You are on page 1of 109

Identifying Energy-Efficiency

Upgrades and Incentives


Mark Jewell
President, EEFG, Inc.
mjewell@eefg.com

San Diego Gas and Electric

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

Identifying energy-saving opportunities


Setting savings targets
Planning your moves
Performance contracting
Calculating returns
Selecting the funding
Finding rebates/incentives to reduce first cost
Tax incentives
SDG&E programs
Formulating compelling value propositions
3

1.

IDENTIFYING ENERGY-SAVING
OPPORTUNITIES

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

STEP #1: BENCHMARKING

o
o
o
o

You cannot manage what you dont measure!


Helps establish a normalized baseline
Addresses the requirements of AB 1103
ENERGY STARs Portfolio Manager software

HOW DOES PORTFOLIO MANAGER WORK?

Normalizes building variables


affecting energy consumption
Building size
Space type
Weather
Hours of operation
Occupancy
Plug load
and creates a whole building mpg rating

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

Eligibility Requirements
Ratable Space Types
At least 50% of the building square footage
must be classified as one of the ratable space types
< 10% of SF can be classified as
computer data center (if estimates are used)
or other space
Minimum and maximum thresholds
for operating characteristics
To learn the specific eligibility requirements for your space type, go to:
www.ENERGYSTAR.gov/Benchmark

Eligible Space Types for 1-100 ENERGY


STAR score

Bank/Financial
Institutions

Hotels

Courthouses

Data Centers

Houses of
Worship

K-12 Schools

Retail Stores

Supermarkets

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

Dormitories

Medical Offices

Warehouses

Hospitals

Office Buildings

Wastewater
Treatment Plants

Examples of Non-Ratable Space Types

Police Stations
Fire Stations
Assisted Living Facilities
Convention Centers
Laboratories
Libraries
Malls
Movie Theatres
Restaurants
Stadiums and Arenas
Building clusters that share at least one energy meter

SPACES DEFINED AS OTHER


Education
College/University (campus-level)
Food Sales
Convenience Store (with or without gas
station)
Food Service
Restaurant/Cafeteria
Fast Food
Health Care: Inpatient (Specialty
Hospitals, Excluding Childrens)
Health Care: Long Term Care (Nursing
Home, Assisted Living)
Health Care: Outpatient
Clinic/Other Outpatient Health

Mall (Strip Mall and Enclosed)


Public Assembly
Entertainment/Culture
Library
Recreation
Social/Meeting
Public Order and Safety
Fire Station/Police Station
Service (Vehicle Repair/Service, Postal
Service)
Storage/Non-Refrigerated Warehouse
Self-Storage
Retail - Other
Other *

Lodging

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

OTHER SPACES FEATURE


ENERGY USE INTENSITY (EUI)

OTHER SPACES FEATURE ENERGY USE INTENSITY (EUI)

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

FUTURE OF BENCHMARKING IN
CALIFORNIA

AB 1103 (Saldana)

AB 1103 Commercial Building


Benchmarking Law
October 2007: Governor signed AB 1103 into law
Phase One of AB 1103
January 1, 2009: Utilities must provide consumption data upon
request from customer
Phase Two of AB 1103
As early as July 1, 2011*: Non-residential building owners are
required to disclose benchmarking data for sale, lease, or
refinancing of an entire building
AB 531 was signed by Governor in October 2009 which provided for
the California Energy Commission (CEC) to establish the schedule to
implement AB 1103
* Date subject to change.
14

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

14

AB 531 Authority to Draft


Schedule for AB 1103
Draft AB 1103 schedule for disclosure of benchmarking
data during sale, lease, or re-finance of an entire building
As early as July 1, 2011*
Owner-occupied buildings > 1,000 sq. ft.
Multi-tenant buildings > 50,000 sq. ft.
January 1, 2012*: Multi-tenant buildings > 10,000 sq. ft.
January 1, 2013*: All non-residential buildings sold,
leased, or refinanced >1,000 sq ft
* Dates subject to change.
15

15

AB 1103 Commercial Building


Benchmarking Law
Buildings eligible to receive an EPA ENERGY STAR
energy performance score of 1 to 100 must disclose
score
Buildings ineligible for ENERGY STAR score must
disclose energy use intensity level (kBtu/sf-yr)
CEC developing California benchmarking system

16

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

16

2.

