Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NOTE: All matters associated with this course are subject to change at the instructor's discretion.
Any changes will be communicated to students.
Course Description
The course presents an integrated approach to writing, reading, and critical thinking by
developing the grammatical, logical, and rhetorical skills necessary for university writing. All
classes work in a computerized learning environment. Students are taught basic computer
literacy and submit all work electronically and on paper.
Required Textbooks
The Aims of Argument: A Rhetoric and Reader
by Timothy Crusius and Carolyn Channell
Fifth Edition. McGraw-Hill, 2006
ISBN 0-07-321761-1
All assignments are due by the next class period unless noted otherwise. Assignments from The
Aims of Argument textbook denoted by AA; assignments from A Writer's Resource denoted by
2
AWR. “Readings TBA” usually refers to the essays and articles from Part Three and Part Four of
AA. As the semester proceeds, we will discuss as a class what articles and essays to include in
our readings for discussion.
MON 01/08: In-class: Introduction to course and motime blog site. Set up blog and register for AWR
and AA companion websites (the AWR website includes an e-book.)
Assignments: Read AA Ch. 1 and AWR Ch. 4; Send me an e-mail introducing yourself by Tuesday
01/17. Read Plato’s Allegory of the Cave and write a one page “reflection” due on Wednesday 01/10.
WED 01/10: In-class: Turn in Plato paper. Discussion over the nature of language, writing, and
rhetoric. We will also read and discuss a short excerpt from Plato’s Phaedrus. Discussion of AA Ch
1 and AWR Ch. 4
Assignments: Record your first observation on your blog. Read chapter 2 in AA.
WED 01/17: In-class: Discussion of AA Ch 2. Open discussion of Plato, and analysis of two short
op-ed pieces from the newspaper. If we have time, we will also have a demonstration of AWR
electronic resources.
Assignments: Read AA Ch. 3; pay close attention to the Toulmin Method. Choose an article, essay
or op-ed piece that you would like to analyze rhetorically and bring it in to class on Monday for class
discussion. Record your second observation in your blog.
MON 01/22: In-class: In-class practice of a Rhetorical Analysis during our discussions of the articles
brought in to class. Discussion of Chapter 3.
Assignments: Write your Rhetorical Analysis and turn in the first draft on Wednesday 01/24.
WED 01/24: In-class: Turn in the first draft of your Rhetorical Analyses. Class discussion about the
upcoming research papers, formatting, MLA, and the library.
Assignments: Record you third observation on your blog. Read AA Ch. 5. Your first major paper will
be an argument to inquire. Decide on a topic of your first argument and be prepared to let me know
on Monday.
MON 01/29: In-class: I will hand back the first draft of the Rhetorical Analysis and have individual
meetings with each student to discuss their writing and the first major essay.
Assignments: The final draft of your Rhetorical Analysis is due on Wednesday 01/31. Read AA Ch.
5 and be prepared for our meeting in the library this coming Wednesday.
WED 01/31: In-class: Rhetorical Analyses are due. We will meet with a Research Librarian to
discuss the proper way to conduct college level research.
Assignments: Record observation #4 in your blog. Post the topic of your first paper on your blog
site. Read Chapter 6, work on your research paper, and be prepared to have your first draft ready for
peer review on Wednesday 02/07. Assigned readings TBA.
MON 02/05: In-class:. Discussion of grammar, readings, the topics for the first argument, AA Ch. 6,
and general discussion of MLA, sources and research. If we have the time, we will have a
demonstration of Catalyst electronic resources for Research
Assignments: First draft due on Wednesday. Work on your paper.
WED 02/07: In-class: Peer review. Bring in two copies of the first draft of your first argument, and
be prepared to read two papers by your peers and accept criticism on your own work.
Assignments: Record your 5th observation on your blog. Take into account the suggestions by your
peers and revise your paper for turn-in on Monday 02/12. Read the handout on fallacies. Readings
TBA.
