You are on page 1of 6

PSYCHOLOGY OF PREJUDICE

(PSY 4324)
FALL 2007
THURSDAYS 7:00 – 10:00PM
GR4.301

INSTRUCTOR: Salena Brody, Ph.D. EMAIL: Salena.brody@utdallas.edu

OFFICE HOURS: Please email to arrange an appointment.

REQUIRED READINGS:

(1) Plous, S. (Ed). (2003). Understanding Prejudice and Discrimination. San Francisco: McGraw Hill.

(2) Supplementary Readings (available via webct.utdallas.edu)

(3) Website http://www.understandingprejudice.org

Course description and learning objectives:


Examines prejudice and discrimination, applying social-psychological theory and research to various
social and historical issues, including stereotypes and prejudice in the media, old-fashioned and modern
prejudice, sexism, heterosexism, classism, acculturation, inter-group contact, and the application of
theory to policies including public housing, Affirmative Action, drug laws and welfare.

3.1 Use critical thinking to evaluate popular media and scholarly literature.
3.3 Use creative thinking to address psychology-related issues.
4.1 Demonstrate effective writing skills in various formats (e.g., summaries, integrations, critiques, technical
reports) and for various purposes (e.g., informing, teaching, explaining, defending, persuading, arguing).
4.2 Demonstrate effective oral communication skills in various context (e.g., group discussion, debate,
lecture) and for various purposes (e.g., informing, teaching, explaining, defending, persuading, arguing).
4.3 Demonstrate basic computer skills, proper etiquette, and security safeguards.
4.4 Demonstrate competence in effectively collaborating with others.
5.1 Apply psychological concepts, theories, and research findings to issues in everyday life.
5.2 Identify appropriate applications of psychology in social services and education.
5.3 Demonstrate how psychological principles can explain social issues and inform public policy.

Evaluation criteria:

“Change the World!” project 60%


Exam 1 20%
Exam 2 20%

1
Participation in this class will enrich your educational experience. This class involves collaborative work, participating in interactive
exercises, in-class thought papers, making presentations, being an active listener, and contributing to class discussions. Reading the
required text is essential to your participation score. At times, the content of in-class writing assignments will be evaluated as well as your
ability to discuss any of the assigned readings. During classroom discussion, a positive attitude is expected and disrespect directed at any
classmate will not be tolerated.

The CHANGE THE WORLD project applies concepts in intergroup relations to real life. A separate handout will be posted on WebCT with
details about expectations, due dates and grading criteria.

Exam 1 and Exam 2 will include multiple choice questions. Exam 2 will not be cumulative (i.e. it will only cover the second half of the
course).

Policy on missing tests and late papers:

There will be NO alternative test times. If you miss a test due to an excused absence, an alternative evaluation procedure will be
established. This will require proper documentation and must be negotiated with the instructor. If proper documentation is not provided
regarding the missed class, a grade of zero will be assigned.

The highest grade possible for late papers/projects turned in at the next class period will be a C (75). Assignments turned in after this point will be
deducted an additional letter grade for each late day. In extenuating circumstances, such as a death in the family or a traumatic life event,
extensions will be granted, but ONLY if arranged in advance.

“My printer broke at the last minute” is never a valid excuse for why an assignment is late. PLAN AHEAD and have your assignment done early
enough so you have time to handle technical problems.

Policy on tardiness: Coming to class on time is expected and required. Coming to class late distracts other students from learning and is a sign
of disrespect to your professor and your peers. Arriving late sends a signal that YOUR time is more valuable than others’ time. Assignments are
always due at the BEGINNING of class, so showing up late on project due dates will also mean that your assignment is late and points will be
deducted.

Policy on cell phones, text messaging & wireless computing: Class time is for learning. Barring an emergency, using cell phones for any
reason (talking or text messaging) during class time is inappropriate. Cell phones should be turned off or turned to silent mode during class. If a
student uses a cell phone during class, the professor may ask the student to turn over the phone for the remainder or class time or leave. You
may use a computer to take notes during this class. However, you must turn off the wireless feature on your computer when class begins.
Surfing the internet during class time is unacceptable and your grade will be penalized should you be caught!

