Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/surfrep
Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Introduction............................................................................................................................................................................ 170
Techniques to study surfaces under ambient pressure conditions ................................................................................................... 170
Problems and solutions in electron-based spectroscopies.............................................................................................................. 171
3.1. Electron mean free path and differential pumping ............................................................................................................. 171
3.2. History ........................................................................................................................................................................ 172
3.3. The new ambient pressure photo-electron spectrometer ..................................................................................................... 172
3.3.1. Transfer electron optics ..................................................................................................................................... 173
3.3.2. Analysis and preparation chambers ..................................................................................................................... 173
3.3.3. X-ray windows................................................................................................................................................. 173
X-ray electron spectroscopies ................................................................................................................................................... 174
4.1. XPS and XAS............................................................................................................................................................... 174
4.2. Calibration and background signal issues ......................................................................................................................... 175
4.3. Charging and beam damage effects ................................................................................................................................. 176
4.4. Gas phase spectra.......................................................................................................................................................... 176
Applications to environmental science ....................................................................................................................................... 176
5.1. The melting of ice ......................................................................................................................................................... 177
5.2. The surface of aqueous ionic solutions............................................................................................................................. 178
5.3. Water films on surfaces .................................................................................................................................................. 178
5.3.1. Water on T i O2 (110)......................................................................................................................................... 179
5.3.2. Water on amorphous Si O2 ................................................................................................................................ 179
Applications to catalysis .......................................................................................................................................................... 180
6.1. Oxidation of Pd(111)..................................................................................................................................................... 181
6.2. Redox chemistry of Cu:Oxidation of Cu 2 O to CuO .......................................................................................................... 182
6.3. Reduction of a Cu/Z n O nanostructured system ............................................................................................................... 183
6.4. Catalytic reactions......................................................................................................................................................... 186
6.4.1. Copper in MeOH oxidation................................................................................................................................ 186
6.4.2. Ruthenium: Oxidation of CO and MeOH............................................................................................................. 189
6.4.3. Copper in MeOH steam reforming...................................................................................................................... 192
6.4.4. Automobile catalysis: Coadsorption of CO and NO on Rh..................................................................................... 195
6.4.5. Poisoning of H2 chemisorption by CO on Pt(111) ................................................................................................ 196
Corresponding address: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Rd. Bldg. 67-2111, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States.
170
7.
Outlook.................................................................................................................................................................................. 197
Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................................................. 197
References ............................................................................................................................................................................. 197
1. Introduction
Progress in science often follows or parallels the development of new techniques. The optical microscope helped convert medicine and biology from a speculative activity in old
times to todays sophisticated scientific disciplines. The telescope changed the study and interpretation of the heavens from
mythology to science. X-ray diffraction enabled the flourishing of solid state physics and materials science. The technique
object of this review, Ambient Pressure Photoelectron Spectroscopy or APPES for short, has also the potential of producing dramatic changes in the study of liquid and solid surfaces, particularly in areas such as atmospheric, environment
and catalysis sciences. APPES adds an important missing element to the host of techniques that give fundamental information, i.e., spectroscopy and microscopy, about surfaces in
the presence of gases and vapors, as encountered in industrial
catalysis and atmospheric environments. APPES brings electron spectroscopy into the realm of techniques that can be used
in practical environments. Decades of surface science in ultra
high vacuum (UHV) has shown the power of electron spectroscopy in its various manifestations. Their unique property is
the extremely short elastic mean free path of electrons as they
travel through condensed matter, of the order of a few atomic
distances, in the energy range from a few eV to a few thousand
eV. As a consequence of this, the information obtained by analyzing electrons emitted or scattered from a surface refers to the
top first few atomic layers, which is what surface science is all
about. Low energy electron diffraction (LEED), Auger electron
spectroscopy (AES), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS),
Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS), and other such
techniques have been used for decades and provided some of
the most fundamental knowledge about surface crystallography,
composition and electronic structure available today. Unfortunately the high interaction cross section of electrons with matter
also prevents them from traveling long distances unscattered in
gas environments. Above the millibar pressure range this distance is reduced to less that a millimeter, effectively preventing
its use in the most relevant environments, usually between millibars and atmospheric pressures. There is therefore a large gap,
of several orders of magnitude, where information about surfaces is scarce because these powerful electron spectroscopies
cannot operate.
