Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
1.
IDENTIFYING ENERGY-SAVING
OPPORTUNITIES
o
o
o
o
Eligibility Requirements
Ratable Space Types
At least 50% of the building square footage
must be classified as one of the ratable space types
< 10% of SF can be classified as
computer data center (if estimates are used)
or other space
Minimum and maximum thresholds
for operating characteristics
To learn the specific eligibility requirements for your space type, go to:
www.ENERGYSTAR.gov/Benchmark
Bank/Financial
Institutions
Hotels
Courthouses
Data Centers
Houses of
Worship
K-12 Schools
Retail Stores
Supermarkets
Dormitories
Medical Offices
Warehouses
Hospitals
Office Buildings
Wastewater
Treatment Plants
Police Stations
Fire Stations
Assisted Living Facilities
Convention Centers
Laboratories
Libraries
Malls
Movie Theatres
Restaurants
Stadiums and Arenas
Building clusters that share at least one energy meter
Lodging
FUTURE OF BENCHMARKING IN
CALIFORNIA
AB 1103 (Saldana)
14
15
16
16
2.
10
11
12
13
3.
o
o
o
Preliminary
Targeted
Comprehensive
http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF
14
PRELIMINARY AUDIT
o
o
o
o
o
http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF
o
o
o
o
http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF
15
o
o
o
o
http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF
COMPREHENSIVE AUDIT
o
o
o
o
http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF
16
17
http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF
http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
O&M
Building envelope
Lighting
HVAC
Domestic hot water
Energy generation
http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/2000-03-20_400-00-002.PDF
18
http://www.fypower.org/bpg/index.html?b=offices&print=true
BUILDING ENVELOPE
http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/2000-03-20_400-00-002.PDF
19
LIGHTING
http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/2000-03-20_400-00-002.PDF
http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/2000-03-20_400-00-002.PDF
20
HVAC
http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/2000-03-20_400-00-002.PDF
21
http://www.energy.wsu.edu/documents/rem/energyaudit/audit2.pdf
http://www.oregon.gov/ENERGY/CONS/Industry/docs/AuditGuide.pdf
22
http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/tools_directory/subjects_sub.cfm
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/industry/bestpractices/software.html
23
https://www.aeeprograms.com/store/category.cfm?category_id=6
VFD Compressors
Water-side economizer
Heating Equipment
Cost per BTU of heat
output
Warm-up strategy
Condensing Boilers
Pumps
VFDs (no reset)
24
Lighting
T-8s, CFLs, LEDs, etc.
Light levels
Garage Ventilation
Carbon monoxide controls
Makeup air
25
Building
kWh per
SF
Total IDd
kWh Savings
Estim.
% kWh
savings
Implem.
ECOs
kWh saved
Implem.
ECOs
cost saved
Implem.
% kWh
savings
19.4
2,009,493
31%
1,134,977
$93,491
17%
14.2
5,528,248
41%
4,456,753 $277,506
33%
15.5
939,369
28%
123,275
$8,305
4%
o
o
o
o
o
o
26
What should be in
the contract?
More
http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF
ADVANTAGES OF OUTSOURCING
o
o
o
o
o
http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF
27
DISADVANTAGES OF OUTSOURCING
http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF
ENERGY CONSULTANTS
o
o
o
o
http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF
28
o
o
o
http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF
4.
PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING
29
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
TYPES OF ESCOs
o
o
o
o
Independent ESCOs
Building equipment manufacturers
Utility companies
Other energy/engineering companies
30
TYPES OF
ESCOs
FOCUS ON MUSH
AND FEDERAL
31
FOCUS ON ENERGY
EFFICIENCY
EMPHASIS ON
PERFORMANCE
32
5 STEPS TO SUCCESSFUL
PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
o
o
o
o
33
34
35
36
37
CLARIFYING EXPECTATIONS
(ADVICE FROM DOE FEMP SuperESPC)
o
o
Site goals
Project boundaries
CLARIFYING EXPECTATIONS
(contd)
Project requirements/limitations
Contract length
Amount of investment
Operations and maintenance services
Escalation
Codes and environmental requirements
Available studies
38
CLARIFYING EXPECTATIONS
(contd)
Project timeline
Contractor milestones
Agency milestones
Risk/commitment points
39
5.
