Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Recommended Readings:
Carter, R. (1998). Mapping the Mind. Berkeley, CA: University
of California Press. Available from online book-sellers.
R1 Nicolelis, M. A. & Chapin, J. K. Controlling robots with the mind. Scientific American, Oct., 2002, 46-53.
R2 Nicolelis, M. A. & Ribeiro, S. (2006). Seeking the neural code. Scientific American, Dec, 2006, 70-77.
R3 Hogan J. The forgotten era of brain. Scientific American, Oct. 2005, 66-73.
R4 R. D. Fields, White matter matters. Scientific American, March, 2008, 54-61.
R5 Bower, J. & Parsons, L. “Rethinking the lesser brain.” Scientific American, Aug. 2003, 49-57
R6 Copeland, B. J., Proudfoot, D. Alan Turing’s forgotten ideas in computer science. Scientific American, April, 1999, 99-103.
R7 Gazzaniga, M. The split brain revisited. Scientific American, July 1998, 50-55.
R8 Ramachandran, V.S. Hubbard, E.M. Hearing colors, tasting shapes. Scientific American, May 2003, 52-59.
R9 Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V. (2006). Mirrors in the mind. Scientific American, Nov, 2006, 54-61.
R10 Ramachandran, V.S. & Oberman, L. (2006). Broken mirrors. Scientific American, Nov., 2006, 62-69.
R11 Hickok, G., Bellugi, U. Klima, E. Sign language in the brain. Scientific American, June 2001, 57-65.
R12 Wright, K. Times of our lives. Scientific American, Sept., 2002, 58-65.
R13 Loftus, E. Creating false memories. Scientific American, Sept., 1997, 71-75.
R14 Treffert D. J & Christensen, D. D. (2005) Inside the mind of a savant. Scientific American, Dec., 2005.
R15 Ross, P. E. (2006) The expert mind. Scientific American, August 2006 64-71.
R16 Chialdini, R. The science of persuasion. Scientific American, Feb., 2001, 76-81.
R17 Solms, M. Freud returns. Scientific American, May, 2004, 83-89.
Student Conduct & Discipline for possible plagiarism and is over 90% effective.
The University of Texas System and The University of
Texas at Dallas have rules and regulations for the orderly Email Use
and efficient conduct of their business. It is the responsibility
of each student and each student organization to be The University of Texas at Dallas recognizes the value and
knowledgeable about the rules and regulations, which efficiency of communication between faculty/staff and
govern student conduct and activities. General information students through electronic mail. At the same time, email
on student conduct and discipline is contained in the UTD raises some issues concerning security and the identity of
publication, A to Z Guide, which is provided to all registered each individual in an email exchange. The university
students each academic year. encourages all official student email correspondence be sent
only to a student’s U.T. Dallas email address and that faculty
The University of Texas at Dallas administers student and staff consider email from students official only if it
discipline within the procedures of recognized and originates from a UTD student account. This allows the
established due process. Procedures are defined and university to maintain a high degree of confidence in the
described in the Rules and Regulations, Board of Regents, identity of all individual corresponding and the security of the
The University of Texas System, Part 1, Chapter VI, transmitted information. UTD furnishes each student with a
Section 3, and in Title V, Rules on Student Services and free email account that is to be used in all communication
Activities of the university’s Handbook of Operating with university personnel. The Department of Information
Procedures. Copies of these rules and regulations are Resources at U.T. Dallas provides a method for students to
available to students in the Office of the Dean of Students, have their U.T. Dallas mail forwarded to other accounts.
where staff members are available to assist students in
interpreting the rules and regulations (SU 1.602, 972/883- Withdrawal from Class
6391). The administration of this institution has set deadlines for
withdrawal of any college-level courses. These dates and
A student at the university neither loses the rights nor times are published in that semester's course catalog.
escapes the responsibilities of citizenship. He or she is Administration procedures must be followed. It is the
expected to obey federal, state, and local laws as well as student's responsibility to handle withdrawal requirements
the Regents’ Rules, university regulations, and from any class. In other words, I cannot drop or withdraw
administrative rules. Students are subject to discipline for any student. You must do the proper paperwork to ensure
violating the standards of conduct whether such conduct that you will not receive a final grade of "F" in a course if you
takes place on or off campus, or whether civil or criminal choose not to attend the class once you are enrolled.
penalties are also imposed for such conduct.
