The crust thickness of flexible pavements in many countries including India is based upon the laboratory California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of soil. During construction it is very difficult to ascertain whether the design stipulation have been achieved or not. The Light Weight Deflectometer provides a measurement of the dynamic modulus of elasticity of the soil.
The crust thickness of flexible pavements in many countries including India is based upon the laboratory California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of soil. During construction it is very difficult to ascertain whether the design stipulation have been achieved or not. The Light Weight Deflectometer provides a measurement of the dynamic modulus of elasticity of the soil.
The crust thickness of flexible pavements in many countries including India is based upon the laboratory California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of soil. During construction it is very difficult to ascertain whether the design stipulation have been achieved or not. The Light Weight Deflectometer provides a measurement of the dynamic modulus of elasticity of the soil.
In-situ Evaluation soil subgrade using Dynamic cone penetrometer
light weight deflectometer.
ABSTRACT The crust thickness of flexible pavements in many countries including India is based upon the laboratory California Bearing Ratio (CBR). Test conduct to find the CBR of soil is very time consuming and sensitive to many parameters such as relative density, particleshape and texture, moisture content and confinement pressure etc. Thus during construction it is very difficult to ascertain whether the design stipulation have been achieved or not. In this study Light Weight Deflectometer (LWD) a handy and portable version of the falling weight deflectometer is used for evaluation of soil subgrade. The LWD provides a measurement of the dynamic modulus of elasticity of the soil that is comparable with Field CBR determined through dynamic cone penetration test(DCPT). This equipment i s recentl y used at the construction of approaches of high level bridge in Ludhiana district of Punjab state for i nsi tu eval uati on of soi l subgrade. The Light Weight Deflectometer (LWD) was developed in Europe to measure the in situ dynamic modulus of soils. The LWD is similar to the falling weight deflectometer (FWD) used for roadways, but is portable with a weight of approximately 15 kg to 25 kg, can be operated by 1 person and the test can be done in 1 to 2 minutes. During operation, the plate is first placed directly over level ground and 3 initial blows of the drop weight are given to ensure a close contact. A subsequent 3 drops of the weight are performed and the data acquisition system calculates the deformation (deflection) for each blow and the soils dynamic modulus Evd. A printout or downloadable trace of the accelerometer readings can then be generated (Figure 1). The dynamic soil modulus (Evd) is calculated by Equation 1, where r is the radius of the load plate, is the stress below the plate and s is the measured deflection or settlement.
E vd = 1.5 r / s [1]
Figure 1. Output from the LWD (Dynatest 3031)
Soil subgrade was tested at fifteen location and simultaneously samples were collected for laboratory testing of the soil during the actual construction at site. Index properties tests were first conducted on the subgrade samples in accordance with IS:2720-V to obtain the Atterbergs limits, including the liquid limit (LL), plasticity limit (PL) and plasticity index (PI). The index tests were followed by particle size analysis test on the samples as per IS:2720-IV test procedure. Based on the Atterberg limits and particle size test results, the subgrade samples were generally classified as MH, ML, SM, CL, or SC according to Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). The average LL and PI for the 15 subgrade soils was 23% and 19%, respectively. As expected, the sandy soils had smaller LL and PI values. IRC: 36-2010, considers MH soils as poor subgrades with high compressibility and high susceptibility to expansion. In addition, moisture- density tests were performed on the subgrade soils in accordance with IS: 2720-VIII, method to establish the maximum dry density and the optimum moisture content of the samples. Compaction curves obtained from the modified Proctor tests were used to define a target density and moisture contents at which the subgrade specimens were prepared for testing. The maximum dry density ranged from 16.8kN/m3 to 19.3kN/m3, with corresponding optimum water contents varying from 13.5% to 8.6%, respectively. As expected, the sandy soils samples had higher maximum dry densities and lower optimum moisture contents.
The correlation between Evd and degree of compaction varies with soil type and moisture content as well as with compactive effort. Table 1 illustrates the measured relationship between Evd and degree of compaction, as compiled by the German Road and Transport Research Association (FGVS 1997), for a broad range of soil types.
Soil Group Degree of compaction D Pr
Modulus of Resilence E vd
DIN 18 196 % MN/M 2
GW, GI, GU, GT as per ZTVE >103 60 GW, GI, GU, GT as per ZTVE 100 98 97 50 40 35 GE, SE, SW, SI 100 98 97 40 35 32 Mixed-grain soils: GU2, GT2, SU, ST i.e soil with kankar 100 98 97 35 30 25 Fine grained soils: U, T 97 25 Mixed grain soils GU, GT, SU, ST 95 20