Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Includes accounts payable, liabilities for wages (accrued wages), interest payable (accrued interest expenses), liabilities for
taxes. Do not include liability notes payable or liquid portion of long-term debt.
Cash Flow, Company Value and Free Cash Flow
In the field of valuation of companies there is not a great consensus of financial professioanls
and investors for the most appropriate method to use. In this chapter the emphasis will be placed
on the DCF method and it will be applied to INA PLC. Furthermore, a comparison with other
methods will be given. Before dealing with the DCF method in detail, it is necessary to define
Free Cash Flow. After the definition the DCF method will be described and applied to INA PLC.
Free Cash Flow in recent times is gaining importance from the point of view of investors.
This is supported by the fact that an increasing number of companies that operate in the most
developed securities market (like the American one) regularly publish information on Free Cash
Flow in their reports (Mulford, Comiskey, 1997: 345). According to IAS 7 "The separate
disclosure of cash flows that represent increases of capacity and cash flows required to maintain
2
There is an accordance between U.S. GAAP and IAS 7.
3
Taken from: Anthony, Reece (2004: 255).
Clean
gain
+
Depreciation expense
Increase in deferred
taxes
Decrease in receivables
Decrease in inventories
Decrease in prepaid
expenses
The incrase in liabilities
Loss from sale
-
Decrease in deferred taxes
Increase in inventories
Increase in prepaid
expenses
Decrease of liabilities
Gain from sale
Net cash
flow
from
operating
activities
=
Cash Flow and Company Valuation Analysis... 329
operating capacity is useful because it allows users to determine whether the company invested
in the proper maintenance of its operating capacity." (Mulford, Comiskey, 1997: 345).
According to this view there are various definitions of Free Cash Flow. One of them is the Free
Cash Flow that represents the amount available for capital requirements while maintaining
productivity levels unchangend. Mulford and Comiskey (1997: 386) further divide Free Cash
Flow to Free Cash Flow for the company (the FCFF: Free Cash Flow to Firm) and Free Cash
Flow to owners of ordinary shares (the FCFE: Free Cash Flow to Equity).
According to the authors Free Cash Flow for the company consists of cash flow from
operating activities before interest but after investment expenses
4
. In accordance this definition is
the definition of Copeland, Koller and Murrina. They state that Free Cash Flow is equal to the
sum of profit after taxes plus non-cash expenses and net investment in working capital, property,
plant and equipment and other property (Copeland et al., 2000: 134). From their point of view
the definition that matches best the DCF model is the one that expresses the cash flow that the
company generates from its business, which is available to all capital owners (equity and debt
capital). For the purpose of this study the author will use a simplified method, less complex
method than the one used by Copeland et al. The simplier DCF method for FCFF and FCFE is
the one used by Demodarna
5
.
Free Cash Flow and INA Oil Industry PLC.
The following assumptions are relevant for the calculation: cash flow from operations will be
equal to cash flow from operating activities, capital expenditures will be equal to cash flow from
investing activities and interest will be equal to the interest on short-term and long-term loans,
tax relief for interest will be abstracted, just like other adjustments that would be required to
obtain a more realistic Free Cash Flow. The calculation of Free Cash Flow for the INA PLC.
follows
6
in Figure 2.
2011. 2010.
2009.
2008.
CASH FROM OPERATIONS 3.534 1.563
2.960
2.629
- CASH FROM INVESTMENT 1.591 2.809 4.490 4.354
FREE CASH FLOW FOR OWNERS OF COMON SHARES 1.943 -1.246 -1.530 -1.725
+ INTERESTS PAID FOR LONG TERM LOANS 704 786 399 411
FREE CASH FLOW TO FIRM 2.647 -460
-1.131
-1.314
Figure 2. The calculation of Free Cash Flow for the oil industry INA PLC. (amounts given in millions kunas
7
).
4
www.investopedia.com/terms/f/freecashflow.asp (29.2.2008), www.investopedia.com/terms/f
/freecashflowtoequity.asp, (29.1.2008), www.investopedia.com/terms/f/freecashflowfirm.asp, (29.1.2008),
Copeland et al..: Valuation Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies, McKinsey & Company Inc., New
York, 2000: 134.
5
See: Fcff.pdf i fcfe.pdf, pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page /valuation/val.htm#ch2 (27.1.2008).
6
The calculation of Figures 2 and 3 are made according to the financial reports published on www.zse.hr,
(28.2.2008).
7
The kuna is the Croatian currency. One (1) USD is around 5.8-5.9 kunas.
