Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Project Brief
The GAZELLE oil field offshore RAS AL ZUBAIR has been producing for a number of years with
all production exported via oil pipeline system to Fort Thompson. Development of the field has
included injection of produced water into a deep horizon within the field where inadequate
pressure support from the aquifer was observed. All effluent water discharges to the sea were
halted and subsequent injection and disposal of the produced water required drilling of waste
water injection and disposal wells from a second bridge linked well-head jacket. Due to the
decline in oil production and hence associated gas there is a real possibility that field life may be
constrained by lack of adequate fuel gas for the water disposal/injection and oil export pumping
systems.
NRGU E&P acquired the offshore producing oilfield, GAZELLE, in 2008 and carried out an
assessment of near field potential and reprocessing of existing seismic data leading to
exploration of a deep gas prospect which the previous operator had considered to be too high
risk. The results of this exploration well have confirmed a gas condensate reservoir with the
predicted production forecast given in the appendices. NRGU E&P have authorised drilling of ten
development wells to support the supplied production forecast.
You are a consultant field development engineer and have been directed to assess the
development options and to make a detailed report with recommendations to the NRGU
E&P board.
2. Scope of Report
Identify two different development concepts for the GAZELLE field to process the gas and
condensate to export quality and define an export method (oil stabilisation and export is already
handled by the existing Gazelle platform and is outwith the scope of your report).
i.
ii.
Gas will be sold and distributed to the nearby fields (custody transfer at GAZELLE) to
provide fuel gas and also exported to Fort Thompson to provide fuel for the local market.
The high value condensate will be exported to Fort Thompson to use as feedstock for
the new locally owned chemical plant.
iii.
All waste products from the hydrocarbon processing shall be disposed locally using the
existing GAZELLE facilities to meet all requirements of the strict national environmental
laws.
Both options should detail the incremental development from wellhead to gas and condensate
delivery points. The subsurface plan is fixed and your report should comprise the following
sections:-
a) Prepare flow schemes showing the layout and of the main components used from wellhead
to the point of export for BOTH the options being considered. (20%)
b) Critically assess the advantages and disadvantages of each of your development options
including descriptions of the main items of equipment used. Based upon your analysis select
a recommended field development plan. This should cover technical viability, cost and
commerciality aspects. Cost comparisons should be completed using the supplied XLS
spreadsheet and for each option you should include a copy of the working spreadsheet in
your report. (30%)
c) Discuss your selected method for fiscalisation for the produced gas and condensate streams.
(15%)
d) Highlight flow assurance issues that may specifically be encountered by your preferred
development plan and propose your selected solutions to these indicating the likely impact
upon production operations. (20%)
e) Outline the key considerations required for the decommissioning plan for the incremental
aspects of your development options. (15%)
3. Report
The report should be not more than 3000 words with flow diagrams and other relevant drawings
to illustrate any points being raised.
All references used must be fully identified.
Gazelle facility
Fort
Thompson
Figure 1. Field Location
UNIT
650
psi
15024
8270
48.3
ft.bmsl
ft
API degrees
Condensate production
Gas specific gravity
130
0.65
bbl/mmscf
Production Forecast
The production forecast has been generated by a reservoir simulator:
Gazelle
Year
Net Oil
EMGEE - J
J - wells
kbpd
2015
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
63
57
51
46
41
37
37
33
29
25
22
18
13
9
5
1
0
0
3
6
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Gas
Condensate
mmscf/d
bpd
6
30
50
60
60
60
59
57
56
54
53
52
50
49
48
47
45
44
780
3900
6500
7800
7800
7800
7605
7415
7230
7049
6873
6701
6533
6370
6211
6055
5904
5756
5. General information
Should you require further information to prepare a development plan, you are asked to make
assumptions on those issues for which you have no or insufficient information. Please ensure that
these assumptions are clearly detailed in your report.
Appendices
a. Cost information:
Item
Value
Discount rate
Royalty
4.00%
30.00%
Comments
Economics
Oil Price $/bbl
75
Condensate $/bbl
125
8.6
Pipeline $mm/km
Subsea
12 dia pipe
Subsea
6 dia pipe
Land
1.5
all sizes
Bundle
Jackets $mm
Piled
75
Concrete
200
Semi-sub
175
TLP
160
SBM
25
75
Production separation
125
100
140
Utilities
65
Accommodation
80
Floating ($mm)
FPSO Construct
225
0.35
0.15
Operating Costs
Fixed (%ge of cum CAPEX)
5%
50
10.00
65
45
Platform
25
The above figures are indicative costs only. You can use other figures if these are
justified with full explanation and references.