One characteristic of surfaces in ambient pressure environments is that they are covered by dense layers of molecules,
even when their binding energy is weak. Water for example is
known to form layers several molecules thick at room temperature in humid environments. Metals readily form oxide films
several layers thick in oxygen atmospheres. Dense layers of adsorbed molecules can also be produced in ultra high vacuum,
often by the simple and expedient method of cooling the sample to cryogenic temperatures. A large amount of data has been
171
Fig. 1. Electron elastic mean free path through an oxygen gas environment
as a function of kinetic energy. At 100 Pa (1 mbar) a 400 eV electron travels
approximately 4 mm before suffering an inelastic collision. Ten Pa-meter
represents the same number of molecules as approximately 1 monolayer, if
condensed on a surface.
172
173
Fig. 2. Conceptual design of traditional differential pumping system used for photoelectron spectroscopy in ambient gas pressures (left). Apertures communicate
the various pumping chambers as well as the x-ray source. In the new design (right) a thin membrane window separates the x-ray source from the sample chamber.
Electrostatic lenses refocuse the electron trajectories into the apertures communicating the differential pumping stages.
Fig. 3. Exchangeable conic aperture separating the high pressure chamber from
the first pumping stage. The diameter is 1 mm or less.
174
Fig. 4. (a) Schematic diagram of the chamber, differential pumping stages and
electrostatic lenses. (b) Photograph of lens system and a calculated electron
trajectory. (c) Artistic rendition of the system. The replaceable nozzle is shown
in green, the lens system in gray and the -metal in red. The hemispherical
analyzer is in yellow.
Fig. 5. Schematic diagram of the x-ray insertion tube (blue), tapered off to bring the end as close to the surface as possible to avoid absorption by the gas. A 100 nm
thick Si3 N4 or Al membrane closes the end of the tube to prevent gas from entering the x-ray source. The transmission of x-rays through a 0.1 micrometer thick Al
membrane as a function of energy is shown in the graph at the right.
175
176
Fig. 6. XPS spectrum of KCl under 0.7 mbar of water vapor obtained using
650 eV photons. Peaks due to K, Cl, O and C can be observed. In vacuum the
same spectrum is shifted by tens of eV due to charging. Gas phase ions created
by the x-rays neutralize the sample at this pressure.
177
at the melting point in the 107 Pa range (e.g. In, Pb, Ga), the
vapor pressure of most liquids is high and outside the range
of applicability of electron based techniques. In the following
subsections we show a few examples of applications to studies
of water surfaces and the growth of thin water films.
5.1. The melting of ice
At the triple point of water near 0 C, the pressure is
6.12 mbar. Since at present the instrument is capable of
operating at approximately 10 mbar, saturation humidity can
be reached by cooling to near 0 C. Using this technique
Bluhm et al. [25] investigated the changes in the structure
of the water surface through the melting transition, when
the temperature varied from 40 C to +2 C. Auger yield
XAS at the O1s edge provided information on the LUMO
structure of water near the surface, while the composition
was monitored by XPS. It was indeed shown theoretically by
Petersen et al. and experimentally by Nilsson et al. that the
XAS spectrum depends strongly on the Hbonding structure
of water [26]. Qualitatively the argument is as follows. The
threshold transition 1s 4a1 in the isolated molecule involves
s and p orbitals that make the transition dipole allowed.
When water forms ice it becomes tetrahedrally coordinated
with 4 other molecules through Hbonds. This modifies the
hybridization of the LUMO orbitals such that they become
more s-like in character. This translates into a decrease of
the absorption probability. The transition from ice to liquid is
marked by the progressive increase in the number of broken
Hbonds. Therefore it is the LUMO orbitals of molecules, with
dangling Hbonds (non-donor type molecules), that contribute
the most to this transition. This allowed the authors to study
the changes in Hbonding through the melting transition. The
experiments were carried out on millimeter-thick ice films
grown on a cold Cu substrate. The substrate was heated from
liquid nitrogen temperatures to the melting point, and slightly
above. Supercooled water was formed at 2 C by slow cooling
of the liquid film. The evolution of the XAS is shown in
Fig. 7. The peak at 535 eV, corresponding to transition 1s
lowest LUMO state, increases appreciably in intensity from
the ice to the liquid. The peak is already present in ice at low
temperatures due to the surface molecules, which necessarily
have dangling Hbonds. The gradual increase in intensity of
this peak indicates that pre-melting is occurring. Pre-melting is
characterized by an increase in the number of broken Hbonds
in a thin film, sometimes referred to as being liquid-like.
