The Nature of the Ether and Divisible Existence

by
Leslie Iverson
It is the purpose of this work to show that not only is the ether the medium through which
light travels but that it is also the material out of which mass is composed. We show that the
atom and its immediate sub particles including the proton, neutron and electron are made up of
slowed ether particles existing in different states of density and form the same as the fluids, gases
and solids of our world are composed of atoms in different states of matter. We show that
radiation, polarity, charge, electricity, magnetism, energy and the events described by Einsteins
relativity theories are all ether phenomenon and that the expression mass to energy, energy to
mass means an exchange is going on between the fast moving particles of the gaseous ether and
the slowed, condensed ether particles of atomic mass. We describe what the atom would look
like if you could see it and how it is structured in ether particle fluid layers, what the chemical
bond is physically, why the properties of atoms change as we move across the periodical table,
why atoms emit their characteristic light emissions, why the ichelson!orley experiment
yielded nil results when it tried to prove the existence of the ether on Earths surface, why the big
bang theory is based on a misreading of the red shift, why a black hole could never exist and why
there are push but no pull forces in the universe. We also delve into the nature of divisible
existence to show what matter is made of and that gravity is not an ether but rather a sub ether
phenomenon whose force moves at super light velocity.
"#$
1. THE ETHER, ETHER PARTI!E AND "RA#IT$
%hat the ether particle could make up the gaseous medium through which radiation
travels and at the same time be the brick out of which atomic mass is composed is not a radical
idea. &t one time man thought the world was composed of earth, wind, water and fire because
they appeared to be the irreducible elements of nature. %he atomic theory surpassed the idea
with great result. &lthough no one had then or even now seen the atom, the idea that a single
particle could be common to them all yielded keen insight into the workings of nature.
%he ether theory parallels the atomic theory in this and other ways. %he atomic theory
was needed to explain how sound moves through air. %he ether theory explains what radiation is
and how light and the electromagnet wave move through space. &ir molecules exist in gaseous
form. %he ether particles that transmit radiation through space, the ether, exist in gaseous form.
%he atom that transmits sound through the air is the same atom that makes up the fluids and
solids of our macroscopic existence. %he particle that makes up the ether is the same as that
which makes up atomic mass including the proton, electron and neutron.
If radiation is transmitted through the ether, it follows that the ether exists in all space in
that radiation resides in every corner of the universe. We know that as a gas it must exert
pressure on atomic mass wherever it exists because its the nature of a gas to spread and as such
it would disperse everywhere until back pressure stopped it. 'iguring that radiation moves at
about ()*ths the velocity at which ether particles vibrate in their free space, same as sound moves
at about ()*ths the velocity at which gaseous air molecules vibrate, its estimated that ether
particles vibrate in its space at approximately #.** times the speed of light.
%he fact that atoms, electrons, protons and other subatomic bodies move through space as
spherical units necessitates that their slight masses are being pulled in by an unknown force or
pushed in on themselves by the pressure of one or more elemental gases. We rule out the pull
force hypothesis as it implies action at a distance. It says that theres something in mass that can
stretch out across space like long elastic hooks to pull on mass wherever it exists. It implies that
a single atom buried deep inside the sun has the ability to reach out in every direction and pull on
all mass in the galaxy and beyond. %he idea is nonsensical and it violates causality whereas the
cause and effect push hypothesis does not.
If atomic mass is held together by the pressure of elemental bodies, the +uestion arises as
to how many of these sub bodies levels actually exist. 'ortunately, the answer presents itself
once we reali,e that as units of mass ether particles have to be pressed together by the pressure of
even tinier, faster moving particles. %hese sub particles in turn have to be pushed together by
their sub particles and they theirs and either the process goes on without end or at some level of
divisible existence there need exist a primary particle that is elastic, indivisible and the source of
all motion and mass in the universe as the atom was once thought to be.
-ollisions between primary particles would need be elastic because if it was otherwise all
motion, momentum and energy in the universe would grind to a halt. %hat primary particles
would need be indivisible is inherent in the use of the word primary. Without sub particles,
however, these fundamental bricks of existence would need be massless which is not only a
contradiction of terms but unfathomable. We conclude that matter is infinitely divisible.
If mass is held together by the pressure of sub particles, it follows that the sub particles
move and agitate at a significantly higher velocity than the bodies they hold together. %hat
velocity would need increase the deeper we delve into divisible existence and approach but never
reach infinite velocity as it will always takes time for a particle to proceed from point & to point
. no matter how fast it moves. %hat sub particles can move at such velocities is proved by the
fact that the gravitational force exerts its effect across the galaxy in an instant.
%he rate at which ether and sub ether particles agitate is greater in space away from mass
than nearer it because of the energy dampening effect that mass has on it. ass absorbs energy
from the ether and sub ether but instead of burning up from the heat it radiates it away. %he loss
of ether and sub ether energy to mass creates a pressure deficit that moves out like a fading
shadow. %his is why light bends while passing through a suns ether field as with Einsteins
/eneral %heory of 0elativity. %hat part of the field nearer the sun loses energy faster than that
further away and so it vibrates at a slower rate. %he result is that bodies entering the shadow
experience a net push toward the sun. 1urprisingly, the pressure deficit created when the ether
loses energy to mass is not gravity but the electrical field. Its the pressure deficit created by all
the sub ether particles of divisible existence losing energy to mass that make up gravity.
2roof that gravity is created by the particles of divisible existence below the ether and not
the ether itself losing energy to mass is the fact that an ether pressure deficit moves away from
mass at light speed whereas the gravitational force moves at many times that velocity. It would
take 3.( minutes for gravity to reach out from the sun to Earth if it was an ether phenomenon but
this is not the case as pointed out by 4r. %om 5an 'landern.