SETTING SAVINGS TARGETS

Set Energy Performance Target

Set Baseline Periods

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

10

Difference between these two numbers is your energy savings target

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

11

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

12

Difference between these two numbers is your energy savings target

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

13

3.

PLANNING YOUR MOVES


THOUGHTFULLY

PLAN YOUR MOVES THOUGHTFULLY

Audit/upgrade in a way that does not preclude


future improvement

Decide what audit game youre playing

o
o
o

Preliminary
Targeted
Comprehensive

http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

14

PRELIMINARY AUDIT

o
o
o

Conducted by in-house staff?

Projects w/favorable economics justify further


study

o
o

Typically cost $0.01/SF to $0.03/SF

Determine whether to hire an energy consultant


Generate a rough estimate of costs and savings
for broad groups of projects

Minimal calcs; no measure interactions

http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF

TARGETED ENERGY AUDIT


Detailed analysis on one or more types of projects

o
o
o
o

Could be result of Preliminary Audit or a vendor


May be technology specific (e.g., vendor study)
Lighting audits: $0.03/SF to $0.07/SF (or less)

HVAC replacement project study: $0.05/SF to


$0.09/SF

Number/type of lighting fixtures, spot checks of lighting levels,


operating hours

Equipment operating data, computer simulations

EMS audits: interactivity between systems

http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

15

TARGETED ENERGY AUDIT

o
o
o
o

Provides detailed analysis of specific technologies


Provides no energy management plan
Potentially biased analysis
May miss non-targeted opportunities

http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF

COMPREHENSIVE AUDIT

o
o
o
o

All major energy-related systems

Should include energy balance calcs (estimated


use by system compared to utility bills; prevents
over/under estimates of savings.

Costs typically $0.18/SF to $0.50/SF for <50KSF;


$0.12/SF for >250KSF; $0.10/SF for >1MSF

May consider thermal storage and/or cogeneration


Considers interactivity
Includes detailed energy cost savings calcs and
project costs; may use computer models

http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

16

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

17

http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF

http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF

DATA TO COLLECT IN ADVANCE


o

Building design: Square footage, location of doors/windows,


insulation type, operating hrs., etc.

o
o

Lighting: types, wattage, operating hours

Process equipment: size/efficiency ratings on motors,


refrigeration equipment, compressors, heat recovery systems

o
o
o
o

Architecture, electrical, mechanical systems drawings

Ventilation: Volume of air, size of motors relative to make-up


air and exhaust systems

Operating and production schedules


Operating manuals and equipment specifications
Utility data
http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/2000-03-20_400-00-002.PDF

OVERALL ORDER OF EVALUATION

o
o
o
o
o
o

O&M
Building envelope
Lighting
HVAC
Domestic hot water
Energy generation

http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/2000-03-20_400-00-002.PDF

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

18

ELECTRICITY END USE IN COMM. OFFICE

http://www.fypower.org/bpg/index.html?b=offices&print=true

BUILDING ENVELOPE

http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/2000-03-20_400-00-002.PDF

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

19

LIGHTING

http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/2000-03-20_400-00-002.PDF

DOMESTIC HOT WATER

http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/2000-03-20_400-00-002.PDF

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

20

HVAC

http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/2000-03-20_400-00-002.PDF

LIST OF TYPICAL MEASURES

SEE ENTIRE LIST ON PAGES 3-6 FF


http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/2000-03-20_400-00-002.PDF

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

21

ENERGY AUDIT WORKBOOKS

http://www.energy.wsu.edu/documents/rem/energyaudit/audit2.pdf

INDUSTRIAL ENERGY AUDITS

http://www.oregon.gov/ENERGY/CONS/Industry/docs/AuditGuide.pdf

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

22

BUILDING ENERGY SOFTWARE TOOLS

http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/tools_directory/subjects_sub.cfm

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/industry/bestpractices/software.html