Using the intensity of this peak (evaluated by a Gaussian fitting)
and the attenuation length of 500 eV electrons (2.3 nm) the
thickness of the liquid-like film was measured, as shown in
the graph of Fig. 8. As can be seen, pre-melting starts to be
visible around 20 C and the thickness of the liquid-like layer
increases rapidly above that, reaching 1.5 nm around 5 C and
quickly diverging as the temperature approaches the triple point
value.
An interesting finding of this work was that the extent of
pre-melting is influenced by the presence of surface impurities.
Using XPS the authors could confirm that carbonaceous
178
Fig. 10. Atomic Br/K ratio measured from the areas of the Br and K XPS peaks
as a function of water vapor pressure. The Br/K ratio is virtually constant until
the deliquescence point at 2.7 mbar, where it increased to a value around 2 in
the saturated solution. The picture at the right shows the liquid drop produced
by the dissolution of the sample.
Fig. 9. Ion concentration profile near the surface of an aqueous 1.2 M
NaBr solution calculated by classical molecular dynamics simulations (from
Ref. [29]). A marked enhancement of the halide ion concentration at the surface
is predicted.
179
Fig. 12. XPS spectra in the O1s region of a TiO2 sample in the presence of
2.25 Pa of H2O at 298 K (bottom curve, red), and in 133 Pa at 270 K (top curve)
The photon energy is 690 eV. The peaks at 534 eV and 531.7 eV correspond to
molecular water and OH respectively. Only the molecular water peak changes
with water exposure, increasing in intensity and shifting to lower energies.
Fig. 11. Measured anion/cation atomic ratio as a function of the average
sampled depth (from inelastic mean free paths) in saturated solutions of KBr
and KI. The depth was changed by varying the photon energy.
180
Fig. 14. O1s and Si2p XPS peaks of a SiO2 /Si(111) wafer under 2 mbar of
water. (a) T = 23 C, RH 5%. (b) T = 6 C (50% RH), which produces
a water film about 3 layers thick on the surface. (c) T = 15 C (100% RH),
with a macroscopic ice layer condensed on the surface.
Fig. 13. (a) Coverage of OH (red symbols) and H2 O (blue) obtained from
different isobars (ranging from 1.3 to 200 Pa) as a function of relative humidity.
(b) Enlarged view of the low relative humidity region (different symbols
correspond to different isobars). Notice the change of the x axis from linear
to logarithmic in the two plots.
Fig. 15. Left y-axis (solid symbols): Water film thickness as a function of
relative humidity (RH) determined from the XPS peaks. Different symbols
correspond to experiments on different samples and/or at different water vapor
pressure. A thickness of 0.3 nm was assumed to correspond to one monolayer of
water. Right y-axis (open symbols): Changes in surface potential as a function
of RH measured by the AFM in a different chamber, operating in the Kelvin
probe mode at 21 C.
181
Fig. 16. Pd3d5/2 and O1s/Pd3p3/2 XPS regions at different stages in the
oxidation of Pd(111): (a) clean Pd (bulk and surface peaks), (b) O(2 2)
182
Fig. 18. Arrhenius plot for various Pd oxidation and reductions steps. Filled
triangles correspond to the transformation from surface to subsurface oxide;
filled squares to that from subsurface oxide to PdO, both in 47 Pa of O2 ;
finally open squares correspond to the reduction of PdO to the metal, in 0.4 Pa
of O2 .
Fig. 17. (a) Phase diagram showing the experimentally observed stability
regions of the various palladium oxide phases. The points mark the conditions
under which XPS data were obtained. The solid line is the phase boundary
between Pd and PdO calculated from tabulated values of enthalpies and heat
capacities. The hatched region shows the PdO stability region when the pressure
is reduced from 1 Torr at fixed temperature. (b) Phase diagram calculated from
atomistic thermodynamics [Ref. [36]].
183
Fig. 19. Schematic illustration of the oxidation of Pd. As the chemical potential of oxygen increases, first a monolayer thick surface oxide forms. The
thermodynamically stable state at higher potentials is the bulk PdO. However, this requires a morphological restructuring of the oxide film that kinetically hinders
the transformation. Instead, metastable growth of an epitaxial oxide film, two or more monolayers thick takes place (sub-surface oxide). During reduction by heating
there is enough thermal energy for directly reducing the PdO to the surface oxide and to the clean metal, bypassing the metastable sub-surface oxide.