CALCULATING RETURNS
40
41
IN LANDLORD/TENANT SETTINGS
42
Discount Rate
The minimum rate of return required by
the investor
Interest rate used in present value
calculations
The higher the perceived risk of an
investment, the higher the discount rate
The higher the discount rate, the lower
the present value
43
$1.00 = $ .91
at Date 0
Date 2
$1.00 = $ .83
at Date 0
Date 3
$1.00 = $ .75
at Date 0
= $2.49
at Date 0
TOTAL
Date 0 is today
Date 1 is the end of Year 1
44
Present Value
Present Value
(contd)
Cash Flow
( 1 + Disc. Rate ) Date
45
46
Before-tax
cash flow
-$2,550,000
$214,025
$239,960
$266,314
$284,765 $4,678,551
After-tax
cash flow
-$2,550,000
$168,224
$181,110
$193,941
$201,156 $4,105,037
Before-tax IRR
(BTIRR)
19.64%
After-tax IRR
(ATIRR)
15.17%
47
48
"Today"
End of
1st Year
End of
2nd
Year
End of
3rd Year
End of
4th Year
Date
Cash Flow
(1,000)
$1,000
$ 1,000
$1,000
$1,000
(1,000)
$ 909
$ 826
$ 751
$ 683
2,170
92.76%
10%
PV = $ divided by (1+ discount rate)^year
49
"Today"
Date
End of
1st Year
End of
2nd
Year
End of
3rd
Year
End of
4th Year
Cash Flow
(1,000)
$1,000
$ 1,000
$1,000
$1,000
(1,000)
$ 519
$ 269
$ 140
$ 72
IRR
92.76%
Discount Rate
92.76%
50
Present Value =
Cash Flow
( 1 + Disc. Rate ) Date
51
52
Present Value
PMT
Payment
Number of periods
INT
FV
Future value
53
YR1
YR2
YR n
Cash outflows
Single investment
Phased investment
Financed investment
Cash inflows
Rebate/incentive recd
Energy savings
Maintenance savings (or cost)
54
YR1
YR2
YR n
Cash outflows
Single investment
Phased investment
Financed investment
Cash inflows
Rebate/incentive recd
Energy savings
Maintenance savings (or cost)
55
Lighting retrofit
Chiller replacement
Various motors/drives
Retrocommissioning
Capitalization Rate
A special discount rate used in the
income approach to appraisal
The rate of return an investor would
expect to receive if the income-producing
property were purchased with all cash
= Asset value
56
$0.35 SF/year
Taxable Income
net operating income
- interest portion of debt service
- depreciation allowance
= taxable income
$3.50/SF
10%
57
58
LEASING BASICS
o Gross lease
o Net lease
o Fixed-base lease
o Regional variations
o The devil is in the details
Language is sacred.
59
YR 1
$1.90/SF
Expense Stop
for Energy
YR 2
$2.00/SF
$1.60/SF
Energy Cost
BEFORE
Upgrade
Energy Cost
AFTER
Upgrade
T = $0.10/SF
$2.00/SF in YR1
T saves $0.10/SF
SAVE
$0.40/SF
L saves $0.30/SF
L = $1.90/SF
L = $1.60/SF
$1.60/SF in YR2
60
6.