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

23

ENERGY AUDIT BOOKS

https://www.aeeprograms.com/store/category.cfm?category_id=6

KEY MEASURES FOUND IN PORTFOLIO


of >100 LARGE OFFICE BLDGS.
Controls

Night setback and


optimum start

Outside air (CO2 sensors)

Mixed air setpoint


Cooling Equipment
Water-cooled DX vs. aircooled DX

VFD Compressors

Water-side economizer

Heating Equipment
Cost per BTU of heat
output

Warm-up strategy

Condensing Boilers

Pumps
VFDs (no reset)

Right-Sizing vs. Throttling

This Building Triage process identified plenty of potential improvements, even in


ENERGY STAR-labeled buildings.

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

24

KEY MEASURES FOUND IN PORTFOLIO


of >100 LARGE OFFICE BLDGS.
Fans

VFDs (no reset)

Fan-powered VAV (series or


parallel)

Lighting
T-8s, CFLs, LEDs, etc.

Light levels

Garage Ventilation
Carbon monoxide controls

Makeup air

This Building Triage process identified plenty of potential improvements, even in


ENERGY STAR-labeled buildings.

CASE STUDY: BUILDING A


ECOs with rebates identified: ECOs with savings but no rebate:
LED exit signs
Kitchen steamer
Occupancy sensors
Domestic hot water boiler
Retrofit 32W T8 with 25W T8s Low-flow toilets
VFDs for boiler fans
Low-flow valves on faucets
Waterside economizer system Boiler lead-lag control
Exhaust energy recovery
Balancing air and water flows
CO2 based ventilation
Air handler shutdown
VFD pump drives
Convert pneumatic controls to
DDC
Chiller lead-lag control

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

25

IDENTIFIED VS. IMPLEMENTED SAVINGS

Building

kWh per
SF

Total IDd
kWh Savings

Estim.
% kWh
savings

Implem.
ECOs
kWh saved

Implem.
ECOs
cost saved

Implem.
% kWh
savings

19.4

2,009,493

31%

1,134,977

$93,491

17%

14.2

5,528,248

41%

4,456,753 $277,506

33%

15.5

939,369

28%

123,275

$8,305

4%

ASSESS NEEDS AND CAPABILITIES

o
o
o
o
o
o

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

In-house vs. outsourced


Utility audits
Energy consultant
Engineering firm
Vendors
Energy Service Company (ESCO)

26

HOW TO HIRE AN ENERGY AUDITOR

What type of audit


do you need?

How should you


select an energy
auditor?

What factors affect


energy audit cost?

What should be in
the contract?

More

http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF

ADVANTAGES OF OUTSOURCING

o
o
o
o
o

Helps confirm project feasibility


Uses latest technical and cost information
Uses computerized building simulation models
Identifies technological problems before installation
Frees up in-house staff time

http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

27

DISADVANTAGES OF OUTSOURCING

Still need to prepare an RFP and scope of work to


select the consultant

Still need to manage the consultant and review the


energy audit

Still need to resolve protests and conflicts from


losing bidders and consultants

http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF

ENERGY CONSULTANTS

o
o

Energy consultants evaluate/recommend projects

Can provide other services, too

On-staff engineers estimate energy use, project


costs and savings

o
o

Prep project specifications


Engineering and design

Usually do not provide financial or management


services

Assist in hiring vendors, managing contractors,


reviewing bid packages, evaluating proposals

http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

28

ENERGY SERVICE COMPANIES

o
o
o

Perform energy audits

Vested interest in the completion, operation and


resulting savings

Main interests are installing and managing upgrades


Some arrange financing and provide equipment
maintenance

http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/efficiency_handbooks/400-00-001C.PDF

4.

PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

29

IS PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING A FIT?

o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o

Aging buildings or equipment


Recurring maintenance problems or high costs
Comfort complaints
Scarce budget resources
Lack of energy expertise
No recent upgrades
Energy-related equipment ready for replacement
Stable use of facility
Reasonable project size
Project paybacks predicted to be >18 months

TYPES OF ESCOs

o
o
o
o

Independent ESCOs
Building equipment manufacturers
Utility companies
Other energy/engineering companies

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

30

TYPES OF
ESCOs

FOCUS ON MUSH
AND FEDERAL

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

31

FOCUS ON ENERGY
EFFICIENCY

EMPHASIS ON
PERFORMANCE

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

32

5 STEPS TO SUCCESSFUL
PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING

1.

