Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Statement
Lucky Cement Limited
Second meeting
By the time of the second meeting, I had collected a bulk of research data. But I was having trouble
extracting the relevant information out of such huge amount of data discussed it with my mentor and he told
me to stay calm and focus on my research objectives. He said it was easy to get lost in the sea of data but
one should only seek the information that he require. This way I will only put my time and effort in the
relevant information and not every piece of article which is available on the internet He also told me to
consider the latest information as current issues are more relevant to the business analysis part of the
project. I was done with my ratio analysis and requested my mentor to review it. My mentor found some
issues with my referencing and advised me to cross check my conclusions with various external sources
other than companys official website. He urged me to read the opinions of other analysts as they have the in
depth information and historical information and it might help to create a stronger perspective. I had decided
to perform a detailed and comprehensive SWOT analysis to cover the business analysis as I believe SWOT
analysis can provide a reasonable picture of the companys strategic position in the market for this RAP
keeping in mind the imposed word count by the OBU. My mentor reaffirmed my use of the SWOT model for
the business analysis part and gave me a deadline for the third meeting.
Third meeting
I started the meeting by delivering the presentation I had prepared on PowerPoint slides. A question answers
section was followed by the presentation as my mentor had invited some of his students to see my
presentation. I was asked a lot of questions regarding the models I had used and the financial ratios
calculated. My mentor however asked questions that tested my background supporting and basis for my
conclusions.
After the presentation, my mentor reviewed my whole project and identified weaknesses that need to be
rectified. He rechecked my financial analysis and appreciated the improvements I had made since our last
session. He checked my business analysis in detail and was satisfied with the overall consistency between
the two analyses. He however had some advice for the format of my report and suggested ways to improve
it. He also reviewed the structure and style for presentation of financial results and asked me to incorporate
some changes to make it look professional. He appeared satisfied with the referencing of my project but
insisted to put some more graphs and charts in order to demonstrate proper IT skills. Overall he was satisfied
with my basis and conclusions and gave me the green signal to submit the project.
receivable collection period and payable payment period to assess the companys working capital position. I
compared the financial performance of the company with its immediate competitor in the market. During my
assessment of the financial performance of the company I evaluated the reasons for change in its
performance with preceding year and of its competitor. I also applied the SWOT analysis in order to evaluate
the companys strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats and its competitive position in the market. I
also used porter five forces model to assess the environmental factors which can affect the companys
business performance. I believe I have conducted my research very carefully and according to the
instructions of the Oxford Brookes University. My conclusions are consistent with the general understanding
of the company and cement industry. Therefore I can confidently say that my research objectives have been
met and research questions are answered satisfactorily.