You are on page 1of 11

1

rTEM NO.3O1

couRT NO.2

SECTTON:rVrI

s u P * t " T _ c o u R T
o E 'r N D r A
RECORD
OE PROCEEDTNGS

34-36,

j;irr{l";tJTt-'

43-44 in coNMr.p'r.(c)
No. 412/20126

j I tri,,#j;t ii,;,,TiJ,#,a**,:t:,i
i: "z;,il;i!
in
:.n

s . E .B .r .
petitioner

(s)

vERSUS
SAHARA ftlDfA

REAL ESTATE CORPN.


LTD. &ORS.

appropriate

Respondent

(s)

=r.
Jna
pe
rmr
;l;;;"""
rl"lnnff :T:: ":il: i:: 1;":::: rri::
:$:::i """
jT""

directi

with
T'c' (c) No' 83 of
Date:

0g/oL/2015

2oL4, 87/2974, e6/20L4,


8 4 / 2 9 1 4a n d B s / 2 0 L 4
These rnatters

were ca'led

on for

CORAM :
HON'BIE !{R. JT,STTCE
T.S.
HON'BLE !4R. iIUSTICE
A}IrI.

hearing

THAKUR
R. DA\ZE

HoN'BLEMR. ..'rrsrrcE
a.n. ,i^._

Mr. Shekhar Naphade,Sr.Ad,v.


Ms. Shubhangi TuIi,aar.---'
Mr. Vikrarn Sobti,Adv.
For

petitioner(s)

Mr.

Arvind
pratap

DatarrSr.Adv.
Venugopal,Ad,v.
Y".
Ms. Surekha RamanrAdv.
Ms. Supriya JainrAdv.
Mr. Ga.urav NairrAdv.
For M/s. K. J.
.fohn & Co.
For Applicant

iiiffi"''
Brought to you by http://StockViz.biz

(s)

Mr. S. GaneshrSr.Adv.
Dr. Rajiv Dhawan,Sr.Adv.
Mr. Gautam AwasthirAdv.
Mr. Keshav MohanrAdv.
Mr. Aarohi BhalJ.a,Adv.
Ga.urav Kejriwal,Ad,v.
|-vlr.
Ms. Amrita
HaiayanrAd,v.
Mr. Sujit
Keshri,Adv.
Mr. Raghav Ghei,
Adv.
Mr. P.K.Rao, Adv.

( A .c . )

( sEBr )

today.

2
For Respond,ent (s)

UPON hearing

Ms. Sujata

Kurdukar,

Mr.

Shazma, Adv.

the

Niraj

counseL

Adv.

the Court made the


O R D E R

following

r.As. No. 3T-39:


Taken

on Board,

By our
'L2

of,

2oL4

transf,er'
by

fired

serl

thern

that
in

of,
the

their
not
for

with

excess

the

fn

the
the

Agree!'ent"

and

parties
course

the

of

it

of

that

any,

the
than

to
said

after

china

shall

the

the

purchase

the

negotiations
drawn

by

by

had
said

sare

the

with

deposited

sEBr

the

saharas

sharr

.BRE and .rtl

5g of, such

varue.

started

negotiations

offshore

properties.

certain

up but

before

r\In
the

in

bail

regardiag

properties
by

.r.oan

directed

Court

estimated

saharas

of

further

most

owned

cond,itional

this

10
to

entire

We had

offshore

value

at

the

the

from

of

properties

deposited
in

No.

saharas

repalznent

is

be

ord.ers
sare

order

appears

hotel
that

contained

await

above

the

sa.haras

red,uced

wirling

rilas ar'so

Brought to you by http://StockViz.biz

to

of,fshore

26.O3.20L4.

