Professional Documents
Culture Documents
controlofphysicalagentsin
MetrolandMediaGroup
OHS314PhysicalAgents
Submittedto:Dr.AbdoliEramaki
Submittedby:
AbdelHameedAdra
AbdurRehmanKhawaja
HarleenPanfer
HarounKhokar
RabioulHassan
SimonLi
Introduction
Physicalagentssuchasnoise,light,heatandcold,andvibrationsarepresentatevery
workplace.Eachoftheseagentscanbemeasuredandobservedbyanexpertinthisfieldand
thedatadisplayedinchartsortablestocompareandensureproperstandardsaremetand
tohelpreduceallphysicalagentsrelatedoccupationalhazards.
ToapplywhatwaslearnedinthecourseweconductedourfinalprojectatMetrolandMedia
Group,locatedat10TempoAve.,Toronto,ON.Ourcontactwasthepressroomsupervisor,
Mr.ScottReis,whoeagerlyguidedusaroundtheworksite.
Scopeofthereport
Ourfocuswasmainlyongettingasoundlevelmeterreadingaroundtheredprintingpress
andinsidethesupervisorsofficeandcreatingasoundmap.Thesoundlevelmapwillshow
theareasofhighandlowsoundpressureswheretheworkersnormallyexecutetheirtasks.
Dosimetrymeasurementsweretakenaroundtheredpressatvariouslocationsandinthe
lunchroomforfiveminuteintervalstodeterminetotalnoiseexposureasingleworkeris
exposedtoinatenhourshift.Thedrybulb,wetbulb,globetemperatureandairvelocity
readingsweretakenaroundtheredpressinordertocalculatetheWorldBulbGlobe
Temperature(WBGT)andtheheatstressthatworkersareexposedto.Aphotometrywas
alsoconductedtodeterminewhetherthereisadequatelightingpresenttoensurethework
canbedoneefficientlyandwithoutstraintotheeye.
MethodsandMaterials
TheSoundLevelMeter,SoundtrackLxTfromLarsonDavis,wasassembledbyattachingthe
microphonetothemainbody,confirmedbyaclickwhenplacedcorrectly.Thecapofthe
microphonewasremovedandtheroundspongewasattachedtoitsendwhicheliminates
windandinflatedreadings.Onceturnedon,theSLMsettingsweresettoAforFrequency
Weighting,SlowforDetector,AforPeakWeighing,andLinearforIntegrationMethod.To
createasuccessfulsoundmaparoundtheonlyworkingmachineatthetimeofvisit,theRed
Press,ageneralfloormapoftheareasurroundingthemachinerywasdrawn.Determining
thattakingthereadingswiththeSLMclosetoearheightoftheoperatoratanarmsdistance
wasadequateforthepurposesoftheproject.Beforestartingtotakethereadings,the
pressroomsupervisor,Mr.Reisprovideduswithfootguardsthatwouldserveasfoot
protectionandapairof3MOPTIME101PeltorearmuffsthathaveaNoisereductionrating
of27dB.Withoutthesetwopersonalprotectiveequipmentoneisforbiddentooperateor
comenearthemachine.Theworkerswerealsowearingoverallsthatcoveredthearmsand
legsfully,woreglovesthatprovidedextragrip,andhaveeyeprotection.Multiplereadings
weretakenaroundtheperimeterofthepressattheclosestdistanceanemployeestands
fromthepress,1meter,2metersandwherepossibleupto5metersaway.Therecordings
wereplottedonexcel,andtheresultsshowninfigure1.Anothersoundmapwascreatedof
theFloorSupervisorsofficeandtheresultsshowninfigure2.
Thenoisedosimeter,fromBrel&Kjr,wasusedtomeasuresoundlevelexposureover
time.ThedosimeteriscalibratedforAweightingandclippedtothecollarofanemployee
whowouldthencontinuetoperformtheirjob.Measurementswererecordedinsixstations.