3
MON 02/12: In-class: Turn in second draft of first argument. Discussion of readings, logical fallacies,
grammar, sentence structure, and style.
Assignments: Post ten fallacies on your blog site. Your next major paper will be an argument to
convince, persuade, or mediate. During the next several weeks, we will be discussing chapters 7, 8
and 9. Be prepared to discuss the ideas laid out in AA during the next several weeks.
WED 02/14: In-class: Individual meetings. I will return your first papers with my suggestions and
critique.
Assignments: Record your 6th observation. Finish Essay #1 and have a good college level essay
and argument ready for turn in on Monday 10/2. Be prepared to discuss some of the readings and
chapter 7 on Monday.
MON 02/19: In-class: Turn in final draft of Essay #1. Group discussion of fallacies, the readings and
discussion of chapter 7 in AA.
Assignments: Read Chapter 8 in AA. Pay close attention to Martin Luther King’s Letter from the
Birmingham Jail.
WED 02/21: In-class: Discuss King’s rhetoric, rhetorical tropes, and Chapter 8 in AA.
Assignments: Record Observation #7. Read Chapter 9 in AA. Readings TBA.
MON 02/26: In-class: Discussion of readings, Chapter 9, and the midterm grade argument.
Assignments: On Friday 03/02, your midterm grade argument is due. Do not post this argument on
your blog. Send me this argument in a private e-mail. Send me this argument by Friday the 2nd of
March. You also need to begin thinking about your next argument. This second major essay will be
an argument to convince, persuade, or mediate. Be prepared to discuss your topics on Wednesday
02/28. Readings TBA.
WED 02/28: In-class: Recap discussion of chapters 7 thru 9 and group discussion about midterm
grades, the readings, and topics for your second major argument.
Assignments: Record your 8th Observation in your blog. Work on your paper, and bring in two
copies of your argument on Monday.
SPRING BREAK!
MON 03/12: In-class: Peer Review. Bring in two copies of your second argument, and be prepared to
read two papers by your peers and accept criticism on your own work.
Assignments: Work on revision of Essay #2 based on peer review suggestions, and turn in by
Wednesday 03/14.
MON 03/19: In-class: Turn in the second draft of your argument today. General discussion of topics.
Assignments: We need to begin thinking about our Visual Rhetoric project. Read Chapter 4 in AA.
Work on your final draft of Essay #2.
WED 03/21: In-class: I will return your papers with my suggestions and criticism, and we will discuss
your writing in individual Teacher-student conferences. You will have until Monday 03/26 to revise
and return this essay.
Assignments: Record an Observation on your blog. Work on your final draft of Essay #2.
MON 03/26: In-class: Final draft on essay #2 due. I expect this to be a professional college level
research essay. We will continue discussing the Visual Rhetoric project.
4
Assignments: Read the provided Roland Barthes argument “The Rhetoric of an Image.” Think of a
website where you can find good examples of visual rhetoric. Provide a link to this site on your blog.
WED 03/28: In-class: Discussion of Barthes and some of the websites provided by students.
Assignments: Record an Observation on your blog. Read the provided excerpts from Marshall
McLuhan and from Scott McCloud’s The Vocabulary of Comics. Begin thinking about your Visual
Rhetoric projects, and be prepared to discuss them in class on Monday.
MON 04/02: In-class: Discussion of McLuhan, McCloud and group discussions of our Visual Rhetoric
projects.
Assignments: Peer Review of our Visual Rhetoric projects are due this Wednesday. Create a work
of art that is both visually stimulating and rhetorically brilliant.
MON 04/09: In-class: Individual meetings with instructor to speak about your final Visual Rhetoric
project.
Assignments: Work on your Visual Rhetoric project.
MON 04/23: LAST DAY OF CLASS! We will wrap up the class and finish all Visual Rhetoric
presentations.
Assignments: Chose your favorite presentation of the day and write a brief observation in your blog.
