Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The enterprise value is wrong; securitizations are non-recourse; cash on the balance
sheet is ignored, net income is also wrong
DRII is not some sort of scam; in fact, they pioneered the asset-light model which
results in the highest forms of FCF and returns while minimizing risk
Online agencies like Expedia are big partners, not adversaries
The report mistakes intentional churn of low quality acquired (in M&A) members for
a long-term pattern of decline. Memberships are not in decline
Loans in Default: The report CONFUSES servicing of a portfolio of loans with
securitized assets held in a portfolio. The student says that $243MM are in default.
Rather, $210MM (of the $243MM) are merely being serviced and were PURCHASED
out of bankruptcy in 2011. This $210MM is a company ASSET, a supply of inventory.
Further, DIAMOND IS INFACT OVER RESERVED. We expect management to provide
more clarity in their upcoming 10-K
Cash flow is significant, growing and sustainable NOT declining, NOT one-time
For ease of reading, we have underlined the factual and analytical errors. We remain
open to questions and comments. Once again, we are not in the business of publishing
reports, nor do we take any pleasure in showing the flaws in a students analysis.
Nonetheless, we do know what can happen when a companys reputation is harmed:
investors just look the other way and say pass. That would be a mistake in the case of
Diamond Resorts.
DRII is a timeshare company that operates on a points system. It currently has 513,000
members under its global network. DRII sells points through Vacation Interest Sales and
collects an annual maintenance fee through Management Services
In April 2007, Stephen Cloobeck, acquired
Sunterra Corporation by merger, which was
delisted from NASDAQ as a result of the
resignation of Sunterra Corporation's auditors and
the withdrawal of their certification of Sunterra
Corporation's financial statements
Market Cap: ~$2.0B
Enterprise Value: $2.4B + ~450M of securitized
notes
2014E Net Income: $43.4M
The author in
his prior career
Imperial Capital on inventory: Each year, 3-5% of owners fall behind on their annual payments and
abandon their interest. Diamond Resorts guarantees the annual payment (to the HOA) and resells the
ownership
I asked IR how they achieve such a 97% retention rate; they responded: they just like it so much
97% Retention?
Reviews
Owners are trying to give their timeshare away after paying $20,000 plus initially
(for free). I realize now Diamond Resorts run a scam I should have done more
research before purchasing, but being a senior citizen, I was not prepared for this
kind of overcharging.
On Yelp, comments such as:
Diamond Resort Facebook users polled that 93.6% would not join again or recommend the
product to a friend.
97% Retention
Due to historical industry practices, the timeshare industry has detractors. Every company has positive and
negative reviews. But DRII in particular, with its acquisitions of underperforming / failing resorts, has its share
of naysayers who do not want to or cannot pay for a better (yet more costly) experience. DRII continues to
be well respected in the timeshare community. For questions or concerns, check www.ARDA.org
Positive
Negative
and file a formal complaint. Our fees have increased an average of 20%
per year for the last 3 years. We were contacted tonight by a board
member of Diamond Resorts, telling us what our fees will be for 2014. The
increase is 44.5% over what we paid in 2013! This is absolutely
OUTRAGEOUS!
Scam is right! Marriot runs this game and make the rules up as they
choose. Who is to say in another 5 years they dont come out with
another scheme that makes your points as worthless and impossible to
use as your weeks are now. Join the class action lawsuit that was entered
in May 2014!
Secondary Marketplace
On sites such as Redweek.com and ebay.com,
members are selling their time shares at literally
nothing
DRII is threatening the users for not paying the
membership fee or their loans
The secondary market effectively competes against
DRIIs VIS
The Problem
Current provision rate is only ~9% of sales
Cost of marketing is ~50% regardless of whether
member defaults
Net revenues and earnings are grossly overstated
DRII securitizes some of its mortgages to obtain
cash flow.
Declining Membership
The SEC on February 22, 2013, wrote to DRIIs in
regards to the confidential draft registration:
Please balance your discussion of your
strategy to increase membership in THE Club
with the fact that you experienced lower
member count in the club for the period
ended September 30, 2012.
Q3 gain was after the acquisition of PMR
where they gained ~25,000 members
DRII has lost approximately ~2% of its NET
members each quarter. This is very alarming
since their VIS sales are up over 50% growth
rate for 2013 and over 15% for the past 3
quarters.
Valuation
After adjusting DRIIs earnings with a
provision rate reflective of the state of
the business, DRII trades at 91x 2015E
and 107x 2016E
VIS
Gross
V acation
Interest
Sales
Provision
Marketing
a nd
other
costs
VIS
Gross
Profit
Management
Services
Revenue
Cost
of
management
s ervices
Management
Gross
Profit
2011A
211,321
16,562
71,737
123,022
$148,977
27,125
$94,069
2012A
318,555
25,457
157,309
135,789
$177,364
35,330
$111,723
2013A
509,283
44,670
258,102
206,511
$208,131
37,907
$135,891
2014E
596,003
82,368
305,018
208,617
$246,130
33,294
$179,830
2015E
685,403
163,772
366,940
154,690
$240,371
35,235
$173,938
2016E
719,673
171,961
385,287
162,425
$232,196
$32,956
$170,061
134,295
152,022
250,524
255,247
260,337
268,709
Operating
Income
Interest
e xpense
Earnings
before
taxes
Taxes
Net
Income
Provision
as
%
of
gross
sales
82,796
82,010
786
95,490
96,157
(667)
91,878
88,626
3,252
133,200
54,868
78,332
68,292
38,304
29,987
63,776
38,304
25,472
(9,517)
$10,303
(14,310)
$13,643
5,777
($2,525)
34,927
$43,405
8,996
$20,991
7,642
$17,830
7.8%
8.0%
8.8%
13.8%
23.9%
23.9%
2011A
9,292
(109,800)
(100,508)
2012A
24,600
(69,338)
(44,738)
2013A
(5,409)
(57,925)
(63,334)
2014E
92,341
(18,589)
73,752
2015E
100,495
(24,000)
76,495
2016E
97,839
(28,000)
69,839
3.85%
3.99%
3.65%
A required 8% cash flow rate in 2015 in a declining cash flow business (since VIS have started to peak)
values DRII ~$12. However these cash flows are a result from earlier investments and thus mask the
underlying business economics. A P/E multiple places the stock much lower.
Valuation
Due to the faulty default rate analysis, the report has outsized provision costs
that are nonsensical. The students EPS is irrelevant
Cash flow growth comes only partially from a vastly lower interest rate on
corporate debt as well as recently acquired (2013) properties at 1 to 2x
EBITDA. The $50M of that cash flow is nowhere to be found in any of the
financial statements. As shown to the right, the free cash flow inflection is
powerful and sustainable
VOI sales have NOT started to peak. The statement is wholly inaccurate!
An asset-light quality, real estate based business should trade at a 6% to 8%
free cash flow yield. At this multiple, DRII would trade at at $48 to $64 on
2015 figures and materially higher on 2016. ALL OF THIS ignores that debt /
EBITDA will be under 1x by year-end 2015! We need only be half right on our
expectations for this stock to be at least a double
ALL competitors trade on EBITDA and free cash flow multiples making the
P/E multiple less relevant though better than what his report implies
Management mentions in its latest roadshows: For the first six months of 2014 we generated
$81.5 million in cashThe primary source of cash generated during the six-month period was
from earnings.
Not true. It was through an increase in due to related parties (~$45M) and increase in
cash flow from financing (~$38M)