Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Since the very beginning, Kohinoor has been a trendsetter, setting the
pace and direction for Pakistan’s textile industry. It has always been a
leader in yarn products and its “Telephone” brand yarn is always
leading the yarn market.
Group Profile
HISTORY
This is 1948, Pakistan, just a few months old, has yet to see a
cultivator of its parched industrial scene. Saigols having inherited the
business tradition from their forefathers an erstwhile family of trades
in Calcutta, have chosen Lyallpur (Later named Faisalabad) as their
base. Taking the initiative, they are setting up under the umbrella of
Kohinoor Industries Limited, the country’ first major textile mill –
Kohinoor Textile Mills in Lyallpur.
Let’s come to 1950, KTM, with a unique edge of location in the heart of
cotton growing area of Pakistan, has started its production with a
humble capacity of 25,000 spindles. But through a rapid process of
consolidation and expansion extending over a few years it grew into a
prestigious giant of 147,000 spindles and 2,300 Auto power Looms,
with Latest facility for bleaching, mercerizing, continuous dyeing, and
roller printing, finishing including Eva set and a large make up
department to handle its production.
It was a very strong group and enjoyed leadership up till 1965 and
after it began to become financially weak. In 1971 nationalization
started by Bhuto and this industry took a lot of
loan from the government and ran only on loans, this was the reason
government did not nationalization it.
In 1984, the top management decided to produce only yarn in order to
meet expenses. However during 80s it was given many loans and once
again it becomes profitable for owners, but in 90s owners took no
interests.
PRESENT STATUS
COMPANY INFORMATION
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
COMPANY SECRETARY
AUDITORS
BANKERS
REGISTERED OFFICE
Tel.6306133
RAW MATERIAL.
Cotton
Heathers
99% Carded Cotton / 1% Black Poly Open End 6/1 - 30/1
95% Carded Cotton / 5% Black Poly Open End 6/1 - 30/1
90% Carded Cotton / 10% Black Poly Open End 6/1 - 30/1
85% Carded Cotton / 15% Black Poly Open End 6/1 - 30/1
80% Carded Cotton / 20% Black Poly Open End 6/1 - 30/1
Product line
COMBED YARN
20/1 CMD
72/1 CMD
52/1 CMD
80/1 CMD
CARDED YARN
20/1 CD
32/1 CD
24PC CD
30PC CD
40PC CD
LOCAL CITIES.
Potential market
COMPETITOR
LOCAL MARKETS
FOREIGN MARKETS
Bangla Deish
India
China
Competitor Analysis
Sales Analysis
Sales/
Sales Sales Emp Largest
Company (blns) Growth (US$) Region
Kohinoor Industries
1.937 1.1% N/A N/A
Limited
Dewan Textile Mills
2.604 14.3% 18,031 N/A
Limited
Bhanero Textile Mills
1.439 10.0% 18,239 N/A
Limited
Apollo Textile Mills
1.098 13.3% 18,729 N/A
Limited
Stock Performance
In recent years, this stock has performed terribly. In fiscal year 1996,
the stock traded as high as 15.75 Pakistan Rupees, versus 1.80
Pakistan Rupees on 11/15/02. (In 1996, the stock retreated
significantly from its high, and by the end of the year was at 3.75
Pakistan Rupees).
Wk
Pr
Book Sales Chg
Kohinoor
Industries 11/15/02 N/A N/A 0.03 N/A
Limited
Dewan
Textile Mills 9/10/02 23.8 0.75 0.20 N/A
Limited
Bhanero
Textile Mills 10/30/02 4.7 0.57 0.15 N/A
Limited
Apollo Textile
10/21/02 14.3 0.19 0.04 N/A
Mills Limited
Dividend Analysis
This company has paid no dividends during the last 12 months. The
company also reported losses during the previous 12 months.
Kohinoor Industries Limited last paid a dividend during fiscal year
2000, when it paid dividends of 0.60 per share.
Profitability Analysis
Financial Position
Financial Positions
LT
Debt/ Days
Company Year Equity AR
Kohinoor Industries
2001 0.25 68
Limited
Dewan Textile Mills
2001 0.47 62
Limited
Bhanero Textile Mills
2001 0.19 47
Limited
LOCATION OF PLANT
It has an area of about 120 acres and has residence for employees and
other facilities for them within the mills.