"6$
%he Earth is pushed towards the
sun not where it was 3.( minutes ago but where it is moment to moment.
/aseous ether particles can only pound an atom at its surface because they are blocked by
its slowed ether particle mass from penetrating deeper into its interior. %he result is that an ether
pressure deficit is determined by the surface area of a body and not its mass consistent with what
is known of the electrical field. 1ub ether particles do, however, penetrate into atomic mass to
strike its particles at all levels of divisible existence making the emergent pressure deficit a mass
determined phenomena consistent with what is known of gravity. %he electrical field is a more
powerful force per unit volume of the space it effects but the gravitational force of a massive
body such as a planet or sun far exceeds that of the electrical field because their masses far
exceed their surface areas.
%. THE N&!E&', E!ETR(N )!&ID 'TR&T&RE AND (PTIA! AT*('PHERE
%he neutron is nothing more than wall to wall slowed ether particles compressed into
their naturally occurring highest density state by ether and sub ether particles. It forms out of the
ether when a heavy concentration of its particles contract in on themselves as occurs with a
forming sun or in a vast area of space where the ether coalesces about a low pressure center as
with dark matter. %he ether particle density reaches such a point where they begin to swirl like
hurricanes in a 2acific storm and collapse in on themselves to form neutrons.
%he idea that the neutron condenses out of ether particles is supported by a phenomenon
reported on by 7.7. %homson, -larence 1kinner, 8arold Wilson, 1ilvera and Walraven and others.
"($
%hese experimental scientists noted the appearance of protons when running their discharge
tubes despite all efforts to prevent them from entering the vessels. We +uote 1kinner9 :While
making an experimental study of the cathode fall of various metals in helium it was observed that
no matter how carefully the gas was purified, hydrogen radiation, tested spectroscopically,
persistently appeared in the cathode glow. 1imultaneously with this appearance there was a
continuous increase in the gas pressure with the time of discharge.;
"*$
It figures that the electron fluid passing through the vacuum tube as droplets slammed
into the cathode where super heating followed by rapid cooling caused the concentrated fluid to
condense into neutrons. %hey transformed into protons and hydrogen atoms soon after. <o
theory of modern physics can explain the phenomenon as the chambers were repeatedly
evacuated but the results flow from this theory.
%he reason that neutrons dont form into more massive bodies in a laboratory or the ether
is that any extra bulk would make them unwieldy in atomic space causing them to breakup like
overly large raindrops being pressured by air as they fall. %he reason neutrons dont fuse when
pressed together in the nucleus is that sub ether particles press them together as units, nuclides
have their own spins where each nuclide figures to rotate in a direction opposite to the one next
to it and that =oining together would cause them to become unwieldy and break up even in a
nucleus. %he si,e and density that homogenous particles at all levels of divisible existence can
reach is determined by the intensity of the pressure that they receive from sub particles.
%he mass and density of neutrons and protons is set by nature but they can compress in
high speed collisions to make it appear as if theyre composed of heavier particles. 2rotons that
smash into each other fly off as high density fragments but thats all they are is fragments that
decompress and break up into electrons soon after. 2hysicists note that the faster protons strike
each other the greater the density of the emergent fragment and revel in what they think is the
discovery of the new particle. %hey observe that if protons strike one another at odd angles and
the resultant particle ac+uires spin this must be an elemental particle as well. 2hysicists have
discovered over a thousand elemental particles in this manner and are confidence that they can
find more if they can but increase the velocity at which protons slam into one another.
%he proton is a neutron that has been exposed to the ether to cause the thick nuclear fluid
to form about its surface. Its a +uestion as to whether the fluid evaporates up from the neutron
or condenses out of the ether. 4ata suggests that the fluid evaporates up from the neutron in that
protons are thought to be lighter than neutrons and such would account for the missing mass.
Intuitively, however, it seems more likely that the fluid would condense out of the ether because
of the une+ual energy exchange going on between it and the exposed neutron body. It may be
that the nuclear fluid masks the true weight or inertia of the proton body making it seem as if it
were a lighter particle than it is.
%hat a heavy fluid surrounds the nuclide or nuclides of a nucleus is verified by the fact
that fluids heavier than electrons but lighter than nuclide fragments, beta particles for instance,
can fly out of atoms during high speed collisions. We note that the e=ected fluid can be of
variable density but that it decompresses and breaks up into electron droplets when freed of the
nucleus. %his is further evidence that nuclear and electron fluid is made of the same material.
We also note that the neutron is stable when inside the nucleus but unstable out which tells us
that the fluid doesnt form above the neutrons surface when its protected from ether pressure.
%he nuclear fluid forms above nuclei for the same reason that it forms above a neutron.
%he une+ual energy exchange between the nucleus and ether and sub ethers cause the volume of
the fluid to increase as nuclei are added to atoms but it gives in to pressure at regular intervals to
collapse in on itself. %he result is that the density of the fluid increases as its volume remains
about the same. %he irregular contraction of the nuclear fluid is what the brilliant but ill fated
8enry oseley observed when he recorded the > and L series emissions to determine an atoms
atomic versus mass number
"?$
early in the 6@
th
century.
%he lighter density electron fluid develops above its nuclear counterpart in layers where
the thickest but narrowest layer abuts the nuclear fluid and the thinnest, most voluminous layer
lies at the outer edge of the structure. %he number and density of layers increase from atom to
atom as one progresses up the periodical table of elements. %he location of these layers more or
less parallel the electron shell structure of +uantum physics and therein lies the reason for its
success as a model even if it misrepresents whats really going on with the atom.
