You are on page 1of 9

OMTEX CLASSES

Global warming
Global warming is the observed increase in the average temperature of the Earth's atmosphere and
oceans in recent decades. The Earth's average near-surface atmospheric temperature rose 0.6 ± 0.2
°Celsius (1.1 ± 0.4 °Fahrenheit) in the 20th century [1].
The current scientific consensus is that "most of the observed warming over the last 50 years is likely to
have been attributable to human activities"[2]. The extent of this consensus was the subject of a study—
published in December 2004 in the journal Science—that considered the abstracts of 928 refereed
scientific articles in the ISI citation database identified with the keywords "global climate change". This
study concluded that 75% of the 928 articles either explicitly or implicitly accepted the consensus view
— the remainder of the articles covered methods or paleoclimate and did not take any stance on recent
climate change[3] [4].
The primary causes of the human-induced component of warming are the increased amounts of carbon
dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases (GHGs)[5]. They are released by the burning of fossil fuels,
land clearing and agriculture, etc. and lead to an increase in the greenhouse effect. This effect was first
described by Joseph Fourier in 1824, and first investigated quantitatively in 1896 by the Swedish chemist
Svante Arrhenius[6], although the greenhouse effect did not enter into popular awareness until the
1980's.
Climate sensitivity is a measure of the equilibrium response to increased GHGs, and other anthropogenic
and natural climate forcings. It is found by observational [7] and model studies. This sensitivity is usually
expressed in terms of the temperature response expected from a doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere.
The 2001 IPCC report estimates a likelyhood between 66% and 90% for a climate sensitivity in the range
1.5–4.5 °C (2.7–8.1 °F)[8]. This should not be confused with the expected temperature change by a given
date, which also includes a dependence on the future GHG emissions and a delayed response due to
thermal lag, principally from the oceans. Models referenced by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC), using a range of SRES scenarios, project that global temperatures will increase between
1.4 and 5.8 °C (2.5 to 10.5 °F) between 1990 and 2100.
An increase in global temperatures can in turn cause other changes, including a rising sea level and
changes in the amount and pattern of precipitation. These changes may increase the frequency and
intensity of extreme weather events, such as floods, droughts, heat waves, hurricanes, and tornados.
Other consequences include higher or lower agricultural yields, glacial retreat, reduced summer stream
flows, species extinctions and increases in the ranges of disease vectors. Warming is expected to affect
the number and magnitude of these events; however, it is difficult to connect particular events to global
warming. Although most studies focus on the period up to 2100, warming (and sea level rise due to
thermal expansion) is expected to continue past then, since CO2 has an estimated atmospheric lifetime
of 50 to 200 years. [9]. Only a small minority of climate scientists discount the role that humanity's
actions have played in recent warming. However, the uncertainty is more significant regarding how
much climate change should be expected in the future, and there is a hotly contested political and
public debate over implementation of policies that deal with predicted consequences, what, if anything,
should be done to reduce or reverse future warming, and how to deal with the predicted consequences.
Historical warming of the Earth
OMTEX CLASSES
See also: Temperature record of the past 1000 years

Two millennia of mean surface temperatures according to different reconstructions, each smoothed on
a decadal scale. The unsmoothed, annual value for 2004 is also plotted for reference.
Relative to the period 1860–1900, global temperatures on both land and sea have increased by 0.75 °C
(1.4 °F), according to the instrumental temperature record. Since 1979, land temperatures have
increased about twice as fast as ocean temperatures (0.25 °C/decade against 0.13 °C/decade (Smith,
2005). Temperatures in the lower troposphere have increased between 0.12 and 0.22 °C per decade
since 1979, according to satellite temperature measurements. Over the one or two thousand years
before 1850, world temperature is believed to have been relatively stable, with possibly regional
fluctuations such as the Medieval Warm Period or the Little Ice Age.
Based on estimates by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2005 was the warmest year since
reliable, widespread instrumental measurements became available in the late 1800s, exceeding the
previous record set in 1998 by a few hundredths of a degree Celsius. Similar estimates prepared by the
World Meteorological Organization and the UK Climatic Research Unit concluded that 2005 was still only
the second warmest year, behind 1998 [11] [12].
Depending on the time frame, a number of temperature records are available. These are based on
different data sets, with different degrees of precision and reliability. An approximately global
instrumental temperature record begins in about 1860; contamination from the urban heat island effect
is believed to be small and well controlled for. A longer-term perspective is available from various proxy
records for recent millennia; see temperature record of the past 1000 years for a discussion of these
records and their differences. The attribution of recent climate change is clearest for the most recent
period of the last 50 years, for which the most detailed data are available. Satellite temperature
measurements of the tropospheric temperature date from 1979.