Station1wastheFoldingstation,station2wastheKeystation,station3wastheRolling
station,station4wastheWebbingStation,Station5wastheConsoleStationandstation6
wasthelunchroom.Eachstationwasrecordedatvaryingdistancesfromthesource,
dependingonthetypeofworkthatneededtobedone.Theemployeewiththedosimeter
attachedwouldstayandperformnormaltasksforfiveminutesateachstationwhilethe
dosimeterwasrecording.After5minutes,theworkerwouldhavethedosimetertakenoffand
theresultswererecorded.Theresultsarethentobecomparedagainsttheestimatedtimea
workerwillspendateachstation,andextrapolatedon,toprovideanaccuraterepresentation
ofthenoisedosereceivedbytheworker.Theworkerswereallwearing3MOptime101Peltor
earmuffswhichhasanoisereductionof27dB.Thedataisshownintable1.
Thedeviceusedtomeasuretheilluminationandluminancewasthephotometer.The
experimentbeganbyattachingthelightsensortothephotometerandtakingthecoveroffof
thelightsensor.Thedevicewasthenturnedonanditwasmadesurethattheunitwassetto
Lux.ThephotometerthatwasusedtoconductthisexperimentwasanOEMSmartSensor
ModelAR823.Webeganbyanalyzingthesecondhalfoftheprintingpressroomwhichwas
notinoperationandthatgaveustheperfectopportunitytomovearoundandmeasureas
effectivelyaspossible.Theoperationoftheprintingpresswasacompleteindooroperation,
andnowindowswerepresentsononaturallightwascomingintotheroom.Afteranalyzing
theroom,theareawasplottedoutonapieceofpaperandwebegantakingmeasurements.
Westartedtakingmeasurementsbyplacingthedigitalluxmeteroverworkstationsandareas
whereworkersmightreadnumbersoffameter.Wemadesurethatthedevicewasplaced
horizontallyandthatwestoodasfarawayfromthedeviceaspossible.Afterplacingthe
devicehorizontally,weturnedthedigitalluxmeteraround180degreestomeasurethe
luminance.Thedigitalluxmeterwasplacedover10printingpressmachines,1conveyer,2
controlpanelswithbuttonsandacomputeronthem,asortingcabinetandapapercutting
machine.Eachprintingpressmachinehad6lightfixturesbuiltintothem,3onthefrontand3
ontheback.Aftermeasuringboththeilluminanceandtheluminanceon21workstations,we
proceededtomeasurethereflectionofthewall.Onesideoftheroomseemedtobemadea
greybrickwall,andtheothersideoftheroomseemedtobecoveredbyacertaintypeof
metal.Theilluminance,luminanceandreflectanceofthesurfacesdataisshownintable4.A
floormapoffixturesandthereadingsofthesurfacesoftheRedPressisshowninfigure3.
MainFindings
CalculationsandDataforDosimetry
Station1:FoldingStation
Leq=10log10{(15.9/100)x(8/3)}+85dBa
=81.3dBA+727dBA
=61.3dBA
LEX=Leq+1.75
=54.3+1.75
=56.05dBA
Station2:KeyingStation
Leq=10log10{(15.9/100)x(8/3)}+85dBa
=81.3dBA+727dBA
=61.3dBA
LEX=Leq+1.75
=54.3dBA+1.75
=56.05dBA
Station3:RollingStation
Leq=10log10{(10/100)x(8/3)}+85dBa
=79.3dBA+727dBA
=59.3dBA
LEX=Leq+1.75
=52.3dBA+1.75
=54.05dBA
Station4:WebbingStation
Leq=10log10{(7.6/100)x(8/1)}+85dBa
=82.8dBA+727dBA
=62.8dBA
LEX=Leq+1.75
=55.8dBA+1.75
=57.55dBA
Station5:ConsoleStation
Leq=10log10{(15.9/100)x(8/10)}+85dBa
=76.0dBA+727dBA
=56.0dBA
LEX=Leq+1.75
=49.0dBA+1.75
=50.75dBA
Station6:LunchRoom
Leq=10log10{(0.01/100)x(8/1)}+85dBa
=54.0dBA
LEX=Leq+1.75
=54.0+1.75
=55.75dBA(noheadphoneswereusedinthelunchroom)
Table1
Station
1
(Foldin
g
Station)
3
Working
Period in
each
Station
(hours)
Sampling in 5mins
Minutes
Dose(%)in 15.9%
Each
Sampling
Dose (%) 63.6
Extrapolate
dfor12
hours
Station Station
2 (Key 3
Station) (Rolling
Station)
3
Station
4
(Webbin
g
Station)
1
Station
5
(Consol
e
Station)
10
Station
6
(Lunch
Room)
5mins
5mins
5mins
5mins
5mins
Total
Dose:
65.3%
15.9%
10.0%
7.6%
15.9%
0.0%
63.6
40
91.2
19.08
277.48
%
Table1.,displaysthethesixstationswherethedosimeterrecordingswerecollectedaswell
asdose%ineachsamplingwhichwasthenextrapolated
CalculationandDataofWorldBulbGlobeTemperature(WBGT)
Sincemeasurementsweretakeninsidetheworkplaceonly,onlytheWBGT(inside)of
eachworkstationwillbecalculated.Alltheworkerswerewearinglightworkuniforms.