Student Grievance Procedures
Academic Integrity Procedures for student grievances are found in Title V, Rules
The faculty expects from its students a high level of on Student Services and Activities, of the university’s
responsibility and academic honesty. Because the value of Handbook of Operating Procedures.
an academic degree depends upon the absolute integrity of
the work done by the student for that degree, it is imperative In attempting to resolve any student grievance regarding
that a student demonstrate a high standard of individual honor grades, evaluations, or other fulfillments of academic
in his or her scholastic work. responsibility, it is the obligation of the student first to make a
serious effort to resolve the matter with the instructor,
Scholastic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, supervisor, administrator, or committee with whom the
statements, acts or omissions related to applications for grievance originates (hereafter called “the respondent”).
enrollment or the award of a degree, and/or the submission Individual faculty members retain primary responsibility for
as one’s own work or material that is not one’s own. As a assigning grades and evaluations. If the matter cannot be
general rule, scholastic dishonesty involves one of the resolved at that level, the grievance must be submitted in
following acts: cheating, plagiarism, collusion and/or writing to the respondent with a copy of the respondent’s
falsifying academic records. Students suspected of School Dean. If the matter is not resolved by the written
academic dishonesty are subject to disciplinary proceedings. response provided by the respondent, the student may
submit a written appeal to the School Dean. If the grievance
Plagiarism, especially from the web, from portions of papers is not resolved by the School Dean’s decision, the student
for other classes, and from any other source is unacceptable may make a written appeal to the Dean of Graduate or
and will be dealt with under the university’s policy on Undergraduate Education, and the deal will appoint and
plagiarism (see general catalog for details). This course will convene an Academic Appeals Panel. The decision of the
use the resources of turnitin.com, which searches the web Academic Appeals Panel is final. The results of the
academic appeals process will be distributed to all involved
parties. Religious Holy Days
The University of Texas at Dallas will excuse a student from
Copies of these rules and regulations are available to class or other required activities for the travel to and
students in the Office of the Dean of Students, where staff observance of a religious holy day for a religion whose
members are available to assist students in interpreting the places of worship are exempt from property tax under
rules and regulations. Section 11.20, Tax Code, Texas Code Annotated.
Incomplete Grade Policy The student is encouraged to notify the instructor or activity
As per university policy, incomplete grades will be granted sponsor as soon as possible regarding the absence,
only for work unavoidably missed at the semester’s end and preferably in advance of the assignment. The student, so
only if 70% of the course work has been completed. An excused, will be allowed to take the exam or complete the
incomplete grade must be resolved within eight (8) weeks assignment within a reasonable time after the absence: a
from the first day of the subsequent long semester. If the period equal to the length of the absence, up to a maximum
required work to complete the course and to remove the of one week. A student who notifies the instructor and
incomplete grade is not submitted by the specified deadline, completes any missed exam or assignment may not be
the incomplete grade is changed automatically to a grade of penalized for the absence. A student who fails to complete
F. the exam or assignment within the prescribed period may
receive a failing grade for that exam or assignment.
Disability Services If a student or an instructor disagrees about the nature of the
The goal of Disability Services is to provide students with absence [i.e., for the purpose of observing a religious holy
disabilities educational opportunities equal to those of their day] or if there is similar disagreement about whether the
non-disabled peers. Disability Services is located in room student has been given a reasonable time to complete any
1.610 in the Student Union. Office hours are Monday and missed assignments or examinations, either the student or
Thursday, 8:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.; Tuesday and the instructor may request a ruling from the chief executive
Wednesday, 8:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m.; and Friday, 8:30 a.m. officer of the institution, or his or her designee. The chief
to 5:30 p.m. executive officer or designee must take into account the
legislative intent of TEC 51.911(b), and the student and
The contact information for the Office of Disability Services is: instructor will abide by the decision of the chief executive
The University of Texas at Dallas, SU 22 officer or designee.
PO Box 830688
Richardson, Texas 75083-0688 These descriptions and timelines are subject to
(972) 883-2098 (voice or TTY) change at the discretion of the Professor.