John Henry Smith

PO BOX 123
ANYWHERE, UTAH 84000
________________________________________________________________________
FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
STATE OF UTAH
_______________________________________________________________________
)
in Admiralty
FIRST NATIONAL BANK
)
Case # 1234
Plaintif
)
)
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF
v.
)
NOTICE OF John Henry Smith
)
AS AMICUS CURIAE REGARDING
JOHN H SMITH
)
COMMERCIAL NOTICE
Defendant
)
APPOINTMENT OF FICUDIARY
)
DEBTOR
JOHN H SMITH
)
3rd Party Plaintif
)
v.
)
)
WILLIAM JONES 1234
)
3RD Party Defendant
)
John Henry Smith, Real Party in
)
Interest, agent
)
1.

The UNITED STATES is operating in a chapter 11 reorganization

bankruptcy (see Exhibit A, attached).

2.

JOHN H SMITH is a US vessel operating in commerce.

3.

WILLIAM JONES 1234 is a US vessel operating in commerce.

4.

The UNITED STATES is the holder of the principal obligation for all US
vessels.

5.

The FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT is a court in Admiralty and

enforces the bankruptcy of the UNITED STATES and all US vessels which
are in the bankruptcy (see Exhibit B, attached).

6.

All courts of the UNITED STATES operate in fiction and with fictions and are
color of law (see Exhibit C, attached).

7.

William Jones 1234, an attorney, is operating ultra vires in the public (see
Exhibit D, attached).

8.

All debt issues are of necessity in the Admiralty/Maritime jurisdiction as

there is no money in circulation in commerce, that is, there is no in law
remedy for debt possible. Since there is no in law remedy for any court
action involving debt, then Civil No.:
1234 must be in Admiralty
jurisdiction, and must be a colorable action dealing with legal fictions and

titles. The Fiduciary Debtor in this matter appears to be making a seizure

of substance, i.e., the labor/capital of John Henry Smith. This court
operating in Admiralty/bankruptcy cannot reach parity with John Henry
Smith, a living breathing, sentient being. The attempts for seizure of
substance remedy by William Jones 1234 is in the nature of involuntary
servitude and peonage as against a real man, a non-fiction. This is known
as piracy (see Exhibit E and G, attached).
9.

William Jones 1234 is misbehaving as an agent for a foreign entity causing

injury in the public (see Exhibit F, attached).

10.

In the matter of any debt owing to FIRST NATIONAL BANK, John Henry
Smith has already exerted a UCC remedy by Acceptance, but said
creditor has failed to produce the product of their offer. William Jones
1234 has created a tort with knowledge.

____________________________________
John Henry Smith

_______
date

EXHIBIT A
United States Congressional Record March 17, 1993 Vol. #33, page H-1303
Speaker-Senator James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House: Mr.
Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11. Members of Congress are official
trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt entity
in world history, the U.S. Government. We are setting forth hopefully, a
blueprint for our future. There are some who say it is a coroners report
that will lead to our demise.
It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has
been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1,
Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and
insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress in session June 5, 1933 - Joint
Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause
dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official
capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and
Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal
Government exists today in name only.
The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International
Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International
Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are
now operating within a de facto status in name only under Emergency War
Powers. With the Constitutional Republican form of Government now
dissolved, the receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of
government for the United States. This new form of government is known
as a Democracy, being an established Socialist/Communist order under a
new governor for America. This act was instituted and established by
transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that
of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564,
page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part: The U.S. Secretary of Treasury
receives no compensation for representing the United States.
United States Congressional Record May 4, 1992, page H 2891, Senator
and Chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on Banking,
Finance and Urban Afairs, Senator Henry Gonzalez (Texas) speaking on
NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL THIEVERY IN HIGH PLACES We are
bankrupted. We are insolvent on every level of our national life, whether it
is corporate, whether it is just plain you and I out there with the life of
debt that we have all piled up, private debt, credit cards and what not, or
whether it is the government. We are insolvent. How long will it take
before that nasty Mega-truth is conveyed?
United States Congressional Record January 19, 1976, page 240 Marjorie
S. Holt (Maryland): Mr. Speaker, many of us recently received a letter
from the World Afairs Council of Philadelphia, inviting members of
Congress to participate in a ceremonial signing of A Declaration of
INTERdependence on January 30 in Congress Hall, adjacent to
Independence Hall in Philadelphia. A number of Members of Congress
have been invited to sign this document, lending their prestige to its