330 Tomislav Jeletic
It is evident that Free Cash Flow is negative (years 2010, 2009, 2088). The reason for this is
that it is taken a more realistic measure of capital expenditure, which is expenditure for investing
activities (which are for future business growth) instead of estimates of capital expenditure on
depreciation (Mulford, Comiskey, 1997: 11). In Figure 3. it is shown the Free Cash Flow
calculated using depreciation as a mesure of investment activities.
2011. 2010.
2009.
2008.
CASH FROM OPERATIONS 3.534 1.563
2.960
2.629
- CASH FROM INVESTMENT 2.640 1.750 1.507 1.371
FREE CASH FLOW FOR OWNERS OF COMMON SHARES 894 -187 1.453 1.258
+ INVESTMENTS PAID FOR LONG TERM LOANS 704 786 399 411
FREE CASH FLOW TO FIRM 1.598 599
1.852
1.669
Figure 3. The calculation of Free Cash Flow for the oil industry INA PLC. with an estimated investment
on the basis of depreciation (amounts in millions of kunas).
There is a big difference that distorts the information. Certainly the first calculation in Figure 2.
thorough and reliable, and provides information that shows the actual situation within the INA
PLC.
Disconted Cash Flow
As stated previously in this paper, the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method is uset to calculate
FCFF and FCFE. The following formula is the general formula for DCF (Value of the Company)
(Orsag, 1997: 197.):
=
+
=
n
t
t
t
r
VALUE
CF
1
) 1 (
(1)
Where:
t time period
ncompany's timelife
CF cash flow in the period of t
r discont rate (cash flow valuation risk included)
It is evident from the above formula that, according to this method, the value of the company is
equal to the sum of Discounted Cash Flows for all the years the calculation is performed. It t is
recommended to take the price of the opportunity cost of invested capital as the value of r.
According to the presented formula, the DCF method will be elaborated in order to calculate the
FCFF and FCFE.
Cash Flow and Company Valuation Analysis... 331
The companny value is calculated as follows
8
:
) (
1
n
g WACC
FCFF
Value
= (2)
Where:
FCFF
1
the expected FCFF for the next year
WACC waged avarage capital cost
g
n
rate od FCFF growth (tending to infinity)
Model assumption:
growth rates in the model should be reasonable in relation to the growth of the economy;
ratio of capital expenditures and depreciation is a constant with a constant growth rate.
WACC is calculated using the formula as follows
9
:
) 1 ( Re Tc Rd
V
D
V
E
WACC + = (3)
Where:
WACC the weighted avarage capital cost
Re cost of equity
Rd cost of dept
E equity value
D company's dept value
V E+D
E/V percentage of financing from equity
D/V percentage of financing from dept
Tc tax rete
WACC serves as the discount rate that complies with the definition of DCF and expresses the
opportunity cost of all capital sources according to their part in the companys total capital
(Copeland et al., 2000: 134). Using the formula above the companys present value of cash flow
is calculated under the assumption of infinite and continuous business growth. The specified
value is used when determing the value of the firm.
The present value of the company (PV of FCFE) is calculated using the formula
10
:
8
See: fcff.pdf, Copeland (131), www.investopedia.com/university/dcf/, (27.1.2008); Copeland et al. (2000: 131);
Mulford, Comiskey (1997: 359).
9
See: www.investopedia.com/terms/w/wacc.asp, (1.2.2008).
10
See: Fcff.pdf, pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/valuation/val.htm#ch2, (27.1.2008); Mulford,
Comiskey (1997: 360).
332 Tomislav Jeletic
n
g r
FCFE
P
=
1
0
(4)
Where:
P
o
present value of the company
FCFE
1
expected Free Cash Flow for Equity in the next year
r company's equity cost
g
n
rate of company's FCFE growth (tending to infinity)
The model can be used if the comany is stable if capital investments are not bigger than
amortisation, shares' beta is close to 1, the debt is stabile and dividends are not significant. DCF
for FCFE is not as accurate as DCF for FCFF. In praxis it is harder to calculate the DCF using
FCFE. The calculation is used for determing the company's value.
DCF-based fundamental indicators are certainly less tendent to volatility. DCF is
particularly advantageous if the investor buys a share for a longer investment period (as does W.