Causes
Main articles: Attribution of recent climate change and Scientific opinion on climate change

Carbon dioxide during the last 400,000 years and the rapid rise since the Industrial Revolution; changes
in the Earth's orbit around the Sun, known as Milankovitch cycles, are believed to be the pacemaker of
the 100,000 year ice age cycle.
The climate system varies both through natural, "internal" processes as well as in response to variations
in external "forcing" from both human and non-human causes, including solar activity, volcanic
emissions, and greenhouse gases. Climatologists agree that the earth has warmed recently. The detailed
causes of this change remain an active field of research, but the scientific consensus identifies
greenhouse gases as the primary cause of the recent warming. Outside of the scientific community,
however, this conclusion can be controversial.
Adding carbon dioxide (CO2) or methane (CH4) to Earth's atmosphere, with no other changes, will make
the planet's surface warmer; greenhouse gases create a natural greenhouse effect without which
temperatures on Earth would be an estimated 30 °C (54 °F) lower, and the Earth uninhabitable. It is
OMTEX CLASSES
therefore not correct to say that there is a debate between those who "believe in" and "oppose" the
theory that adding carbon dioxide or methane to the Earth's atmosphere will, absent any mitigating
actions or effects, result in warmer surface temperatures on Earth. Rather, the debate is about what the
net effect of the addition of carbon dioxide and methane will be, when allowing for compounding or
mitigating factors.
One example of an important feedback process is ice-albedo feedback. The increased CO2 in the
atmosphere warms the Earth's surface and leads to melting of ice near the poles. As the ice melts, land
or open water takes its place. Both land and open water are less reflective than ice, and so absorb more
solar radiation. This causes more warming, which in turn causes more melting, and the cycle continues.
Due to the thermal inertia of the earth's oceans and slow responses of other indirect effects, the Earth's
current climate is not in equilibrium with the forcing imposed by increased greenhouse gases. Climate
commitment studies indicate that, even if greenhouse gases were stabilized at present day levels, a
further warming of perhaps 0.5 °C to 1.0 °C (0.9–1.8 °F) would still occur.
Greenhouse gases in the atmosphere

Plots of atmospheric Carbon dioxide and global temperature during the last 650,000 years.
Greenhouse gases are transparent to shortwave radiation from the sun. However, they absorb some of
the longer infrared radiation emitted as black body radiation from the Earth, thereby slowing radiational
cooling and raising the 'equilibrium' temperature of the Earth. How much they warm the world by is
shown in their global warming potential.
The atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and methane have increased by 31% and 149%
respectively above pre-industrial levels since 1750. This is considerably higher than at any time during
the last 650,000 years, the period for which reliable data has been extracted from ice cores. From less
direct geological evidence it is believed that carbon dioxide values this high were last attained 40 million
years ago. About three-quarters of the anthropogenic (man-made) emissions of carbon dioxide to the
atmosphere during the past 20 years is due to fossil fuel burning. The rest of the anthropogenic
emissions are predominantly due to land-use change, especially deforestation [13].
The longest continuous instrumental measurement of carbon dioxide mixing ratios began in 1958 at
Mauna Loa. Since then, the annually averaged value has increased monotonically by approximately 21%
from the initial reading of 315 ppmv, as shown by the Keeling curve, to over 380 ppmv in 2006 [14] [15].
The monthly CO2 measurements display small seasonal oscillations in an overall yearly uptrend, with the
maximum reached during the northern hemisphere's late spring (the growing season in the northern
hemisphere temporarily removes some CO2 from the atmosphere).
Methane, the primary constituent of natural gas, enters the atmosphere both from biological
production and leaks from natural gas pipelines and other infrastructure. Some biological sources are
natural, such as termites, but others have been increased or created by agricultural activities, such as
the cultivation of rice paddies [16]. Recent evidence suggests that forests may also be a source (RC;
BBC), and if so this would be an additional contribution to the natural greenhouse effect, and not to the
anthropogenic greenhouse effect (Ealert).
Future carbon dioxide levels are expected to continue rising due to ongoing fossil fuel usage, though the
actual trajectory will depend on uncertain economic, sociological, technological, and natural
OMTEX CLASSES
developments. The IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios gives a wide range of future carbon
dioxide scenarios [17], ranging from 541 to 970 parts per million by the year 2100. Fossil fuel reserves
are sufficient to reach this level and continue emissions past 2100, if coal and tar sands are extensively
used.