PRESS SPECULATION
NRGU E&P Inc. excited by EMGEE J4 flowback analysis September
2012
Exciting times for shareholders as NRGU E&P Inc. continues to release details from its flagship
Ras Al Zubair, EMGEE J4 well, the long-awaited follow-up to its proof-of-concept EMGEE J3 well,
the first horizontal fracced well drilled in this license which ran into mechanical and completion
issues in 2011.
NRGU E&P who took over in 2008 believed that the underlying deeper tight Eocene zones could,
with the aid of the horizontal drilling and multi-stage hydraulic fracking techniques that
revolutionised drilling in North America, deliver many times the discovery well production rates.
But, as long-time shareholders can attest, this vision has proved far more challenging, and costly,
to deliver and the current well is the company's second attempt to get this right.
Initial signs are encouraging: the recovered condenstae, which has an average API value of 48.3
degrees, has been transported via a temporary export system using a leased shuttle tanker to a
nearby refinery for sale, where it attracts a premium price.
The gas is currently being flared during testing but in the future there will be ready demand given
this is the offshore hub for the Greater Gazelle region, where fuel gas shortage results in fuel gas
prices of US$8.40/mmbtu (US$8.61 /mscf). The oil/condensate to gas ratio is reckoned to be
around 130 barrels of liquids per mmscf, some 300 per cent higher than anticipated during well
design. This is an unexpected boost for the company.
"It is a nice sweetener to continue production of oil which sells for an attractive price during flowback and clean-up as some wells only flow water during early clean-up, says the current MD,
Brody Chance, who took over in December 2012
True to form, however, the well has thrown up complications, with pressure data indicating a
partial clogging of the well bore perforations due to the breakdown of the polymer gel used in the
frac fluid and very fine particulate matter.
The company will use a chemical flush to clear the blockages, which it says is a common
remedial treatment in the industry and not unexpected for such a pioneering well. As the first
well of this type in the Gazelle Basin to "flow-back and clean-up" Chance commented, it is not
unexpected for some remedial work as part of those operations, - So far, so good, it seems.
Source: CrudeNews
CONFERENCE REPORT
Fort Thompson, Ras Al Jumar 26/8/2009
Ras Al Zubair oil output threatened by platforms running out of juice - AH
Press
The Ras Al Zubair oil industry is facing the threat of a cascade of rig closures, unless ageing
platforms can urgently source more gas to help squeeze out the remaining barrels. The potential
threat to oil revenues looms as Ras Al Zubair prepares to vote in January's national elections -- a
debate in which oil production forecasts have become a political football.
The affected offshore area, the Gazelle trend, is a very mature part of the basin where producers
are trapped in a vicious circle of falling output, rising costs to patch up ageing platforms, and
dwindling power supplies. To lift more oil from these depleted reservoirs, producers need to inject
vast quantities of water -- a power intensive process that requires a reliable source of fuel gas.
Some platforms are not able to generate enough of their own fuel so have to try and import the
shortfall from neighbours, but the overall net position will go negative as early as 2016. This could
force the early abandonment of rigs, with the loss of critical platform hubs sounding the death
knell for dependent fields.
'We may be near a production efficiency precipice,' said Muhanned Al Ahmad, economics and
joint venture manager at RAZONG (Ras Al Zubair Ministry for Oil & Natural Gas), speaking at Oil
& Gas Ventures Fort Thompson conference earlier this summer. 'Because of the
interconnected nature of this area, there is a domino effect that kicks in.'
Al Ahmad presented findings from a cross-operator work group he co-chairs which seeks to
improve co-operation amongst producers focused on the 'Gazelle Rejuvenation Area'. This
includes NRGU E&Ps Gazelle hub, which will leave the most stranded assets if shut down early.
The fall in production efficiency means that time is running out. The Rejuvenation Area is now
producing at just 7 percent of its peak, compared with 29 percent for the Ras Al Zubair Offshore
Industry as a whole.
Possible solutions
To arrest this decline, producers need to lay their hands on fresh power supplies. Under
government auspices, a Gas Working Group is looking at ways to source, transport and deliver
reliable fuel gas. 'We've got to get this fixed a very small amount of gas could make a lot of
difference to this area,' Al Ahmad said. 'If you can improve water injection then it delivers a
significant incremental uptick in barrels.'
As output has declined, platforms have become increasingly dependent on each other for fuel
gas supplies and to spread fixed costs. The leveraging effect of any one party withdrawing is
getting bigger as margins are squeezed. Al Ahmad described a downward 'death spiral' where
less power leads to lower water injection, so production falls and there is less fuel gas for water
injection. Eventually the platform becomes uneconomic and has to cease production.
'We are all inextricably tied together, we depend on each other. We have no time left to make
mistakes,' Al Ahmad said.