R.A. 386 An Act to Ordain and Institute the Civil Code of the Philippines
New Civil Code took effect on August 30, 1950
Civil Law branch of public law which governs the relations of private individuals within the society.
LAW PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS
I. EFFECT AND APPLICATION OF LAWS
Art. 1 This code shall be known as the Civil Code of the Philippines.
Art. 2 Laws shall take effect after fifteen days following the completion of their publication in the Official gazette, unless it is otherwise provided. This code shall take effect one year after such publication.
E.O. 200 provides for publication either in the Official Gazette or Newspaper of general circulation
Publication: 1. Condition sine qua non MANDATORY 2. Must be in full since its purpose is to inform the public
Effect of publication: People are deemed to have been conclusively notified of the law even if they have not read them.
COVERAGE OF PUBLICATION: 1. PDs and Eos 2. IRRs, if their purpose is to enforce or implement existing law pursuant to a valid legislation NOT COVERED: 1. Interpretative regulations and those administrative regulations internal in nature 2. Letters of Instruction 3. Municipal ordinances (covered by the LGC)
ART. 3 Ignorance of the law excuses no one from compliance therewith.
Ignorantia legis neminem excusat Art. 3 applies only to Philippine law and not to foreign law. Foreign law, whenever applicable, must be proved by the proponent thereof; otherwise it will be presumed to be the exactly the same with Philippine law (doctrine of processual presumption).
Art. 4 Laws shall have no retroactive effect, unless contrary is provided. Lex de futuro judex de preterito (Law provides for the future, the judge for the past)
EXCEPTIONS: PIERCER 1. Penal laws when favorable to the accused who is not a habitual delinquent, even though at the time of the enactment final judgement has already been rendered. 2. Interpretative statutes 3. When the law itself expressly provides, except: a. Ex post facto law b. Laws impair obligations in a contract 4. Remedial statutes as long as it does not affect vested rights 5. Curative laws purpose is to cure defects or imperfections in judicial or administrative proceedings 6. Laws which are of emergency nature or are authorized by police power 7. Laws creating new substantive rights unless vested rights are impaired.
Art. 5 Acts executed against the provisions of mandatory or prohibitory laws shall be void, except when the law itself authorizes their validity.
Mandatory law prescribes some element as a requirement
Prohibitory law forbids something
General Rule: Acts contrary to mandatory or prohibitory laws are VOID.
Exceptions: 1. Law itself authorizes its validity (i.e. lotto) 2. Law makes the act only voidable and not void (i.e. vitiated consent) 3. Law makes the act valid but punishes the violator 4. Law makes the act void but recognizes legal effects flowing therefrom Art. 6 Rights may be waived, unless the waiver is contrary to law, public order, public policy, morals, or good customs, or prejudicial to a third person with a right recognized by law.
General Rule: Rights may be waived. Exceptions: 1. Waiver is contrary to law, public policy, morals and good customs; 2. Waiver is prejudicial to third person
Requisite of a VALID WAIVER: (RCCLF) 1. The waiving party must actually have the right he is renouncing. 2. He must have the full capacity to make the waiver. 3. The waiver must be clear and unequivocal. 4. The waiver must not be contrary to law, public order, public policy, morals or good customs or prejudicial to a third person with a right recognized by law. 5. When formalities are required; such must be complied with.
Waivers which are contrary to law 1. Waiver of future inheritance 2. Waiver of future support 3. Waiver of political rights Other examples of prohibited waivers: 1. Waiver of protection of pactum commissorium 2. Waiver of employment benefits in advance 3. Waiver of minimum wage (i.e. to receive less) 4. Waiver of right to revoke a will 5. Waiver of action against future fraud
Art. 7 Laws are repealed only by subsequent ones, and their violation or non-observance shall not be excused by disuse, or custom or practice to the contrary. When the courts declared a law to be inconsistent with the Constitution, the former shall be void and the latter shall govern. Administrative or executive acts, orders and regulations shall be valid only when they are not contrary to laws or the Constitution.