Anthropogenic emission of greenhouse gases broken down by sector for the year 2000.
Globally, the majority of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions arise from fuel combustion. The
remainder is accounted for largely by "fugitive fuel" (fuel consumed in the production and transport of
fuel), emissions from industrial processes (excluding fuel combustion), and agriculture: these
contributed 5.8%, 5.2% and 3.3% respectively in 1990. Current figures are broadly comparable. [18]
Around 17% of emissions are accounted for by the combustion of fuel for the generation of electricity. A
small percentage of emissions come from natural and anthropogenic biological sources, with
approximately 6.3% derived from agriculturally produced methane and nitrous oxide.
Positive feedback effects, such as the expected release of methane from the melting of permafrost peat
bogs in Siberia (possibly up to 70,000 million tonnes), may lead to significant additional sources of
greenhouse gas emissions. [19]. Note that the anthropogenic emissions of other pollutants—notably
sulfate aerosols—exert a cooling effect; this partially accounts for the plateau/cooling seen in the
temperature record in the middle of the twentieth century [20], though this may also be due to
intervening natural cycles.
Alternative hypotheses
The extent of the scientific consensus on global warming—that "most of the observed warming over the
last 50 years is likely to have been attributable to human activities"[21]—has been investigated: In the
journal Science in December 2004, Dr Naomi Oreskes published a study of the abstracts of 928 refereed
scientific articles in the ISI citation database identified with the keywords "global climate change". This
study concluded that 75% of the 928 articles either explicitly or implicitly accepted the consensus view
— the remainder of the articles covered methods or paleoclimate and did not take any stance on recent
climate change. The study did not report how many of the 928 abstracts explicitly endorsed the
hypothesis of human-induced warming, but none of the 928 articles surveyed explicitly endorsed an
alternative hypothesis. [22] [23]
Contrasting with the consensus view, alternative hypotheses have been proposed to explain all or part
of the observed increase in global temperatures. Some of these hypotheses (listed here without
comment on their validity or lack thereof) include:
• The warming is within the range of natural variation.
• The warming is a consequence of coming out of a prior cool period, namely the Little Ice Age.
• The warming is primarily a result of variances in solar irradiance, possibly via modulation of
cloud cover [24]. It is similar in concept to the operating principles of the Wilson cloud chamber, but on
a global scale where earth's atmosphere acts as the cloud chamber and the cosmic rays catalyze the
production of cloud condensation nuclei.
• The observed warming actually reflects the Urban Heat Island, as most readings are done in
heavily populated areas which are expanding with growing population [25].
Solar variation theory
OMTEX CLASSES

30 years of solar variability.