%he +uantum model mirrors the true life electron fluid structure on most atoms but it
misses the mark on others, especially metals, where the si,e and density of their outermost fluid
layers are almost identical to one another. %heorists believe that a valence electron skips inner
orbits in preference for ones further out but that not only misrepresents whats going on, it fails
as an analogy as well. Electron fluid layers pile up on one another from atom to atom without
any space between them but because the si,e and density of the outer layers on metals is similar
it makes it appear as if a particular outer layer or orbital remains the same from atom to atom.
%he electron fluid surrounds the nucleus in layers but breaks up into spherical droplets of
an average si,e and density when e=ected from the atom into atomic space. It may move from
the atom as a heavy stream of fluid but decompresses and breaks up into droplets of a specific
si,e and density soon after because of the pressure that ether and sub ether particles exert on it.
%he drops constitute the electrons of atomic inner space but they spread out over the surface of
ions to become part of their electronic surface again when recaptured.
.ecause the electron fluid moves through atomic inter space as droplets, theorists
inferred that they orbit the nucleus as such, like the moon orbiting the Earth, when captured by
an atom. %his proved to be a costly error in that it led to the view that the electron is both a fluid
cloud smeared out over the atom and particle at the same time. %hey had to hold to the idea that
it surrounds the nucleus like a cloud because evidence proved that to be the case after <iels .ohr
orbital particle theory broke down early in the twentieth century. %he assumption led to the
success of the +uantum mechanical model but aware that the electron moves through atomic
space as a particle they forced a solution by asserting that it was both a particle and cloud at the
same time. 2hysicists threw reason out the door and atomic physics has suffered ever since.
<ot only were theorist wrong in their assumptions, they lost what chance they had to see
the simplicity that exists behind atomic and sub atomic phenomena. %he history of science
teaches us that nature is never that complicated when understood in its simplest element and if it
seems so its because we havent gotten to the bottom of things. %hat was the case with the
electron. It exists in fluid layers while attached to the atom but breaks up into droplets of a
specific si,e and density while moving through atomic space.
&bove the electron fluid lies the atoms gaseous optical atmosphere and above that the
ether. %he relationship of the atmosphere to the electron fluid is the same as Earths atmosphere
to its oceans. %hey are both gaseous where the hottest most expansive layer abuts the ether of
inter and outer space and the coolest, least expansive layer borders the electron fluid. %he
difference is that Earths atmosphere evaporates up from its oceans whereas the optical
atmosphere forms out of the ether and returns to it when displaced from the atom. %his occurs
when the outer electron fluid layer of two gaseous atoms displace part of their atmospheres in
uniting to form the li+uid suction that is the chemical bond.
%he optical atmosphere forms above the electron fluid because of the energy exchange
going on between the atom and ether and sub ether mediums of divisible existence which results
in the slowing and contraction of those mediums about the atom. Ether and sub ether particles
lose energy to an atom which is absorbed not as heat but is pumped out of the atom via radiation
as suggested by %homasin, 4. %homson, and Lorent,.
"A$
%he result is a drop in ether pressure at
the atoms surface to create the electrical field and in sub ether momentum throughout the atom
to create the gravitational force. %he deficits radiate out like fading shadows the strength of
which diminishes by the s+uare of the distance.
%he structure of the optical atmosphere varies from atom to atom depending on the
makeup of the electron and nuclear fluid below. Bptical emissions occur when optical layers are
driven into one another by a penetrating ob=ect or ether impulses otherwise known as radiation.
%he first resonance emission of an atom occurs when an ob=ect drives the outermost optical layer
into the cooler, but higher density less voluminous layer below. %he lower layers acts as a wall
of resistence to the incoming stroke and trapped particles are accelerated to light speed to emit
the atoms first spectral emission line. %his is the first line of the Lyman 1eries with hydrogen.
If the force of the incoming ob=ect or impulse is of sufficient energy, it drives the
resonance outer layer not only into the next lower layer but the one below that as well to create
the second spectral line of hydrogens Lyman 1eries. &dditionally, in driving the first layer into
the third it drives the second layer into the third to create the lower strength first emission of
hydrogens .almer 1eries. If the ob=ect drives the outer layer not only into the outer edge of the
third layer but the fourth as well you get the first, second and third emissions of the Lyman
1eries, first and second line emissions of the .almer 1eries and the first emission of the 0it,!
2aschen 1eries. 8ydrogens entire optical emission series is emitted once all the optical layers
are driven into the electron fluid below. .ecause the structure of the optical atmosphere is
different on each gaseous atom, they all display their own uni+ue spectra.
Bptical emissions occur when one layer is driven into the outer edge of the next layer and
not before. %he atmosphere is gaseous and as such it compresses as ob=ects drive into it but it
doesnt emit radiation until one layer is driven all the way into the outer edge of the next higher
density layer below. Btherwise, the momentum is absorbed as kinetic energy and the atom
moves. If the energy is increased the result is the same until it reaches sufficient thrust to drive
the layer all the way to the second layer at which time another emission occurs. If the energy is
thereafter increased in small incremental steps no new emission occurs until it reaches sufficient
force to drive into the third layer. It re+uires a =ump or :+uantum; increase of energy for the next
emission to occur and herein lies the reality behind the physicss +uantum mechanical model.
%heorists attribute this regular irregularity to an orbital electron that knows to =ump back and
forth to certain orbits but not others for no reason other than its re+uired by theory.
%he situation existing with the optical atmosphere is similar but different than that of the
electron fluid structure below. %he density and li+uid nature of the electron fluid is such that
emissions are continuous and of a graduating strength as an ob=ect or impulse plows into one of
its layers. It is only when the ob=ect encounters the edge of the next higher density layer below
that a =ump of energy is re+uired for an ob=ect to overcome the new higher density barrier and
enter the new layer. %hereafter it, again, re+uires a gradual increase of energy to proceed until it
encounters the next lower layer at which time the process repeats itself. If the inward thrust
should make it all the way to the outer edge of the nuclear fluid, the electron emission spectra of
the entire atom including its strongest > series is emitted.