REPEAL OF LAWS: 1. Express repeal repeal of repealing law will not revive the old law (unless expressly provided) 2. Implied repeal provision of the subsequent law are incompatible with those of the previous law. However, the following must occur: a. Both laws cover the same subject matter b. The latter law is repugnant to the earlier law
Violation of law is not justified even if: 1. No one follows the law 2. There is a custom to the contrary
Art. 8 Judicial decisions applying or interpreting the laws or the Constitution shall form part of the legal system of the Philippines.
Art. 9 No judge or court shall decline to render judgment by reason of the silence, obscurity or insufficiency of the laws. A judge must decide the case assigned to him whether or not he knows what law shall be applied. In case of silence or insufficiency of the law, a judge may still be guided by the following: 1. Customs which are not contrary to law, public order or public policy; 2. Court decisions, foreign or local, in similar cases; 3. Legal opinions of qualified writers and professors; 4. General principls of justice and equity; and 5. Rules of Statutory construction.
In criminal cases, however, it is an established rule that there is no crime where there is no law punishing it Nulla poena sine lege. The judge must dismiss the case if there is no law punishing it.
Art. 10 In case of doubt in the interpretation or application of laws, it is presumed that the lawmaking body intended right and justice to prevail.
Art. 11 Customs which are contrary to law, public order or public policy shall not be countenanced.
Art. 12 A custom must be proved a fact, according to the rules of evidence.
Custom rules of conduct formed by repetition of acts, uniformly observed as a social rule, legally binding and obligatory
Requisite for making CUSTOM an OBLIGATORY RULE: (PPOT) 1. Plurality of acts or acts have been repeatedly done 2. Generally practiced by the great mass of the social group 3. Community accepts it as a proper way of acting, such that it is considered obligatory upon all. 4. The practice has been going on for a long period of time
Judicial Custom supplement statutory law or applied in the absence of statute.
Note: Custom, even if proven, CANNOT prevail over a statutory rule or even a legal rule enunciated by Supreme Court.
Art. 13 When the law speaks of years, months, days or nights, it shall be understood that years are of three hundred sixty-five days each; months, of thirty days; days, of twenty-four hours; and nights from sunset to sunrise. If months are designated by their name, they shall be computed by the number of days which they respectively have. In computing a period, the first day shall be excluded, and the last day included.
Under E.O. 292, year is now understood to be 12 months.
II. CONFLICTS OF LAW PROVISIONS
Art. 14 Penal laws and those of public security and safety shall be obligatory upon all who live and sojourn in the Philippine territory, subject to the principles of public international law and to treaty stipulations.
Two principles: 1. Territoriality General Rule: Criminal law apply only in Philippine territory. Exception: Art 2 of RPC 2. Generality General Rule: Criminal law apply to everyone in the territory (citizens and aliens) Exceptions: (All the Philippines can do is expel them) 1. Treaty stipulations which exempt some persons within the jurisdiction of Philippine courts (e.g. bases agreement) 2. Heads of State and Ambassadors (Note: Consuls are subject to jurisdiction of our criminal courts.)
Art. 15 Laws relating to family rights and duties, or to the status, condition and legal capacity of persons are binding upon citizens of the Philippines, even though living abroad.
Theories on Personal Law: 1. Domiciliary theory personal laws of a person are determined by his domicile 2. Nationality theory nationality or citizenship determines the personal laws of the individual *Philippines follows Nationality theory (Lex Nationalis).
Art. 16 Real property as well as personal property is subject to the law of the country where it is stipulated. However, intestate and testamentary successions, both with respect to the order of succession and to the amount of successional rights and to the intrinsic validity of testamentary provisions, shall be regulated by the national law of the person whose succession is under consideration, whatever may be the nature of the property and regardless of the country wherein said property may be found.
Lex situs or lex rei sitae principle which applies the law of the place where real/personal property is situated.