Main article: Solar variation theory
Modeling studies reported in the IPCC Third Assessment Report (TAR) did not find that changes in solar
forcing were needed in order to explain the climate record for the last four or five decades [26]. These
studies found that volcanic and solar forcings may account for half of the temperature variations prior to
1950, but the net effect of such natural forcings has been roughly neutral since then [27]. In particular,
the change in climate forcing from greenhouse gases since 1750 was estimated to be eight times larger
than the change in forcing due to increasing solar activity over the same period [28].
Since the TAR, some studies (Lean et al., 2002, Wang et al., 2005) have suggested that changes in
irradiance since pre-industrial times are less by a factor of 3 to 4 than in the reconstructions used in the
TAR (e.g. Hoyt and Schatten, 1993, Lean, 2000.). Other researchers (e.g. Stott et al. 2003 [29]) believe
that the effect of solar forcing is being underestimated and propose that solar forcing accounts for 16%
or 36% of recent greenhouse warming. Others (e.g. Marsh and Svensmark 2000 [30]) have proposed
that feedback from clouds or other processes enhance the direct effect of solar variation, which if true
would also suggest that the effect of solar variability was being underestimated. In general the level of
scientific understanding of the contribution of variations in solar irradiance to historical climate changes
is "very low" [31].
The present level of solar activity is historically high. Solanki et al. (2004) suggest that solar activity for
the last 60 to 70 years may be at its highest level in 8,000 years; Muscheler et al. disagree, suggesting
that other comparably high levels of activity have occurred several times in the last few thousand years
[32]. Solanki concluded based on their analysis that there is a 92% probability that solar activity will
decrease over the next 50 years. In addition, researchers at Duke University (2005) have found that 10–
30% of the warming over the last two decades may be due to increased solar output [33]. In a review of
existing literature, Foukal et al. (2006) determined both that the variations in solar output were too
small to have contributed appreciably to global warming since the mid-1970s and that there was no
evidence of a net increase in brightness during this period. [34]
Expected effects
Main article: Effects of global warming
The expected effects of global warming are many and various, both for the environment and for human
life. These effects include sea level rise, repercussions to agriculture, reductions in the ozone layer,
increased intensity and frequency of extreme weather events, and the spread of disease. In some cases,
the effects may already be manifest, although it is difficult to attribute specific incidents of natural
phenomena to long-term global warming. Since the mid-1970s, the total annual power of hurricanes has
increased markedly because their average intensity and duration have increased; in addition, there has
been a high correlation of hurricane power with tropical sea-surface temperature[35][1]. In spite of such
strong evidence, the relationship between global warming and hurricanes is still being debated. [36][37]
A draft statement by the World Meteorological Organization acknowledges the differing viewpoints on
this issue [38].
The extent and probability of these consequences is a matter of considerable uncertainty. A summary of
probable effects and recent understanding can be found in the report of the IPCC Working Group II [39].
OMTEX CLASSES
Some scientists have concluded global warming is already causing death and disease across the world
through flooding, environmental destruction, heat waves and other extreme weather events. (Reuters,
February 9, 2006; archived)
Effects on ecosystems
Both primary and secondary effects of global warming — such as higher temperatures, lessened snow
cover, rising sea levels and weather changes — may influence not only human activities but also
ecosystems. Some species may be forced out of their habitats (possibly to extinction) because of
changing conditions, while others may flourish. Similarly, changes in timing of life patterns, such as
annual migration dates, may alter regional predator-prey balance. The effect of advanced spring arrival
dates in Scandinavia of birds that over winter in sub-Saharan Africa has been ascribed to evolutionary
adaptation of the species to climatic warming [40].
Ocean pH is lowering as a result of increased carbon dioxide levels. Lowering of ocean pH along with
changing water temperature and ocean depth will have a damaging effect on coral reefs.
Another suggested mechanism whereby a warming trend may be amplified involves the thawing of
tundra, which can release significant amounts of the potent greenhouse gas methane that is trapped in
permafrost and ice clathrate compounds [41].
There are also ecological effects of melting polar ice: for example, polar bears use sea ice to reach their
prey, and they must swim to another ice floe when one breaks up. Ice is now becoming further
separated, and dead polar bears have been found in the water, believed to have drowned[42]. More
recently, some scientists have suggested that the observed cannibalistic behavior in polar bears may be
the result of food shortages brought on by global warming (Amstrup et al. 2006).
Effect on glaciers