theme, but I want the record to show my strong opposition to this

declaration. It calls for the surrender of our national sovereignty to
international organizations. It declares that our economy should be
regulated by international authorities. It proposes that we enter a New
World Order that would redistribute the wealth created by the American
people. Mr. Speaker, this is an obscenity that defiles our Declaration of
Independence, signed 200 years ago in Philadelphia. We fought a great
Revolution for independence and individual liberty, but now it is proposed
that we participate in a world socialist order. Are we a proud and free
people, or are we a carcass to be picked by the jackals of the world, who
want to destroy us? When one cuts through the high-flown rhetoric of this
Declaration of INTERdependence, one finds key phrases that tell the
story. For example, it states that The economy of all nations is a seamless
web, and that no one nation can any longer efectively maintain its
processes of production and monetary systems without recognizing the
necessity for collaborative regulation by international authorities. How do
you like the idea of international authorities controlling our production
and our monetary system, Mr. Speaker? How could any American
dedicated to our national independence and freedom tolerate such an
idea? ....America should never subject her fate to decisions by such an
assembly, unless we long for national suicide. Instead, let us have
independence and freedom....If we surrender our independence to a new
world order........,we will be betraying our historic ideals of freedom and
self-government. Freedom and self-government are not outdated. The
fathers of our Republic fought a revolution for those ideals, which are as
valid today as they ever were. Let us not betray freedom by embracing
slave masters; let us not betray self-government with world government;
let us celebrate Jeferson and Madison, not Marx and Lenin.
A dollar is a measure of weight defined by the Coinage Act of 1792 and
1900 which is still in force today. A dollar specifies a certain quantity,
24.8 grains of gold, or 371.25 grains of silver. In Blacks Law Dictionary,
sixth Edition, Dollar: The money unit employed in the United States of
the value of one hundred cents, or of any combination of coins totaling
100 cents. Cent: A coin of the United States, the least in value of those
now minted. It is the hundredth part of a dollar.
Gold and silver were such a powerful money during the founding of the
united states of America, that the founding fathers declared that only gold
or silver coins can be money in America. Since gold and silver coinage
were heavy and inconvenient for a lot of transactions, they were stored in
banks and a claim check was issued as a money substitute. People traded
their coupons as money, or currency. Currency is not money, but a
money substitute. Redeemable currency must promise to pay a dollar
equivalent in gold or silver money. Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) make no
such promises, and are not money. A Federal Reserve Note is a debt
obligation of the federal United States government, not money. The
federal United States government and the U.S. Congress were not and
have never been authorized by the Constitution for the united states of
America to issue currency of any kind, but only lawful money, -gold and
silver coin.

It is essential that we comprehend the distinction between real money and

paper money substitute. One cannot get rich by accumulating money
substitutes, one can only get deeper into debt. We the People no longer
have any money. Most Americans have not been paid any money for a
very long time, perhaps not in their entire life. Now do you comprehend
why you feel broke? Now, do you understand why you are bankrupt,
along with the rest of the country?
Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) are unsigned checks written on a closed
account. FRNs are an inflatable paper system designed to create debt
through inflation (devaluation of currency). When ever there is an increase
of the supply of a money substitute in the economy without a
corresponding increase in the gold and silver backing, inflation occurs.
Inflation is an invisible form of taxation that irresponsible governments
inflict on their citizens. The Federal Reserve Bank who controls the supply
and movement of FRNs has everybody fooled. They have access to an
unlimited supply of FRNs, paying only for the printing costs of what they
need. FRNs are nothing more than promissory notes for U.S. Treasury
securities (T-Bills) - a promise to pay the debt to the Federal Reserve
Bank.
There is a fundamental diference between paying and discharging a
debt. To pay a debt, you must pay with value or substance (i.e. gold, silver,
barter or a commodity). With FRNs, you can only discharge a debt. You
cannot pay a debt with a debt currency system. You cannot service a debt
with a currency that has no backing in value or substance. No contract in
Common law is valid unless it involves an exchange of good & valuable
consideration. Unpayable debt transfers power and control to the
sovereign power structure that has no interest in money, law, equity or
justice because they have so much wealth already.
Their lust is for power and control. Since the inception of central banking,
they have controlled the fates of nations.
The Federal Reserve System is based on the Canon law and the principles
of sovereignty protected in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. In fact,
the international bankers used a Canon Law Trust as their model, adding
stock and naming it a Joint Stock Trust. The U.S. Congress had passed a
law making it illegal for any legal person to duplicate a Joint Stock
Trust in 1873. The Federal Reserve Act was legislated post-facto (to
1870), although post-facto laws are strictly forbidden by the Constitution.
[1:9:3]
The Federal Reserve System is a sovereign power structure separate and
distinct from the federal United States government. The Federal Reserve
is a maritime lender, and/or maritime insurance underwriter to the federal
United States operating exclusively under Admiralty/Maritime law. The
lender or underwriter bears the risks, and the Maritime law compelling
specific performance in paying the interest, or premiums are the same.
Assets of the debtor can also be hypothecated (to pledge something as a
security without taking possession of it.) as security by the lender or

