Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 3, Issue 9, September 2013)
PG Student, 2Assistant Professor, 3Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, MITS, Madanapalle. Andhra Pradesh.,
INDIA.
Based on mode of operation brakes are classified as
follows:
Hydraulic brakes.
Electric brakes.
Mechanical brakes.
The mechanical brakes according to the direction of
acting force may be sub divided into the following two
groups:
1. Radial brakes.
2. Axial brakes.
I. INTRODUCTION
A brake is a device by means of which artificial
frictional resistance is applied to moving machine member,
in order to stop the motion of a machine. In the process of
performing this function, the brakes absorb either kinetic
energy of the moving member or the potential energy given
up by objects being lowered by hoists, elevators etc. The
energy absorbed by brakes is dissipated in the form of heat.
This heat is dissipated in to the surrounding atmosphere to
stop the vehicle, so the brake system should have the
following requirements:
1. The brakes must be strong enough to stop the vehicle
with in a minimum Distance in an emergency.
2. The driver must have proper control over the vehicle
during braking and the vehicle must not skid.
3. The brakes must have good ant fade characteristics
i.e. their effectiveness should not decrease with
constant prolonged application.
4. The brakes should have good anti wear properties.
383
Steps in ANSYS:
To solve any problem in ANSYS it mainly follows the
following steps. These are common steps to all problems
except material properties and type of analysis used.
1) Preliminary decisions
a. Analysis type
b. Model
c. Element type
384
3) Solution
a. Apply loads
b. Solve
4) Post processing
a. Review results
b. Check the validity of the solution.
= 774265.68 Joules
Step-2:
The total kinetic
Qg = 774265.68 Joules.
energy=
The
heat
generated
Step-3:
Area of the rubbing faces
A= 2 * (Do Di) * Dmin = p * t
= 0.01255 m2.
Step-4:
Heat Flux = Heat Generated / Second / Twice the
projected area
= 1927952.39 W/m2.
The analysis is done by taking braking efficiency 30%
and heat distributed from front and rear axle is 70:30
Heat Flux= 1927952.39 * 0.7
=1349566.673 w/m2
Heat absorbed by the brake = work done by the friction
force
E= Ft * * d * n * t
Ft= 4460.64N
VI. RESULTS
CarbonCarbon
Composites
Maraging
Steels
Cast
Iron
Density (Kg/M3)
1800
8100
7100
Youngs Modulus
(GPa)
95
210
125
Poisson Ratio
0.31
0.3
0.25
Thermal Conductivity
(W/M-K)
40
25.5
54.5
755
813
586
Coefficient of Friction
0.3
0.8
0.2
Properties
V2
385
Meshed Model
Maraging Steel
Cast Iron
Cast Iron
Carbon-Carbon Composites
Nodal Temperature
Displacement Vector Sum
386
Meshed Model
Maraging Steel
Nodal Temperature
Cast Iron
Nodal Temperature
Maraging Steel
387
Cast Iron
The table 2 gives the results of the three materials
Carbon-Carbon Composites, Maraging Steel and Cast Iron
proposed and shows that Maraging Steel gives less nodal
temperature value when the loads are applied. Therefore
Maraging Steel material is preferred over the existing
materials.
Nodal Temperature
VI. CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
388
389