Global glacial mass balance in the last fifty years, reported to the WGMS and the NSIDC. The increased
downward trend in the late 1980s is symptomatic of the increased rate and number of retreating
glaciers.
Global warming has led to negative glacier mass balance, causing glacier retreat around the world.
Oerlemans (2005) showed a net decline in 142 of the 144 mountain glaciers with records from 1900 to
1980. Since 1980 global glacier retreat has increased significantly. Similarly, Dyurgerov and Meier (2005)
averaged glacier data across large-scale regions (e.g. Europe) and found that every region had a net
decline from 1960 to 2002, though a few local regions (e.g. Scandinavia) have shown increases. Some
glaciers that are in disequilibrium with present climate have already disappeared [43] and increasing
temperatures are expected to cause continued retreat in the majority of alpine glaciers around the
world. Upwards of 90% of glaciers reported to the World Glacier Monitoring Service have retreated
since 1995 [44].
Of particular concern is the potential for failure of the Hindu Kush and Himalayan glacial melts. The melt
of these glaciers is a large and reliable source of water for China, India, and much of Asia, and these
waters form a principal dry-season water source. Increased melting would cause greater flow for several
decades, after which "some areas of the most populated region on Earth are likely to 'run out of water'"
(T. P. Barnett, J. C. Adam and D. P. Lettenmaier 2005) [45]
Miniature rock glaciers
OMTEX CLASSES
Rock glaciers — caches of ice under boulders — are among other water signs such as drying meadows
and warming lakes that scientists are studying in the Sierras in the western United States [46]. Connie
Millar searches for the rock glaciers in the Yosemite area of the Sierra crest. She hypothesizes that rock
glaciers will be predictors of how ecosystems change with rising temperatures. Millar is leading an effort
(the Consortium for Integrated Climate Research in Western Mountains [47]) to co-ordinate the work of
many scientists to see how the pieces of the Global Warming puzzle may fit.
Destabilization of ocean currents
Main article: Shutdown of thermohaline circulation
There is also some speculation that global warming could, via a shutdown or slowdown of the
thermohaline circulation, trigger localized cooling in the North Atlantic and lead to cooling, or lesser
warming, in that region. This would affect in particular areas like Scandinavia and Britain that are
warmed by the North Atlantic drift.
Sea level rise and environmental refugees

The termini of the glaciers in the Bhutan-Himalaya. Glacial lakes have been rapidly forming on the
surface of the debris-covered glaciers in this region during the last few decades. According to USGS
researchers, glaciers in the Himalaya are wasting at alarming and accelerating rates, as indicated by
comparisons of satellite and historic data, and as shown by the widespread, rapid growth of lakes on the
glacier surfaces. The researchers have found a strong correlation between increasing temperatures and
glacier retreat.
Rising global temperatures will melt glaciers and expand the water of the seas through the mechanism
of thermal expansion, leading to sea level rise. Even a relatively small rise in sea level would make some
densely settled coastal plains uninhabitable and create a significant refugee problem. If the sea level
were to rise in excess of 4 meters (13 ft) almost every coastal city in the world would be severely
affected, with the potential for major damage to world-wide trade and economy. Presently, the IPCC
predicts sea level rise is most probable to be just short of half a metre, and at least between 9 and 88 cm
through 2100 [48] - but they also warn that global warming during that time may lead to irreversible
changes in the Earth's glacial system and ultimately melt enough ice to raise sea level many meters over
the next millennia. It is estimated that around 200 million people could be affected by sea level rise,
especially in Vietnam, Bangladesh, China, India, Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia, Nigeria and Egypt.
An example of the ambiguous nature of environmental refugees is the emigration from the island nation
of Tuvalu, which has an average elevation of approximately one meter above sea level. Tuvalu already
has an ad hoc agreement with New Zealand to allow phased relocation [49] and many residents have
been leaving the islands. However, it is far from clear that rising sea levels from global warming are a
substantial factor - best estimates are that sea level has been rising there at approximately 1–2
millimeters per year (~1/16th in/yr), but that shorter timescale factors—ENSO, or tides—have far larger
temporary effects [50] [51] [52] [53].
Spread of disease
One of the largest known outbreaks of Vibrio parahaemolyticus gastroenteritis has been attributed to
generally rising ocean temperature where infected oysters were harvested in Prince William Sound,
OMTEX CLASSES
Alaska in 2005. Before this, the northernmost reported risk of such infection was in British Columbia,
1000 km to the south (McLaughlin JB, et al.).
Global warming may extend the range of vectors conveying infectious diseases such as malaria. A
warmer environment boosts the reproduction rate of mosquitoes and the number of blood meals they
take, prolongs their breeding season, and shortens the maturation period for the microbes they disperse
[54]. Global warming has been implicated in the recent spread to the north Mediterranean region of
bluetongue disease in domesticated ruminants associated with mite bites (Purse, 2005). Hantavirus
infection, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever, tularemia and rabies increased in wide areas of Russia
during 2004–2005. This was associated with a population explosion of rodents and their predators but
may be partially blamed on breakdowns in governmental vaccination and rodent control programs.[55]
Similarly, despite the disappearance of malaria in most temperate regions, the indigenous mosquitoes
that transmitted it were never eliminated and remain common in some areas. Thus, although
temperature is important in the transmission dynamics of malaria, many other factors are influential
[56].
Financial effects
Financial institutions, including the world's two largest insurance companies, Munich Re and Swiss Re,
warned in a 2002 study (UNEP summary) that "the increasing frequency of severe climatic events,
coupled with social trends" could cost almost US$150 billion each year in the next decade. These costs
would, through increased costs related to insurance and disaster relief, burden customers, taxpayers,
and industry alike.
According to the Association of British Insurers, limiting carbon emissions could avoid 80% of the
projected additional annual cost of tropical cyclones by the 2080s. According to Choi and Fisher (2003)
each 1% increase in annual precipitation could enlarge catastrophe loss by as much as 2.8%.
The United Nations' Environmental Program recently announced that severe weather around the world
has made 2005 the most costly year on record [57]. Although there is "no way to prove that [a given
hurricane] either was, or was not, affected by global warming" [58], global warming is thought to
increase the probability of hurricanes emerging. Preliminary estimates presented by the German
insurance foundation Munich Re put the economic losses at more than US$200 billion, with insured
losses running at more than US$70 billion.
Nicholas Stern in the Stern Review has warned that one percent of global GDP is required to be invested
in order to mitigate the effects of climate change, and that failure to do so could risk a recession worth
up to twenty percent of global GDP [59]. Stern’s report[2] suggests that climate change threatens to be
the greatest and widest-ranging market failure ever seen. The report has had significant political effects:
Australia reported two days after the report was released that they would allott AU$60 million to
projects to help cut greenhouse gas emissions[60]. Tony Blair said the Stern Review showed that
scientific evidence of global warming was "overwhelming" and its consequences "disastrous"[61].
Biomass production
The creation of biomass by plants is influenced by the availability of water, nutrients, and carbon
dioxide. Part of this biomass is used (directly or indirectly) as the energy source for nearly all other life
forms, including feed-stock for domestic animals, and fruits and grains for human consumption. It also
includes timber for construction purposes.
OMTEX CLASSES
A rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide can increase the efficiency of the metabolism of most plants,
potentially allowing them to create more biomass.[citation needed] A rising temperature can also
increase the growing season in colder regions. It is sometimes argued that these effects can create a
greener, richer planet, with more available biomass. However, there are many other factors involved,
and it is currently unclear if plants really benefit from global warming. Plant growth can be limited by a
number of factors, including soil fertility, water, temperature, and carbon dioxide concentration.
IPCC models currently predict a possible modest increase in plant productivity. However, there are
several negative ramifications: decreases in productivity may occur at above-optimal temperatures;
greater variation in temperature is likely to decrease wheat yields; in experiments, grain and forage
quality declines if CO2 and temperature are increased; and the reductions in soil moisture in summer,
which are likely to occur, would have a negative effect on productivity. [62]
Satellite data show that the productivity of the northern hemisphere did indeed increase from 1982 to
1991 [63]. However, more recent studies [64][65] found that from 1991 to 2002, widespread droughts
had actually caused a decrease in summer photosynthesis in the mid and high latitudes of the northern
hemisphere.