underwriter. The Federal Reserve Act stipulated that the interest on the
debt was to be paid in gold. There was no stipulation in the Federal
Reserve Act for ever paying the principle.
Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free
and clear of any liens or mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913)
Hypothecated all property within the federal United States to the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve,-in which the Trustees (stockholders)
held legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a
beneficiary of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the federal
United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties,
assets and labor of their subjects, the 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to
the Federal Reserve System.
In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend the federal United
States corporation all the credit money substitute it needed. Like any
other debtor, the federal United States government had to assign
collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. Since
the federal United States didnt have any assets, they assigned the
private property of their economic slaves, the U.S. citizens as collateral
against the unpayable federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated
federal territories, national parks forests, birth certificates, and nonprofit
organizations, as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been
transferred as payment to the international bankers.
Unwittingly, America has returned to its pre-American Revolution, feudal
roots whereby all land is held by a sovereign and the common people had
no rights to hold allodial title to property. Once again, We the People are
the tenants and sharecroppers renting our own property from a Sovereign
in the guise of the Federal Reserve Bank. We the people have exchanged
one master for another.
This has been going on for over eighty years without the informed
knowledge of the American people, without a voice protesting loud
enough. Now its easy to grasp why America is fundamentally bankrupt.
Why dont more people own their properties outright? Why are 90% of
Americans mortgaged to the hilt and have little or no assets after all debts
and liabilities have been paid? Why does it feel like you are working
harder and harder and getting less and less?
We are reaping what has been sown, and the results of our harvest is a
painful bankruptcy, and a foreclosure on American property, precious
liberties, and a way of life. Few of our elected representatives in
Washington, D.C. have dared to tell the truth. The federal United States is
bankrupt. Our children will inherit this unpayable debt, and the tyranny to
enforce paying it.

EXHIBIT B
It is known that most insurance is a tontine scheme, and its therefore forbidden by
law. Although insurance is basically a private enterprise rather than government,
when the government became a corporation (National Recovery Act etc. in the FDR
administration), the government then became involved in private and commercial
enterprise. The commerce clause Art I Sec. 8, which gives Congress the power to
regulate commerce between the states, also invokes admiralty law as "the Law of
Nations)... on Land and Water." Yet the 1st Continental Congress itself had entered a
complaint against England "which ... extend the powers of Admiralty courts beyond
their ancient limits." When the government embarked on its nationwide
tontine scheme, the Social Security Administration and its accompanying
"insurance policies," the courts of the nation were thereby converted into
Admiralty courts. " A policy of insurance is a maritime contract and therefore of
admirality jurisdiction." De Lovio v. Boit, 7 Fed. Chs. No 3.7766 (1815).

COURTS DEAL WITH FICTIONS-EXHIBIT C

"Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a
creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial
persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from
creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that
no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself
with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between
them."
S.C.R. 1795, Penhallow v. Doane's Administraters 3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54

EXHIBIT D
THE NATURE OF LAWYER-CRAFT IN AMERICA
I.

II.

III.

IV.

AS PER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT;