%he function of the optical atmosphere is to help shield the atom from the relentless
pressure of the ether. %he si,e to which it grows is determined by how well the electron fluid can
shield the atom indicating a reciprocal relationship between the ability of the fluid to shield the
atom and the si,e to which the atmosphere will grow. %he fluids ability to shield the atom is in
turn determined by how compact its outer layer is which is determined by the makeup of its inner
structure, the nuclear fluid and nuclides below.
& soft outer electron fluid layer is better able to reflect ether and sub ether pressure than a
compact one because its particles move faster and are spread out over a larger area. /aseous
ether and sub ether particles that collide with atomic mass lose momentum at a faster pace than
slower versus faster moving particles which cause a stronger pressure deficit to radiate out from
mass. -onversely, the ether and sub ethers contract about the atom to a greater degree which
leads to the growth of a more expansive optical atmosphere.
&n example of an atom that has a small compact outer electron fluid layer that causes the
energy exchange between it and the ether and sub ether to be high so that a huge atmosphere
forms above its surface relative to its si,e is helium. %he chemical bond occurs when the outer
electron fluid layer on two atoms come into contact with each other so that they create a li+uid
suction. .efore the layers can touch, however, they must pass through each others gaseous
atmosphere which acts as an elastic barrier. %he barrier is formidable with helium as evidenced
by the fact that it takes 6* electron volts of energy for a force to penetrate it to tear off the outer
electron fluid layer below. .onding is especially difficult with helium in that to overcome the
barrier an approaching atom has to come in too fast to cushion into its small, compact surface
which causes the atoms to rebound from each other and this is why helium is an inert gas.
%he situation existing with helium is reverse with lithium the next atom on the periodical
table. Lithium has a large soft outer electron fluid layer compared to helium and because of that
the ether!sub ether energy exchange is less unbalanced. Bnly a small atmosphere develops
above lithiums outer electron fluid layer as a result as evidenced by the fact that it re+uires only
A electron volts of energy to tear away the layer. Its easy for an atom to approach lithium and
its better able to cushion into it to form a chemical bind when it does.
%he above analysis explains why lithium is highly reactive chemically whereas helium is
inert. It also reveals the relationship between heliums large optical atmosphere and lithiums
large outer electron fluid layer which is that one leads to the formation of the other. &s the
nucleus of helium transforms into that of lithium, its already compact outer electron fluid layer
further contracts. %hat in turn causes the optical atmosphere to grow even larger than it was. It
continues to increase in si,e and density until at some point it collapses in on itself to form the
large, soft outer electron fluid layer of lithium. ost of heliums atmosphere is converted into
electron fluid in the process so now only a small one remains. %he result is that its now easier
for atoms to penetrate the atmosphere to cushion into the now softer electron fluid below to bond
and this is why lithium and the alkali metals are so chemically reactive.
%he addition of a nuclide or nuclides to an atom doesnt automatically transform it into
the next atom on the periodical table. Each additional nuclide pulls on the nuclear fluid, talking
figuratively, which compresses but the atom doesnt transform until the fluid collapses in on
itself to form a higher density fluid. 1uch explains the difference between atomic number and
mass number and the reason that isotopes exist.
%he chemical bond is created when the electron fluid on two atoms =oin together to create
an ether particle li+uid suction. %he covalent bond occurs when the outer electron fluid layers of
two atoms is soft enough that they sink into each other fluids surfaces. %his creates a strong
suction and because the atoms con=oin they cannot spin off each others surface. %he ionic bond
occurs when the outer electron fluid layers of two atoms is compact. %hey dont sink into each
others fluid but rather spin off of one anothers surface.
(. RADIATI(N, THE +I" +AN" THE(R$, *A"NETI'* AND !I"HT P(!ARIT$
%here are two types of radiation. %he first is the electromagnetic wave, the other light.
%he electromagnetic wave is caused by an ether pressure deficit, charge, moving through space
as in the air with lightning or down a conductor at light speed. %he charge causes the
surrounding ether to collapse in about it thereby causing a rub between it and conducting
electron fluid to create a magnetic field. %he second is light. It propagates forward as individual
impulses that compress the ether ahead which kicks back once it passes. 1ince light has no
electrical field as shall be shown the ether doesnt rub against it to create the ether particle spin
that is magnetism. Emission fre+uency does not determine the strength of the electromagnetic
wave which is different than with light where the greater the fre+uency the greater the mass of
the impulse. %he mass of an electromagnetic wave depends on the magnitude of a charges
pressure deficit and nothing else. &n easy way to understand this is to imagine a cell phone
emitting a million waves per second to the nearest receiving tower. Individual waves have little
energy as the signal is generated by a battery. %he tower receives the signal and retransmits it
with waves that are amplified many times over so it can reach a greater area but theyre sent out
with the same fre+uency of the original cell phone. %his is the electromagnetic wave.
Light is made up of longitudinal concussion impulses that compress the ether ahead
which kicks back once the impulse has passed as stated. %he impulses can be likened to bullets
in this sense where each bullet has its own tra=ectory and the mass of the bullet doesnt spread.
%his is different then what occurs with an electromagnetic wave which spreads and by doing so
loses energy like a wave on a pond. %hat light can move through space for millions of years
before dissipating out of existence confirms this proposition.
%he energy of a particular light fre+uency is determined by how many ether particles are
in each impulse and how close they follow one another through the ether. 1tronger, more
massive impulses can follow one another at a closer range than less massive ones because they
compress the ether ahead with greater force which causes it to spring back at a higher velocity to
fill the rarefaction or vacuum left behind. 8ow fast the rarefaction is filled determines in its turn
how close the next impulse can follow without being neutrali,ed by the kickback force.