Decide if energy performance contracting is a good


solution for your situation

2.
3.

Select an energy service company (ESCO)

4.
5.

Negotiate a long-term contract with your ESCO

Contract with your ESCO to identify energy-saving


opportunities
Verify savings and enjoy the benefits
Adapted from the Energy Services Coalition website at
www.energyservicescoalition.org

SELECTING THE ESCO

o
o
o
o

Develop a facility profile


Develop an RFP
Invite ESCOs to tour the facility
Evaluate the proposals

Excerpted from the Energy Services Coalition website at


www.energyservicescoalition.org

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

33

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

34

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

35

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

36

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

37

CLARIFYING EXPECTATIONS
(ADVICE FROM DOE FEMP SuperESPC)

o
o

Site goals
Project boundaries

Project building sites


Energy conservation measures
Simple payback ranges

CLARIFYING EXPECTATIONS

(contd)

(ADVICE FROM DOE FEMP SuperESPC)

Project requirements/limitations

Contract length
Amount of investment
Operations and maintenance services
Escalation
Codes and environmental requirements
Available studies

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

38

CLARIFYING EXPECTATIONS

(contd)

(ADVICE FROM DOE FEMP SuperESPC)

Project timeline

Contractor milestones
Agency milestones
Risk/commitment points

Asking the right questions leads


to a superior outcome!

FOR MORE INFO ON ESCOs


Federal Energy Management Program
www1.eere.energy.gov/femp
Energy Services Coalition
www.energyservicescoalition.org
National Association of Energy Service Companies
(NAESCO)
www.naesco.org

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

39

5.

CALCULATING RETURNS

USING THE RIGHT FIGURES


o How did you calculate your costs?
o

Were local figures for labor and material used?

Any prevailing wage considerations?

How about demolition, recycling, disposal, soft costs?

How much contingency has been added?

Were rebates, incentives, tax benefits deducted from


the first cost?

Who actually pays the cost?

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

40

USING THE RIGHT FIGURES


o How did you calculate your savings?
o

Which utility tariff?

Time of day or year significant?

When do the savings start?

What about interaction between the measures?

Using balancing calculations and other rules

Who actually gets the savings?

Simple Payback Period (SPP)


How long to recover your investment?
Advantages
Simple & accepted
Often considered in relation to expected holding
period of property
Disadvantages
Ignores Time Value of Money
Ignores period after payback
Do you reject a project just because its SPP is
longer than your projected holding period?

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

41

MORE DISADVANTAGES OF SPP


Cannot consider reduced probability of receiving
one or more future cash flows
Maximum acceptable SPP seems arbitrary given
market conditions or organizational hurdle
rates
SPP is only as accurate as the costs & benefits
used to calculate it
In Landlord/Tenant settings, calculating the SPP
is not necessarily simple!

IN LANDLORD/TENANT SETTINGS

What are the Landlords shares of costs and


savings?

Could the Landlord recover part of the cost from the


tenants?

Would the Landlord see a reduction in unreimbursed


operating expenses?

Would lower Op Ex result in higher base rents


and/or better tenant retention/attraction?

Would higher NOI support higher asset value upon


refinancing or sale?

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

42

Return On Investment (ROI)


The annual interest rate earned on an
investment or the ratio of net savings to
cost
Advantages
Simple & accepted
Easy to compare to the owners cost of capital
Disadvantages
Calculated using savings in Year 1
Assumes consistent annual rate of savings
Not useful w/irregular cash flows
Doesnt reflect duration of savings stream

Discount Rate
The minimum rate of return required by
the investor
Interest rate used in present value
calculations
The higher the perceived risk of an
investment, the higher the discount rate
The higher the discount rate, the lower
the present value

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

43

Present Value (PV)


What is a particular cash flow worth in
todays dollars?
Based on the concept that money earns
interest

If $0.91 invested at 10% = $1.00 after 1 year


then the PV of $1.00 at Date 1 must be $0.91

Present Value (PV)


