Professional Documents
Culture Documents
b. If the answer is “No,” state the date of your last employment, the amount of your take-home salary or wages
and pay period and the name and address of your last employer.
3. In the past 12 twelve months have you received any money from any of the following sources?
a. Business, profession or other self-employment G Yes G No
b. Rent payments, interest or dividends G Yes G No
c. Pensions, annuities or life insurance payments G Yes G No
d. Disability or workers compensation payments G Yes G No
e. Gifts or inheritances G Yes G No
f. Any other sources G Yes G No
If the answer to any of the above is “Yes,” describe, on the following page, each source of money and state the
amount received and what you expect you will continue to receive.
USDCDC 1 OF 46
AO 240 Reverse (Rev. 10/03)
5. Do you own any real estate, stocks, bonds, securities, other financial instruments, automobiles or any other
thing of value? G Yes G No
6. List the persons who are dependent on you for support, state your relationship to each person and indicate
how much you contribute to their support. (If children are dependents, please refer to them by their initials)
NICHOLAS DEL RIO, SON, 710.00 PER MONTH, PER UNFINALIZED VOID ORDERS NO. 2000-27121
IFP permission granted in 98% of cases: (most recent) US Supreme Court Case No. 09-6398,
Tx Supreme Court Case No.s 08-0896 & 09-0702, US Federal Claims Case No. 09-130C
I declare under penalty of perjury that the above information is true and correct.
NOTICE TO PRISONER: A Prisoner seeking to proceed without prepayment of fees shall submit an affidavit
stating all assets. In addition, a prisoner must attach a statement certified by the appropriate institutional officer
showing all receipts, expenditures, and balances during the last six months in your institutional accounts. If you have
multiple accounts, perhaps because you have been in multiple institutions, attach one certified statement of each
account.
USDCDC 2 OF 46
EX PARTE
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
DEFENDANT(S)
US ATTORNEY GENERAL NAME(S)
ERIC HOLDER
THEIR ADDRESS
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,
Washington DC 20530-0001
CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE
PH 202-514-2000
EMAIL askdoj@usdoj.gov
COMPLAINT
DEFENDANT
DO NOT WRITE ON SAMPLE FORM
SET FORTH
THIRD PARTY THE FACTS OF YOUR CASE.
DEFENDANTS: 42 USC § 2000d-7; 28 USC § 2403;
Tracey Del Rio, Lois Hill, 42 USC § 1983; 42 USC § 421;
Spring ISD Special Services, 28 USC § 2254; 18 USC § 241 & 242;
ON THE
Denise LAST PAGE
Drexler, OF YOUR COMPLAINT, SPELL
Doug Warne, OUT§ THE
18 USC 1512 RELIEF
& 1513; YOU ARE
REQUESTING
Baylor CollegeFROM THIS COURT.
of Medicine, Bivens 403 U.S. 388;
Texas Children's Hospital, Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908),
Cole Speech & Language Center, Monell, 436 U.S. 658 (1978);
IF YOU
City ARE ASKING
of Houston, Juana FOR
Del A TRIAL BY JURY, YOU
Rio, MUST
Civil STATE
Rights Act THIS IN YOUR
of 1871 & 1964;
COMPLAINT.
Maggie Del Rio, Josefina Del Rio, FALSE CLAIMS, & 4th & 9th Amendments
2431 Pinpoint Drive Spring TX 77373,
Depelchin Family Center,
IF YOU
David ARE REQUESTING
Khaleq, Dollar GeneralA SPECIFIC
on AMOUNT OF MONEY, STATE THIS IN YOUR
COMPLAINT. Rd,
Rayford-Sawdust
Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations,
Ray & Myrna Gregory, Elizabeth Pagel,
(more to be added soon)
_______________________________
ORIGINAL SIGNATURE (IN PEN)
_
VICTOR DEL RIO
YOURPINPOINT
2427 NAME DRIVE
YOUR ADDRESS
SPRING, TX 77373
CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE
Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 520 (1971) Supreme Court found that pro se pleadings
should be held to "less stringent standards" than those drafted by attorneys.
USDCDC 3 OF 46
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
02. Article I, II, & III of the D.C. Constitution and under the 14th Amendment Section 3.
04. 42 USC § 2000c–8 (Personal suits for relief against discrim ination in public education)
05. 42 USC § 2000a–6 (Jurisdiction; exhaustion of other rem edies; exclusiveness of remedies; assertion of
rights based on other Federal or State laws and pursuit of remedies for enforcement of such rights)
11. D.C. CODE § 11-501. Civil jurisdiction. In addition to its jurisdict ion as a United States district court
and any other jurisdiction conferred on it by law, the United States District Court for the District of
(1) Any civil action or other matter begun in the court before the effect ive date of the District of
Columbia Court Reorganization Act of 1970 other than any matter over which the Superior Court of
(4) Any civil action (other than a matter over which the Superior Court of the District of Columbia
has jurisdict ion under paragraph (3) or (4) of section 11-921(a)) begun in the court during the thirty-
month period beginning on such effective date wherein the amount in cont roversy exceeds $50,000.