WBGT(inside)Folder
WBGT(inside)=(0.7)(WB)+(0.3)(GT)
=(0.7)(17.1)+(0.3)(24.1)
=11.97+7.23
=19.2
WBGT(inside)Key
WBGT(inside)=(0.7)(WB)+(0.3)(GT)
=(0.7)(17.1)+(0.3)(24.1)
=11.97+7.23
=19.2
WBGT(inside)Roll
WBGT(inside)=(0.7)(WB)+(0.3)(GT)
=(0.7)(17.4)+(0.3)(23.7)
=12.18+7.11
=19.29
WBGT(inside)Web
WBGT(inside)=(0.7)(WB)+(0.3)(GT)
=(0.7)(17.2)+(0.3)(23.4)
=12.04+7.02
=19.06
WBGT(inside)Lunch
WBGT(inside)=(0.7)(WB)+(0.3)(GT)
=(0.7)(17.0)+(0.3)(23.6)
=11.90+7.08
=18.98
WBGT(inside)Console
WBGT(inside)=(0.7)(WB)+(0.3)(GT)
=(0.7)(17.6)+(0.3)(23.8)
=12.32+7.14
=19.46
TimeWeightedAverageWBGT
TWAWBGT=[(WBGT1)(t1)]+[(WBGT2)(t2)]+[(WBGT3)(t3)]+[(WBGT4)(t4)]
+[(WBGT5)(t5)+(WBGT6)(t6)]/(t1+t2+t3+t4+t5+t6)
=[(19.2)(3hr)]+[(19.2)(3hr)]+[(19.29)(3hr)]+[(19.06)(1hr)]+[(18.98)(1hr)]
+[(19.46)(10hr)]/(3hr+3hr+3hr+1hr+1hr+10hr)
=(57.6hr.)+(57.6hr.)+(57.87hr.)+(19.06hr.)+(18.98hr.)+(194.6hr.)/
(21hr)
=(405.71hr.)/(21hr)
=19.32
TimeWeightedAverageMetabolism
TWAM=[(M1)(t1)]+[(M2)(t2)]+[(M3)(t3)]+[(M4)(t4)]+[(M5)(t5)+(M6)(t6)]/(t1+t2+t3+t4
+t5+t6)
=[(300kcal/hr)(3hr)+(300kcal/hr)(3hr)+(300kcal/hr)(3hr)+(300kcal/hr)(1hr)+
(101.25kcal/hr)(1hr)+(56.75kcal/hr)(10hr)]/(3hr+3hr+3hr+1hr+1hr+10hr)
=900kcal/hr.hr+900kcal/hr.hr+900kcal/hr.hr+300kcal/hr.hr+101.25kcal/hr.hr+
567.5kcal/hr.hr/21hr
=174.70kcal/hr
Table2
Work
Station
Dry()
Wet()
Globe()
Air
velocity(m/s
)
Total
Metabolis
Shift(hr) m(kcal/hr)
Folder
22.9
17.1
24.1
0.15
300
Key
22.9
17.1
24.1
0.15
300
Roll
22.7
17.4
23.7
0.04
300
Web
22.3
17.2
23.4
0.02
300
Lunch
Room
22.4
17.0
23.6
0.02
101.25
Console
22.8
17.6
23.8
0.20
10
56.75
Table2.,showsthetemperatureandairvelocitymeasurementstakenwiththeWBGTmeter
andanemometerinandm/s
Table3
WorkStation
WBGT()
Folder
19.2
Key
19.2
Roll
19.29
Web
19.06
LunchRoom
18.98
Console
19.46
Table3.,showsthecalculatedWBGTinforeachworkstation
CalculationandDataforIllumination
Allthecalculationswerebasedonthefollowingequation:
Reflectance(%)=Luminance/Illuminancex100
PrintingPressMachine1:Reflectance=Luminance/Illuminance=70/767x100=9.13%
PrintingPressMachine2:Reflectance=6/138x100=4.35%
PrintingPressMachine3:Reflectance=1/38x100=2.63%
PrintingPressMachine4:Reflectance=32/300x100=10.67%
PrintingPressMachine5:Reflectance=22/120x100=18.33%
PrintingPressMachine6:Reflectance=24/195x100=12.3%