Determine value of each cash flow at Date 0
using discount rate, then add them together
Date 1

$1.00 = $ .91

at Date 0

Date 2

$1.00 = $ .83

at Date 0

Date 3

$1.00 = $ .75

at Date 0

= $2.49

at Date 0

TOTAL

Date 0 is today
Date 1 is the end of Year 1

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

44

Present Value

Present Value

(contd)

Cash Flow
( 1 + Disc. Rate ) Date

Net Present Value (NPV)


Advantages
Recognizes Time Value of Money
Widely accepted & frequently understood
Recognizes ups & downs in cash flows
Disadvantages
Constant discount ratebut which rate?
Project must have an end date

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

45

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)


At what Discount Rate will NPV = 0?
Advantages
Project return vs. cost of capital
Recognizes up and down cash flows
Widely accepted & occasionally understood
Disadvantages
Project must have an endbut when?
Multiple sign changes in cash flows can cause > one
IRR
Assumes that all cash inflows are reinvested at IRR
Modified IRR
Reinvesting cash inflows at the safe rate

Modified IRR (MIRR)


Like IRR, but reinvestment rate is specified by
user
Advantages
More realistic than IRR
Assumes that cash flows are reinvested at a safe
rate
Widely accepted & occasionally understood
Disadvantages
Project must have an endbut when?
Multiple sign changes in cash flows can cause more
than one MIRR

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

46

Before-tax vs. After-tax IRR


End of Year 1 is Date 1
Date 0

Before-tax
cash flow

-$2,550,000

$214,025

$239,960

$266,314

$284,765 $4,678,551

After-tax
cash flow

-$2,550,000

$168,224

$181,110

$193,941

$201,156 $4,105,037

Before-tax IRR
(BTIRR)

19.64%

After-tax IRR
(ATIRR)

15.17%

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF)


Basics of time value of money
and present value (PV)
1) A dollar is worth more today than tomorrow.
2) An income propertys value can be thought of
as
PV of cash inflows minus PV of cash outflows

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

47

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF)


Assign negative value to each cash outflow and
positive value to each cash inflow
Properly place each cash flow on the timeline
Does the cash flow occur at the beginning or end
of the period?

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF)


Evaluate the stacked cash flows over the life
of the project
First cost (and/or payments w/financing cost, if
any)
Operating and maintenance costs
Salvage value (+ or - ?)
Convert all cash flows back to Date 0 (i.e.,
today) using appropriate discount rate to
generate the present values

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

48

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis (DCF)

Energy efficiency can affect both inflows and


outflows
Cash inflows: higher rent, lower vacancy, lower
unreimbursed Op Ex, rebates
Cash outflows: upgrade costs, tenant fit-outs,
maintenance, capital expense reserves

Sample Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

"Today"

End of
1st Year

End of
2nd
Year

End of
3rd Year

End of
4th Year

Date
Cash Flow

(1,000)

$1,000

$ 1,000

$1,000

$1,000

Present Value (PV)

(1,000)

$ 909

$ 826

$ 751

$ 683

Net Present Value (NPV)


IRR
Discount Rate
Present Value Formula

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

2,170

92.76%
10%
PV = $ divided by (1+ discount rate)^year

49

IRR is discount rate at which NPV = 0

"Today"
Date

End of
1st Year

End of
2nd
Year

End of
3rd
Year

End of
4th Year

Cash Flow

(1,000)

$1,000

$ 1,000

$1,000

$1,000

Present Value (PV)

(1,000)

$ 519

$ 269

$ 140

$ 72

Net Present Value (NPV)

IRR

92.76%

Discount Rate

92.76%

Present Value Formula

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

PV = $ divided by (1+ discount rate)^year

50

What is the formula that


converts a future value
into a present value?

Present Value =

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

Cash Flow
( 1 + Disc. Rate ) Date

51

What is the formula that


converts a present value
into a future value?

