Thinking About Diversity and Inclusion Discussion Questions Week 4 Frederick R. Paige III
University of Phoenix 2 The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is a government organization responsible for enforcing federal labor laws that would discriminate against potential job applicants or employers because of race, religion, color, sex, and age. Other responsibilities include pregnancy, national origin, disability and other generic information that an employer could use to discriminate against an individual. These federal laws apply to all aspects of the work situation including hiring, firing, promotions, harassment, training, wages and benefits. On April 14, 2013 the EEOC filed a lawsuit on behalf an employee who was fired for religious reasons. Bo-Cherry, Inc. a North Carolina corporation that operates the restaurant Bo Jangles is located in Charlotte, North Carolina. According to EEOC the restaurant violated federal law when it failed to accommodate this employees religious beliefs then fired him because of his religion shortly after. The complaint states that former employee Devin Charles has been a practicing Muslim for the last 14 years. As a male in the Muslim faith and member of his sect of the Sunni branch of Islamic faith, Charles is required to grown and maintain a beard and is not allowed to trim of cut it unless it exceeds the length of his fist. This is known as fist length. Charles interviewed for a position as food prep and got hired, still having his beard. The manager at that store location informed him that he might need to cut his beard, but Charles responded and informed the manager of his Muslim faith and he could not cut his beard. Charles suggested an accommodation of a food net, which is typically worn on the head to protect hair from failing into food. The same concept would be applied for Charles beard, but was denied by management and even a district supervisor. Charles was then University of Phoenix 3 told to leave the restaurant and not to come back unless he shaved his beard. Because of Charles religious reasons, he refused to shave his beard and was fired. Regional attorney for the Charlotte District Office, Lynette A. Banes stated. Under federal law, employers have an obligation to attempt a fair balance between an employees right to practice his or her religion and the operation of their business. It was made clear by Charles that he could not shave off his beard for religious reasons and he even suggested a reasonable accommodation to keep his employment. Management failed to compromise or even suggests another reasonable accommodation, the consequently fired Charles. This unfair practice by Bo-Cherry Incorporated received attention from EEOC representatives and subsequently led to a lawsuit filed on Charles behalf. One of the principals that the United States was founded under was freedom of religion. This is one reason that so may different religious groups and affiliations came to America during its early years. Religion is a strong topic and mixing religion and work are sometimes difficult for employers and employees. Finding an appropriate balance for both is paramount for success, legally and morally. Harvey and Allard (2009) state. Unlike other management trends, religion is a personal issue at the core of most peoples values. The inappropriate application of religious principles can have potentially dangerous consequences. September 11, 2011 brought on lots of bias and misconceptions about Muslims and their practices therefore when cases like this one are highlighted in the news, it brings a lot of attention. Misconceptions include thinking all Muslims are terrorists, all Muslims are Arabs, Muslim women and children have no rights. It is important for employers to be knowledgeable about religion in the workplace and have appropriate responses to conflicts University of Phoenix 4 that arise. Schaeffer (2011) states. The attack of September 11, 2011, engineered by Arab Muslim terrorists, caused many Americans to associate Arab and Muslim Americans with Americas enemy in the war against terrorism. As the economy softened and taxpayers paid for increased security, Arab and Muslim Americans became scapegoats. Scrutiny of Muslim Americans was on the rise with vandalism to mosques, attacks on Arab-speaking individuals and illegal hiring practices. It should not take the EEOC to make corrections to illegal practices but it is a government agency that ensures that fair, appropriate and legal business practices are followed. This lawsuit brings about social change due to the fact that it deals with religion and even more specific, Muslim religious beliefs. I believe that misconceptions are big reason that so many people are intolerant of other people and their religion to include religious beliefs. In the case of Devin Charles, he was unfairly fired because of his religious beliefs and was not given a fair chance by his employer. The lawsuit brought on by the EEOC will make change possible to have employers think about their business practices and discrimination roles. Employers and business owners need to be cognizant of laws and procedures that govern discrimination practices in the workplace. Age, sexual orientation, race, religion, religious practices, and disability are among the biggest and most controversial issues that the EEOC deals with on a regular basis. Most companies have a code of conduct or other documents that govern what the business model is. In some cases, businesses use their own resources to handle employee claims of discrimination. If I were a business owner or employer I would have a code of conduct or code of ethics for hiring, firing and discriminatory practices. All individuals deserve to work in an University of Phoenix 5 environment where they re treated with dignity and respect. Making my company a credible company brings out the full potential in its employees and contributes to a companys success. I would build trust, credibility and fairness amongst the employees to build an inclusive work environment. Creating a culture of open communication is also vital to success and avoiding avoidable discriminatory practices.
University of Phoenix 6 References Harvey, C. P., & Allard, M. J. (2009). Understanding and managing diversity (4 th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Schaefer, R. T. (2011). Racial and ethnic groups (12 th ed.). Upper Saddle River, JL: Pearson http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/4-4-13.cfm
Moral Turpitude: Misleading the Court - California Compendium on Professional Responsibility State Bar Association -Moral Turpitude Defined and Applied - California Attorney Misconduct Legal Reference - Business & Professions Code § 6106 Commission of Any Act Involving Moral Turpitude, Dishonesty or Corruption - California Supreme Court Justice Leondra R. Kruger, Justice Mariano-Florentino Cuellar, Justice Goodwin H. Liu, Justice Carol A. Corrigan, Justice Ming W. Chin, Justice Kathryn M. Werdegar, Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye California Business and Professions Code § 6100 Supreme Court Summary Disbarment
California Judicial Branch News Service - Investigative Reporting Source Material & Story Ideas