PrintingPressMachine7:Reflectance=4/159x100=2.52%
PrintingPressMachine8:Reflectance=19/210x100=9%
PrintingPressMachine9:Reflectance=28/260x100=10.77%
PrintingPressMachine10:Reflectance=7/192x100=3.65%
Conveyer:Reflectance=70/853x100=8.2%
ControlPanel1p1:Reflectance=8/430x100=1.86%
ControlPanel2p2:9/195x100=4.62%
ControlPanel3p3:19/332x100=5.72%
SortingCabinet:6/137x100=4.38%
ControlPanel2p1:30/670x100=4.48%
ControlPanel2p2:26/263x100=9.89%
ControlPanel2p3:37/196x100=18.88%
PaperCuttingMachinep1:104/315x100=33%
PaperCuttingMachinep2:24/573x100=4.19%
Table4
Area/Machine
Illuminance(lux) Luminance(lux)
Reflectance
PrintingPress1
767
70
9.13%
PrintingPress2
138
4.35%
PrintingPress3
38
2.63%
PrintingPress4
300
32
10.67%
PrintingPress5
120
22
18.33%
PrintingPress6
195
24
12.3%
PrintingPress7
159
2.52%
PrintingPress8
210
19
9%
PrintingPress9
260
28
10.77%
PrintingPress10
192
3.65%
Conveyer
853
70
8.2%
ControlPanel1p1
430
1.86%
ControlPanel1p2
195
4.62%
ControlPanel1p3
332
19
5.72%
SortingCabinet
137
4.38%
ControlPanel2
670
30
4.48%
ControlPanel2p2
263
26
9.89%
ControlPanel2p3
196
37
18.88%
PaperCuttingMachinep1
315
104
33%
PaperCuttingMachinep2
573
24
4.19%
Table4.,showstheilluminance,luminanceandreflectanceofthesurfacesoftheRedPress.
ResultsandComparison
TheSLMwasusedatvariouspointsinordertocreatethefloormapshowninfigure1and
figure2.Thedistancetheemployeesworkvarythroughouttheshift,butmostoftheworkis
donewithinametersdistanceoftheRedPress.Majorityofthereadingsclosesttothepress
weregreaterthan85dBA.Althoughsomeofthepartsofthepresswereoffwhilethereadings
werebeingtaken,itissafetoassumethatevenifthepartswereoperationalthesoundlevel
wouldbe+0.5dB1dBasitwasnotaverysignificantincreaseinthenoiseproduced.This
isduetothelogarithmicpropertiesofsoundmeasurement.Thelowestrecordedvaluewas
82.4dBAwhichwasataboutadistanceof5metersawayandthehighestrecordedvalue
was90.6dBAandrecordedatapointdirectlyadjacenttothemotoroftheRedPress.The
employeesmustalwayswearprotectiveequipmenttosafeguardtheirhearingandbodies.To
significantlydecreasetheimpactontheemployeesears,theyareequippedwith3MOptime
101Peltorearmuffsthathasanoisereductionratingof27dB.Therefore,eventhoughthe
SLMread90.6dBA,anemployeesearwouldonlyhearthenoiseat64dB,whichismuch
belowOntariostandards.