Future Value = Cash Flow x ( 1 + Disc. Rate ) Date

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

52

Time Value of Money (TVM) functions


on a handheld calculator
PV

Present Value

PMT

Payment

Number of periods

INT

Interest rate per period

FV

Future value

TVM on an Excel worksheet


PV = PV ( rate, nper, pmt, [fv], [type] )
PMT

= PMT ( rate, nper, pv, [fv], [type] )

NPER = NPER ( rate, pmt, pv, [fv], [type] )


RATE = RATE ( nper, pmt, pv, [fv], [type], [guess] )
FV= FV ( rate, nper, pmt, [pv], [type] )
Using the fx button for formula syntax
Getting the positive/negative values right

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

53

Modeling cash flows for typical projects


Today

YR1

YR2

YR n

Cash outflows
Single investment
Phased investment
Financed investment
Cash inflows
Rebate/incentive recd
Energy savings
Maintenance savings (or cost)

Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA)


Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) looks at the
total cost of a design choice:
First-cost
Operation, maintenance and repair costs
Financing costs
Serviceable life of the design
Salvage

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

54

Should you use LCCA?


Benefits
Offsets higher first-cost with benefits over time
Incorporates time value of money into
decision-making
Caveats
Not widely understood
Accuracy & usefulness depend on inputs

Modeling cash flows for typical projects


Today

YR1

YR2

YR n

Cash outflows
Single investment
Phased investment
Financed investment
Cash inflows
Rebate/incentive recd
Energy savings
Maintenance savings (or cost)

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

55

Modeling cash flows for typical projects

Lighting retrofit
Chiller replacement
Various motors/drives
Retrocommissioning

Capitalization Rate
A special discount rate used in the
income approach to appraisal
The rate of return an investor would
expect to receive if the income-producing
property were purchased with all cash

Net operating income


Capitalization rate

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

= Asset value

56

EE NOI Asset Value


Appraisal Methods
Cost approach
Market comparison approach
Income approach
Efficiency can boost NOI and appraisal

Owners view of lower OpEx


Before-Tax Cash Flow

In this example, a $1.00/SF upgrade with

~3-year simple payback period supports


potential gross income
$3.50/SF in higher asset value.
- vacancy and bad debt allowance
+ miscellaneous income
= effective gross income
- operating expenses
+ operating expense reimbursements
Income Approach to Appraisal
- cap ex reserve for replacements
net operating income
= net operating income
= asset value
- debt service (interest + princ. amort.)
capitalization rate
= before-tax cash flow from operations

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

$0.35 SF/year

Taxable Income
net operating income
- interest portion of debt service
- depreciation allowance
= taxable income

$3.50/SF

10%

57

Line-by-line view of improved efficiency

What kind of lease did you say it was?

Graphic excerpted from Jewell leasing brief for BetterBricks

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

58

LEASING BASICS
o Gross lease
o Net lease
o Fixed-base lease
o Regional variations
o The devil is in the details

Language is sacred.

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

59

The terms Net and Gross are


often incorrectly used to refer to
who performs building services
rather than
who ultimately pays the expense.

and remember to consider all of the expense,


not just the amount up to a certain base year or expense stop.

THE FIXED-BASE LEASE

YR 1

$1.90/SF
Expense Stop
for Energy

YR 2

$2.00/SF

$1.60/SF

Energy Cost
BEFORE
Upgrade

Energy Cost
AFTER
Upgrade

T = $0.10/SF

$2.00/SF in YR1
T saves $0.10/SF
SAVE
$0.40/SF
L saves $0.30/SF

L = $1.90/SF

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

L = $1.60/SF

$1.60/SF in YR2

60

Increases in NOI must be persistent to


impact the buildings appraised value
Increased efficiency reduces utility expense
How long will the EE savings persist?
Owners share of savings affects NOI
How long will building owner realize savings?
Increases in rental income affect NOI
How long will the new rental rates last?
How long will tenant attraction/retention benefits
last?

6.