Buffet). One of the advantages is certainly the fact that the investor should be thoroughly
familiar with the operations of enterprises because in this way he stands face to face with the
assessment of the growth of the company. A disadvantage that can be mentioned is his need for
more input data than other models. Huge amounts of data not only creates the vastness, but also
opens up the space for manipulation which aims to provide distorted information. Furthermore
there is no guarantee that something will be overevaluated or undervalued. It may happen that
the model shows that the entire market is underevaluated, which can be a particular problem for
the portfolio managers and analysts. The limitation is that the model can be used only for
companies: with positive current cash flow, with a high probability of estimating of future cash
flow and with a reliable indication of risk to which the future Free Cash Flows could be
discounted. The model is mostly suitable for investors who have long targeted investment times
(which will allow the market to correct the errors in estimating) or sre able to provide a catalyst
that will bring the price values to the adequate value or a potential buyer of the entire company
11
.
Other Valuation Methods
The following is an overview of several methods of valuations that do not belong to the widely
known ones. The model of Economic Profit is a commonly used model in which the value of the
company is equal to the invested capital plus a premium that represents the present value of the
value that is created each year. The concept of economic profit is based on the theory of Alfred
Marshall formed in the 1890. Marshall's theory states that the value created by the company
through any period of time must take into account not only the accounting cost but also the
opportunity cost of capital invested in the company.
The advantage of this model compared to the DCF is that economic profits can be used to
understand the operations of any company in a single year, which is not the case of Free Cash
Flow. For example, the management of the company can increase the Free Cash Flow by
postponing planned investments for the future. Thus, Free Cash Flow is subject to discretionary
management measures. So this model mesures the performance in a single period and is more
reliable (Copeland et al., 2000: 178).
11
See: Approach.pdf, pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/, (31.1.2008).
Cash Flow and Company Valuation Analysis... 333
Another model is the Adjusted Present Value model that is similar to the DCF model. The
DCF and APV discount Free Cash Flow in order to obtain the value of the company. This model
subtracts the debt value from the companys value and reaches the companys present value. The
difference between DCF and APV-a is that the APV model separates the value of cash flow from
the operations on two values: the value of the operation if the company would only be financed
from its own resources and the benefit of the tax shelter because of financing through debt. The
APV concept is used to indicate the impact of taxes on the assessment of the future value of the
company. The contribution of this model is reduced after findings that taxes do not have a crucial
role in determining the price of the shares of the company (Copeland et al., 2000: 180). There
may be variations of the DCF model:
use real instead of nominal cash flows and discount rates;
discounted cash flow before taxes, instead of the cash flow after taxes;
prediction using a variety of formulas instead of explicitly discounting the estimated cash
flow.
The last variation of the DCF is not advisable for use nor reliable and it would be advisable to
forecast cash flow based on the circumstances of each enterprise, which is estimated separately
(Copeland et al., 2000: 183).
The DCF model applied on INA PLC
Before doing the calculation of the DCF, the Free Cash Flow has to be calculated first. For the
calculation of the FCF, the last availible data is used (Figure 4):
2011. 2012. (estimate)
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES 3.534 3.816
- CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES 1.591 1.591
FREE CASH FLOW FOR OWNERS OF COMON SHARES 1.943 2.225
+ INTERESTS PAID FOR LONG TERM LOANS 704 704
FREE CASH FLOW TO COMPANY 2.647 2.929
Figure 4. Calculation of Free Cash Flow for INA PLC. for the year 2011 and the estimation for 2012
12
(values in millions of kunas).
The Cash Flow for 2011 is positive as a result of the investments made in the previous years.
The estimation of data for the 2012 is made using historical trands and expectations of the
author. Investing activities are estimated to be the same as in 2011.
Using data from Figure 4, FCFF, FCFE and WACC are calculated. The cost of INA's own
capital is estimated to be 5,66% (according to market trends in Croatia), the cost for loans is
estimated to be 11%, the percentage of INA's capital is 57%. According to formula (3) WACC is
7,59. The growth of Free Cash Flow is expected to be 4,5%.
12
Source: INA PLC. Financial reports at the Zagreb Stock Exchange.
334 Tomislav Jeletic
789 . 94
045 , 0 0759 , 0
2.929
) (
1
=
=
n
g WACC
FCFF
Value (5)
The value for the firm according to DCF is 94.789 million kunas. In the following
calculation (6) the value of the company for equity owners is calculated according to the formula
(4) and data are taken from Figure 4. The r is equal to WACC and g
n
is equal to the data used in
(5).
006 . 72
045 , 0 0759 , 0
225 . 2
1
0
=
=
n
g r
FCFE
P (6)
The present value of the company is 72.006 milion kunas. Because of the abstraction of some
values this value is not accurate but can be a clear ilustration of the valuation model.