A. The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State Schware v.
Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239
B. The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT! ( Sims v.
Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925))
The "CERTIFICATE" from the State Supreme Court:
1.
ONLY authorizes,
A.
To practice Law "IN COURTS" As a member of the STATE JUDICIAL
BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT.
B.
Can ONLY represent WARDS OF THE COURT, INFANTS, PERSONS
OF UNSOUND MIND (SEE CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM, VOLUME 7,
SECTION 4.)
C.
"CERTIFICATE" IS NOT A LICENSE to practice Law AS AN
OCCUPATION, nor to DO BUSINESS AS A LAW FIRM!!!
The "STATE BAR" CARD IS NOT A LICENSE!!!
A.
It is a "UNION DUES CARD" .
B.
The "BAR" is a "PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION." 1. Like the Actors
Union, Painters Union, etc. 2. No other association, EVEN DOCTORS,
issue their own license. ALL ARE ISSUED BY THE STATE.
C.
It is a NON-GOVERNMENTAL PRIVATE ASSOCIATION.
The State Bar is;
A.
An Unconstitutional Monopoly.
B.
AN ILLEGAL & CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE;
C.
Violates Article 2, Section 1, Separation of Powers clause of the
Constitution.
D.
There is NO POWER OR AUTHORITY for joining of Legislative, Judicial, or
Executive within a state as the BAR is attempting. BAR members have
invaded all branches of government and are attempting to control de
jure government as agents of a foreign entity!
E.
It is quite simple to see that a great fraud and conspiracy has been
perpetrated on the people of America. The American Bar is an offshoot
from London Lawyers' Guild and was established by people with

V.

invasive monopolistic goals in mind. In 1909 they incorporated this

TRAITOROUS group in the state of Illinois and had the State Legislature
(which was under the control of lawyers) pass an unconstitutional law
that only members of this powerful union of lawyers, called the ABA,
could practice law and hold all the key positions in law enforcement
and the making of laws. At that time, Illinois became an outlaw state
and for all practical purposes, they seceded from the United States of
America.
The BAR ASSOCIATION then sent organizers to all the other states and
explained to the lawyers there how much more profitable and secure it would
be for them, as lawyers, to join this union and be protected by its bylaws and
cannons. They issued to the lawyers in each state a charter from the Illinois
organization. California joined in 1927 and a few reluctant states and their
lawyers waited until the 1930's to join when the treasonous act became DE
FACTO and the Citizen's became captives. Under this system, the lawyers
could guarantee prejudged decisions for the privileged class against the
lower class. This was all made possible by the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION
to favor the right and have unlawfully substituted them in place of
Constitutional Laws. The Constitution was written in plain English and the
Statutes passed by Congress were also in plain English, with the intent of
Congress how each law should be used and not the opinions of various Judges
as the codes list. Any normal person can read the Constitution and Statutes
and understand them without any trouble. The public in California was
shocked to learn that the State Government has no control or jurisdiction over
the Bar Association or its members. The state does not accredit the law
schools or hold Bar examinations. They do not issue state licenses to
LAWYERS. The Bar Association accredits all the law schools, holds their
private examinations and selects the students they will accept in their
organization and issues them so-called license but keeps the fees for
themselves. The Bar is the only one that can punish or disbar a Lawyer. They
also select the lawyers that they consider qualified for Judgeships and various
other offices in the State. Only the Bar Association or their designated
committees can remove any of these lawyers from public office. The State
Legislature will not change this system as they are also a designated
committee of the Bar. On August 21, 1984, Rose Bird, Chief Justice of the
California State Supreme Court, another of the Bar Associations Judicial
Committee's, stated in essence that the Bar should determine the legality of
all initiatives before they were allowed to go on the ballot. This is contrary to
both State and Federal Constitutions, as well as the Laws of this Nation
instituted By and For the People as a Sovereign UNITY of Independent States
of We The People, not a fraudulent Corporate entity of Lawyers. This is a
tremendous amount of power for a PRIVATE union that is incorporated and
headquartered in Illinois to hold over the Citizens of California or any other
state. The only recourse is through this initiative process and vote by the
people. After the Founding Fathers had formed the Constitution, outlining the
laws as to the way our government was to be run, Thomas Jefferson said, in
essence, "This proves that plain people, if given the chance, can enact laws
and run a government as well as or better than royalty and the blue bloods of
Europe." The American people must stop thinking that lawyers are better
than they are and can do a better job than they can before the courts of
America. Under the Common Law and the Laws of America, no where is it
expressly given for anyone to have the power or the right to form a

VI.

VII.

