. 2002. Consumer experience tourism and brand bonding. Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol 11(1): 30-41. Mitchell, R., Hall, C.M. and McIntosh, A. 2000. Wine tourism and consumer behaviour. In C.M. Hall, L. Sharples, B.Cambourne & N. Macionis. Wine Tourism around the World. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann. Morgan, R.M. and Hunt, S.D. 1994. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing. 58(2): 20-45. ONeill, M. and Charters, S. 2000. Service quality at the cellar door: implications for Western Australias developing wine tourism industry. Managing Service Quality. 10(2): 112-122. Palmer, A. 2002. The Evolution of an Idea: An environmental explanation of relationship marketing. Journal of Relationship Marketing, Vol 1(1): 79-94. Payne. A. 1997. Advances in Relationship Marketing. London: Kogan Page. Sin, L.Y., Tse, A.C., Yau, O.H., Lee, J.S. and Chow, R. 2002. The effect of relationship marketing orientation on business performance in a service-oriented economy. Journal of Services Marketing. 16(7): 656-676. Sheth, J.N. 2002. The future of relationship marketing. Journal of Service Marketing. 16(7): 590-592. Sheth, J.N. and Parvatiyar, A. 1995. Relationship Marketing in Consumer markets: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 23(4): 225-271. Veloutsou, C., Saren, M. and Tzokas, N. 2002. Relationship marketing: What if? European Journal of Marketing. 36(4): 433-449. Wikstrom, S. 1996. Value creation by company-consume interaction. Journal of Marketing Management. 12: 359-74. Zaheer, S., Albert, S. and Zaheer, A. 1999. Time Scales and Organizational Theory. Academy of Management Review. 24(4): 725-741. Market Orientation and Relationship Marketing Track 1141