The System of Ratios Using Cash Flow as Data Source
In almost all textbooks of finance and accounting indicators are mentioned, but it is almost
impossible to find them among the indicators that are based on the Cash Flow Statement. The
following ratios that will be presented are based on data that can be found in the Statement of
Cash Flow (Mills, 1991). Indicators of cash flow for the assessment of liquidity:
Interests coverage ratio =
Cash flow from operations
Expenditure for interests
Liabilities coverage ratio =
Cash flow from operations dividends paid
Expenditure for interests
Coverage of dividends from
common shares
=
Cash flow from operations- dividends for preferred
shares
Cash flow for dividends from common share
Coverage for the sum of
dividends
=
Cash flow from operations
Cahs flow for the sum of dividends
Indicators of capital quality:
Quality of realization =
Cash income from realization
Realization (sales)
Quality of profit =
Cash flow from operation
Profit from regular activities
Quality of profit =
Cash flow from operations before interest and tax
Profit before interests, tax and amortization
Indicators of capital expenditure :
Cash Flow and Company Valuation Analysis... 335
Indicator of capital assets
buying
=
Cash flow from operations cash flow for dividends
Cash expenditure for capital assets
Indicator of investments =
Cash flow for investment activities
Cash flow from financial activities
Indicator of financing =
Cash flow from investment activities
Cash flow from operations and financial activities
Indicators of Cash Flow return:
Cash flow per share =
Cash flow from operations cash expense for preferred stocks
Weighted average of preferred shares
Cash return per invested
assets
=
Cash flow from operations before interests and tax
Average assets
Return on liabilities and
capital
=
Cash flow from operations
Avarage of liabilities and capital
Return on capital
=
Cash flow from operations
Avarage capital
It should be noted that empirical data show that in developed countries the mesure of a
"healthy" company is the ratio of cash flow from operating activities to current liabilites of at
least 40% and a ratio of cash flow from operationg activities to liabilities of at least 20% . For all
these ratios there is a rule that is comparable only with companies within the same branch or in
comparison with the average branch. It is certainly useful for observing the dynamics of the
observed ratios over time and for making comparisons with companies from the same branch.
The system parameters without the use of other valuation methods is useless, but if
complemented with other methods, it can be very useful when valuating the signs of the
company and thus determing the enterprise value.
Cash Flow Manipulation
In developed financial markets, investors value particularly the ability of firms to generate large
amounts of "cash" from their business (www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/02_28/
b3791114.htm, (1.2.2008.). Due to the high expectations of the market, frauds occur
(www.winninginvesting.com/spot_red_flags_easier.htm, 1.2.2008). The reasons for
manipulation are: the impact on share price, the impact on the ability to borrow, and to
compensate employees
13
. One of the main reasons for the possibility of fraud is the flexibility of
standards and there are cases of fraud that go beyond the permissible standards. Some of the
most common opportunities for fraud is the classification of cash flow as cash flow from
operating activities altought it would normally be an investment or financial activity (Mulford,
Comiskey, 1997: 81 - 121). Some potential fraud are: (www.investopedia.com/articles/basics/
05/062405.asp, 2.2.2008):
13
Cf. Mulford, Comiskey, 1997: 33; www.investopedia.com/articles/basics/05/062405 (2.2.2008).
336 Tomislav Jeletic
profits from trading in securities classified as cash flow from operating activities;
questionable capitalization of expenses (eg for software development);
securitization of receivables (although it is not applied in Croatia).
One way to "verify" cash flow from operating activities is to compare it with the net profit
over a longer period of time (www.winninginvesting.com/spot_red_flags_easier.htm, 1.2.2008).
Because of its simplicity, this method is not sufficient. Mulford and Comiskey (1997: 241)
developed complex methods to adjusted cash flow from operating activities and thus obtain more
reliable data. The authors found some differences between the reported cash flow and the
corrected one in a 3 years period of time. In some companies the differences were small, while in
some they were significant. All the companies were taken form the S&P 100 index. The Cash
Flow Statement is the most reliable Financial Statement, however certain caution is needed.
Perspective Of The Contemporary Accounting Practice And Advanced Valuation Models
In Croatia
There are few trends that will have impact on the future development of the accounting and
company evaluation practice in Croatia. One of them is certainly the fact that Croatia will
become a member of the European Union in 2013. In 2008 the actual Accountig Act has been
voted. A signs of the development of the Croatian accounting practices is the article which
stipulates that from the date of Croatian accession to the EU the IFRS and interpretations
published in the Official Journal of the EU are to be applied to the Croatian accounting practice.