if

lesser

said. properties
to

the

dated

and, permitted

condition

directions

account

a price

three

Bank

amount,

utilisation
at

by

we had, arr.orped
x.As

contemnors

the

the

Court

sepa.rate

be

to

the

this

22.o7.20L4

encumber

towards

pursuant
with

0r

the

received

outstanding
compliance

dated

by

s'bject

conside'ration

order

order

principle
dear

could,

3
be

finalised

adverse

difficulties

pubricity

against

the

entity'

cut

in

fallen

and

through

expJ.ore
said

sare

the

terms

of

the

leaving

properties

baekdrop
others

they

raise

Sa,haras
have

have
by

the

story

Principle

no

option
of

the
have

sought

arisen

the

filed

this

particular

in

due

is

in

the

the

eours)

except

ft

3Z_39

court

of

moatga.ge

amount.

of

p*blic

sale

has

or

f .As.No.

from

sahara.s

sale/transf,er

requisite

the

proposed

the

account

of
to

Agreement
f,or

on

section

properties

short

rn

methods

to

that

of

long

alternative

to

demonstration

proposed

To

property

appear

to

of
in

which

the
that

among

foll0wing

two

reliefs:
a)
other

arty,

related

of,

to
b)

of

charges

on

sharehording

the

of

china's
the

its

permission

us$650

mirlion

and

foreign

hoter

the

rerevant

wtren these

rAs

carne up for

in

china's

terms

of

outstanding

Brought to you by http://StockViz.biz

l0ans

to
of

by

oa,sis

sahara

the

or

by

(incruding

terms

and

some
the

conditions

loans.

said

by

whether

amendment

in

$teae infozrned
that

grrant
to

permission,

and

such

up

its

Bank

securities)

appJ.icable

l0ans

Grant

u/s'
the

Rajeev
fresh
roan

for

hotel

raising
the

0wning

be

creation

of

us

s.Ganesh

mooted,
repaid

(or

junior

subordinate
on

sahara,s

companies)

before

Dhawan and

sharr

ad.itionar

properties

hearing

proposal

of

by

by

on 02 .L2.20L4
senior

sharas
substituting

we

advocates
the

Bank

of

another

4
lender

in

sharas
640

its

propose

Curia.e

for

bef,ore

the

an

Mr'

towards

Naphade

the

country

other

permission
fndia

bringing

proposed
the

of

under

the
the

examine

view

in

the

rnd,ia

arnount

rndia

with

that

matter.

money

the

in

FEMA and

to

from

may

the

also

aspects
Ganesh
since

rernains

is

regarding

that

may

be

properties.
from

outside

repaying

any

statutory

have

the

had

have

said

borrowed.

a.s a.n

proposed

Mr.

wha.t

a view

Sahara

by

to

and

seek

Reserve

regrulations

Bank

the
of

framed

thereunder.
on behalf
that
the

there

is

proposed

Brought to you by http://StockViz.biz

of
a

saharas
certain

deals

by

it

was argrued by

amount
which

of

urgency

Bank

of

!a/s.
in

China

Dhawan and Ganesh

the
has

finalisation
to

us

above.

certain

a.nd, Datar

apart

authority
of

that

the

no

to

opposite

Naphade

against

urged

competent
provisions

M/s

the
They

told

and

roan

that
into

He

regrard

counser

a sum of

Naphade

thereto.

We are

into

junior

liability.

complieations

to

in

Besides

mentioned

time

relating

by

for

shekhar

writing

expaessed

10an

and

rearned
in

Court.

sEBr

submissions.

can be brought

outstanding

some

explained

of

hords

for

the

this

properties

inforrnation

by

of

junior

offshore

d,oeuments

their

apprehension

per:arissibJ.ity

raised

the

raised
and

per:nrission

additional

sought

f,urther

rnake

answered'

only

an
the

had

certain

they

the

appearing

and

queries

been

raise

Datar,

transactions
asked

with

against

Arvind

Asricus

that

to

milrions

M/s'

place

exit

of
upon

5
aepayment
from

They

of

nelo

by

stating
an

tilr

Group

million

out

junior

roan

Limited

usD

ruith

Mirach

f,or

Hospitatity

necessaay
significant

by

as

out

r.imited
Mirach
investnent

Brought to you by http://StockViz.biz

that

of

has

puqpose
as

per

capitar
and
according,

said
of

Mirach

Capital

Group

Bank

being

the

Group

L&c

aneirriary
the

and
dated

of

that

Mirach

usD

650

execution
in

Decenrber

dated

to
of

the

ag.reements.