%hat light impulses involve a set number of ether particles explains various light
phenomena including the photoelectric effect. %he essence of the photoelectric effect is that
different light possess different energies as measured in the e+uation EChv where E e+uals
2lancks constant h times the fre+uency of a light impulse. 1ince fre+uency e+uates with the
mass of the impulse, it was discovered that each impulse, photon, carries a fixed energy when
striking metal atoms to knock off electrons. %his is knowable because the e=ected electrons carry
a set energy no matter how intense the light and by the fact that if the fre+uency of the impulse
drops below a certain level no electrons are e=ected from the metal.
Electromagnetic waves appear to run from radio waves to microwave radiation. %hey
could run higher up the spectrum if charge could be made to move back and forth across a
conductor fast enough but that is difficult above a certain fre+uency. Light impulses on the other
hand run from radio to gamma impulses to overlap the electromagnetic wave on the radiation
spectrum.
&nother way to confirm that the particles that make up light impulses and the ether are
the same as those that make up atomic fluids is by noting that light is often able to propagate in
and out the atom. %his shows that an atoms electron and optical fluid provide an ether particle
medium for the impulse or it wouldve been stopped at the atoms edge. We also know that light
can be re emitted at a lower fre+uency as with the -ompton Effect.
"D$
%his says that when light
propagates across an atom to move it, part of its mass is converted into kinetic energy. %he
remainder of the energy acts to initiate a lower mass impulse that moves back out the atom into
the ether. %hat the second impulse moves in a different direction than the first tells us that
theyre two separate impulses and that the first ended the moment the second began. %his is
confirming evidence that the particles that make up atomic fluid are those that make up the ether
for as sound, whether in the air, a fluid or solid, can only be transmitted by atoms only ether
particles can transmit radiation.
%he mistake that science made in assuming that light was an electromagnet wave can be
traced back to ichael 'araday. & young William %homson who later became Lord >elvin
attended one of 'aradays lectures at the 0oyal Institute in London. It was there that %homson
brought to 'aradays attention the similarity between magnetism and polari,ed light wondering if
they werent two different aspects of the same phenomenon. 'araday was so intrigued by
%homsons +uestion that he went on to explore the issue in depth as revealed in part three of his
epic volume :Experimental 0esearches In Electricity;.
'araday set up an experiment where he allowed light from an outside source to reflect off
a surface at an angle so as to polari,e it and noted the beam on a back screen. 8e then proceeded
to run a magnetic field laterally across the light ray and noted that it moved the image sideways
proving in his mind that light had a magnetic component to it. 8e reasoned that if light was
magnetic in nature it must possess an electrical field which said it was electromagnetic. 8e
recorded his findings and light has been regarded as an electromagnetic wave ever since.
'aradays experiment was simple and his interpretation of the results reasonable but in
this rare instance he was wrong in his conclusion. Light becomes polari,ed when the ether
particles of an impulse are made to spin in a linear direction by being reflected off a surface at an
angle. 1ince the impulse move at light speed the rate of rotation of the ac+uired spin is high.
%he spin is transmitted from ether particle to ether particle as the impulse propagates
forward with its up and down direction reversing with each encounter. 1ince magnetism
involves ether particle angular momentum as well it was reasonable to think that when the
spinning particles of the magnetic field struck those of polari,ed light to deflect the image that
'araday should conclude, as >elvin suggested, that magnetism and polarity were two sides of the
same coin.
Its true that magnetism and polari,ed light both involve ether particles that spin in a
linear direction at or near light speed but there is a ma=or difference between the phenomenon.
%he ether pressure deficit or charge of an electromagnetic wave causes the ether to contract in
about it whereas polari,ed light does not. %he particles of polari,ed light spin like magneti,ed
ether particles but because they dont pull in the surrounding ether with an associated charge they
dont rub against them to create the lateral spin or magnetic field associated with electricity.
Its informative to note that %homas Eoung in trying to interpret polari,ed light assigned
to it an up and down transverse motion similar to a water wave moving across a pond instead of
the up and down spin of light particles. 8e said in effect that light from the sun to Earth waves
up and down as it proceeds through empty space without explaining how it could move in such
an irregular manner. It was a reckless disregard of reason made worse by the fact that it was
known that transverse waves can only exist between two mediums like water and air with water
waves or between the ground and air with earth+uakes where the wave is pushed up into the
lighter medium and driven back, again, as it moves ahead. 4eeper down in water or in earth or
higher up in air or out in space only longitudinal impulses can exist.
Bne can see why light can travel for millions of light years whereas an electromagnetic
wave emerging from charge cannot. %he electromagnetic wave expends part of its energy in
creating the lateral spin of its magnetic field which slowly but gradually dissipates the strength of
the impulse. %hat doesnt happen with light because it doesnt have a magnetic field associated
with it. Light impulses do, however, fade as their particles thin out over long stretches of space.
%he particles involved in a blue light impulse dissipate as they cross interstellar space so
that they reduce to the lesser ether particle mass of red light and hence the red shift. .ecause the
now red shifted blue light impulses continue to follow one another with the higher emission
fre+uency of blue light, however, scientists concluded that the source of the emission, suns and
their orbitals, are moving away from Earth as occurs with the sound of a receding train whistle.
%hey reason that the greater the red shift the greater the velocity of the receding sun and give no
thought to the possibility that the mass of light might dissipate with distance.
%he reason theorists cant imagine that light might dissipate is that they declared long ago
that radiation is a massless phenomenon and once science sets its mind on something the issue is
seldom revisited. It is a curious fact, though, that they should come up with such an idea in that
energy and force have mass built into their e+uations. 2roponents of the massless transverse
wave theory of light try to get around this by admitting :yes; light is created by moving mass
and later effects mass to move it but that it lacks mass when moving through space. &s to why
light should move in a wavy manner, theorists are predictably silent.