12. 5th Amendment of US Constitution: No person … be deprived of life, liberty, or p roperty, without due
process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
13. 9th Amendment of US Constitution: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be
construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. Ref Quo Warranto
USDCDC 4 OF 46
16. Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction And Enforcement Act ("UCCJEA") Section 204
All of which gives the HONORABLE DISTRICT COURT OF THE DISTRIC T OF COLUMBIA
COMPLAINT
17.
Now Comes PETITIONER, VICTOR DEL RIO, on behalf of SON and himself, both long term victims of
State and Federal Crimes (s ince 1996), suffering irreparable damages, retaliation (Title II and ADA 504
discrimination), denials and deprivations of their Civil Rights, and loss of life-libert y-propert y, as
Naturalist Citizens of the United States of America, who have not rescinded their Cit izenship to their
Country. Their Urgent Pleading for Redress for Grievances comes in the form of this COMPLAINT for
falsely diagnosed as symptomatic to Aut ism until PETITIONER'S discovery in early 2008
b. Parents divorced, standard custody until January 2006, then every other week custody,
c. School district (Spring Independent School District ) denies IDEA 2004 compliant F.A.P.E.
06) In mid 2007, Due Process against SISD is permitted but completely biased and prejudiced for SISD
09) From September through December 2007, PETITIONER home schools SON with amazing results and
10) In December 2007, PETITIONER requests another Due Process and files in local District Court for
USDCDC 5 OF 46
11) On December 16th, TRACEY DEL RIO denies SON and PETITIONER almost all conta ct until March
in order to prevent further HEARINGS which SON and PETITIONER had both decided to end to focus
on their new family business (com ic book publishing) combined, home schooling, and pursuing their
mutual dream.
12) Since December 16th to date, PETITIONER and SON have tolerated DISCRIMINATION (retaliation)
13) Since December 16th to date, PETITIONER and SON have tolerated Federal Torts,
14) Since December 16th to date, PETITIONER and SON have tolerated NO LEGAL REMEDY
in almost all Courts inc. Texas Supreme Court, U.S. Supreme Court, local Courts,
etc...
15) Since December 16th to date, PETITIONER and SON et al have learned ongoing DENIAL of IDEA
2004 Compliant F.A.P.E. and how to HANDLE and REMOVE PETITIONER are according to a
classified 'protocol' in the hands of SISD, their legal counsel Bracewell & Giuliani and Thompson &
16) PETITIONER and SO N, without any legal counsel, have been and are still facing immense legal
complexities:
a. Family Court issues – custody, child abuse, void orders, denial of Due Process,
b. Federal and State court issues – FALSE CLAIMS, F.T.C.A., Civil rights,
Constitutional dama ges, Torts, State Action Requirement, duo jurisdictions, et c...
18. Expedited Writ of Habeas Corpus (or Writ of Right) for return of SON suffering brain
b. Rules Gove rning Domestic Relations Proceedings (SCR-Dom. Rel.) Rule 64,
d. UCCJEA
19. Permission for PETITIONER to testify via Teleconference, Internet, Video, or locally to
USDCDC 6 OF 46
MAGISTRATE, to arrange # 01
21. Emergency local special sessions pursuant to DC ST § 11-911 (Emergency authority to conduct
proceedings outside Dist rict of Columbia) in a local Court since PETITIONER'S are residents of
Texas and bankrupted, denied gainful employment, denied their right ful share to proceedings
against former employer, (Pugh v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc., No. 4:07-CV-2869),
denied approx. 8 months of unemployment insurance by former employer, both forced to reside with
a. restricting their access to 'legal remedies' (by phone, internet, mail, etc...),
22. Expedited Motion to Vacate & Evidentiary Hearings on Unfinalized,Void Orders, No. 2000-
27121, from 2008 Custody Hearings which disregarded ALL TESTIM ONY and RIGH TS of
PETIONER and SON. Temporary Orders should replace TRACEY DE L RIO with VICTOR DEL
PETITIONER has not been permitted any conta ct or custody of SON, going on 1.5 years, to:
23. Proceed over (2) FTCA Forms submitted to US DOJ in mid-May 2009 without reply to date,
total $4 million
24. DEFENDANT's immediate cease and desist of tortious interference by or denials of legal duties owed to
USDCDC 7 OF 46
SON and PETITIONER by:
as it pertains to F.T.C.A.,
25. Damages currently total $4 million; however, PETITIONER is very willing to negotiate for the sake of
everyone's best interest – his SON, himself, home state, and country.
bar.
