Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Petitioner,
v.
Case No. 06-C-14-067023
William M. Schmalfeldt,
Respondent.
FACTS
The instant peace order was issued with proper regard for Petitioners due
process rights. He was advised of the time and place for the de novo trial before this
Court on 27 August, 2014. Neither any agent of the State nor any private party
prevented him from attending the hearing. He simply chose not to do so.
Prior to the de novo trial in August, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss
based on improper venue. Judge Galloway denied that motion. The question of
venue is settled. Respondent offers no valid reason to change the law of the case.
Respondent asserts that the Circuit Court cannot conduct the pending
hearing because Mr. Hoge did not file his petition on a District Court form. That is,
of course, nonsensical.
Respondent asserts that it is improper for Mr. Hoge to seek relief through a
civil contempt proceeding and that he can only seek relief through criminal charges.
That is, of course, erroneous.
CONCLUSION
Respectfully submitted,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on the 29th day of January, 2015, I mailed a copy of this filing
to William M. Schmalfeldt, Trailer 71, 6636 Washington Blvd., Elkridge, Maryland
21075, via First Class U. S. Mail.