61
PURCHASE
o
o
o
Cash
Loans
Bonds
Content for this and related slides was excerpted and/or adapted from US EPAs ENERGY STAR
Building Upgrade Manual, Chapter 4, a full copy of which is available at the following link:
http://www.energystar.gov/ia/business/EPA_BUM_CH4_Financing.pdf
62
o
o
Loan sizes and terms vary for private and publicsector applications
http://ase.org/content/article/detail/5476
LEASING
o
o
o
Operating Lease
Capital Lease
Municipal Lease
63
OPERATING LEASE
o
o
OPERATING LEASE
o
o
o
Simple
64
CAPITAL LEASE
o
o
o
FASB 13
65
o
o
MUNICIPAL LEASE
o
o
o
o
o
o
66
PEFORMANCE CONTRACTING
o
o
PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING
o
o
o
(contd)
Guaranteed Savings
Shared Savings
Paid-from Savings
67
ADDITIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
Rebates and
incentives
State/local govts;
other agencies
Other sources
68
Content for this slide and previous one was excerpted from EPAs Easy
Access to Energy Improvement Funds in the Private Sector, Nov. 2004
69
1
2
70
71
ELIGIBLE TECHNOLOGIES
o Energy Mgmt. Systems (EMS) & controls
o Lighting
o HVAC
o Motors/drives
o Building envelope (e.g., window film, cool roof)
o Process technologies
o Other (e.g., gas, water, renewables, custom measures)
o Projected savings must be defensible and persistent
72
PRESCRIPTIVE REBATES
o Set rebate amounts for
specific measures or
component
o Before >>> mainly new
construction and small
retrofit/renovation
o Now >>> many larger
projects also eligible
o Limitations may include
capped rebate amounts,
restrictive technologies
PERFORMANCE REBATES
o Rebates based on calculated energy savings
o Measurement and Verification (M&V) may be required,
and if so, must meet pre-set savings level
o Payments may be made over time based on M&V
o Detailed Energy Analysis (DEA) may be required
o Pre- & post-construction inspections may be needed
73
CUSTOM MEASURES
o Often innovative ways for
reducing demand (i.e., not
simply a one-for-one
replacement)
o Measurement and
Verification may be required
o Detailed proposal & savings
analysis prior to purchasing
materials
o Custom Measures must
represent permanent
wattage reductions
74
(contd)
o Equipment specifications
Energy efficiency of existing
specs?
Willing to increase EE to get
rebate to cover added cost?
Can/does or equivalent
lower EE (and rebate
eligibility)?
How far ahead do you order
equipment?
75
76
New construction
Remodeling/renovations
Tenant fit-out
Feasibility studies
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
8. SDG&E PROGRAMS
85
SDG&Es REBATES
Energy Efficiency Business Rebates (Express Efficiency)
http://www.sdge.com/business/rebatesincentives/programs/energyEfficiency.shtml
86
BENCHMARKING REQUIREMENT
http://www.sdge.com/business/rebatesincentives/benchmarking/
87
http://www.sdge.com/documents/business/savings/SDGEBenchmark.pdf
88
http://www.sdge.com/business/benchmarking/
Calculate rebate
89
90
91
92
ON-BILL FINANCING
http://www.sdge.com/business/rebatesincentives/programs/onbillfinancing.shtml
93
ON-BILL FINANCING
http://www.sdge.com/business/rebatesincentives/programs/onbillfinancing.shtml
http://www.sdge.com/documents/business/savings/obf/OBFFactSheet.pdf
9. TAX INCENTIVES
94
TAX INCENTIVES
o
o
o
o
o
Depreciation
Interest
Commercial Buildings Deduction
State and local tax incentives
Other
95
96
www.efficientbuildings.org
97
www.efficientbuildings.org
(frequently asked questions page)
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/
printable_versions/tax_commercial.html
98
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/
qualified_software.html
www.energytaxincentives.org
99
www.efficientbuildings.org
www.efficientbuildings.org
100
www.lightingtaxdeduction.org
http://www.lightingtaxdeduction.org/faq.html
101
http://www.lightingtaxdeduction.org/standard.
html
10.
FORMULATING COMPELLING
VALUE PROPOSITIONS
102
o
o
o
o
103
http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=assess_value.financial_tools
The quality of
your outcome is
directly related
to the quality of
the questions
you ask.
104
o
o
o
o
o
105
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
106
o
o
o
o
o
107
Scenario A
10 projects this year
Scenario B
2 projects per year
Total Cap Ex
$1,681,000
$1,764,503
PV of Investment
$1,681,000
$1,241,656
IRR
27.2%
19.3%
NPV
$1,016,071*
$578,366
$437,705
108
Thank you!
Mark Jewell
President
EEFG, Inc.
mjewell@eefg.com
215-880-8173 cell
Every winning strategy needs a winning mechanism.
- Jim Collins, author of Good to Great
109