You are on page 1of 4

H J AMES J OHNSON

HUMAN RIGHTS § CIVIL RIGHTS § CORRUPTION § MEDIA


D EFA M AT I O N § P R O F E S S I O N A L N E G L I G E N C E L AW
1 S T F L O O R 1 4 1 O S B O R N E S T R E E T S O U T H YA R R A V I C T O R I A 3 1 4 1
TELEPHONE: +613 9279 3932 FA C S I M I L E : + 6 1 3 9 2 7 9 3 9 5 5

Wednesday 14 October 2009 *** IMPORTANT COMMUNICATION


*** PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
Dr Timothy Entwisle
Timothy J Entwisle Pty Ltd
32 Highett Street
Richmond Victoria 3121

By Facsimile: 9421 3855 (... pages)


And by Registered Mail (with attachments)

Dear Dr Entwisle

VICTORIAN SUPREME COURT PROCEEDINGS 9665 OF 2007, 9263 AND 10222 OF 2008
AND 3731 AND 3366 OF 2009
1. I refer to my previous letters, including my last being dated 15 September 2009 (copy
attached).
2. I am disappointed that you do you appreciate the kindness in the second chance that I
offered to you.
3. As I have indicated repreatedly, I am very much focused on exposing the lack of ethics
and standards, and criminal conduct of these members of my own legal profession.
Hence my offer of amnesty if you were up to it.
4. I shall now be making formal complaints about your lack of professional competence and
lack of professional ethics. I shall now be making formal complaints to the Medical
Practice Board and the Psychiatrist Registration Board. I shall leave it to your
professional bodies to sort out the situation with you. I hope they do not prove as
incompetent as my own professionol bodies have proven. I merely reference the
Victorian State Ombuddsman's 2008-09 damning report on the Victorian Legal Services
Commissioner and Legal Services Board, the joint CEO of which has since resigned in
disgrace and I trust will soon face criminal charges over her reign of failure.
5. Should the Medical Practice Board and the Psychiatrist Registration Board not sort you
out, I still have several years within the statututes of limitiations to initiate legal
proceedings against you.
6. For the record:

Page 1
(a) In May this year I was examined by a highly competent and ethical psychiatrist, and
cleared of all malicious suggestions of any diagnosable psychiatric illnesses.
(b) this May 2009 dianosis was extremely robust given that this was not an independent
examination – the psychiatrist had been lopsidedly and maliciouslly infected by being
briefed with the incompetent and malicious reports separately prepared by David List
(Eighth Defendant by Counterclaim) and yourself, without being given the accurate and
balance reports separately prepared by psychologists Michael Clairbrough and Marianne
Love.
(c) this May 2009 report concluded (by reason of the aforementioned contamination) that I
may suffer from some narcisstic personality symptoms – a fair call that would apply with
varying degrees of severity to almost all members of the legal profession (as per recent
press reports of statements by the Federal and State Attorney-Generals) – despite me
being at the lower end of the narciss pool compared to my professional peers.
7. In your report you noted that Ms Cressy's domestic violence towards her children (as per
eye witness, police and psychiatric hospital records) was “vivid and disturbing.”
(a) Dr List's report was “vivid and disturbing” for trivialising and covering up for the
Court the seriousness of Ms Cressy's domestic violence (and other criminal activities that
Ms Cressy admitted to him during the preparation of his report).
(b) Your testimony in Court, contradicting your written report, by saying that there was
nothing out of the ordinary about Ms Cressy's domesticc violence towards her children etc
etc is a “vivid and disturbing” indictment of you too.
8. In the May 2009 report clearing me of all malicious mental illness allegations, the eminent
psychiatrist notes as a limitation of his report that according to his proper clinical methods
he would normally not rely just on an interview of the reviewee but would seek out an
interview of a credible third person who has long known the reviewee and could speak of
their moods and personality traits over that long period.
(a) that is exactly the flaw that I identified to Dr List (Eighth Defendant by Counterclaim)
and yourself.
(b) worse, you diagnosed (hurriedly, understatedly but with accuracy consistent with the
February 2009 judgements of a Supreme Court Judge) that Ms Cressy was a person well
practised in deception. Your diagnosis was much stronger than even David List's
begrudging acknowledgement that she had lied to him also.
(c) Nevertheless and in a 180 degree direction from 'proper clinical methods' you made a
diagnosis of me based on malicious self-serving and criminally defamatory lies that Ms
Cressy made up about me. Your future as a practising psychiatrist looks very dim, Tim.