15,
Amby
that

disburse
usD

in

Decernber

cormnunication

by

affir:nrs

funds

of

accord,ance

aceepted

America

for

(Mauritius)

investment

after

processed,

disburse

further

an

Letter

and, earmarked.

usD 1o5o million

and,

retter

making

to

inter

to

letter

unenct'nbered

offer

pariwar

after

LLc

05.01.2015

rndia

agreements

Group

funds

properties.

Amby valrey

L&C

ad,vised

the

the

states

of

between

The

of

bl0cked

America

offer

capitat

arranging

dated

further

funds

Group

in

by

transaetions

definitive

LLc

M/s.

letter

agreed,

Limited-

Group

from

Bank of

mentioned

Mirach

the

is

as

sahara

remains

unencumbered,

binding

million

million

advised

mortga.gee

to

the

The

Capital

(Mauritius)

400

issued

Mirach

comrnunication

million

sahara.

said

directions

for

it,

America

1o5o

traneaction

by

capital

of

towards

as
us

2015

has

of, the

terms

issued

valley

and

legal''y

the

20L4

20,

LLc

and

necessary

Bank
und,er

of

Miraeh

capital

usD

that

February

between

before

the

amount

outstand.ing

introduced

placed

addressed

LLc

roan

r-end,er

have

alia

the

1o5o

sahara
15,

2015

exeeution

of

I{trat

is

af,orementioned

6
Bank

of

Group

America

LLc

junior

loan

with

fact

concerned

some time

to
it
in

before
under

rega'rding
for

was argrued
the

issue

be

allayed
specific

Brought to you by http://StockViz.biz

the

use

thereof,,

transactions

the

apprehension
of
in

amount

Ambey

fndia.

regard,ing
by

manner

in

Valley

subsidiary
r.n

the

of

f t

a.lso

instructions

f,rom
to

or
this
its

aae

bound

M/s.

by

up

to

parties
deal
to

this
be

0f

take
the

and

court,
credited

whieh

Valty

submitted

diversion

of

Court

the

subsidiary

deal

f,rom America

Limited

to

lvas

Naphade

first

Ambey

xt

20,2015,

raised

wirr

cotqpany

misutilisation
direction

so

(Mauritius)

liras

a gaeat

by

not

and the

the

is

direeted,

guestion

blocked

February

is

the

deprive

there

amount

20L5.

a,mount invorved,

expressed,
the

been

the

agreement

finalising

would

by

if

mirlion

2oth ,

which

clinched

instructions.

utilised,

huge

capitar

milr.ion

400

have

amount

same are

the

usD

for

the

Mirach

investment

February

said.

the

of

owned

apprehension

the

view

1o5o

and

required

in

beneficial

that

on

from

usD

for

aforementioned

repatriation

account

incorporated

business

of

being

of

r,imited

keeping

the

regards

rndia

wholly

can

the

funds

usD 650 mirrion

funds

f,inalising

fixed
As

2015

brocking

in

of

cornpanies

of

urgrlncy

nd

although

20,

that

Datar

the

the

February

for

instructions

said

Hospitarity

that

between

under

the

agrreement

by

argued

ar-so

unbl0ck

saha'ra

executed

date

to

is

is

Limited,
that

those

any
fund,s

Saharas

Ambey

to

Valley

7
(Mauritius)
same

in

as the

to

this

with

subsidiary
any

100t

valrey
wirl

outstanding
repa'f'ment

against
would

contemprated
any

rate

including
a clea'r
the

by

the

cut

not
the

saharas

the

Reserve

direction

transactions

Brought to you by http://StockViz.biz

an

so

enable
at

attract

the

f,unds

the

Bank
that

mentioned,

of

rira.s

if

statutory
or

or

the

to

learned,

bar

Amicus

at

the

appropriate

attraet

its

available

to

proposed

Any such

India

not

from

full.