%he above analysis explains why there appears to be an edge to the universe. &ll
radiation, whether it started out as massive gamma impulses or blue light, diminishes in mass
over time not only to that of red light but to radio impulses. 'inally, it dissipate back into the
ether. 1ince physicists committed themselves to the idea of massless radiation, however, they
cant fathom that it might phase out of existence in time.
1cience reasons that since theres a visual edge to the universe and since far away
galaxies appear to be receding because of its misreading of the red shift the universe is
expanding. <ot only that, but expanding from a location near Earth in astronomical terms since
everything appears to be moving away from us which feeds the egocentric idea that Earth and
an are at the center of the universe. %hey go on to reason that since galaxies are moving away
from a point that all mass mustve once been compressed into a space no larger than the tip of a
needle head but later erupted from that space in the granddaddy of all explosions and hence the
big bang theory. %heorists reason further that since the light of those stars farthest from Earth
appears to be red shifted the most, they must be accelerating from us at a faster pace than those
closer by. <ot only did stars go flying out from the hellish big bang needle point, those that
escaped first did so not only at a faster velocity but at a faster rate of acceleration. It was as if
/od attached afterburners to their backsides with the force of the burner being determined by the
order in which they escaped the hell hole. &pparently, the hole can only accommodate so many
trillions of galaxies before the pressure of it all causes the compressed mass to blow.
<ot only does the idea of massless radiation defy reason, it led to numerous errors in the
understanding of natural phenomenon. & good example is the bending of light. %heory asserts
that blue light refracts more than red light because it moves at a slower clip. %hats like saying
some sounds move at a faster clip than others when in fact all longitudinal impulses move at the
same velocity in their mediums. %he truth is that blue light bends more than red because there
are more ether particles involved in its impulses and it takes longer for them to tor+ue from air
into a higher density medium such as a glass prism.
,. AT(*I HAR"E AND THE RE!ATI#IT$ THE(RIE'
2rotons that approach one another fall into each others ether pressure deficit shadow
which causes their nuclear fluids to be pushed towards one another in advance of the higher
inertia nuclides below. %he result is that the protons back sides are stripped of the protective
fluid which leave them exposed to the ether. Instantaneously, meaning really fast, the ether loses
energy to those bared surfaces and a pressure deficit surpassing that existing on their mutually
facing side is created and the protons are pushed apart. Its the shifting of the nuclear fluid from
one side of an ion or atomic body to the other where its held by the ether deficit of the other ion
and the resulting drop of pressure on their backsides that drives them apart.
2rotons are pushed from one another but that doesnt occur when they encounter
electrons. %he electron fluids mass is consistent throughout and so without a countervailing
force to alter its course it is simply pushed to the proton. %he neutron lacks nuclear fluid and so
its exposed surface radiates a pressure deficit out in all directions but its dimensions are so small
that it the pressure deficit shadow extends into ether space for only a short distance making it
more of a nuclear and atomic than interatomic phenomenon. We reason that the strength of the
nuclear force amongst nuclei is due both to the short ranged ether pressure deficit shadows that
they cast and the li+uid suction that develops between them.
Electron fluid droplets seem to repel each other when moving through ether space but
thats not the case. %he electron radiates an ether and sub ether pressure deficit because of the
energy exchange between those mediums and itself and so its pressed inward like other mass.
%he drops would dissipate when moving through ether space if that wasnt the case. %he reason
they remain as separate entities in ether space is for the same reason they broke up into them in
the first place. &lso with electricity, we see that the electron fluid must form a continuous cover
around atoms for current to flow and so we know it pulls together but only around atoms where
the ether cannot exert its force to break it up into droplets.
%he gravitational and electrical fields of a massive body such as a sun not only slows
light to bend it, they would also slow clocks and the biological processes of humans if, lets say,
a space ship could pass by it without bursting into flames. Bnboard clocks would slow because
the velocity at which its hands move is determined by the rate at which their atoms move which
is determined by how fast the particles of the surrounding ether and sub ether fields agitate.
1ince a suns ether field agitates at a slower rate than that of deep space, the ships clock would
slow while under its influence. %ime would slow for people onboard ship for the same reason
but they wouldnt reali,e it because their internal clocks wouldve slowed as well.
%hat light bends while passing the sun in the manner described isnt a difficult idea to
accept if one considers gravity on Earth. What propels a man down as he dives out of an
airplane is the difference in the sub ether pressure that he experiences above and below his body
at every instant of his flight. %he same would be true of a piece of paper dropped from the plane.
%he difference of pressure that it experiences from above and below is enough to drive it down
and if we accept /alileos experiment it would move as fast as a ball of lead were it in a vacuum.
Einsteins 1pecial %heory of 0elativity describes what occurs when ob=ects are
accelerated to high velocity in the ether. %he reason a ship streaking through space couldnt
reach light speed is that ether wind resistance would stop it. /aseous ether particles that couldnt
get out of the way would build up in front of the ship to create a wall of resistance that would
approach infinity if it were actually able to reach light speed. 2ushing all the ether of the
universe in front of the ship is impossible which makes light speed impossible.
It would re+uire ever more power to propel our hypothetical ship against a growing ether
headwind putting enormous pressure on its front and rear forcing gaseous ether particles out of
the ship. %hose that remained would lose an increased amount of momentum to the compacted
mass. %he ships atoms would agitate at a slower velocity as a result reducing the rate at which
its physical processes occur. -locks would slow as would the biological process of the ships
passengers, but no one would notice because thought would slow as well. If a person traveled on
the ship near light speed for a year his time, years may have passed on Earth. <o time warp in a
metaphysical sense, =ust the ship experiencing the local ether effects of high velocity.