Intable1,theworkingperiodreferstotheamountofhoursaworkerwouldbeworkingovera
periodoftime.Forexample,aworkerwouldbeworkingatstation1forabout3hoursofa12
hourshift.However,insteadofrecording12hoursworthofdata,only5minutesworthofdata
wascollectedfromeachstationtothenbeextrapolated.Tofurtherillustrate,aworkerwould
beatstation2for3hoursoverthecourseofa12hourshift.Anotherpieceofdatafromthe
tableisthesamplinginminutes.Thisreferstotheamountoftimethedatawasrecordedfor
perstation.Next,intable1thedose(%)ineachsamplingwasrecorded.Thisvaluewas
recordedthroughtheuseofadosimeterwhichwasattachedtoaworkerwhothencontinued
workingtheirshift.Finally,thelastpieceofdatafromtable1isthedose(%)thatwas
extrapolatedfor12hours.Thisextrapolatedvalueisthemostaccuratewayofdescribingthe
conditionsthataworkerwillfaceover10hoursofworkexposurewithoutactuallyrecording
for10hoursofactualwork.Inaddition,resultsweretakenfrom5workstationsandthenthe
lunchroomwhichwasclassifiedasstation6inTable1.
InTable2themeasurementsshownaretherecordeddrybulb,wetbulb,globetemperature
andairvelocityreadings.Thesemeasurementsweretakenateachoftheworkstations.After
alltherecordingsweretaken,theWBGTofeachworkplacewascalculated.TheWBGT
(inside)equationwhichis,WBGT(inside)=(0.7)(WB)+(0.3)(GT),indegreecelsiuswasonly
calculatedsincealltheworkareaswereinsidethefacility.TheTimeWeightedAverage
(TWA)WBGTshowstheaverageWBGToftheentireworkplaceinasingleworkday.The
equationtakesintoaccounteveryWBGTforeachworkstationindegreecelsiusandandthe
timespentateachstationinhours.Table3showstheoverallcalculatedWBGTforeachwork
station.TheWBGTvaluesarerelativelyclosetoeachothersincetheworkstationswere
withinrelativelycloseproximityofeachother.Furthermore,theworkplacewaslargeandhad
adequateventilationfortheworkers.Thismeansworkerwerecomfortablesincetheywere
notworkinginhotandcrampedconditions,keepingthelevelofheatstressatlowlevels.
Anotherfactorthatkeptheatstresslevelslowwasthattheworkerswerenotdoinganyoverly
strenuouswork,butratherlight,moderatework.TheTimeWeightedAverageWBGTequates
to19.32.TheminimumstandardWBGTforanenclosedindustrialworkplacesuchas
MetrolandMediainOntariois18basedonACGIHstandards.Thismeansthatthe
workplacemeetstheminimumrequiredWBGTforthisworkplace.Furthermore,forevery
workstation,theminimumWBGTwasmeetwhichareasfollowsFolder(19.2),Key
(19.2),Roll(19.29),Web(19.06),LunchRoom(18.98)Console(19.46).
Theprintingpressmachinesprovedtohavesimilarillumination,luminanceandreflectance
ratiosexceptforthefirstprintingpressmachineandthethirdprintingpressmachineas
shownintable4.Thefirstprintingpressmachinewasrecordedtobe767luxbecauseitwas
theclosestonetothewallandthereflectanceofthewallaffectedthemachine.Thisdoesnot
provetobeaproblemastherewasnoglarebasedonthefactthatlookingatthebuttonwith
thereflectancewasbetterthancoveringthebuttonfromthereflectanceoftheadjacentwall.
Thethirdprintingpressmachinewasrecordedtobe38luxbecausenotenoughlightfixtures
wereworking.Thedeviationinilluminationbetweenonemachineandanotherwasduetothe
numberofworkingfixturesaboveeachprintingpressmachine.Thesamereasoningofbeing
adjacenttothewallgoesfortheconveyerastowhyitishigherthantheothermeasurements.