NOAA projects that by the 2050s, there will only be 54% of the volume of sea ice there was in the 1950s.
Opening up of the Northwest Passage in summer
Melting Arctic ice may open the Northwest Passage in summer in approximately ten years, which would
cut 5,000 nautical miles (9,300 km) from shipping routes between Europe and Asia. This would be of
particular relevance for supertankers that are too big to fit through the Suez Canal and currently have to
go around the southern tip of Africa. According to the Canadian Ice Service, the amount of ice in
Canada's eastern Arctic Archipelago decreased by 15% between 1969 and 2004 [66][67]. A similar
opening is possible in the Arctic north of Siberia, allowing much faster East Asian to Europe transport.
Adverse effects of the melting of ice include a potential increase in the rate of global warming, since ice
reflects 90% of solar heat, while open water absorbs 90% [68].
Further global warming (positive feedback)
Some effects of global warming themselves contribute directly to further global warming:

Wikinews has news related to:


Scientists warn thawing Siberia may trigger global meltdown
• Melting of permafrost may lead to methane release; methane clathrate deposits on the ocean
floor might release more methane (the clathrate gun hypothesis).
• There have been predictions, and some evidence, that global warming might cause loss of
carbon from terrestrial ecosystems, leading to an increase of atmospheric CO2 levels [69] [70]
• Sea ice and seasonal snow cover are more reflective than the underlying sea; hence any
meltback leads to further warming

You might also like