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

SELECTING THE FUNDING

61

POTENTIAL FUNDING ANGLES


There are
plenty of viable
financing
options for
both private
and public
organizations

PURCHASE

o
o
o

Cash
Loans
Bonds

Content for this and related slides was excerpted and/or adapted from US EPAs ENERGY STAR
Building Upgrade Manual, Chapter 4, a full copy of which is available at the following link:
http://www.energystar.gov/ia/business/EPA_BUM_CH4_Financing.pdf

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

62

IS ON-BILL FINANCING AVAILABLE?

o
o

Tariff-based systems vs. On-bill loans

Loan sizes and terms vary for private and publicsector applications

For more information, consult Alliance to Save


Energys Brief #3: Paying for Energy Efficiency
Upgrades through Utility Bills available at

Available in a growing number of locations around the


country

http://ase.org/content/article/detail/5476

LEASING

o
o
o

Operating Lease
Capital Lease
Municipal Lease

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

63

OPERATING LEASE

A lease in which the clear


intent is to return the
equipment to the Lessor at
the end of the lease term

o
o

Lessor owns the equipment

Extend the lease, negotiate a


new lease, or return the
equipment

Rents it to the Lessee for


fixed period of time

OPERATING LEASE

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

o
o
o

Simple

Payments usually lower than


for capital leases

Payments are 100% taxdeductible

Funded by operating budget


May be ideal for shorterterm projects or projects
where owning the
equipment is not desirable

64

CAPITAL LEASE

Essentially installment purchase of equipment, though


legal title remains with Lessor during the lease term

o
o
o

Little or no initial capital required

Fixed assets and debt are added to the balance sheet

Both financial and tax rules treat it as purchase


Leased assets depreciated; depreciation as well as
interest portion of the lease payment are tax-deductible

FASB 13

Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) created


rules for lease classification in its Statement No. 13

A lease meeting any of the following criteria must be


treated as a capital lease:

Ownership of the property is transferred at the end of the


lease term

Lease includes a bargain purchase option

PV of the future lease payments >= 90% of the fair market


value at the beginning of the lease

Lease term covers 75% or more of the propertys economic


life

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

65

CAPITAL LEASE VS. LOAN

Leasing companies have more flexibility than banks in


setting terms

Capital leases typically require little/no down payment


and significantly less paperwork

o
o

Capital leases may finance soft costs


Other advantages.

MUNICIPAL LEASE

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

Faster, simpler than a bond


referendum

o
o

Reduced transaction costs

o
o

Full financing of all project costs

o
o

No large capital outlay

Lower interest rates (tax-exempt


interest to the Lessor)
Practical terms match the lease
term with the useful life of the
asset
Pathway to future unencumbered
project ownership

66

PEFORMANCE CONTRACTING

Complex and lengthy to


negotiate

Specify detailed work for


individual facilities

o
o

Involve large sums of capital

Require expertise in law,


engineering and finance

Savings first service the debt


financing the project

Cover a wide range of


contingencies

PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING

o
o
o

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

(contd)

Guaranteed Savings
Shared Savings
Paid-from Savings

67

ADDITIONAL OPPORTUNITIES

Rebates and
incentives

State/local govts;
other agencies

ARRA Stimulusbased funding

Other sources

WHICH OPTION IS THE BEST FIT?

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

68

Content for this slide and previous one was excerpted from EPAs Easy
Access to Energy Improvement Funds in the Private Sector, Nov. 2004

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

69

7. REBATES & INCENTIVES

REBATES AND INCENTIVES


o Why do they give rebates/incentives?

1
2

NIMBY & BANANA prevent new


generation 1,2

Transmission and distribution bottlenecks

Uncertainties re: carbon-counting landscape

Ratepayers relief as energy prices rise

More states setting Renewable Portfolio


Standards (RPS) and Energy Efficiency
Portfolio Standards (EEPS)

Not In My Back Yard


Build Almost Nothing Around Nearly Anyone

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

70

REBATES AND INCENTIVES


o Rebates/incentives are not
just for retrofits
o Types of rebates/incentives
Equipment efficiency
improvements
Demand response programs
Distributed generation
Technical assistance
Other

REBATES AND INCENTIVES


o Project must be in a
rebate friendly
jurisdiction
o Components used must
meet efficiency guidelines
o Rebate applicant usually
party appearing on utility
bill

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

71

ELIGIBLE TECHNOLOGIES
o Energy Mgmt. Systems (EMS) & controls
o Lighting
o HVAC
o Motors/drives
o Building envelope (e.g., window film, cool roof)
o Process technologies
o Other (e.g., gas, water, renewables, custom measures)
o Projected savings must be defensible and persistent