Corporation. Corporations are given birth because of ignorance on the part of

the American people and are operating under implied consent and power
which they have usurped and otherwise stolen from the people. By RIGHT
AND LAW THEY HAVE NO POWER, AUTHORITY OR JURISDICTION, and must be
put out of business by the good Citizens of America in their fight for
FREEDOM
The U.S. Constitution GUARANTEES to every state in this union a REPUBLICAN
FORM of government. Any other form of government is FORBIDDEN. No
public officer or branch of government can be limited to a RULING CLASS of
any kind, or the states become ARISTOCRACIES and NOT republics. Also, the
lawyers have made themselves 1st Class Citizens, where many public offices
and branches of government are open to lawyers only. All other people are
limited to only two branches of government and to only certain offices in
those two branches of government, making all people who are non-lawyers
into 2nd class subject citizens. When the courts belong to the people, as the
United States Constitution REQUIRES, (Article IV, Section 4, we the people,
will NEVER rule against themselves.) In these Unconstitutional courts foreign
tribunals (hoodlum centers), "men" in black dresses, that are Unconstitutional
ROBES OF NOBILITY. (Article 1, Section 9 and 10) dispense a perverted
ideology, where the people are terrorized by members of the BLACK ROBE
CULT (lawyers and lawyer judges in the courtrooms). The legislative branch
of government does NOT have the Constitutional Power to issue Court Orders
or any other kind of Orders to people, as a fiction court or a court/corporation
for profit and gain cannot reach parity with a lawful man. ONLY presidents
and governors have the Constitutional Power to grant PARDONS, but lawyers
and lawyer-judges are unconstitutionally granting PARDONS with "immunity
from prosecution." Citizens are not permitted to act like people in the courts.
The Citizen (2nd class) is told that he does not know how to fill out fancy
lawyer forms; that he is not trained in the law; that he does not know court
rules and procedures; etc. This is Unconstitutional "lawyer system," only
HEARSAY SUBSTITUTES (lawyers) NOT under oath, have access to the
fiction/for profit and gain courts, even though ONLY sworn testimony and
evidence can be presented in court. Anything else is Bill of Attainder, NOT
permitted under the U.S. Constitution (Article 1, Sections 9 and 10). The U.S.
Constitution does NOT give anyone the right to a lawyer or the right to
counsel, or the right to any other HEARSAY SUBSTITUTE. The 6th Amendment
is very SPECIFIC, that the accused ONLY has the right to the ASSISTANCE of
counsel and this ASSISTANCE of counsel CAN BE ANYONE THE ACCUSED
CHOOSES WITHOUT LIMITATION.
LAWYERS and LAWYER-JUDGES: Created Unconstitutional "lawyer system"
pre-trial "motions" and "Hearings" to have eternal EXTORTIONISTIC
litigations, which is BARRATRY and also is in violation of the U.S. Constitution,
and Article 1, as this places defendants in DOUBLE JEOPARDY a hundred
times over. Defendants only have a right to A TRIAL, NOT TRIALS. When a
criminal is freed on a TECHNICALITY, HE IS FREED BECAUSE OF A FIX and a
PAY-OFF, as a defendant can only be freed if found innocent BY A JURY NOT BY
ANY "TECHNICALITY." Whenever a lawyer is involved in a case directly or
indirectly, as a litigant or assisting in counsel, ALL LAWYER-JUDGES HAVE TO
DISQUALIFY THEMSELVES, AS THERE CANNOT BE A CONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL
and also there would be a violation of the conflict of interest laws, along with
the violation of separation of powers and checks and balances, because
"OFFICERS" OF THE COURT ARE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BENCH. These same

VIII.

IX.