Write your final grade argument and send it to me by Wednesday the 25th.
Grading Policy
Assignment Percentages for Spring 2007
Rhetorical Analysis 10%
Essay 1, Inquiry Argument 15%
Essay 2, Convincing, Motivating or Mediation Argument 20%
Essay 3, Analysis of Visual Image/Visual Rhetoric Essay 20%
Rough Drafts, attendance during Peer Review and individual meetings 15%
Homework/Short Assignments/Blog Observations / Attendance and 20%
Participation
Total 100%
You will receive individual grades for your Rhetorical Analysis, final drafts of the three major
essay assignments, and for the portfolio. However, at both midterm and end of the semester you
will present a written argument for what you feel your grade should be based or your specific
assessment of the quality of your learning, especially with regard to your attendance,
participation, promptness, level of writing, effective use of argumentation, creativity, collaboration,
and sound rhetorical skills.
5
Evidence supporting your claim(s) must be drawn from your portfolio and should specifically
demonstrate mastery of rhetoric, research, collaboration, and critical thinking and your
development across five dimensions of learning (confidence and independence, skills and
strategies, knowledge and understanding, use of prior and emerging experience, and
reflectiveness).
The final interpretation and assessment of your grade(s), however, remains the responsibility of
the course instructor.
The following grade criteria describe very general indicators for assessing your work and
progress in the course.
The following grade criteria describe very general indicators for assessing your work and
progress in the course.
C: Represents good (but average) participation in all course activities; all assigned work
completed, with generally good quality overall in course work. Evidence of some
development across the five dimensions of learning and five course strands.
Participation IN THIS COURSE does not include doing work that is not for this course during
class, sleeping in class, or using the computers or other personal electronic devices for personal
messaging, research, or entertainment. Please turn off cellular/mobile phones, pagers, and other
personal electronic devices during class.
Major Assignments
6
Argumentative Essay #1
An essay that presents an inquiry argument using the principles and criteria in The Aims of
Argument (Chapter 6). Essay should be 5-6 double-spaced pages using MLA format for Works Cited.
Argumentative Essay #2
An essay that presents a convincing or persuasive argument using the principles and criteria in
The Aims of Argument (Chapter 7 or 8). Or, you could present a mediation argument using the
ideas and principles laid out in chapter 9 of AA. This essay should be 5-6 double-spaced pages
and should use MLA format for all works cited.
Late Work
All drafts, including final, must be submitted when and as required in order to successfully
complete this course. Late assignments will suffer grade deductions, or may not be accepted.
The University of Texas at Dallas administers student discipline within the procedures of
recognized and established due process. Procedures are defined and described in the Rules and
Regulations, Board of Regents, The University of Texas System, Part 1, Chapter VI, Section 3,
7
and in Title V, Rules on Student Services and Activities of the university's Handbook of Operating
Procedures. Copies of these rules and regulations are available to students in the Office of the
Dean of Students, where staff members are available to assist students in interpreting the rules
and regulations (SU 1.602, 972/883-6391).
A student at the university neither loses the rights nor escapes the responsibilities of citizenship.
He or she is expected to obey federal, state, and local laws as well as the Regents' Rules,
university regulations, and administrative rules. Students are subject to discipline for violating the
standards of conduct whether such conduct takes place on or off campus, or whether civil or
criminal penalties are also imposed for such conduct.
Academic Integrity
The faculty expects from its students a high level of responsibility and academic honesty.
Because the value of an academic degree depends upon the absolute integrity of the work done
by the student for that degree, it is imperative that a student demonstrate a high standard of
individual honor in his or her scholastic work.
Scholastic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, statements, acts or omissions related to
applications for enrollment or the award of a degree, and/or the submission as one's own work or
material that is not one's own. As a general rule, scholastic dishonesty involves one of the
following acts: cheating, plagiarism, collusion and/or falsifying academic records. Students
suspected of academic dishonesty are subject to disciplinary proceedings.