Policy on academic honesty: No form of academic dishonesty will be tolerated. This includes cheating on exams, plagiarizing scholarly works,
and copying text from internet sources without proper documentation of the author. The consequences of academic dishonestly can be severe,
ranging from failing the class to being on academic probation. NO EXCUSES! Methods of properly documenting sources will be covered in class.
If you are unclear about the line between paraphrasing other’s work and plagiarism, please see the professor for clarification. Please see official
policy and examples of plagiarism at: http://www.utdallas.edu/student/slife/scholastic.html

2
PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND READINGS:

DATE TOPIC READINGS ASSIGNMENTS

8/16 Introduction Plous, Ch. 1 1. Take Baseline survey before reading the text
Syllabus http://www.understandingprejudice.org/baseline/
Outline of the course *Register and enter 4324Fall07 as the Class ID when you
Slide show discussion take the survey
Can we change the world? 2. Log into WebCT

8/23 Stereotyping, prejudice & Plous, Ch. 2


discrimination
Defining terms & concepts WebCT,
Theories of prejudice WEEK 2
Stigmatization
Stereotype threat

8/30 Prejudice old and new Plous, Chs. 3 Take an Implicit Attitude Task (Hidden Bias) at
Subtle vs. Blatant prejudice &4 www.tolerance.org
Historical examples
Measuring prejudice: Explicit & implicit
attitudes
WebCT,
Explaining intergroup inequality WEEK 3
-Relative deprivation
-Tokenism
-Minimization of
discrimination
Small group discussions

9/6 Genocide WebCT, See Hotel Rwanda in class


WEEK4 *Take Native IQ test on:
http://www.understandingprejudice.org/demos/

9/13 Genocide Plous, Chs. 6


&7
9/20 Sexism & Heterosexism Plous, Chs. 5 Take ambivalent sexism scale at
Gender in the workplace &8 www.understandingprejudice.org
Benevolent and hostile sexism
Ambivalent sexism **Study for Exam 1, bring a scantron
Heterosexism
WebCT,
Sexual politics and policy WEEK6

9/27
EXAM 1

3
10/4 Intergroup conflict & contact Plous, Ch. 9
The Color of Fear & discussion

10/11 Prejudice reduction WebCT,


Approaches to improved intergroup WEEK 9
relations
Plous, Ch. 10

10/18 Contact and classism WebCT,


Cross-group friendship WEEK 10
Contact and housing, Video
Contact and service-learning

10/25 Cultural relations WebCT, Take the Immigration Myths and Realities Quiz:
Immigration, Acculturation, Integration, WEEK 11 http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/newamericans/quiz.html
Marginalization
Culture shock
Culture learning

11/1 Social change WebCT, *Study for Exam 2, from “Intergroup conflict & contact” to
Collective action WEEK 12 Social Change
Applying intergroup relations theory to
policy
Group exercise: Defending Affirmative
Action

11/8 *Bring a scantron for the exam


EXAM 2
11/15
Presentations,
Part I
No class 11/22

11/29 Presentations, Part II


Final reflection due via WebCT 11/30
*Take baseline survey again, see what you’ve learned!