LAWYER-JUDGES are awarding or approving LAWYER FEES, directly and

indirectly, amounting to BILLIONS OF DOLLARS annually, all in violation of
conflict of interest laws. As long as there are lawyers, there will never be any
law, constitution or justice. There will only be MOB RULE, RULE BY A MOB OF
LAWYERS.
CASE "LAW" IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL: As CASE "LAW" IS ENACTED BY THE
JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT. When a lawyer-judge instructs, directs,
or gives orders to a jury, the lawyer-judge is TAMPERING WITH THE JURY. He
also tampers with testimony when he orders the answers to be either "Yes" or
"No." The lawyer-judge also tampers, fixes, and rigs the trial when he orders
anything stricken from the record, or when he "rules" certain evidence and
the truth to be inadmissible. This makes the trial and transcript FIXED and
RIGGED, because the jury does not hear the REAL TRUTH and ALL THE FACTS.
Juries are made into puppets by the lawyers and lawyer-judges. All lawyers
are automatically in the judicial branch of government, as they have the
Unconstitutional TITLE OF NOBILITY (Article 1, Section 9 and 10), "Officer of
the court." Citizens have to be elected or hired to be in any branch of
government but non-lawyer Citizens are limited to only 2 of the 3 branches of
government. Lawyers as 1st class citizens, can be hired or elected to any of
the three branches of government. Lawyers, "Officers of the Court," in the
Judicial Branch, are Unconstitutionally in 2 branches of government AT THE
SAME TIME whenever they are hired or elected to the executive or legislative
branches. This is a violation of the separation of powers, checks and
balances, and the conflict of interest laws. District attorneys and State's
attorneys have taken over the Grand Juries FROM the people, where the
people are DENIED ACCESS to the grand juries when they attempt to present
evidence of crimes committed in the courtrooms by the lawyers and lawyerjudges. The U.S. Constitution, being the Supreme Fundamental Law, is not
and CANNOT be ambiguous as to be interpreted, or it would be a worthless
piece of paper and we would have millions of interpretations
(Unconstitutional amendments) instead of the few we have now. That is why
all judges and public servants are SWORN TO SUPPORT the U.S. Constitution,
NOT interpret it.
Under INTERNATIONAL ORDERS: ALL LAWYERS, whether they left law school
yesterday or 50 years ago, are EXACTLY THE SAME. All lawyers have to file
the same motions and follow the same procedures in using the same
Unconstitutional "lawyer system". In probate, the lawyers place themselves
in everyone's will and estate. When there are minor children as heirs, the
lawyer-judges appoint a lawyer (a child molesting Fagin) for EACH CHILD and,
at times, the lawyer fees EXCEED the total amount of the estate. An
OUTRAGEOUS amount of TAX "MONEY" is directly and indirectly STOLEN BY
LAWYERS. Money that is budgeted to County Boards, School Boards and
other local and federal agencies eventually finds its way into the pockets of
lawyers, as ALL of these agencies are "TRICKED" and "FORCED" into ETERNAL
EXTORTIONISTIC LITIGATION.

Admiralty Claim EXIHIBIT E

Jurisdiction: In international law and according to the law of the land, agents of a
foreign principal are required to file any pretended claim in the appropriate district
court prior to exercising rights to that claim. The district courts have "exclusive
original cognizance" of all inland seizures and this includes vessels in rem (Rule
C(3)) such as trust organizations and legal names (abbreviated name. Nomen,
PETITIONER NOMEN, Respondent, Paul O'Neill, John Snow etc.) "...the United
States, ... within their respective districts, as well as upon the high seas; (a) saving
to suitors, in all cases, the right of a common law remedy, where the common law is
competent to give it; and shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all
seizures on land,..." The First Judiciary Act; September 24, 1789; Chapter 20, page
77. The Constitution of the United States of America, Revised and Annotated Analysis and Interpretation - 1982; Article III, 2, Cl. 1 Diversity of Citizenship, U.S.
Government Printing Office document 99-16, p. 741.
This fact of protocol - filing a claim in district court according to international law - is
beyond dispute and extends into antiquity: "Meanwhile those who seized wreck
ashore without a grant from the Crown did so at their peril." Select Pleas in the

Court of Admiralty, Volume II, A.D. 1547-1602; Introduction - Prohibitions, Note as to

the early Law of Wreck, Selden Society, p. xl, 1897. Even the IRS recognizes the
protocol:
"Place for filing notice; form. Place for filing. The notice referred to in subsection (a)
shall be filed -- with the clerk of the district court. In the office of the clerk of the
United States district court for the judicial district in which the property subject to
the lien is situated..." Title 26 U.S.C. 6323.
The issue is simple. Agents of a foreign principal are required to file their complaint
in the appropriate district court prior to exercising any claim against a man on the
land. This is international and common law.
There is no excuse for the arbitrary and capricious attorney actions - debt action in
assumpsit - that have confronted good men and women since the Banker's Holiday.
Roosevelt implemented a "voluntary compliance" national debt (upon the States by
Governor's Convention) but utilized the 1917 Trading with the Enemy Act to compel
citizens of the United States to comply. The substitution of citizen of the United
States for the German nationals on this land was against Stoehr v. Wallace, 255 U.S.
239 (1921) where the Court clearly expresses "The Trading with the Enemy Act,
originally and as amended, is strictly a war measure..." - directly citing the
Constitution Article I, 8, clause 11. The war on the Great Depression 1) does not
count and 2) would only last the duration of the emergency if it did.