Plagiarism, especially from the web, from portions of papers for other classes, and from any other
source is unacceptable and will be dealt with under the university's policy on plagiarism (see
general catalog for details). This course will use the resources of turnitin.com, which searches the
web for possible plagiarism and is over 90% effective.
Email Use
The University of Texas at Dallas recognizes the value and efficiency of communication between
faculty/staff and students through electronic mail. At the same time, email raises some issues
concerning security and the identity of each individual in an email exchange. The university
encourages all official student email correspondence be sent only to a student's U.T. Dallas email
address and that faculty and staff consider email from students official only if it originates from a
UTD student account. This allows the university to maintain a high degree of confidence in the
identity of all individuals corresponding and the security of the transmitted information. UTD
furnishes each student with a free email account that is to be used in all communication with
university personnel. The Department of Information Resources at U.T. Dallas provides a method
for students to have their U.T. Dallas mail forwarded to other accounts.
In attempting to resolve any student grievance regarding grades, evaluations, or other fulfillments
of academic responsibility, it is the obligation of the student first to make a serious effort to
resolve the matter with the instructor, supervisor, administrator, or committee with whom the
grievance originates (hereafter called “the respondent”). Individual faculty members retain primary
responsibility for assigning grades and evaluations. If the matter cannot be resolved at that level,
the grievance must be submitted in writing to the respondent with a copy of the respondent's
School Dean. If the matter is not resolved by the written response provided by the respondent,
the student may submit a written appeal to the School Dean. If the grievance is not resolved by
the School Dean's decision, the student may make a written appeal to the Dean of Graduate or
Undergraduate Education, and the deal will appoint and convene an Academic Appeals Panel.
The decision of the Academic Appeals Panel is final. The results of the academic appeals
process will be distributed to all involved parties.
Copies of these rules and regulations are available to students in the Office of the Dean of
Students, where staff members are available to assist students in interpreting the rules and
regulations.
Disability Services
The goal of Disability Services is to provide students with disabilities educational opportunities
equal to those of their non-disabled peers. Disability Services is located in room 1.610 in the
Student Union. Office hours are Monday and Thursday, 8:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.; Tuesday and
Wednesday, 8:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m.; and Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
Essentially, the law requires that colleges and universities make those reasonable adjustments
necessary to eliminate discrimination on the basis of disability. For example, it may be necessary
to remove classroom prohibitions against tape recorders or animals (in the case of dog guides)
for students who are blind. Occasionally an assignment requirement may be substituted (for
example, a research paper versus an oral presentation for a student who is hearing impaired).
Classes enrolled students with mobility impairments may have to be rescheduled in accessible
facilities. The college or university may need to provide special services such as registration,
note-taking, or mobility assistance.
It is the student's responsibility to notify his or her professors of the need for such an
accommodation. Disability Services provides students with letters to present to faculty members
to verify that the student has a disability and needs accommodations. Individuals requiring special
accommodation should contact the professor after class or during office hours.
The student is encouraged to notify the instructor or activity sponsor as soon as possible
regarding the absence, preferably in advance of the assignment. The student, so excused, will be
allowed to take the exam or complete the assignment within a reasonable time after the absence:
a period equal to the length of the absence, up to a maximum of one week. A student who notifies
the instructor and completes any missed exam or assignment may not be penalized for the
absence. A student who fails to complete the exam or assignment within the prescribed period
may receive a failing grade for that exam or assignment.
If a student or an instructor disagrees about the nature of the absence [i.e., for the purpose of
observing a religious holy day] or if there is similar disagreement about whether the student has
been given a reasonable time to complete any missed assignments or examinations, either the
student or the instructor may request a ruling from the chief executive officer of the institution, or
his or her designee. The chief executive officer or designee must take into account the legislative
intent of TEC 51.911(b), and the student and instructor will abide by the decision of the chief
executive officer or designee.