Mis-Implied Consent

All statute law or code, as it is applied around the world, is unlawful

against those who choose not to subject themselves to it. Those who
scare us into submission against our will are criminal violators of law.
There are a number of fatal flaws in the prevailing system of statutory
law and the first of which centers around the concept of “Notice”. From
The Barron's Law Dictionary Fifth Edition:

NOTICE - “information concerning a fact, actually

communicated to a person by an
authorized person or actually derived by
him from a proper source...”

There is one glaring problem with this particular definition that we

will note and sustain. A “person” does not mean a flesh and blood man
or woman. It is a corporation or a fictional entity of international or
interstate commerce under the UCC, the CFR and all statutory code of
import have similarly defined fictions. We will assume that as this
burdensome encumbrance, people call code or statute law, is to be
intentionally ambiguous in order to fool the ignorant and therefore, we
will presume that its definition intends to convey a meaning of
“person” to be indeed recognized as a flesh and blood man or woman.
That said, proper “Notice” is required when communicating contract
terms between parties. Statue and code can only be lawful under the
laws of contract as men and women have the right and power to bind
themselves to any contract of their choosing. The right to unlimited
contract is a fundamental right and this right has been perverted such
that most have been subject to contracts without their knowledge.
Contracts have been is used to fool people into compliance with those
that would be our slave masters by its substitution for the real law that
flows from the Supreme Authority: that which men call the one true
living God.
 How “notice” relates to contract is crucial to unraveling the
application of real law. Real laws are rules or principles enforced by
what man calls the one true living God. All other forms of law are
“colorable” or “fiction” and result, primarily, by the existence of a
contract between men or women. As this right and power of contract is
given to men an women, as an essential requirement of constructive
existence on this planet, then to not understand the rules of contract is
to be a slave in ignorance to those that do know the difference. For
millennia this fundamental law has been suppressed and not taught to
the rank-and-file. It is a secret that remained in close circles of power
that have promulgated the ignorance of the law and exploited it to
their advantage. As this concealment was itself lawful, meaning that it
met with God's approval, then this law was permitted to be used
against the rank-and-file as a lesson. Those who turn their face to God
and trust God without condition will be taught this law. Those who do
not turn their face to God and do not trust God without condition are
allowed to make themselves slaves. It is the law and those men and
women, who would be our masters, know this truth and above all else
have sought to suppress this concept at all cost.

Contracts enforced by God are verbal and the parties are held to
the terms by the law: “Thou shalt not bear false witness” or “let your
yes be yes and your no be no”. Your word is your bond. Break your
word and you will loose power and freedom as that power and freedom
will be manifest on the behalf of the injured party by God. God holds
the parties to the terms of the contract. All contracts are “buyer
beware” or “caveat emptor” and we are responsible for knowing and
understanding the terms of the contracts we enter. There must be an
offer, an acceptance, an exchange of consideration and a meeting of
the minds for a valid enforceable contract to be created. The meeting
of the minds cannot take place between a man and a fiction. The
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a fiction as it is a corporation. It can
only hold a colorable or fictional contract with another colorable or
fictional entity. This is why the colorable entity known as “person” had
to be created through the 14th Amendment. Person is a corporate
office or a subsidiary of the pinnacle corporation called the UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA. Statutes or law of color only applies to the fiction
or the office. It cannot, under real law, apply to a man or woman. The
mistake we make is when we, as flesh and blood men or women, place
ourselves in these offices and we do not know any better, then the
man or woman subjects the office and their flesh and blood body to a
fiction of law. This is known as “dabbling in witchcraft” and we are
warned not to “dabble in witchcraft”. Statute is not real and all
colorable law and colorable contracts are considered witchcraft. A
violation when dealing in witchcraft carries with it consequences. If one
looks at what our country has become one can easily see this axiom in
action.

All contracts are voluntary. One cannot be forced into contract or

through fraud or trickery. What keeps a man or woman from being
tricked? God alone and only when we trust God without condition. One
can however, be compelled or forced to meet the terms of a contract.

Through a term of a contract is the only way a man or woman can

be forced to do anything. It is not against their will as all contracts are
voluntary!