Thefirstpartsofbothcontrolpanelswerelayoutsforbuttons,andtheybothhadgoodlighting
asitisimportantnottoconfuseonelightwithanother.Thesecondpartsofthecontrolpanels
werecomputers,andtheirlightingwasperfectbecauseitdidntproduceanyglare,andhada
similarcontrastcomparedtotheadjacentoperation.Thethirdpartsofthecontrolpanelswere
justareaswheretheworkersmightwrite.Thepapercuttingmachineshadexcellentlighting
becausethelightwasadequateandsufficientforsuchatask.
ConclusionandRecommendation
SomeoftheconstraintsweremappingtheregionanddeterminingwhereagoodSLMreading
couldbetaken.MaintainingtheSLMatanarmslengthatearlevelisphysicallydemanding
andisrecommendedthattwopeoplealternatetakingreadingsandrecordings.Itwasdifficult
tonotgetinthewayoftheemployeesduringtheprojectandasupervisorhadtoaccompany
theprojectconductorsinordertoensuretheirsafety.Itwasalsoimpossibletogetevenly
spacedoutreadingsthereforemultiplereadingsweretakenatvariousdistancesinorderto
createadetailedsoundfloormap.Themachineisthesourceofsuchhighlevelnoiseanditis
impossibletoisolatetheworkersinordertocontinueproduction.PersonalProtective
Equipmentplaysagreatroleatthisparticularworkplaceasitensuresthattheearsare
protectedwithearmuffsthatsignificantlyreducethenoiseheard.
MeasuringLeqandLEXforeachstationithasbeenshownthatthereisarelationship
betweenbothvaluesandbothvaluesareimportantinordertodetermineexposure.For
example,LEX=Leq.However,LEX=Leqisonlytrueinregardstoan8hourworkshift.
Whenaworkshiftisnotthetypical8hours,LEXdoesnotequalLeq.Inthiscase,LEX=Leq
+timeshiftcorrection.From8hoursto12hours,thereisa1.75correctionthatneedstobe
made.Forexample,forstation1,theLeqcalculatedwas81.3dBA.However,theworkers
wereallwearingPPEwhichreducedthenoiseby27dBwhichledtoanewvalueof54.3dBA
.But,whenthetimeshiftcorrectionisadded,thenewvalue,LEX,is56.05dBA.Becausethe
workersarenotworking8hourshifts,theuseofthetimeshiftcorrectioniscritical.Theuseof
thetimeshiftvaluenowprovidesthemostaccuraterepresentationofthedBAtheworkerwas
exposedtowithouthavingtorecordforthecourseoftheirshift.AccordingtoOSHA,the
permissibleexposurelimitfornoiseexposureis85dBAforan8hourshift.Becausethe
workerswerenotworking8hourshifts,theLEXvaluewillbeusedinstead.Asseeninthe
calculations,allthestationshadanLEXbelowtheOHSAlimit.ThismeansthatMetroland
Mediadoesnotexceedthepermissibleexposurelimit.SetbyOSHA.Itwasalsoconcluded
thatthedosimeterhasanadvantageoveraregularSLMbecauseitprovidesaconstant
readoutforsoundlevelsasopposedtoasinglesoundlevelreading.Italsocanbeattached
totheworkerinthatcaseamorerealisticreadingcanbetakentobettermeasurethesounds
thattheworkerencounters.Also,itisimportanttonotethatasdosepercentageincreasein
magnitude,sodoestheLeqvalue.Forexample,asshownintable1,station1,2and5had
thehighestdosepercentage(15.9%).Likewise,station6hadthelowest.Allinall,the
objectivewascompletedasboththeLeqandLEXwerecalculatedforeachstationaswellas
thedose(%)extrapolatedover12hours.Apotentialsourceoferrorthatshouldbe
consideredisthatoncethedosimeterwasstrappedonanemployeehisnormalmovements
mayhaveruffledthemicandcouldhavepotentiallycausedanincreaseintheoveralldose
thatwouldberecordedandthenextrapolated.
