A questionnaire was prepared by the researchers and the questions were studied and categorized into cost components, revenue components, profit maximization, and problems encountered and possible solution of the respondents. The researchers used item analysis for validity testing by which the Difficulty Index (DI) and the validity index (VI) of each item in test were determined. The results of the Difficulty Index computation of the questionnaire show that all were marked Moderately Difficult which shows that the questions are valid and appropriate.
A questionnaire was prepared by the researchers and the questions were studied and categorized into cost components, revenue components, profit maximization, and problems encountered and possible solution of the respondents. The researchers used item analysis for validity testing by which the Difficulty Index (DI) and the validity index (VI) of each item in test were determined. The results of the Difficulty Index computation of the questionnaire show that all were marked Moderately Difficult which shows that the questions are valid and appropriate.
A questionnaire was prepared by the researchers and the questions were studied and categorized into cost components, revenue components, profit maximization, and problems encountered and possible solution of the respondents. The researchers used item analysis for validity testing by which the Difficulty Index (DI) and the validity index (VI) of each item in test were determined. The results of the Difficulty Index computation of the questionnaire show that all were marked Moderately Difficult which shows that the questions are valid and appropriate.
A questionnaire was prepared by the researchers and the questions were
studied and categorized into cost components, revenue components, profit maximization, and problems encountered and possible solution of the respondents. In making the questionnaire consultation to Professor Gloria T. Baysa, the thesis adviser was done in preparation of the questionnaire. Survey questionnaires were checked and revised in accordance with the comments and suggestions given by Professor Gloria T. Baysa. The questionnaire was also showed to Ms. Rosalyn Silanga, internal auditor of Webcast Technologies Inc., to verify its applicability and reasonableness to the company and to provide assurance that the respondents will be able to answer it appropriately. All corrections were incorporated to the final draft of the questionnaire. Prior to the actual survey, a pre-survey was conducted in order to test the validity and reliability of the questionnaire as a whole. The researchers used item analysis for validity testing by which the Difficulty index (DI) and the validity index (VI) of each item in test were determined. This was used to determine if the respondents would be able to answer the instruments Eight (8) representatives from Webcast Technologies Inc. who were not part of the respondents are the sample used. The responses of these individuals were tallied to determine who answered the questions with strongly agree strongly disagree. To get: VI = PSA PSD N PSA = NSA N PSD = NSD As to difficulty index, a question was not appropriate if it is easy, appropriate if moderately difficult, and modified if difficult. The Difficult Index formula is:
Where: PSA = Percentage of Strongly Agree PSD = Percentage of Strongly Disagree
The ranges of values used in determining the Difficulty Index are the following: DI .75 Item is Easy (E) .25 DI .75 Item is Moderately Difficult (Mdf) DI .25 Item is Difficult (Df)
The results of the difficulty index computation of the questionnaire show that all were marked Moderately Difficult which shows that the questions are valid and appropriate. On the other hand, questions that resulted to a validity index of highly discriminating were maintained and those that resulted to moderately discriminating were modified. The Validity Index formula is:
2
DI = (PSA PSD) Where: VI = Validity Index PSA = percentage of NSA PSD = percentage of NSA NSA = answer with highest frequency NSD = answer with lowest frequency N = number of sample respondents
The ranges of values used in determining the Validity Index are the following: VI 0.75 Highly Discriminating (HD) 0.25 VI 0.75 Moderately Discriminating (MD) VI 0.25 Not Discriminating (ND)
The result of the validity index computation of the questionnaire shows Highly Discriminating which means that the questions are to be retained and Moderately Discriminating which means that the questions are to be modified. For reliability testing, the researchers used the split-half method. The total set of item questions was divided into halves. The odd numbered items are assigned as variable x, while the even-numbered are assigned as variable y. The scores on the halves were correlated to obtain an estimate of reliability. To obtain the value of correlation, which is the split-half reliability, the Pearson r Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient formula was used. The Pearson r Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient formula is:
Where: r = Pearson correlation coefficient x = Independent variable 9odd-numbered items y = Dependent variables (even-numbered items) n = Total number of respondents
The formula resulted to _____ which denoted a very high correlation. Since the split-half procedure was based upon a correlation between scores obtained on only half the test, a correlation was needed to determine the reliability of the entire test. The halves can be considered approximation to alternate forms. To do this, the Spearman Brown Prophecy Formula was used The Spearman-Brown Prophecy Formula is:
Where: rwt = Reliability of the whole instrument P = Split-half correlation
The formula resulted to _____ which denoted a very high correlation. The computation for validity and reliability are presented in the Appendix D of the study.