4
Student Conduct & Discipline resolved by the written response provided by the respondent, the student may submit a
The University of Texas System and The University of Texas at Dallas have rules and written appeal to the School Dean. If the grievance is not resolved by the School Dean’s
regulations for the orderly and efficient conduct of their business. It is the responsibility of decision, the student may make a written appeal to the Dean of Graduate or Undergraduate
each student and each student organization to be knowledgeable about the rules and Education, and the deal will appoint and convene an Academic Appeals Panel. The
regulations which govern student conduct and activities. General information on student decision of the Academic Appeals Panel is final. The results of the academic appeals
conduct and discipline is contained in the UTD publication, A to Z Guide, which is provided process will be distributed to all involved parties.
to all registered students each academic year.
Copies of these rules and regulations are available to students in the Office of the Dean of
The University of Texas at Dallas administers student discipline within the procedures of Students, where staff members are available to assist students in interpreting the rules and
recognized and established due process. Procedures are defined and described in the regulations.
Rules and Regulations, Board of Regents, The University of Texas System, Part 1, Chapter
VI, Section 3, and in Title V, Rules on Student Services and Activities of the university’s Incomplete Grade Policy
Handbook of Operating Procedures. Copies of these rules and regulations are available to As per university policy, incomplete grades will be granted only for work unavoidably missed
students in the Office of the Dean of Students, where staff members are available to assist at the semester’s end and only if 70% of the course work has been completed. An
students in interpreting the rules and regulations (SU 1.602, 972/883-6391). incomplete grade must be resolved within eight (8) weeks from the first day of the
subsequent long semester. If the required work to complete the course and to remove the
A student at the university neither loses the rights nor escapes the responsibilities of incomplete grade is not submitted by the specified deadline, the incomplete grade is
citizenship. He or she is expected to obey federal, state, and local laws as well as the changed automatically to a grade of F.
Regents’ Rules, university regulations, and administrative rules. Students are subject to
discipline for violating the standards of conduct whether such conduct takes place on or off Disability Services
campus, or whether civil or criminal penalties are also imposed for such conduct. The goal of Disability Services is to provide students with disabilities educational
opportunities equal to those of their non-disabled peers. Disability Services is located in
Academic Integrity room 1.610 in the Student Union. Office hours are Monday and Thursday, 8:30 a.m. to 6:30
The faculty expects from its students a high level of responsibility and academic honesty. p.m.; Tuesday and Wednesday, 8:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m.; and Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
Because the value of an academic degree depends upon the absolute integrity of the work
done by the student for that degree, it is imperative that a student demonstrate a high The contact information for the Office of Disability Services is:
standard of individual honor in his or her scholastic work. The University of Texas at Dallas, SU 22
PO Box 830688
Scholastic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, statements, acts or omissions related to Richardson, Texas 75083-0688
applications for enrollment or the award of a degree, and/or the submission as one’s own (972) 883-2098 (voice or TTY)
work or material that is not one’s own. As a general rule, scholastic dishonesty involves one
of the following acts: cheating, plagiarism, collusion and/or falsifying academic records. Essentially, the law requires that colleges and universities make those reasonable
Students suspected of academic dishonesty are subject to disciplinary proceedings. adjustments necessary to eliminate discrimination on the basis of disability. For example, it
may be necessary to remove classroom prohibitions against tape recorders or animals (in
Plagiarism, especially from the web, from portions of papers for other classes, and from any the case of dog guides) for students who are blind. Occasionally an assignment
other source is unacceptable and will be dealt with under the university’s policy on requirement may be substituted (for example, a research paper versus an oral presentation
plagiarism (see general catalog for details). This course will use the resources of for a student who is hearing impaired). Classes enrolled students with mobility impairments
turnitin.com, which searches the web for possible plagiarism and is over 90% effective. may have to be rescheduled in accessible facilities. The college or university may need to
provide special services such as registration, note-taking, or mobility assistance.
Email Use
The University of Texas at Dallas recognizes the value and efficiency of communication It is the student’s responsibility to notify his or her professors of the need for such an
between faculty/staff and students through electronic mail. At the same time, email raises accommodation. Disability Services provides students with letters to present to faculty
some issues concerning security and the identity of each individual in an email exchange. members to verify that the student has a disability and needs accommodations. Individuals
The university encourages all official student email correspondence be sent only to a requiring special accommodation should contact the professor after class or during office
student’s U.T. Dallas email address and that faculty and staff consider email from students hours.
official only if it originates from a UTD student account. This allows the university to maintain
a high degree of confidence in the identity of all individual corresponding and the security of Religious Holy Days
the transmitted information. UTD furnishes each student with a free email account that is to The University of Texas at Dallas will excuse a student from class or other required activities
be used in all communication with university personnel. The Department of Information for the travel to and observance of a religious holy day for a religion whose places of worship
Resources at U.T. Dallas provides a method for students to have their U.T. Dallas mail are exempt from property tax under Section 11.20, Tax Code, Texas Code Annotated.
forwarded to other accounts.
The student is encouraged to notify the instructor or activity sponsor as soon as possible
Withdrawal from Class regarding the absence, preferably in advance of the assignment. The student, so excused,
The administration of this institution has set deadlines for withdrawal of any college-level will be allowed to take the exam or complete the assignment within a reasonable time after
courses. These dates and times are published in that semester's course catalog. the absence: a period equal to the length of the absence, up to a maximum of one week. A
Administration procedures must be followed. It is the student's responsibility to handle student who notifies the instructor and completes any missed exam or assignment may not
withdrawal requirements from any class. In other words, I cannot drop or withdraw any be penalized for the absence. A student who fails to complete the exam or assignment
student. You must do the proper paperwork to ensure that you will not receive a final grade within the prescribed period may receive a failing grade for that exam or assignment.
of "F" in a course if you choose not to attend the class once you are enrolled.
If a student or an instructor disagrees about the nature of the absence [i.e., for the purpose
Student Grievance Procedures
of observing a religious holy day] or if there is similar disagreement about whether the
Procedures for student grievances are found in Title V, Rules on Student Services and
student has been given a reasonable time to complete any missed assignments or
Activities, of the university’s Handbook of Operating Procedures.
examinations, either the student or the instructor may request a ruling from the chief
executive officer of the institution, or his or her designee. The chief executive officer or
In attempting to resolve any student grievance regarding grades, evaluations, or other
designee must take into account the legislative intent of TEC 51.911(b), and the student and
fulfillments of academic responsibility, it is the obligation of the student first to make a
instructor will abide by the decision of the chief executive officer or designee.
serious effort to resolve the matter with the instructor, supervisor, administrator, or
committee with whom the grievance originates (hereafter called “the respondent”).
Individual faculty members retain primary responsibility for assigning grades and These descriptions and timelines are subject to change at the discretion of the
evaluations. If the matter cannot be resolved at that level, the grievance must be submitted Professor
in writing to the respondent with a copy of the respondent’s School Dean. If the matter is not

5
6

You might also like