MISSION STATEMENT
Vision
Mission
Values
"Honesty, integrity, and hard work."
Principles
"People, relationships, customer, citizenship, innovation, and results."
People
Kohinoor’s philosophy is to attract, develop, and retain the best
people. We focus on growing and developing these people through
continued education, training, and work experience. The safety and
well-being of our employees are primary corporate objectives.
Relationships
We strive to establish and maintain honest relationships with all
stakeholders in the company. This is to include employees,
shareholders, customers, suppliers, and the communities in which we
live. These relationships are to be founded on mutual trust, mutual
respect, and mutual benefit.
Citizenship
In the communities in which we live and the industry in which we
work, we will actively strive to contribute to a better environment for
everyone.
Innovation
In an ever-changing marketplace, new products, services, and
technologies are the lifeblood of our business. We recognize our
responsibility to be a leader in product, technology, and in the
marketplace. We will provide a culture that encourages, nurtures, and
recognizes innovation.
Results
The tools used by both internal and external analysts are the same.
But the purpose for carrying out the analysis is different. The tools
used by the analysts are as follows.
Ratio Analysis
Trend Analysis
Common Size Analysis
♠RATIO ANALYSIS♠
I) LIQUIDITY RATIOS
YEARS:
INDICATES:
This reveals there is no margin by which firm’s current assets cover its
short-term obligations (C. L) And firm is not able to pay its bills as
they come due. Negative Net Working Capital means, the risk of the
firm is very high but is does not mean that the firm is insolvent.
2 = CURRENT RATIO
FORMULA:
CURRENT ASSETS
CURRENT LIABILITIES
YEARS:
874,650
2,356,576
969,756
2,321,818
INDICATES:
A relatively low current ratio in both years represents that the liquidity
position of the firm is not good and the firm is not able to pay its
current liabilities in time without facing difficulties. Because against the
liability of RS. 1 the company has less than 50% of current sources
and in the year 2001 the ratio further decreased by 0.05%. The overall
situation of regarding Current Ratio is very bad.
FORMULA:
QUICK ASSETS
CURRENT LIABILITIES
YEARS:
293,828
2,356,576
436,184
2,321,818
INDICATES:
FORMULA:
CURRENT LIABILITIES
YEARS:
95,205
2,356,576
132,783
2000 = ------------ = 0. 06 : 1
2,321,818
INDICATES :
This ratio shows that the company has 0. 04-paisa worth of absolute
liquid assets for one rupee worth of current liabilities .The company is
needed to improve 0. 46% to cover the standards of 0. 5 : 1.
OVERALL FINDINGS
The liquidity ratios of the company shows the inability to pay the
current liabilities . As Quick Ratio , Current Ratio and Absolute Quick
Ratio are all below the standards.
1) PROFIT RATIOS
FORMULA:
= -------------------------------------------- X 100
SALES
GROSS PROFIT
= --------------------- X 100
SALES
YEARS:
304,195
1,936,795
323,170
1,915,878
INDICATES:
The lower gross profit margin shows that the firm has not controlled
over the cost of goods sold and higher the relative cost of merchandise
sold.
FORMULA:
NET PROFIT
------------------ X 100
SALE
(Due to Loss;
NET LOSS
--------------- X 100
SALES
YEARS:
( 92,272 )
1,936,795
205,664
1,915,878
INDICATES:
But in 2001, the negative ratio indicates that the management has low
efficiency in controlling operating expenses of the firm.
FORMULA:
OPERATING PROFIT
---------------------------- X 100
SALES
YEARS:
130,926
1,936,795
150,520
1,915,878
YEARS:
INDICATES:
We know that Operating Profits are” Pure” because they measure only
the profits earned on operations and ignore any financial and
government charges (Interest and Taxes).
SO, here operating profit is very low which shows that the firms other
expenses are too much higher excluding interest and taxes.
2) EXPENSES RATIOS
FORMULA:
--------------------------------X 100
SALES
YEARS:
1,632,600
1,936,795
1,592,708
1,915,878
INDICATES:
Both ratios are relatively high. It shows the selling cost of one unit is
above than 80% of selling price of one unit, so firm has not control
over the cost of units sold and it is the basic reason for lower profit.