The US is Still a British Colony EXHIBIT F

The 1783 Treaty in conjunction with the 1787 Constitution. The States, by
prescription from the King, by Treaty, hold the land for the King under Legislative
enactment because they are His corporations. They in turn, parcel out the land to
other corporations, and aliens (you) because you are an alien friend allowed to only
hold the land in TAIL for your use, but the King still owns it and the State is his
agent. Got to remember people that Statute "De Donis" converted all such estates
fee simple to estates tail. Did not know that did you? So why is it that you get a
document stating in fee simple? Because they slyly made you a CORPORATE SOLE,
but not like the King. That is why the United States, the corporator of all the states
into a Union can control all the land it owns and if a State cedes land from its
corporate domain to the corporate United States the King still owns it and that is
why we are considered by the States as "corporation sole" for that is the only way

they can collect a tax. Remember Butler v Godley where you are considered two
characters? Remember that legal entity, corporate, name on your IMF. Remember
the CP 55 UK/US Treaty designation and only corporations can be taxed? Why does
the IRS come after you using a CP 515, 516, 517 and 518 notices which are only
designed for a BUSINESS Entity? Are you a corporate person of artificial character
called a "resident" in legal terms, thereby being a "citizen" (26 CFR 1.1-1 and 26
USC sec. 1) in "joint-venture" and therefore a subject "to the jurisdiction thereof"
because you are presumed to be a corporate sole for taxing purposes because you
have the privilege of living on the Kings land held in trust by the corporate State
and United States? You are also in fee simple so that after your body dies the
Corporate Sole still lives on.
Our fore fathers were, in effect, at the mercy of their business ventures with lands
and assets coming to them as a result, and also any lands or rem property they may
have inherited from their ancestors. Why? Well as a matter of settled English
common law, anyone declared to have committed treason, automatically forfeited
any estates or rem property to the king, without a trial. Everyone of our fore fathers
that signed the Declaration of Independence were declared traitors and were to be
hung if found by British troops. Also, after independence was so called won,
everyone swearing their new allegiance to the United States became aliens also,
subject to have their estates forfeited to the king, when a senior land holder died
and Office found. So ask yourself. Did the king have any leverage over our fore
fathers when they negotiated the 1783 Peace Treaty? Is this why even though we
said we won in the history books the king granted us the lands in America. Does the
defeated country ever grant lands to the victor, or do they not always become
property of the Conqueror? This fact along with the above and below court cases
prove, because English common law was not defeated and retained by the new
states, the king's corporations continued unchanged. All that took place was a
reorganization of the king's corporations he set up in America, into individual state
corporations, who transferred their corporate sovereignty over to the United States.
The war was over in 1781, the Treaty was signed in 1783, the United States
Corporation was officially started in 1787. However, the king signed off on its
creation. Read the 1783 Treaty again, the United States corporation is mentioned
four years before it was chartered and the 6th section was added as a condition for
the fore fathers not to lose their estates, and as a matter of quid quo pro, the kind
not forfeit his holdings and corporation, and thanks to English common law being
recognized in the States the fore fathers knew there was nothing they could do
about it, but play word games to cover it up. Patrick Henry recognized their game,
using such terms as "We the People" or the united States being change to United
States. Mr. Informer, I think this would be a good place to inject the following case,
HAMILTON v. BROWN, 161 U.S. 256 (1896). Now those of you in Texas or in other
States that claim to be in a Republic not subject to the laws or jurisdiction of the
state in which you live, you better reserve judgment for just a minute longer. I know
those in Texas claiming they live in a Republic truly believe this, but you have not
seen the debilitating fact of the Republic of Texas claiming English common law.
Where English common law exists, so does the king's corporation, and all grants
stemming there from. Sorry, but it is true, this trumps every argument except one.
A grant of land preceding the king's incorporation, the grant from God Almighty that
all men are tenants on His land, and are to be stewards of it. Any man cannot own
the land as the king and Pope claim, they are only receivers of the grant from God
Almighty like all men, co equal.

"if an ALIEN could acquire a permanent property in lands, he must owe an

allegiance, equally permanent with that property, TO THE KING OF ENGLAND, which
would probably be inconsistent with that which he owes to his own natural liegelord;
What is inconsistent with your natural liege-lord? The king. So the court stated that
the King of England is not your natural liege-lord. The Lord's property is His and
under the same principle, YOU, being the steward of the land under the Almighty's
command of His word, cannot allow the same thing that the King is claiming. The
king is the alien to our true liege-lord and it is he and the State and the United
States corporate sole's that are in conflict with the Almighty's contract with man at
Genesis 17:1-9. So can we, as stewards of the Almighty's property allow these
aliens to claim the land that is permanently our property to protect? Does our liegelord say we have to pay a property tax on land he gave us? Don't you think this is a
good start to rid us of this Satan controlled garbage called the Pope, The King, The
State, The United States, The County, The Townships, the legislators and worst of all
the "Woe be unto you Lawyers?" Do this and why do you need a "republic?" It, in
legal terms, is a commercial bunch of people because it is a commonwealth and
that my dear people will put you right back on the path to where you are now and
history will repeat itself over and over again. Look at all the "de jure Republics being
formed all across the country.