NOTE: PETITIONER REPEATEDLY MADE AWARE OF CONSPIRACY IN 2006 HAS BEEN PLANTING
EVIDENCE TO CONFIRM INVASION OF PRIVACY, CONSPIRACY, ACCUSATIONS OF BEING PARANOID
AND OR CRAZY,
USDCDC 8 OF 46
PRAYER
30.
The District of Columbia not being a State and is not represented in Congress; its officials are not part of
this action as D.C. holds a neutral posit ion. I, VICTOR DEL RIO, respectfully request our case to be heard,
directly or indirect ly through Supervisory Control or Writ of Mandamus, pursuant to Constitutional and
statutory provisions.
SIGNED _____________________________________________________________________
DEC 21, 2009
DATED_______Dec 19, 2009________________________
VERIFICATION
I, VICTOR DEL RIO, Sui Juris, hereby verify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United
States of America, without the “United States” (Federal government), that the above statement of facts and
laws is true and correct, according to the best of my current information, knowledge, and belief, and the
attached documents are true and exact copies of the originals with exception to necessary redaction or
DISTRICT
THIS PETITION is being mailed to the Clerk of the Honorable Court COURT OF
of the Superior THE
Court of the Dist rict
of Columbia and the DEFENDANT'S on this day of _____________ and month of_____________ in the year
2009.
SIGNED _____________________________________________________________________
DEC 19,
DATED_______Dec 21,2009________________________
2009
USDCDC 9 OF 46
TABLE OF CONTENTS
II. CO MPLAINT.........................................................................................................................................03
B. CO MPLAINT.............................................................................................................................05
D. NOTICE.....................................................................................................................................08
E. PRAYER....................................................................................................................................09
F. VERIFICATION........................................................................................................................09
V. CERTIFICATION OF JUDGEMENT...............................................................................................13
21st
USDCDC 11 OF 46
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
US ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,
Washington DC 20530-0001
PH 202-514-2000
EMAIL askdoj@usdoj.gov
21st
USDCDC 12 OF 46
v.
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
US ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,
Washington DC 20530-0001
PH 202-514-2000
EMAIL askdoj@usdoj.gov
USDCDC 13 OF 46
U&VFO 1 of 15
U&VFO 1 of 15 USDCDC 14 OF 46
U&VFO 2 of 15
U&VFO 2 of 15 USDCDC 15 OF 46
U&VFO 3 of 15
U&VFO 3 of 15 USDCDC 16 OF 46
U&VFO 4 of 15
U&VFO 4 of 15 USDCDC 17 OF 46
U&VFO 5 of 15
U&VFO 5 of 15 USDCDC 18 OF 46
U&VFO 6 of 15
U&VFO 6 of 15 USDCDC 19 OF 46
U&VFO 7 of 15
U&VFO 7 of 15 USDCDC 20 OF 46
U&VFO 8 of 15
U&VFO 8 of 15 USDCDC 21 OF 46
U&VFO 9 of 15
U&VFO 9 of 15 USDCDC 22 OF 46
U&VFO 10 of 15
U&VFO 10 of 15 USDCDC 23 OF 46
U&VFO 11 of 15
U&VFO 11 of 15 USDCDC 24 OF 46
U&VFO 12 of 15
U&VFO 12 of 15 USDCDC 25 OF 46
U&VFO 13 of 15
U&VFO 13 of 15 USDCDC 26 OF 46
U&VFO 14 of 15
U&VFO 14 of 15 USDCDC 27 OF 46
U&VFO 15 of 15
U&VFO 15 of 15 USDCDC 28 OF 46
USDCDC 29 OF 46
CLERK=S OFFICE CO-932
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Rev. 4/96
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
NOTICE TO PARTIES:
Pursuant to Rule 40.5(b)(2), you are required to prepare and submit this form at the time of filing any civil action which is
related to any pending cases or which involves the same parties and relates to the same subject matter of any dismissed related cases.
This form must be prepared in sufficient quantity to provide one copy for the Clerk=s records, one copy for the Judge to whom the
cases is assigned and one copy for each defendant, so that you must prepare 3 copies for a one defendant case, 4 copies for a two
defendant case, etc.
NOTICE TO DEFENDANT:
Rule 405(b)(2) of this Court requires that you serve upon the plaintiff and file with your first responsive pleading or motion
any objection you have to the related case designation.