B = OPERATING RATIO
FORMULA:
-----------------------------------------------------------X 100
SALES
YEARS:
1,805,869
1,936,795
1,765,358
1,915,878
INDICATES:
Above the standard and higher operating ratios shows the lower
operating profit and operational inefficiency of the business.
INDICATES:
The lower the ratio, the greater is the profitability and higher the ratio,
lower is the profitability.
Therefore, in 2000, due to lower ratio company gain some profit but in
2001, due to higher ratio company bears net loss in spite of profit.
A= RETURN ON EQUITY
FORMULA:
(Due to Loss;
YEARS:
(92,272)
2001 = ------------X 100 = (18.81%)
490,421
205,664
2000 = ------------X 100 = 41.94%
490,421
INDICATES:
In 2000, a high return on equity reflects the firm’s acceptance of
strong investment opportunities and effective expense management.
But in 2001, negative figure due to net loss indicates the vice versa
situation.
B= RETURN ON INVESTMENT
FORMULA:
(Due to Loss;
YEARS:
(92,272)
2001 = -------------X 100 = (2.14%)
4,317,410
205,664
2000 = -------------X 100 = 4.55%
4,515,314
INDICATES:
This ratio has not great importance to the present and prospective
shareholders, because higher the firms return on investment, the
better.
FORMULA:
YEARS:
(92,272)
2001 = --------------X 100 = (8.09%)
1,140,434
205,664
2000 = -------------- X 100 = 18.03%
1,140,434
INDICATES:
Notice that earnings per share have decreased and become negative in
2001.We knows that common stockholders consider a decline in
earnings per share to be an unfavorable development.
A decline in earnings per share generally represents a decline in the
profitability of the company and creates doubt as to the company’s
prospects for future growth.
OVERALL FINDINGS
FORMULA:
YEARS:
356,919
2001 = ------------ = 1: 1
288,596
457,791
2000 = ------------ = 1: 1
288,596
INDICATES:
The ratio in this case is 1: 1 which means that all the shareholders
equity will be used up in paying the debts of the existing creditors and
there is no coushin for the potential creditors.
FORMULA:
YEARS:
356,919
2001 = ------------ = 0. 73 : 1
490,421
457,791
2000 = ----------- = 0. 93 : 1
490,421
INDICATES:
This ratio indicates that for every each Rs. 1, the outsiders have .73-
cent claims against the firm’s equity.
In 2001, the firm declines their Long Term Debts and therefore, claims
become 0.93 to 0.73 cent against the firm’s equity.
FORMULA:
TOTAL DEBT
---------------------
TOTAL ASSETS
YEARS:
2,713,495
2001 = -------------- = 0.62 : 1
4,317,410
2,779,609
2000 = -------------- = 0.62 : 1
4,515,314
INDICATES:
This ratio tells us that 62% of the firm’s assets are financed with debt,
while the remaining 38% of the financing comes from shareholders
equity.
This indicates that the company has financed above to half of its
assets (Fixed + Current) with debts.
FORMULA:
YEARS:
356,919
2001 = ------------- = 0.08 : 1
4,317,410
457,791
2000 =------------- = 0 . 10 : 1
4,515,314
INDICATES:
Because of the declining rate of the Long Term Debts in 2001, the
fixed assets are financed with only 0.08% of total worth. It reveals
that mostly current assets are used for financing fixed assets which is
not a good indication for investment purposes.
OVERALL FINDINGS
FORMULA:
NET SALES
--------------------------------------
AVERAGE ACCOUNT RECEIVABLE
FOR AVERAGE)
YEARS:
1,936,795
2001 = ------------- = 8. 10 Times
239,065
1,915,878
2000 =------------- = 6.67 Times
287,066
INDICATES:
In 2001, receivable turnover ratio improved by 1: 43 Time than 2000
year. It shows that for the attainment of better position management
improved their efficiency in respect of receivables and the length of
operating cycle becomes shorter.
FORMULA:
YEARS:
360
2001 = ----------- = 44 Days
8.10
360
2000 = --------- = 54 Days
6.67
NOTE:
INDICATES:
Our above calculations show that only 44 Days in 2001and 54 Days in
2000 are required for the collection of Debts.