Page 2
(d) I note that of all of the mental health reports prepared in this wicked little saga, only
the report by Pschologist Michael Clairbrough passed that proper clinical methodology. I
bet that Greg Norman is wishing that his ex-wife of 2 decades had any of the many nice
things to say about him that my ex-wife of 2 decades has to say about me.
9. Your report, like David Lists, was little more than a false propaganda paper to promote
the malicious and criminally defamatory lies of a very mentally ill Ms Cressy. Your report
might have been less so if you at least had had the professionalism to stick by it in the
witness box. As I say, looking dim, Tim.
10. In your report you write that I lack “insight”. Well there's a lot of insight that comes from
trying to help and heal someone who has gone through as much emotional and
psychological abuse as someone like Ms Cressy, and all the while trying to help, protect
and heal her (already damaged) children. Good samaritans, humble humanitarians don't
necessarily need legal, medical or psychiatric degrees.
11. I attach a copy of an article from last Sunday Age's Sunday Magazine – 'what I know
about men.'
12. What a great story. What an amazing and courageous woman. This is the story of a 46
year old woman who was raped at knifepoint as a 21 year old. “Sometimes you can take
on the vision of women the abuser had, and start to apply it to yourself [and others, allow
me to add] without even recognising it. I've spent years and years trying to stop that. The
most dangerous thing is it finds a home in your own mind...”
13. Now imagine being a fatherless 4 year old girl, daughter of a mostly absent 23 year old
single mother whose future mental health (depression), alcohol and substance abuse
(prescription drugs) maybe haven't yet become significant. Now imagine being dropped
off by mum at a childcare centre every morning, where you are sexually abused every day
by the husband of the woman who runs the centre. Only you singled out for abuse, or
other girls and boys too? Nobody knows since the abuse didn't come to light until 11
years later when, a troubled adolescent, Ms Cressy dropped out of school aged 15
pregnant with her first of three children to three different men, and already starting her
criminal record for petty crimes of violence. Now picture that Ms Cressy, playing out that
vision that her abuser had, as a 15, 16, 17 year teenage prostitute (moving into “legal”
brothels as a 17 year old. Servicing the sexual abuses of 6 – 10 men a day whilst
1,2,3,4,5,6 and even 7 months pregnant with the second and third of her three children.
14. Why do you think I worked so hard, tolerated so much to try to protect Ms Cressy's
children from being dragged down that same dark path in life? Obviously, the only way I
could help them (bearing in mind that all 3 regard me as their 'daddy' from very tender

Page 3
ages and I am allegedly the biological father of the youngest of the three and the second
youngest was always raised to believe that I was his biological dad too).
15. I think that there is room to regard Ms Cressy's audacious fraudulent blackmail claims
against me (coming after years and years of threats, abuses, violence, burglaries and
blakcmails) as 'explicable' (not forgiveable, but 'explicable') on grounds of mental illness.
16. But what excuses are there for this clutch of family law lawyers, family law judges, and
hangers on like yourself and David List?
17. There are no excuses. These are inhumane crimes against children. Crimes for which I
will do everything within my powers and within the laws to have you all held 100% legally
accountable. How many more children have you dirty rotten bastards hurt like this? I'm
no Simon Rosenthal but I'll do my best to find out.
18. I expect to receive your written apology and professional resignation (or disqualification)
in the very near future, you shameful, filthy, stinking quack.

Regards

JAMES JOHNSON

Page 4

You might also like