Fig. 20. Oxygen XPS 1s spectra illustrating the oxidation of Cu2 O (bottom
red curve) to CuO by heating the sample to increasing temperatures up to
573 K under 0.25 mbar of oxygen. The copper foil sample was prepared by
first oxidizing it in O2 and then reducing it to Cu2 O by annealing in H2 . The
gas phase peaks of O provide precise alignment of the spectra.
184
Fig. 21. XPS of a CuO/ZnO nominal catalyst precursor acquired during in-situ
reduction. The sample was held in 0.25 mbar hydrogen gas and heated at a rate
of 2 K/min from 300 to 453 K. The peaks around 90 eV arise from Zn 3p, and
the structure at 76 eV from Cu 3p states.
185
Fig. 22. Oxygen 1s XPS data and gas evolution traces during the reduction of a nominal CuO/ZnO catalyst precursor in hydrogen. The conditions are as in Fig. 21.
The dashed line gives the temperature time profile. The spectra were recorded equidistant in time. The reference lines for the binding energies were taken from the
experiment in Fig. 20.
Fig. 23. Cu/Zn atomic ratios obtained from XPS during reduction in hydrogen
under the conditions of Fig. 21. The arrow denotes the end of the CuO
reduction. The dotted line is only a visual guide. The horizontal dashed line
indicates the analytical bulk elemental ratio.
186
Fig. 24. Cu L3 XAS data of the catalyst precursor and of final reduction
product in hydrogen, under conditions as in Fig. 21. The vertical line marks
the position of the first maximum of the metal absorption edge. The spectrum
of Cu2 O was obtained in the conditions of in Fig. 20 and that of the Cu metal
from a clean Cu(111) crystal.
187
Fig. 25. O1s (left panel) and valence band (right panel) XPS of a copper sample
at 400 C in a CH3 OH:O2 reactant gas mixture with ratios 1:2, 1:1, 3:1, and
6:1. The incident photon energy was 720 eV. Gas-phase peaks are found at
BE > 534 eV, and surface peaks at BE < 534 eV. In the 1:2 and 1:1 mixtures
the Cu2 O peak dominates the surface XPS spectrum. The Cu2 O peak is absent
in the spectra that were taken under reducing conditions (3:1 and 6:1 ratios).
In those spectra the subsurface oxygen peak is the strongest peak in the surface
part of the spectrum. The valence band reveals the metallic and/or oxidized state
of the Cu substrate.
188
Fig. 26. Structure function correlation plots for two sets of experiments of methanol oxidation. The abundance of sub-surface oxygen correlates positively with the
formation of formaldehyde in both experiments. The right panel represents data from the experiment described in Fig. 25, the left hand panel was constructed from
data of an experiment described in the literature (see text).
189
190
Table 1
XPS Binding energies of selected adsorbates in the ruthenium-oxygen system
Phase
Species
Ru 3d 5/2
Metal
Bulk
Surface layer (RuI)
Sub-surface layer (RuII)
Adsorbed
Adsorbed
Adsorbed
Adsorbed
Adsorbed:
RuI + 1O
RuI + 2O
RuI + 3O
RuI + 4O
Ru II
Oxidic form:
RuI + 2O
RuI + 3O
Ru II
Oxide ex segregation
Annealed low T (2ML, defective)
Annealed high T (thick, ordered)
Cus sites
Bulk phase
280,1
279,8
280,25
CO
CH3 O
CH2 O
OH
Rux Oy
RuOx
RuO2
O1s
530, 8531,8
531,2
532,2
530,4
280,15
280,5
281,1
281,5
280,6
280,6
281,4
280,9
280,4
280,5
280,65
280,45
280,75
530,0
528,6
529,5
529,5
All values are in eV with an accuracy is 0.05 eV relative to the Fermi level.
191
Fig. 29. SEM images of polycrystalline RuO2 before and after CO oxidation
under stoichiometric feed and at atmospheric pressure in isothermal reactor at
488 K. Note the factor 10 difference in scale.
Fig. 28. Top: O 1s (a) and Ru 3d5/2 spectra (b), illustrating the catalyst
composition during CO oxidation as the temperature is increased from 370
to 600 K (at 2 K/min). Reaction conditions: PCO = 0.5 101 mbar,
PO2 = 0.5 101 mbar. The insert in (a) is a Ru 3d peak intensity map
(64 64 m) illustrating the surface morphology after exposure to 106 L O2
at 670 K with RuO2 (blue) and Rux Oy (green) islands. Bottom: Production of
CO2 during acquisition of the XPS data. The phase transition is marked by the
dotted line.