authorities

will

Valley

the

the

to

no

repay

move

money

liras

towa.rd,s a

the

to

of

that

Arnbey

amount

in

the

submitted

borrowed

to

remain

against

has

other

riabirity

secure

mirlion

not

outside

is

540

company

from

which

as

The

FEttA and

there

pursuant

partly,

transfer
above

are

fnsofar

f,unds

fndia

usD

2OLO.

said

least

to

of

r,imited

ready

the

the

of

outstanding

Limited

Limited

year

any

Court.

funds

as

f t

amount

respond,ents
are

of

rong

f,unds

utirise

provisions

any

the

(Mauritius)
in

this

und.erstanding

the

owes

it

of

Limited,

(Mauritius)

transa'ctions

the

(Mauritius)

transferring

company

of

misutilisation.

Arnbey valley

holding

of

money or

transfer

petitioner's

r,imited

which

Ambey

or

out

that

Valley

the

in

(Mauritius)

argued,

said

permission

tiquidation

Ambey valley

to

impediment

the

the

governing

loas

misdirection

with

arising

for

Ambey

of

according

loan

country
it

dear

without

regulations

concerned

parked

to

impedirnents

related

rndia

not

any manner

regal

other

are

r'imited

rndia

10an

as is

being

curiae.

At

concerned,
level
pursuant

any provision

for
to
of

I
FEI{A oa

the

Saharas
of

regulations

will

not

obtaining

concerned
passed

claim

any

elearance

or

authority

nor

this

expressly

or

brought

aLso

such

by

Court

any

into

framed

wilL

to

in

equity

in

seeking
it

teeth

loas

favour

any

this

any

in

the

Court

legal

that
matter

from

upon

pezmitted,

of

urged

declaration

reliance

that

implication

the

It
its

place

suggest

necessa.ry

India

thereunder.

the
has

the

the

ord,er
either

funds

irnpediment

to

be

against

such movement.
We have
made at
for

sale

not

bar.

of

the

such

off,

indeed

the

has

lender

They
of

Brought to you by http://StockViz.biz

raising

bank

so

proposed

them

xn
with

second,

a junior

to

raise
balance

do

of
not

involve

charge

on

the

an

us

earlier

but

proposal

earrier

to

go into

the

the

fact

remains

of

amount

Bank

This

an add,itionar.
properties.

of

wirr

that

is

crores

could
which

china

according

cash

amount.
of

the

burden

by

suf,ficient

in

equival.ent
sare

that

proposal

the

has

reasons

saharas

alternative

S,OOO/-

invorve

submissions

rnentioned

roan.

an

such

the

eircunstances

an

of

guarantee

simpry

the

substitution

the

proposed.

f,or

sare

to

that

properties

unnecessary

involves

provide

hoter

forward

enable
to

for

properties.

come

consideration

no gainsaying

fructif,ied.

and

saharas

is

is
the

earr.ier

transactions

creation

not

ha.ve

Saharas

arrange

of

a.nxious

shore

xt

fairure

sare

another

f,or

There

the

as nentioned

to

our

materialised.

for

and

the

given

off
in

The

and
The

shore

terms

of,

proposed

9
tra.nsa,ctions
for

sEBr

this

have

and

by

Court

the

Mr.

to

so ra'ised

the

submissions

decline
the

earleer

found

any

through

the

(a)

part

appJ'ications

to

the

fault

subject
into

Curiae

in

to

rndia

learned

this

the

counsel

appointed
Court

al.lowing

condition

und.er

the

by

that

the

provisions

of

concerned,.

learned

prayers

by

J.ea,rned, Amicus

circumstances

by

examined

can be brought

ma.de at

suggested

not

go

FEMA and regulations


rn

critically

Naphade,

who have

transactions

amount

been

therefore

Bar

as

counser
and

of

(b)

f,or

the

the

mad.e in

this

that

also

and,

rAs

that

we see

no

37 and, 3g as

We

but

in

safeg,uard.s

parties

ord,er.

