Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Indicate an issuer’s potential financial loss from over-the-counter debt derivatives (swaps, caps,
collars) due to early termination resulting from credit or economic reasons.
§ Used to enhance the transparency of municipal derivative structures & the impact on credit
quality
§ Swap dependent issuers (mostly housing and structured financings) do not have DDP scores
since ratings on these transactions already incorporate cash flow stress testing of all derivative
risks.
§ Derivatives entered into to generate revenue or relieve rate pressures are seen as gambling on
interest rates and are viewed negatively in the overall analysis.
Scoring System:
(Low Risk) 1 2 3 4 5 (High Risk)
2) Counterparty Risk
Based on the risk that a counterparty will default and terminate a swap and the issuer will lose
a positive swap valuation, thereby diminishing its ability to replace its hedge position.
4) Management Risk
Based on S&P’s assessment of management experience and the quality of its swap and debt
management plan.
* Each of the factors are scored on a scale of 1 to 5, and in most cases equally weighted at
25%. The DDP equals the weighted average score of the factors.
§ Issuer Rating & Outlook: Indicates tolerance for a high DDP score
§ Swap Exposure: Absolute level of involvement with swaps, it will determine overall importance
of the DDP score (total derivative notional divided by total debt outstanding)
§ Value-at-risk versus Reserve Levels: Stress test for the potential worst-case market value loss
resulting from a derivatives trade
§ Net Variable Rate Exposure: Potential risk to an issuer’s revenue stream and reserve levels
resulting from rising interest rates