RULES ON INTRINSIC VALIDITY OF CONTRACTS: 1. Law stipulated by the parties 2. Parties are of the same nationality, their national law applies 3. Different nationality, law of the place of the perfection of the obligation or of the performance 4. If above places are not specified and cannot be deduced from the nature and circumstances of the obligation, then the law of the passive subject shall apply 5. RENVOI DOCTRINE: Where the conflict rules of the forum refer to a foreign law, and the latter refers it back to the internal law, the latter law shall apply. If the foreign law refers it to a third country, the said countrys law shall govern (Transmission Theory).
Art. 17 The forms and solemnities of contracts, wills and other public instruments shall be governed by the laws of the country in which they are executed. When the acts referred to are executed before the diplomatic or consular officials of the Republic of the Philippines in a foreign country, the solemnities established by Philippine laws shall be observed in their execution. Prohibitive laws concerning persons, their acts or property, and those which have for their object public order, public policy and good customs shall not be rendered ineffective by laws or judgments promulgated, or by determinations or conventions agreed upon in a foreign country.
Lex loci celebrationis principle which applies the law of the place where the contract was executed as far as the formalities and solemnities (extrinsic validity) are concerned.
LEX NATIONALIS LEX REI SITAE LEX LOCI CELEBRATIONIS Art 15 Art 16 Art 17 Basis: Citizenship Law of the place where the property is Law of the place where the contract situated was executed Coverage: Family rights and duties, status, condition and legal capacity Real and personal property Only forms and solemnities (extrinsic validity) Exception: Art 26, par. 2 of family code (mixed marriage and divorce) 1. Capacity to succeed 2. Intrinsic validity of the will 3. Amount of succession al rights 4. Order of succession 1. Art 26, par. 1 of the family code (marriage among Filipinos solemnized abroad) 2. Intrinsic validity of contracts
Art. 18 In matters which are governed by the Code of Commerce and special laws, their deficiency shall be supplied by the provisions of this Code.
III. HUMAN RELATIONS
Art. 19 Every person must, in the exercise of his rights and in the performance of his duties, act with justice, give everyone his due, and observe honesty and good faith.
Art. 20 Every person who, contrary to law, willfully or negligently causes damage to another, shall indemnify the latter for the same.
Art. 21 Any person who willfully causes loss or injury to another in a manner that is contrary to morals, good customs or public policy shall compensate the latter for the damage.
Art. 22 Every person who through an act of performance by another, or any other means, acquires or comes into possession of something at the expense of the latter without just or legal ground, shall return the same to him.
Art. 23 Even when an act or event causing damage to anothers property was not due to the fault or negligence of the defendant, the latter shall be liable for indemnity if through the act or event, he was benefited.
Art. 24 In all contractual, property or other relations, when one of the parties is at a disadvantage on account of his moral dependence, ignorance, indigence, mental weakness, tender age or handicap, the courts must be vigilant for his protection.
Art. 25 Thoughtless extravagance in expenses for pleasure or display during a period of public want or emergency may be stopped by order of the courts at the instance of any government or private charitable institutions.
Art. 26 Every person shall respect the dignity, personality, privacy and peace of mind of his neighbors and other persons. The following and similar acts, though they may not constitute a criminal offense, shall produce a cause of action for damages, prevention and other relief: (1) Prying into the privacy of anothers residence; (2) Meddling with or disturbing the private life or family relations of another; (3) Intriguing to cause another to be alienated from his friends; (4) Vexing or humiliating another on account of his religious beliefs, lowly station in life, place of birth, physical defect, or other personal condition.
Art. 27 Any person suffering material or moral loss because a public servant or employee refuses or neglects, without just cause, to perform is official duty may file an action for damages and other relief against the latter, without prejudice to any disciplinary administrative action that may be taken.
Art. 28 Unfair competition in agricultural, commercial or industrial enterprises or in labor through the use of force, intimidation, deceit, machination or any other unjust, oppressive or high-handed method shall give rise to a right of action by the person who thereby suffers damage.
Art. 29 When the accused in a criminal prosecution is acquitted on the ground that his quilt has not been proved beyond reasonable doubt, a civil action for damages for the same act or omission may be instituted. Such action requires only a preponderance of evidence. Upon motion of the defendant, the court may require the plaintiff to file a bond to answer for damages in case the complaint should be found to be malicious. If in a criminal case the judgment of acquittal is based upon reasonable doubt, the court shall so declare. In the absence of any declaration to that effect, it may be inferred from the text of the decision whether or not the acquittal is due to that ground.