Einsteins 1pecial %heory of 0elativity deals with ob=ects moving at high speed through
the ether and the effect it has on them. %he problem is that he eliminated the ether from the
e+uation and attributed the phenomenon to motion as if motion itself could create the effect. &n
ob=ect moving at near light speed doesnt contract because of ether wind resistance in his view, it
contracts because of its motion relative to other frames of reference. %his is perverse.
&nother example of Einsteins twisted thinking is in regards to light. If a man traveling
in a spaceship at half the speed of light relative to the ether was to shine a light ahead it would
move from the ship at light speed according to Einstein. <ot true. Light moves at light speed
relative to the ether and so it moves at half the speed of light relative to the ship. 1hould a
second ship move towards the first at half the speed of light relative to the ether theyd be
moving toward each other at the speed of light. 1hould the second ship shine a light at the
approaching ship, it would move at half the speed of the light relative to itself but at one and a
half times the speed of light relative to the other ship. Einstein says that not only would the light
from the ships move away at light speed, it would approach one another at light speed. It moves
at light speed in relation to all no matter where they are or what their relationship is to the light
source. We like many things about Einstein but unfortunately this is not one of them.
-. *A"NET', *IHE!'(N.*(R!E$, THE A+ERRATI(N () 'TAR!I"HT
%here are two aspects of magnetism as it occurs in a magnet. %he first is the spin that is
transferred from its atoms to the ether particles within and around the magnet. %he defining
characteristic of a magnet is that the axis of rotation of its atoms aligns which allow the atoms
and the particles of their fluids to spin in the same direction to concentrate the force of their
angular momentum. %he second is the ether current that, as suggested by Euler in the #3
th

century, is created in and around the magnet.
"3$
&n atom communicates spin to surrounding ether
particles that cause them to kick out the magnets north pole. %he push creates an ether pressure
deficit at its south pole which causes the flow to curl around and move back into the magnet to
complete a non ending circuit as represented by 'aradays lines of force.
"3$

%he degree to which the axis of rotation of atoms within a magnet align and the velocity
at which they and the outer particles of the optical fluid rotate determines the strength of the spin
force that is communicated to surrounding ether particles. %hat in turn determines the strength of
the ether current moving through the magnet and these factors combine to determine the
magnitude of the magnetic field in and around the magnet.
Earths angular momentum provides the force that allows its magnetic field to exist. %he
ether following the Earth rubs against that of the solar system causing its particles to spin and
kick out. %he kick out force cant move any distance against the inertial resistance of the ether of
space and so its forced across the planet down into the <orth 2ole which is a magnetic low
pressure point and the e+uivalent of the south pole on a magnetic. %he <orth 2ole is in regards
to the Earth a low magnetic pressure point because the ether above it isnt rubbing against the
ether of space. %he force moves through the conducting Earth to cause its atoms to spin in the
direction of the flow and out the 1outh 2ole to curl around the planet.
Bne can see from the lines of force of the 5an &llen belt where the ether following Earth
interacts with the ether of the solar system to create the exterior portion of the Earths magnetic
field. %he rub interaction and resultant ether particle spin begins tens of thousands of miles out
in space and diminishes in intensity the closer we approach Earth until at ground level there is no
spin as the ether is by then moving with the planet and this is why the ichelson!orley
experiment yielded nil results. 2eople proposed the above explanation as to why the famous
experiment failed to yield the predicted result and experiments later proved that higher up in the
atmosphere light was being bent but science had already made up its collective mind by then and
thereafter refused to consider the possibility having closed its book on the sub=ect.
%he above analysis also explains the aberration of starlight. Earth moves in opposite
directions in relation to the light of a far away star during its orbit about the sun over which time
the star appears to move back and forth across the skyF hence the aberration of starlight. %he
reason is that the light bends when it hits the ether thats following the Earth starting at the outer
edge of the planets magnetic field. It continues to bend until near the surface it moves straight
down relative to the planet because its now moving with the ether thats moving with the planet.
It bends in the opposition direction when Earth reverses its orbit about the sun.
/. E!ETRIIT$
& conductor becomes electrified when a difference of ether pressure is created at opposite
ends of the circuit. %he distortion causes the electron fluid above the conductors atoms to shift
toward the low pressure positive end of the circuit thereby polari,ing it. -urrent flows when the
low ether pressure :charge; moves across the conductor to its negative high pressure end at light
speed. %he electron fluid falls backward into charge as it progresses forward to create the force
of electricity. eanwhile charge radiates an electrical field laterally into the surrounding ether as
it moves forward causing it to contract in about the conductor. %hese ether particles rub against
the electron fluid as it falls into charge at light speed to cause ether particle spin. %he spin is
propelled back out into the ether to create an associative magnetic field.
& difference of ether pressure must be maintained at one end of a conductor versus the
other for electrical current to flow as stated. .atteries can sustain the potential difference for a
time, but for most purposes we rely upon magnetic lines of force to induce what 'araday called
an electro!tonic state of matter in the conductor.
"#@$
It occurs when ether particles spinning in a
plane kick the electron fluid on top the atoms of a conductor to one side. %hat creates a fluid
deficit or positive charge above the atoms over which the lines cut and a surplus of fluid or
negative charge over the atoms where it was pushed to electrify the conductor.
Its the electron fluid and not the ether that supports electricity and as such a continuous
sheath of the fluid is re+uired for current to flow and any spacial, ether, gap will stop it cold. %he
electrical field of a moving charge must pull in atoms and their fluid to bridge gaps whether it
moves through air as with lightning or in a li+uid or metal. %he powerful field associated with a
lightning strike pulls to it air molecules and the fluid it needs to ride on from ground to sky.
1ince its impossible to have a continuous sheath of fluid at any moment, the current must stop
and go during the course of the strike consistent with data.
