LEARNING TEAM EVALUATION

LEARNING TEAM___B______ ASSIGNMENT NEW

PRODUCT LAUNCH MARKETING PLAN, PART III

WEEK____6_____

USING THE SCALE BELOW, INDIVIDUALLY RATE EACH MEMBER OF YOUR LEARNING TEAM, INCLUDING YOURSELF (PLEASE USE THE COLLABORATION GUIDE ON THE
NEXT PAGE FOR A MORE DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EACH CATEGORY).

4 = Excellent
Learning Team
Evaluati
on Form

3 = Good

2 = Fair

1 = Poor

0 = None

Team
Involvement

Time
Management

Establishing
and Following
Guidelines

Professional
Communication

Team
Contributions

Collaboration
Comments

(Active and
substantively
involved in the
team discussion)

(Supported team
timeline)

(Helped to define
and adhere to the
goals, roles, and
responsibilities of
the team)

(Communicated
clearly and
professionally)

(What did each team member

contribute to the assignment? What
value did that contribution add to
the completed assignment? )

(Please include any comments

describing why each person
received the collaboration score that
you gave them.)

score

score

score

score

comments

comments

Self Score
Phillip Gilbert

Team Member
Brittany
Devezin

Help to establish
breakdown of the
assignments each
week. Timely on
submitting portion to
team forums.

Took the lead on

starting some of the
weekly assigments.

Every member
communicated and
took part in each
assignment. Every
member turned in
their submissions on
time and no one had
to pick up the slack
for the other person.
The team stayed in
communication with
each other.
Every member
communicated and
took part in each
assignment. Every
member turned in
their submissions on
time and no one had
to pick up the slack

This form is designed to help in evaluating Learning Team collaboration expectations and performance. Substantive involvement in the Learning Team Collaborative Discussion
is defined as any posts or contribution that adds value to the overall discussion. This may include presenting new ideas, examples, perspective, or asking additional questions of
team members that help to further the overall team discussion. Students attending class at local campuses are encouraged to use the Online Learning Forums available in the
course eCampus page. They should also document any offline collaboration that is conducted in their Learning Teams.
February 2011

LEARNING TEAM EVALUATION

Team Member
Kelly Miles

Took the lead on

combining each
weekly assignment
and making sure they
were submitted on
time each week.

Help to establish
breakdown of the
assignments each
week. Timely on
submitting portion to
team forums.

Team Member
Govind
Narasimhan

Team Member
Brian Spies

Help to establish
breakdown of the
assignments each
week. Timely on
submitting portion to
team forums.

for the other person.

The team stayed in
communication with
each other.
Every member
communicated and
took part in each
assignment. Every
member turned in
their submissions on
time and no one had
to pick up the slack
for the other person.
The team stayed in
communication with
each other.
Every member
communicated and
took part in each
assignment. Every
member turned in
their submissions on
time and no one had
to pick up the slack
for the other person.
The team stayed in
communication with
each other.
Every member
communicated and
took part in each
assignment. Every
member turned in
their submissions on

This form is designed to help in evaluating Learning Team collaboration expectations and performance. Substantive involvement in the Learning Team Collaborative Discussion
is defined as any posts or contribution that adds value to the overall discussion. This may include presenting new ideas, examples, perspective, or asking additional questions of
team members that help to further the overall team discussion. Students attending class at local campuses are encouraged to use the Online Learning Forums available in the
course eCampus page. They should also document any offline collaboration that is conducted in their Learning Teams.
February 2011

LEARNING TEAM EVALUATION

Learning Team Collaboration Guide
Team
Involvement

Excellent (4)

Active and substantive

involvement in team
discussions.

Time
Management
Supported team timeline and
met the assignment due date.

Establishing and Following

Guidelines
Took the lead on establishing
and following the goals, roles,
and responsibilities of the team.

time and no one had

to pick up the slack
for
the other person.
Professional
The team stayed in
Communication
Interactedcommunication
with other members with
of the team
with a
respectful and
each
other.
professional tone.
Communication was clear with
no typographical or grammatical
errors.

Team Contributions
Please consider the following when providing individual and team feedback on contributions made to the assignment.
Interacted
other
members
1) Based on the contributions and collaboration for this assignment, should all team members
get thewith
same
grade?
If not, who
Supported a majority of the
of the team with a respectful and
Good should
overall substantive
Helped to establish and follow
get a different grade
(higher
or
lower)
and
why?
team timeline and met the
professional tone.
Good (3) involvement
in team
the goals, roles, and
2) What value
you did you add
to the completed
assignment
due date. product? How does that compare to your teammates?
Communication was clear with
discussion.
responsibilities of the team.
3) What can you, personally, do to improve future team collaborations?
minor typographical or
*Please review the Learning Team Collaboration Guide on the next page for a description of the expectations
for each category.
grammatical errors.

Fair (2)

Poor (1)

None (0)

Moderate substantive
involvement in team
discussion.

Supported some of the team

timeline and met the
assignment due date.

Followed the goals, roles, and

responsibilities of the team.

Interacted with other members

of the team with an informal
tone. Communication was
effective with minor
typographical or grammatical
errors.
Interactions with other members
of the team were disrespectful
and inappropriate at times.
Communication was poor with
numerous typographical or
grammatical errors.

Minimal substantive
involvement in team
discussion.

Did not support the team

timeline but still met the
assignment due date.

Did not always follow the goals,

roles, and responsibilities of the
team.

No substantive involvement in
team discussion.

Did not support the team

timeline .

Did not follow team goals, roles,

or responsibilities.

No communication.

This form is designed to help in evaluating Learning Team collaboration expectations and performance. Substantive involvement in the Learning Team Collaborative Discussion
is defined as any posts or contribution that adds value to the overall discussion. This may include presenting new ideas, examples, perspective, or asking additional questions of
team members that help to further the overall team discussion. Students attending class at local campuses are encouraged to use the Online Learning Forums available in the
course eCampus page. They should also document any offline collaboration that is conducted in their Learning Teams.
February 2011