Leadership and management are correlated with each other and there is always a relationship between each of them. According to me management can"t work without leadership and leadership can"t implement anything without management. I believe that leaders have to make the targets and make a blue print of all the skills which is needed to complete any task.
Leadership and management are correlated with each other and there is always a relationship between each of them. According to me management can"t work without leadership and leadership can"t implement anything without management. I believe that leaders have to make the targets and make a blue print of all the skills which is needed to complete any task.
Leadership and management are correlated with each other and there is always a relationship between each of them. According to me management can"t work without leadership and leadership can"t implement anything without management. I believe that leaders have to make the targets and make a blue print of all the skills which is needed to complete any task.
0Explain the relationship between leadership and management
Many people believe the words Management and Leadership mean the same thing. There is huge difference between the meaning, and thats what I am going to discuss in my essay and explain the difference between them. Leadership and management are correlated with each other and there is always a relationship between each of them. According to me management cant work without leadership and leadership cant implement anything without management
Leadership and management are two sides of coin, working together. Different authors and masters of management have different definitions. According to David Brent(1) management is the set of process that keeps an organisation functioning, whereas leadership is aligning people to the vision and motivating and inspiring others. Brent quotes that "Management is a set of processes that keep an organisation functioningThe processes are about planning, budgeting, staffing, clarifying jobs, measuring performance, and problem-solving when results do not go to plan." As I can relate to David Brent because I am a manger in a shop named Michaels drinks. its really hard to remain only functional and I have to look at so many things at one time. But I love having responsibility; I have to do the inventory and have to be transactional and transformational as well so that other employees can believe me and have trust in me. So on the other hand as well I have to look at the vision of our company as well so I can run according to the organisation DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT Definitions of some well-known authors and professors which tells management and leadership are correlated but not the same thing In my opinion Management is functionally while leadership is visionary this is further supported by John Kotter . Management is a set of processes that keep an organisation functioning. They make it work today they make it hit this quarter's numbers. The processes are about planning, budgeting, staffing, clarifying jobs, measuring performance, and problem-solving when results did not go to plan. "Leadership is about aligning people to the vision that means buy-in and communication, motivation and inspiration." I believe that leaders have to make the targets and make a blue print of all the skills which are needed to complete any task and then he can use the techniques which is planned by the managers and implement individually to the followers. According to Jonathan Gosling, professor of leadership studies at the University. "Target setting is a management technique used to focus attention on certain activities. A hospital, for example, might set targets around waiting times."
According to me Leadership have to be very clear, and leaders only can motivate the individuals and inspired them and they always looking for building relationship. Leadership needs to be clear and strategic, but it also needs to be collaborative both between and within organisations. According to Dame Mary Marsh. "It's crazy to think that you only need to lead when you're working at the top of an organisation you simply can't learn it all then because you'll be too busy doing it."
I believe that Managers are risk-averse, leaders appeared as risk-seeking, leaders are more comfortable in handling the risks and they use all the skills and experiment to overcome that. This is further supported by the website Changing minds diffen
According to Grace Murray Hooper, an American computer programmer and inventor wrote you manage things; you lead people However I believe that Leadership and management have a indirect link with each other. Leaders have to trust their subordinates. But having the trust, leader has to supervise as well so that they can maintain a control which can be beneficial for the manager and indirectly to the organisation. Leaders have to motivate their team, and manager Should try to interact with each other so that at the end of the day mangers may not know all employees but his employees certainly know him, and this keep the vision and mission always in mind. This is supported by the journal article about Rupert Murdoch. And this further supported by the ongoing debate in academic circles over the past 50-odd years relating to the correlation between leadership and management. They describe leadership as "the ability of an individual to influence, motivate, and enable others to contribute toward the effectiveness and success of the organizations of which they are members and management means comprises directing and controlling a group of one or more people or entities for the purpose of coordinating and harmonizing that group towards accomplishing a goal. This debate is supported by the (3)
RESPONSIBLITIES OF LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT 1) In my opinions Leaders create new visions and mission according to the organisation. While managers implement the tactical actions which are required for the organisation Leaders just establish the financial targets in respect with the organisation Managers have to look upon all the budgeting in detailed. Leaders mainly focus on the people about their interests . But as in a contrast I notify that there are some born leaders which can represent both as leader and manager this is further supported by the website (4)
For example Steve Jobs who is autocratic leader, but due to a really good vision about his vision he make apple brand as a cult so everyone want to work for that company. So sometimes leadership style is completely differ with the demand of the organisation. Leaders always have transformational style; they always try to change the environment by their skills and experiment they emphasize more individually. While managers have transactional styles they want everything done formally and they look to relate financially everything