"G$
agnetic current cutting through a conductor displaces electron fluid because its particles
spin in a plane. %his implies that the ether particles that moves forward with the magnetic ether
current spin in a direction opposite to those ahead and behind as is the case with polari,ed light
which explains the famous 1terns and /erlach experiment.
"##$
& beam of silver atoms in a
gaseous state was made to pass through a non uniform magnetic field. It forms a single line on a
back plate when there was no magnet field, but splits into an upper and lower line with a vacant
slot in the middle when the field is applied. %he reason is that half the atoms kick up and half
down by the spinning ether particles of the magnetic field as they left it.
0. (N ENER"$
Energy is a measure of ether particle momentum. %ake kinetic energy. & car moving at
*@ mph possesses not two but four times the energy that it has when moving at 6@ mph and G
times that much when moving at A@ versus 6@ mph. Energy increases in a counterintuitive
manner as one would think that a car moving at *@ versus 6@ mph would have twice the energy
and three times that much when moving at A@ mph.
%hat the s+uare of the velocity should e+ual the energy of an ob=ect only makes sense if
one factors in the ether. %he tires of an accelerating car must push against the atoms of the road
for it to gain forward thrust which seems a straightforward concept. What we dont reali,e is
that they are held in place by a sea of ether particles that resist displacement. We dont see the
wave that is sent back through the ether as car tires push off the road to accelerate. %he greater
the acceleration, the greater the magnitude of the concussion wave created. %he same occurs
when it stops. %ires push against the road ahead as the car brakes so that a concussion wave is
sent forward into the ether particles of the road. %he amount of energy that was used to
accelerate the vehicle is now needed to decelerate it.
%he reason that the cars energy grows by the s+uare of the velocity is that the ether
waves that it creates while accelerating and decelerating are spherical which expand
geometrically outward by the s+uare of the radius. %ake a light bulb. %he intensity of the light
diminishes by the s+uare of the distance and so if one stands four rather than two feet from it the
light diminishes not to half its intensity but a +uarter of it. &s the car accelerates to a higher
velocity, the spherical concussion wave expands geometrically behind it as the tires push against
the ether particles of the expanding sphere. %he same is true when it brakes to create a forward
concussion wave. Its tires must now push against the ether ahead to brake.
&n interesting fact about an ob=ect moving through the ether is that once it has
accelerated to a constant velocity it moves freely thereafter minus friction and air resistance.
&lthough an ether wave follows it in front and back, it doesnt hinder its movement. %his is the
nature of kinetic energy and the truth behind 4e .roglies assertion that moving ob=ects create
waves that follow them through space. %he strength of the wave depends upon the momentum of
the ob=ect.
"#6$
%he situation changes, however, when ob=ects move through the ether at high
velocity as noted by Einstein and others before him. %he ether can no longer conform to an
ob=ects velocity and it resists further acceleration.
& better example of kinetic energy is the hypothetical rocket ship streaking through
space. %he ships thrusters must push off the ether to accelerate as there are no atoms of note and
when it does it creates a spherical concussion wave the magnitude of which depends upon the
ships rate of acceleration. %he reverse is true when it decelerates. %he advantage of this
example is that it eliminates atoms from the mix so that we see the principle in its simplest form.
%he above analysis explains Einsteins energy e+uation. %he reason we s+uare mass by
the speed of light s+uared is because its ether particles move through space as spherical
concussion waves at light speed. %his defines energy as an ether phenomenon and yet it can
have a greater meaning. & ships rocket not only push off ether particles, it pushes off the sub
ether particles of divisible existence as well to create concussion waves that move at super light
velocity. &n example of this force is gravity.
0eferences9
#. %om 5an 'landern, :/ravity,; Pushing Gravity, edited by atthew 0. Edwards,
&perion ontreal. "-. 0oy >eys Inc. 6@@6 ontreal, -anada$, pp #@?!#@A.
6. %om 5an 'landern, Dark Matter Missing Planets and New Comets, <orth &tlantic
.ooks, .erkeley, -&. #GG(. p.*(.
(. 5. 5. 0ad,ievski and I. I. >agalnikova, :%he <ature of /ravitation,; Pushing Gravity,
edited by atthew 0. Edwards, &peiron ontreal. "-. 0oy >eys Inc. 6@@6 ontreal,
-anada$ p. 36.
*. &rthur Edward 0uark and 8arold -layton Hrey, &toms, olecules and Iuanta, "4over
2ublications, Inc. <ew Eork, volume #, #GA*$ pp. 6(3!6*#.
?. 2aul 0owe, :%he &ether 0evisited,; in The Toth-Maatian Review, 5ol.#@ <umber (,
"%he %oth!aatian 2ress, Bctober #GG#$ pp. *G3*!*GG@.
A. 0owe, p. *G3*.
D. 0onald Lane 0eese, University Physics, ".rooks)-ole 2ublishing -ompany, <ew Eork
6@@@$ pp. #6(#!#6(6.
3. -.W.'. Everitt, ames Clerk Ma!well, "-harles 1cribners 1ons, <ew Eork #GD?$
G. 4onald -. &hrens, Meteorology Today, "West 2ublishing -ompany, <ew Eork (
rd

Edition #G33$ p. *(D.
#@. ichael 'araday, Experimental 0esearches in Electricity 2art Bne "0ichard %aylor
and William 'rancis "#3(G$ pp.#A!66
##. 0obert L. 1proull, Modern Physics, "7ohn Wiley J 1ons, Inc., <ew Eork J London,
6
nd
Ed, #GA($ pp. ##(!##?.
#6. Louis 4e .rogile, New Pers"ectives in Physics, ".asic .ooks 2ublishing -o.
#GA6$pp. #@G!#6?