BasedontheWBGTwhencomparedtotheOntarioACGIHstandardforWBGTinan
enclosedindustrialworkplace,MetrolandMediameetstheminimumrequirement.TheWBGT
foreachoftheworkstationsshowedtheheatstressthattheworkerswereplacedin,which
areatsafelevels.Thereasonwhytheworkplacehadsuchexcellentresultsarebecausethe
workareawasverylargeandwellventilated,givingworkersacomfortableworkenvironment
thatwasnthotandcramped.Furthermoretheworkbeingdonewasnotheavybutlightand
moderate.Thisalsohelpedkeeptheworkenvironmentatacomfortabletemperature.Overall,
MetrolandMediameetOntarioACGIHstandardsfortheWBGTlevelsinanenclosed
industrialworkplace.
TheminimalrequirementforilluminationinindustrialareasbasedontheCanadian
OccupationalHealthandSafetyRegulationsis20lux.Novalueofthemeasuredvalueswent
below20lux,sotheworkplacemettheminimalstandards.Basedonthetypeofprinting
pressthisis,thecategoryoftherangeofilluminanceiscategoryD.Mostoftheworkers
wereundertheageof40,speedandaccuracywerenotimportant,andthereflectanceofthe
backgroundtaskwasalmostalwayslessthan30percent.Thisconclusionwascalculatedby
theuseoftheageweightingfactortable.Thisleadsustotheconclusionthatthe
recommendedilluminancefortheprintingpressis200lux.Sincemostofthevalues,witha
fewexceptions,arerelativelycloseto200lux,theworkplacehasprovedtonotonlymeetthe
minimumrecommendedrequirements,butalsotherecommendedrequirements.The
workplaceprovedtoprovideagoodstandardforillumination,theonlyrecommendationwould
beconsistentandperiodicmaintenanceofthelightfixturesoftheprintingpressmachines.
Acknowledgments
WewouldliketothankMr.ScottReisfromMetrolandMediaGroupfortakingtimeoutto
respondtoourquestionsandconcernsandguidingusthroughtheproductionfacility.We
wouldalsoliketothankthesupervisorsthataccompanieduswhileconductingtheprojectand
makingsureweweresafeandoutofharmsway,aswellasinformedaboutpotentialtripping
orotherphysicalhazardspresentatthejob,suchasskids,paperbins,paperrolls,etc.
References
CanadaOccupationalHealthandSafetyRegulations.(2014)PartVI:Lighting,6.5.
Retrievedfrom:
http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/sor86304/page19.html#docCont
CanadaCentreforOccupationalHealthandSafety.(2013)LightingErgonomics
SurveyandSolutions.Retrievedfrom:
http://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/ergonomics/lighting_survey.html
ExtremeHotorColdTemperatureConditions.(2013,November19).RetrievedDecember9,
2014,fromhttp://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/phys_agents/hot_cold.html
"IESNALightingReadyReferenceFourthEdition."RequirementsforLightingLevels.Ed.R.
HarroldandD.Mennie.WBDG(WholeBuildingDesignGuide),7Jan.2010.Web.9Nov.
2014.http://www.me.ua.edu/me416/s09/pdf/IESNARRLightingCalc.pdf
IlluminatingEngineeringSociety.(2014)TheLightingHandbook:Pages6583.
Retrievedfrom:
https://courses.ryerson.ca/@@/9639F3EBD2D35A87C5D1FF415456CC30/courses/1/o
hs314_f14_01/content/_2749002_1/Lighting%20standard%20table.pdf
NoiseOccupationalExposureLimitsinCanada,CanadianCentreforOccupationalHealth
andSafety,lastmodifiedMarch5,2014,accessedSeptember22,2014,
http://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/phys_agents/exposure_can.html
NoiseControl:Aguideforworkersandemployers,OccupationalSafetyandHealth
Administration,U.S.DepartmentofLabor,accessedSeptember22,2014,
http://www.nonoise.org/hearing/noisecon/noisecon.htm
OccupationalSafetyandHealthAdministration,USDepartmentofLabor.(2013).SectionIII,
Chapter5:Noise.InOSHATechnicalManual.Retrievedfrom
https://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/otm/new_noise/index.pdf
Rea,MarkStanley.TheIESNALightingHandbook:Reference&Application.9thed.New
York,NY:IlluminatingEngineeringSocietyofNorthAmerica,2000.Chapter1.Print.