Now, if the management takes a time less than 44 or 54 Days for the
collection of Debts then the management is efficient and otherwise not
efficient.
In 2001, average collection period decreased by 10 Days, it means;
management becomes more efficient for the collection of receivables.
FORMULA:
FOR AVERAGE)
YEARS:
1,632,600
2001 = --------------- = 7.14 Times
228,718
1,592,708
2000 = -------------- = 8.46 Times
188,257
INDICATES:
It shows that the inventories are sold 8 Times in 2000 and 7 Times in
2001. So, in 2001 ratio tells us over investment in inventories and a
dull business.
FORMULA:
YEARS:
360
2001 = ------------ = 50 Days
7.14
360
2000 = ------------ = 43 Days
8.46
INDICATES:
The trend indicated by this analysis is unfavorable, since the length of
time required for Kohinoor Industries to turnover (sell) its inventory is
increasing.
OVERALL FINDINGS
Managerial Efficiency Ratios signifies that the management takes
special steps for the collection of Account Receivables and improved
their efficiency in this respect. But for the management of inventory,
there is a lack of control.
V) COVERAGE RATIOS
FORMULA:
YEARS:
153,290
2001 = ------------- 0.88 Times
175,153
220,670
2000 = ------------- = 1.93 Times
114,479
INDICATES:
The measurement tells us that it is impossible for the company could
cover its interest payments without difficulty.
COMMON-SIZE ANALYSIS
Net sales or revenues divide an analysis of percentage financial
statements where total assets and all income statement items divide
all balance sheet items.
INDEX ANALYSIS
An analysis of percentage financial statements where all balance or
income statement figures for a base year equal 100.0 (percent) and
INTERPRETATION
In 2001, Kohinoor Industries pays both long-term loans and liabilities
against assets subject to finance lease, therefore deferred liabilities
decreased by 92% to 84%.
In assets side, we see that there is no improvement in fixed assets
and current assets significantly declined by 88% to 79%.
The above both situations show that company uses the current assets
for the payment of debts. It is the basic reason of declining the rate of
short-term investment. We know that co. made short-term investment
only in this case, if current assets increased by safety margins, but
there is no indication of safety margin.
In 2001, cash and cash in hand decreased, because receivables and
inventories have inverse relationship.
INTERPRETATION
INTERPRETATION
In vertical analyses, we see that over the three-year span, the
percentage of long-term loan continuously decreased and in 2001, the
long –term loans are only 8.27% of total assets. Although, decreasing
trend of long-term loans is favorable, which shows the value of total
assets increased, but its good impact becomes less because of the
increasing trend of the current portion of long-term liabilities and
short-term loans. It shows that company delays its payments and
further borrows for its liabilities & operations.
On the assets side, operating assets are 48.2% of total assets in 2001,
it shows that operating assets are increased but it is not a fact. The
LIABILITIES 1999 2000 2001 1999 2000 2001
INTERPRETATION
Overall company bears a net loss at the end of income year because of
financial expenses. In 2001, financial expenses increased by 3% and
become 9.04% of total sales.
It is the alarming situation that company should control their expenses
and take the improvement in the their efficiency.
Ǽ
NOW,
FROM
INTER NET
Stock Performance
Sales Analysis
Profitability Analysis
(A): ALL ITEMS ADJUSTED FOR STOCK SPLITS OR DIVIDENDS - 15% IN FIS 95
(D): EARNINGS PER SHARE ESTIMATED USING NET INCOME AFTER PREFERRED
DIVIDEND DIVIDED BY THE YEAR END SHARES OUTSTANDING OR THE LATEST
SHARES AVAILABLE
Dividend Analysis
ANALYSIS SUMMRY
A): ALL ITEMS ADJUSTED FOR STOCK SPLITS OR DIVIDENDS - 15% IN FIS 95
(D): EARNINGS PER SHARE ESTIMATED USING NET INCOME AFTER PREFERRED
DIVIDEND DIVIDED BY THE YEAR END SHARES OUTSTANDING OR THE LATEST
SHARES AVAILABLE
Financial Position
Financial Positions
LT Debt/ Days
Company Year Equity AR
Kohinoor Industries Limited 2001 0.25 68