192
193
Fig. 31. C 1s XPS data for the Cu/ZnO catalyst system in the calcinated state
and after in-situ reduction in 0.25 mbar of hydrogen at 523 K. The reduced
state is very similar to the state under reaction conditions (0.125 mbar water,
0.125 mbar methanol, T = 523 K).
194
Fig. 32. Oxygen 1s XPS data of the activated Cu/ZnO catalyst in steam reforming under the conditions of Fig. 31. In (A) the colored spectrum marks the onset
of hydrogen production in the temperature-programmed scan. In (B) the spectrum were obtained at the hydrogen production onset with constant resolution but
different kinetic energies of the photoelectrons. The gas phase contribution is visible above 534 eV. The variation with kinetic energy indicates that the high binding
energy component (532 eV) is mostly a surface species while the low binding energy component (530.5 eV) is largely a bulk species. A precise determination of
the information depth (roughly between 1.5 and 4.5 nm) however is not possible as the sample is polycrystalline and topographically inhomogeneous.
Fig. 33. Correlation between the intensity of the oxygen 1s peaks in Fig. 32 and
hydrogen production. The inset shows the temperature evolution with an onset
of activity at 420 K. The designation oxide refers to the binding energy and
does not necessary imply that any Cu oxide is in the active state. Remarkably,
the surface hydroxide species that could contain dissociated water, is negatively
correlated with the activity whereas the bulk oxidespecies is positively
correlated. This result indicates that the XPS reflects the constitution of the
active phase, and not necessarily that of the kinetically relevant adsorbates, as
their concentration is too low to be observable.
195
Fig. 34. Displacement of CO by NO on hollow sites of the Rh(111) surface (left diagram) demonstrated by in the in situ C1s XPS results shown in the right hand
side. The first spectrum (bottom) was taken under 20 Pa (=0.2 mbar) of pure CO. It shows two peaks due to CO on top and hollow sites (the binding energy
difference of C1s of CO in fcc and hcp hollow sites is negligible). After admitting 6 Pa of NO (27% curve), a large fraction of the CO in hollow sites has been
displaced. At higher NO fractions the displacement is nearly complete. As the NO percentage increases CO on top sites is also displaced by NO.
196
Fig. 35. Arrenius plot of the H2/D2 exchange turnover frequency (TOF) on a
Pt(111) surface in the presence of a gas mixture consisting of 27 Pa of H2 and
2.7 Pa of D2 (top curve). The bottom curve is for a similar experiment after
addition of 0.7 Pa of CO to the gas mixture. The activation energy increased
from 5.35 kcal/mol to 17.44 kcal/mol upon the addition of CO.
Fig. 36. O1s XPS region of Pt(111) in the presence of 27 Pa H2 , 2.7 Pa D2 , and
0.7 Pa CO at 298 K. The peaks can be deconvoluted into two broad components
assigned to near-top and near-bridge positions. The inset shows a schematic
of the surface structure deduced from STM images acquired under identical
conditions. CO molecules are adsorbed near top and near bridge site positions
in an incommensurate structure.
197
198
[17] M.A. Kelly, M.L. Shek, P. Pianetta, T.M. Gur, M.R. Beasley, Journal of
Vacuum Science & Technology a-Vacuum Surfaces and Films 19 (2001)
21272133.
[18] T. Tyliszczak, T. Warwick, A.L.D. Kilcoyne, S. Farka, D.K. Shuh,
T.H. Yoon, G.E. Brown Jr., S. Andrews, Y. Acreman, Synchrotron
Radiation Instrumentation, Vol. 705, American Institute of Physics,
2004, p. 1356.
[19] J. Stohr, NEXAFS Spectroscopy, Springer, Berlin, 1992.
[20] J.J. Yeh, I. Lindau, Atomic Data Nuclear Data Tables 32 (1985) 1.
[21] G. Moretti, Zeolites 14 (1994) 469475.
[22] H. Shimada, N. Matsubayashi, M. Imamura, T. Sato, A. Nishijima,
Catalysis Letters 39 (1996) 125128.
[23] W. Grunert, R. Schlogl, H.G. Karge, Journal of Physical Chemistry 97
(1993) 86388645.