In all other matters of law the prevailing realization is that “the law
cannot compel performance”. That means God will not force a man or
woman to obey the law, either directly or through any earthly agency.
However, it must be understood that if one does break the law then
they will lose power and freedom as God so chooses to assess. The
consequences of a violation of law rest solely in power of God's
Supreme Authority and the will of the victim through God.

What that means is this:

Unless a valid contract exists between a real man or

woman then no other man, woman or agency is
given the power, by God, to force any other man or
woman to do anything against their will.

How is this practically applied in our lives? Take for instance that an
official in government deems what a man says as a threat. This official
simply labels the man a “terrorist” and the police break into his home,
Taze him and then proceed to drag the man out of his house. This
happens all too often now but we ignorantly believe that we have no
recourse and we could all be subject to this treatment. The police are
not given the power to do so against the man's will so a valid contract
must exist otherwise the police and judges would not be permitted, by
God, to get away with it or even attempt this action in the first place.
When did we give the police and judges our permission to drag us out
of our house? This was done through an adhesion contract. Because
we chose to receive a benefit offered by the government then we can
be presumed to be under contract. When did we do this? There are a
number of ways. If we register to vote we receive the benefit of voting.
Under the Republic that was a right but under the corporation it is a
benefit and a privilege. When we use Federal Reserve Notes we
receive the benefit of limited liability through the use of colorable
money that has no inherent value other then the paper it is printed on.
These are just of few of the dozens of ways we enter this contract.

The weakness in this exercise of power is that if one is hearing this

for the first time then they have not been properly notified. This falls
under the idea of “Implied Notice”. From Barron's Law Dictionary Fifth
Edition:

IMPLIED NOTICE - “notice that may be inferred

from fact that a person had means
of knowing, which was his duty to
use and which he did not use.
Persons have no right to avoid
information and then say they had
no notice.”

Therein lies the Achilles heal of the entire structure of statutory law
and jurisprudence. The courts and the government cannot claim that
the people had the means to apprise themselves of the law. If I write a
contract that says: Any politician who receives the benefit of my vote
is required to pay me 1000 lbs in gold and I hide that contract on Mt
Everest and tell him it is there then have I met the duty of properly
notifying that politician? The answer is no. Conversely do we have
reasonable access to all the law, through contract, that we can
ignorantly bind ourselves to, knowing that to become educated to
these statutes would require that we spend several lifetimes reading
this legislative monstrosity? The answer is again, no. Can we honestly
say that we been taught this law in school, by our parents, by our
clergy or by anyone? Similarly, have we been exposed to the
difference between “public law” and “public policy”? Were the people
properly notified when their government changed from a sovereign
real republic to a colorable corporation? Were the people made aware
of the bankruptcy of our government?

The answer is NO!

Therefore those who purport to be in authority have no lawful

standing to make that claim.
 Were the people given the informed choice between using colorable
money of no value and money of a lawful weight and measure? No. In
fact if we plop a lawful dollar on the counter the clerk, in most cases,
does not even know the difference and will demand Federal Reserve
Notes for the goods being sold. That poses the greatest challenge to
those who falsely believe they are in lawful authority. Since we are left
no option and are forced to use Federal Reserve Notes then the implied
contract is attempted through coercion or fraud and is therefore not
enforceable. Additionally, who is this man or woman we are said to be
in contract with? Have we even seen them? No. Therefore there cannot
exist a meeting of the minds.

There exists no valid contract that will be enforced by God so why

do we continue to act like there is a contract?

Ignorance!

The only tenuous lawful standing they may claim is that because no
man objects then the de facto system is allowed to continue as it is
again through “implied consent” of the people.

I cannot speak for others but I am quite sure that I am not alone
when I choose to revoke my consent for this statutory monstrous
witchcraft. However, it is not in my power to infringe on the rights of
others who willfully, in ignorance, yield power to those more then
happy to accept it. The state we find ourselves in is due, in no small
part, to the choices people have made. “Ignorance of the law is no
excuse”. The reason this axiom is lawful (enforced by God) is that
those that would be our masters understand that if any man or woman
chooses to turn their face to God and trust God without condition then
God will not fail to properly educate that man or woman to the law. We
remain slaves until we know the law and the law can only flow from the
one being in Supreme Authority. If one has been permitted to receive
the law included in this writing then it would be interesting to realize
the true reason why.