Rule 405(b)(3) of this Court requires that as soon as an attorney for a party becomes aware of the existence of a related case
or cases, such attorney shall immediately notify, in writing, the Judges on whose calendars the cases appear and shall serve such notice
on counsel for all other parties.
_______________
A new case is deemed related to a case pending in this or another U.S. Court if the new case: [Check appropriate box(e=s)
below.]
A new case is deemed related to a case dismissed, with or without prejudice, in this or any other U.S. Court, if the new case
involves the same parties and same subject matter.
3. NAME THE UNITED STATES COURT IN WHICH THE RELATED CASE IS FILED (IF OTHER THAN THIS
COURT):
SEE NEXT PAGE
________________________________________________________________________________________________
4. CAPTION AND CASE NUMBER OF RELATED CASE(E=S). IF MORE ROOM IS NEED PLEASE USE OTHER SIDE.
SEE NEXT PAGE
____________________________________ v. ____________________________ C.A. No._________
DEC 21, 2009
_________________________ _______________________________________________
DATE Signature of Plaintiff /Defendant (or counsel) USDCDC
CO-392
301OF
OF46
2
PAGE 30
FAMILY COURT 311TH
01. VICTOR DEL RIO V. TRACEY DEL RIO, NO. 2008-02476 (DISMISSED)
02. VICTOR DEL RIO V. TRACEY DEL RIO, NO. 2008-03143 (DISMISSED)
03. TRACEY DEL RIO V. VICTOR DEL RIO, NO. 2000-27121 (CONTESTED)
APPEALS - STATE
04. VICTOR DEL RIO V. TRACEY DEL RIO, NO. 01-08-00993-CV, DENIED ALL RELIEF
05. VICTOR DEL RIO V. DOUG WARNE INDIVIDUALLY ...,
NO. 01-08-00993-CV, DENIED ALL RELIEF
06. VICTOR DEL RIO V. ELIZABETH PAGEL, NO. 01-08-00993-CV, DENIED ALL RELIEF
07. In re VICTOR DEL RIO, NO. 01-08-00993-CV, DENIED ALL RELIEF
CIVIL COURT
07. N. DEL RIO, bnf VICTOR DEL RIO V. SPRING INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,
NO. H073937, UNHEARD, TRACEY DEL RIO INTERFERED WITH WITNESS
08. USA V. CITY OF HOUSTON, HARRIS COUNTY & TEXAS, NO. 2009-17355, DENIED ALL
RELIEF-DECLARED VEXATIOUS LITIGANT-PENDING MOREHEARINGS IN 2010.
Hon. Judge Randy Wilson, Court Phone: (713) 368-6230
09. UNKNOWN, FALSE CHARGES OF HIRING HOOKER HANDLED BY EX-EMPLOYER (FTCA claim)
10. UNKNOWN, FALSELY CHARGED WITH THEFT BY ANOTHER EX-EMPLOYER (FTCA claim)
FEDERAL COURT
10. VICTOR DEL RIO V. DENISE DREXLER & TRACEY DEL RIO, NO. 409MC00076,
DENIED ALL RELIEF except IFP
11. VICTOR DEL RIO V. TRACEY DEL RIO, NO. 409MC00076, WANT OF JURISDICTION
12. VICTOR DEL RIO V. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, NO. H-09-1651, HEARINGS IN MARCH
2010, DENIED ALL RELIEF except IFP
US SUPREME COURT
14. VICTOR DEL RIO V. TEXAS et al, NO. 09-6398, DENIED ALL RELIEF except IFP
OTHER
18. CPS cases in 2007-2008 No.s 26492443 & 26550760 confirm SON is being neglected,
nervous and frightened (having been in his mother's custody for weeks after she
suddenly discontinues PETITIONER'S every other week custody (since 2006) & home
schooling (from Sep 2007 - Dec 16 2007), symptoms of mental retardation, agents
suspicion TRACEY is lying about PETITIONER, DENISE DREXLER is listed as
COLLATERAL CONTACT but redacted from reports, earlier copies FALSELY ACCUSE
PETITIONER having meth lab near home,
USDCDC
CO-392
312OF
OF46
2
PAGE 31
EX PARTE
In 2006, she openly asked my ex-wife, Tracey Del Rio, if our son, Nicholas, would need
Since that time, there have been attempts on my life and liberty: twice in February 2008
Denise Drexler is obviously collaborating with Family Judge Warne who has removed all
my parental rights and access to my son. I’ve since filed a Sect 1983 case against him in
This leaves me no choice but to file suit for the safety of me and my son. I’ll trust you look
1 of 2 USDCDC 45 OF 46
2 of 2 USDCDC 46 OF 46