[24] H. Shimada, K. Sato, N. Matsubayashi, M. Imamura, T. Saito, K. Furuya,
Applied Surface Science 145 (1999) 2125.
[25] H. Bluhm, D.F. Ogletree, C.S. Fadley, Z. Hussain, M. Salmeron, J. Phys.
Cond. Matter 14 (2002) L227.
[26] S. Myneni, Y. Luo, L.A. Naslund, M. Cavalleri, L. Ojamae,
H. Ogasawara, A. Pelmenschikov, P. Wernet, P. Vaterlein, C. Heske,
Z. Hussain, L.G.M. Pettersson, A. Nilsson, Journal of PhysicsCondensed Matter 14 (2002) L213L219.
[27] E.M. Knipping, M.J. Lakin, K.L. Foster, P. Jungwirth, D.J. Tobias,
R.B. Gerber, D. Dabdub, B.J. Finlayson-Pitts, Science 288 (2000)
301306.
[28] J.H. Hu, Q. Shi, P. Davidovits, D.R. Worsnop, M.S. Zahniser, C.E. Kolb,
Journal of Physical Chemistry 99 (1995) 87688776.
[29] P. Jungwirth, D.J. Tobias, Journal of Physical Chemistry B 106 (2002)
63616373.
[30] S.W. Hunt, M. Roeselova, W. Wang, L.M. Wingen, E.M. Knipping,
D.J. Tobias, D. Dabdub, B.J. Finlayson-Pitts, Journal of Physical
Chemistry A 108 (2004) 1155911572.
[31] S. Ghosal, J.C. Hemminger, H. Bluhm, B.S. Mun, E.L.D. Hebenstreit,
G. Ketteler, D.F. Ogletree, F.G. Requejo, M. Salmeron, Science 307
(2005) 563566.
[32] S. Ghosal, A. Verdaguer, J.C. Hemminger, M. Salmeron, Journal of
Physical Chemistry A 109 (2005) 47444749.
[33] G. Ketteler, S. Yamamoto, H. Bluhm, K. Andersson, D.E. Starr,
D.F. Ogletree, H. Ogasawara, A. Nilsson, M. Salmeron, Journal of
Physical Chemistry C 111 (2007) 82788282.
[34] A. Verdaguer, C. Weis, G. Oncins, G. Ketteler, H. Bluhm, M. Salmeron,
Langmuir 23 (2007) 96999703.
[35] K. Reuter, C. Stampfl, M.V. Ganduglia-Pirovano, M. Scheffler, Chemical
Physics Letters 352 (2002) 311317.
[36] K. Reuter, M. Scheffler, Applied Physics a-Materials Science &
Processing 78 (2004) 793798.
[37] E. Lundgren, J. Gustafson, A. Mikkelsen, J.N. Andersen, A. Stierle,
H. Dosch, M. Todorova, J. Rogal, K. Reuter, M. Scheffler, Physical
Review Letters (2004) 92.
[38] G. Ketteler, D.F. Ogletree, H. Bluhm, H.J. Liu, E.L.D. Hebenstreit,
M. Salmeron, Journal of the American Chemical Society 127 (2005)
1826918273.
[39] E. Lundgren, G. Kresse, C. Klein, M. Borg, J.N. Andersen, M. De Santis,
Y. Gauthier, C. Konvicka, M. Schmid, P. Varga, Physical Review Letters
(2002) 88.
[40] M. Todorova, W.X. Li, M.V. Ganduglia-Pirovano, C. Stampfl, K. Reuter,
M. Scheffler, Physical Review Letters (2002) 89.
[41] I. Barin, Thermochemical Data, VCH, Weinheim, 1992.
[42] T. Schedel-Niedrig, T. Neisius, N. Bottger, E. Kitzelmann, G. Weinberg,
D. Demuth, R. Schlogl, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2 (2000)
24072417.
[43] G.W. Zhou, L. Wang, J.C. Yang, Journal of Applied Physics (2005) 97.
[44] T. Kangas, K. Laasonen, A. Puisto, H. Pitkanen, M. Alatalo, Surface
Science 584 (2005) 6269.
[45] T. Kravchuk, A. Hoffman, Surface Science (2007) 8794.
[46] V.I. Bukhtiyarov, M. Havecker, V.V. Kaichev, A. Knop-Gericke,
R.W. Mayer, R. Schlogl, Physical Review B (2003) 67.
199