Art. 30 When a separate civil action is brought to demand civil liability arising from a criminal offense, and no criminal proceedings are instituted during the pendency of the civil case, a preponderance of evidence shall likewise be sufficient to prove the act complained of.
Art. 31 When the civil action is based on an obligation not arising from the act or omission complained of as a felony, such civil action may proceed independently of the criminal proceedings and regardless of the result of the latter.
Art. 32 Any public officer or employee, or any private individual, who directly or indirectly obstructs, defeats, violates or in any manner impedes or impairs any of the following rights and liberties of another person shall be liable to the latter for damages: (1) Freedom of religion; (2) Freedom of speech; (3) Freedom to write for the press or to maintain a periodical publication; (4) Freedom from arbitrary or illegal detention; (5) Freedom of suffrage; (6) The right against deprivation of property without due process of law; (7) The right to a just compensation when private property is taken for public use; (8) The right to the equal protection of the laws; (9) The right to be secure in one's person, house, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures; (10) The liberty of abode and of changing the same; (11) The privacy of communication and correspondence; (12) The right to become a member of associations or societies for purposes not contrary to law; (13) The right to take part in peaceable assembly to petition the Government for redress of grievances; (14) The right to be free from involuntary servitude in any form; (15) The right of the accused against excessive bail; (16) The right of the accused to be heard by himself and counsel, to be informed of the nature and cause of accusation against him, to have a speedy and public trial, to meet the witnesses face to face, and to have compulsory process to secure the attendance of witness in his behalf; (17) Freedom from being compelled to be a witness against one's self, or from being forced to confess guilt, or from being induced by a promise of immunity or reward to make such confession, except when the person confessing becomes a State witness; (18) Freedom from excessive fines, or cruel and unusual punishment, unless the same is imposed or inflicted in accordance with a statute which has not been judicially declared unconstitutional; and (19) Freedom of access to the courts. In any of the cases referred to in this article, whether or not the defendant's act or omission constitutes a criminal offense, the aggrieved party has a right to commence an entirely separate and distinct civil action for damages, and for other relief. Such civil action shall proceed independently of any criminal prosecution (if the latter be instituted), and may be proved by a preponderance of evidence. The indemnity shall include moral damages. Exemplary damages may also be adjudicated. The responsibility herein set forth is not demandable from a judge unless his act or omission constitutes a violation of the Penal Code or other penal statute.
Art. 33 In cases of defamation, fraud, and physical injuries, a civil action for damages, entirely separate and distinct from the criminal action, may be brought by the injured party. Such civil action shall proceed independently of the criminal prosecution, and shall require only a preponderance of evidence.
Art. 34 When a member of a city or municipal police force refuses or fails to render aid or protection to any person in case of danger to life or property, such peace officer shall be primarily liable for damages, and the city or municipality shall be subsidiarily responsible therefor. The civil action herein recognized shall be independent of any criminal proceedings, and a preponderance of evidence shall suffice to support such action.
Art. 35 When a person, claimining to be injured by a criminal offense, charges another with the same, for which no independent civil action is granted in this Code or any special law, but the justice of the peace finds no reasonable ground to believe that a crime has been committed, or the prosecuting attorney refuses or fails to institute criminal proceedings, the complainant may bring a civil action for damages against the alleged offender. Such civil action may be supported by a preponderance of evidence. Upon the defendant's motion, the court may require the plaintiff to file a bond to indemnify the defendant in case the complaint should be found to be malicious. If during the pendency of the civil action, an information should be presented by the prosecuting attorney, the civil action shall be suspended until the termination of the criminal proceedings.
Art. 36 Prejudicial questions, which must be decided before any criminal prosecution may be instituted or may proceed, shall be governed by rules of court which the Supreme Court shall promulgate and which shall not be in conflict with the provisions of this Code.