EXHIBIT G
In the United States the first development noted is the 1966 merger of the old
General Admiralty Rules into the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Though several
commentators made predictions concerning the effects of unification upon the
substantive law of admiralty, it was not until the late 1970s that the admiralty Court
began to exercise with any measurable regularity the power to administer equitable
remedies in admiralty cases. The delay may seem strange, especially in light of the
quite rapid effects of the 1938 merger of the Equity Rules into the first Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure. But the late depression era was one of great social
activism on the part of the Federal government, and this faded seamlessly
into wartime legislation which appropriated control of private property.
The District courts under the new FRCP were quickly forced by the volume of
litigation into the wholesale application of equitable remedies in actions at law.
The 1936 merger of law and equity left no loose ends; the procedure is entirely
uniform regardless of the nature of the remedy prayed, though of course issuance of
an injunction requires at least an ex parte hearing in chambers. The 1966 merger,
however, leaves six special Supplemental Admiralty Rules appended to the
body of the FRCP, and in order to apply those Supplemental Rules it is
necessary that the complaint specifically invoke the jurisdiction of the
admiralty side of the Court, so as to ensure that the action does not
proceed on the law side, if the common law is competent to supply an in
personam remedy in the particular case. The efect of this has been to
perpetuate an artificial distinction between the law and admiralty sides
of the Court, whereas the distinction between the law and equity sides
has long since disappeared. The equitable power of the American Admiralty
Court had earlier been held to derive from the first Judiciary Act of 1789; in the
words of the late and colorful Chief Judge John R. Brown of the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Judicial Circuit:
The Chancellor is no longer fixed to the woolsack. He may stride the quarterdeck of maritime jurisprudence and, in the role of admiralty judge, dispense, as
would his land-locked brother, that which equity and good conscience impels.
But the American Admiralty Court has been slow to begin to wield the equity power,
which it has always had, and usage of which the 1966 merger was clearly intended
to facilitate.
Unfortunately the remedial authority of the Admiralty Court has been complicated
by the second American development the 1985 amendments to the
Supplemental Admiralty Rules with respect to the issuance of in rem and
quasi in rem process. The problem arose because of a line of decision which
emerged in the 1970s in cases of attachment of property under State law, where
the defendants argued successfully that in having their property under State law,
where the defendants argued successfully that in having their property seized
without a prior hearing they were deprived of property without the due process of
law which is guaranteed by the 5th Amendment to the Constitution. It did not take
long for challenges to be mounted to the constitutionality of maritime attachment
under FRCP Supp. Rule B and arrest in rem under FRCP Supp. Rules C. A few Federal
District Judges were swayed by the argument and declared Rule B attachment
and/or Rule C arrest unconstitutional without a hearing prior to issuance of the
warrant; the remaining District Judges confronted with the question and a majority
in all of the Circuit Courts of Appeal found the traditional procedure constitutional,
deftly grasping that the Constitutions grant of Admiralty jurisdiction carried with it
the essentials of procedure as historically applied in maritime cases, and for a
Federal district court sitting in Admiralty that procedure constituted due process of
law. However, the consensus of opinion within the Maritime Law Association of the
United States which had filed briefs amicus curiae supporting the traditional
procedure in several of the cases and was even granted oral argument in one
pivotal case involving rule C 17 was that the risk of a reversal by the U.S. Supreme

court should be insured against, and it proposed amendment to Supp. Rules B and C
requiring judicial scrutiny prior to issuance of a warrant and to Supp. Rule E to
provide for prompt post-seizure hearing. The amendments were adopted by the
Supreme Court and entered in effect in 1985.
Beyond doubt the 1985 amendments were wiser than playing judicial roulette
they have effectively ended the debate over the constitutionality of arrest and
attachment proceedings in admiralty. But they have also added a new and quite
different requirement in order to employ traditional process in the admiralty Court.
The price paid for security has not been entirely limited to the additional time and
paperwork of the new procedures.