extent

keeping

to

the

have

been

reason

to

extracted

accordingly

subject

view

allow
the

in
these

for.l0wing

conditions:
1)

The

transactions
be

ress

deposited

direction
former

entire

sharl

depositing

processing

with
from

the

Ambey

not
the

amount

and

Ambey
varry

utirise

amount

raised,

with

pursuant

other

Valley
r,td. ,
the

sEBr

to

incidental

hording

proposed

expenses

(Mauritius)
the

the

Limited
cotqpany

shall
with

that

sune except

f,or

the

in

the

ord,ers

of

of

rnd,ia

at

te::nrs

of

a.
the

purpose

of
this

Court.
2l

saharas

appropriate
suitabre

wirr
rever

clarification

Brought to you by http://StockViz.biz

approach
with

an
issued

the

Reserve

appropriate
as

to

Bank

rlpresentation
the

permissiblity

to
of

the

have
bringing

a,

10
in

the

amount

valley

by

one week
rnay rook

from

the

representation
authority

Ieave

it

heard

to

whether

to

in
the

it

saharas

r_aw as
of

two

sahara.s

shalr

competent

in

rike

the

of

the

the

competent

weeks

afford

matter

issue

as possibre
the

to

the

date

the

competent

d.emand,ed by

representation.

authority

to

and/or

as may be
the

authority

from

furnish

Arnbey

be made within

expeditiousJ.y

with

of

transactions

orders

and docrurents

connection

wourd

account

an appropriate

period

inf,ormation

authority

open

discretion

the

sharl

whereof

with

received.

such

competent

receipt

accord.a,nce

is

ar.

The representation

upon

within

into

conseqluence

same and pass

in

prefera''y

in

court.

today,

into

transferred.

Limited

this

clarification

the

may be

(Mauritius)

perrnitted

but

that

to

decide

an opportunity

before

!{e

issuing

in

its

of

being

any

such

clarification.
(3)
the

rn

couase

matter
basis

the
of

wirl
of

lire have

regards

this

saharas

order

or
transfer
to

examined'

Brought to you by http://StockViz.biz

the

in

be
their
the

competent
of

fndia
nor

as at

proceedings

permitting

transaetions
neither

these

not

by

government

aepresentation

the
is

or

any

entitred
favour
proposed

to
nor

any

will

any
it

be

f,ait

pursuant

to

We rnake it
opinion

any

paoceedings

claim

with

received.

concerned..

other

at

transactions

authority

money

expressed

(2') a-bove or

clear

on the

stage
for

equity

on

in

that
the

suggested

that

presented

the

accompri
the
that

question

as

proposed
we have
whether

11
the

amount

into
to

raised

Xndia

which

direct

the

frorn

the
in

tine

the
all

r'As

oral

that

authorities

to

aspect

loe have

or unconditionally

left

for

the

brought

eompetent

authority

decide.
At

by

can be conditionally

No'

to

prayer
facility

terms

time

of

shall

are

our

once

as

disposed,

us

to

ord,er

by

the

dated

again

w.e:f.

conditions

3?-3g

provided

be

said' authorities
sueh

mad,e before

Dr.

eontemnors

provided,

to

off,

been

with

as
the

the

in

jail

contemnors

those

subject
ord,ers.

above directions.

r.A. No.90-91;
Mr.
aff,idavit
different
in
shalr

terms
be

Venugopal

setting
heads
of
free

a,nd when the

to

the

permitted
detaiJ.s

disbursement

ord,er
f,i'e

sarne is

(sHASHr SAREEN)
COURTMASTER

Brought to you by http://StockViz.biz

out
and

oua

is

dated
a

reply

to
of

thereof

file
the

as

31.0g .2OL2 and


to

the

an

additional

expenditure
clairned

by

04.06 .2OL4.

supplementary

continued

20.02.2015

stipulated

the

Dhawanr
by

O1.Og .2OL4

L2.oL 2015 up
to

have

Rajeev

und,er
the

sEBr

Saharas

aff,idavit

f,iled.

(VEENA KHERA)
COURT I4ASTER

as

You might also like