Another significant trend is a restrictive monetary policy of the Croatian National Bank
14
, which
led to the fact that many companies raise capital through the capital market. Their number is still
realtively small but its growth is expected as the financial crisis slowns down. However in the
near future a larger number of shares, investors and more mature market is expected. As the
market matures more and more companies will understand the importance of transparency and
publication of detailed financial data. The consequence of such a trand is the fact that analyst
will have enough data for using more advanced models. More technical and fundamental
analysis expected as well as the modification of the worlds famous models to the small
emerging market economy.
It is posible to expect that the owners themselves will insist on a realistic presentation and
consistent application of standards, because in this way they will receive the highest quality of
information for decisions making. In conclusion the importance of IFRS aplication will grow
with the simultaneus growth of financial reports understanding. Therefore Cash Flow and
evaluation models using cash flow are the hidden star of the future.
Conclusion
The aim of this study was to apply some parts of the world's current theories and models on the
Croatian capital market. Emphasis is placed on two accounting areas in order to give an
overview of the financial statements which give a "health chack-up" of each company (and in
particular the Statement of Cash Flow as a source of important information) and valuation of the
company.
14
HNB Hrvatska Narodna Banka.
Cash Flow and Company Valuation Analysis... 337
The perspective of Cash Flow usage as a valuation tool is clear. The Croatian market is still
evolving and more advanced models of valuation (such as the Cash Flow models) are waiting for
thair chance. As the market evolves, the financial reports are becoming more and more accurate
and that is the trigger of the chance that more advanced models are waiting for. It is hard to say
when it will happen because it is the result of a lasting process that is already in progress.
The company valuation set of models using cash flow is not the saint grail of company
valuation but can help all investors in decision making, if used simultaneously with other
methods. Cash Flow and other advanced models can be applied on developing markets such as
the Croatian one, but further research has to be done.
References
1. Anthony, R., Reece, J.: Racunovodstvo, financijsko i upravljacko racunovodstvo, RRiF plus, Zagreb, 2004.
2. Copeland, T, et al.: Valuation Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies, McKinsey & Company,
Inc., New York, 2000.
3. Gulin, D., et al..: Racunovodstvo trgovackih drustava uz primjenu MSFI/MRS i poreznih propisa, Hrvatska
zajednica raunovoda i financijskih djelatnika, Zagreb, 2006.
4. Mills, C.C., Developing ratios for effective cash flow statement analysis, Journal of Accountancy, 11/91,
New York, 1991.
5. MRS 1, Medunarodni standardi financijskog izvjestavanja (MSFI) 2004.: ukljucujuci Medunarodne
racunovodstvene standarde (MRS), HZRIF, Zagreb, 2005.
6. MRS 7, Medunarodni standardi financijskog izvjestavanja (MSFI) 2004.: ukljucujuci Medunarodne
racunovodstvene standarde (MRS), HZRIF, Zagreb, 2005.
7. Mrsa, J.: Novine u standardiziranju financijskog izvjestavanja malih i srednje velikih poduzeca,
Racunovodstvo i Financije, Hrvatska zajednica racunovoda i financijskih djelatnika, 12/07, Zagreb, 2007.
8. Mrsa, J.: Biljeske uz financijske izvjestaje u malim i srednje velikom poduzecima, Racunovodstvo i
Financije, Hrvatska zajednica racunovoda i financijskih djelatnika, 12/07, Zagreb, 2007.
9. Mulford, C., Comiskey, E.: Creative Cash Flow Reporting, Uncovering Sustainable Financial Performance,
John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 2005.
10. Orsag, S.: Vrednovanje poduzeca, Infoinvest, Zagreb, 1997.
11. Zakon o racunovodstvu, NN 109/2007
12. www.Approach.pdf, pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/ (31.1.2008)
13. www.Fcfe.pdf,pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/valuation/val.htm#ch2 (27.1.2008)
14. www.Fcff.pdf,pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/valuation/val.htm#ch2 (27.1.2008)
15. www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/02_28/b3791114.htm
16. www.iasb.org/NR/rdonlyres/80B373BF-BB16-45AB-B3F7-8385CD4979EA/0/IAS1.pdf (26.1.2008.)
17. www.investopedia.com/articles/basics/05/062405.asp, (2.2.2008)
18. www.investopedia.com/university/dcf/, (27.1.2008)
19. www.investopedia.com/terms/f/freecashflow.asp (29.2.2008)
20. www.investopedia.com/terms/f/freecashflowfirm.asp, (29.1.2008)
21. www.investopedia.com/terms/freecashflowtoequity.asp, (29.1.2008)
22. www.winninginvesting.com/spot_red_flags_easier.htm (13.10.2009)
23. www.zse.hr/INA-R-A-Prospekt.pdf, (28.2.2008)
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without
permission.