REBATE PROGRAM TYPES


o Prescriptive Measures
o Performance Measures
o Custom Measures

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

72

PRESCRIPTIVE REBATES
o Set rebate amounts for
specific measures or
component
o Before >>> mainly new
construction and small
retrofit/renovation
o Now >>> many larger
projects also eligible
o Limitations may include
capped rebate amounts,
restrictive technologies

PERFORMANCE REBATES
o Rebates based on calculated energy savings
o Measurement and Verification (M&V) may be required,
and if so, must meet pre-set savings level
o Payments may be made over time based on M&V
o Detailed Energy Analysis (DEA) may be required
o Pre- & post-construction inspections may be needed

Be sure to file early enough in the process!

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

73

CUSTOM MEASURES
o Often innovative ways for
reducing demand (i.e., not
simply a one-for-one
replacement)
o Measurement and
Verification may be required
o Detailed proposal & savings
analysis prior to purchasing
materials
o Custom Measures must
represent permanent
wattage reductions

REBATE BEST PRACTICES


o Utility jurisdictions relevant to your facilities
Existing buildings
Remodeling targets
New construction targets
Energy-related maintenance activities
o Matching program timelines to your timelines
Funding cycles are not always calendar year!
Some $$$ is extremely short-lived!
Might have to pre-file to qualify
Might have to buy equipment AFTER pre-filing/approval

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

74

REBATE BEST PRACTICES

(contd)

o Equipment specifications
Energy efficiency of existing
specs?
Willing to increase EE to get
rebate to cover added cost?
Can/does or equivalent
lower EE (and rebate
eligibility)?
How far ahead do you order
equipment?

BEST PRACTICE #1: COMMUNICATION!


with utilities
Get to know the program managers!
Know when funding windows open/close
Understand which program gives the most $$$
Know what qualifies as a custom measure
Negotiate M&V to simplify savings verification

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

75

BEST PRACTICE #1: COMMUNICATION!


with utilities (contd)
Know when free design assistance is available
Know if multiple applications can be
consolidated
Know how rules apply to national accounts
Know whether multiple measures get rebate
bonus
Emulate successfully funded projects

BEST PRACTICE #1: COMMUNICATION!


with partners
Maximize cost-effective EE given rebate climate
Avoid or equivalent substitution if less efficient
Have accurate equip. specs/counts before/after
Use proper invoice format & timing
Adhere to guidelines when purchasing equipment

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

76

BEST PRACTICE #1: COMMUNICATION!


throughout your organization
Can Construction give you enough advance notice on

remodels & new sites?


Can Procurement enforce the equipment specs needed
to qualify?
Can Maintenance tell you when theyre ready to
change energy-related equipment?
Can A/P get you copies of invoices?
Can CFO pool all rebate $$$ for other EE initiatives?
Can you record & leverage past filing successes to help

guide future equipment specs and rebate filings?

with the landlord (or tenant)

GETTING YOUR SHARE OF THE $6.1 BILLION


o

No capital project is too small to investigate

Its not just about retrofits!

New construction

Remodeling/renovations

Tenant fit-out

Typical energy/water retrofit campaigns

Emergency replacements of energy/water-consuming


equipment

Feasibility studies

Remember to explore custom programs


Some rebates are available retroactively

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

77

13 TIPS FOR SUCCESSFUL REBATE FILING


1. Know who is eligible

* Excerpted from Winning with Incentives, Mark Jewell,


Energy & Power Management, September 2005

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

78

13 TIPS FOR SUCCESSFUL REBATE FILING


1. Know who is eligible
2. Understand all funding angles

13 TIPS FOR SUCCESSFUL REBATE FILING


1. Know who is eligible
2. Understand all funding angles
3. Compare programs to maximize $$$

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

79

13 TIPS FOR SUCCESSFUL REBATE FILING


1. Know who is eligible
2. Understand all funding angles
3. Compare programs to maximize $$$
4. Invest engineering expertise upfront

13 TIPS FOR SUCCESSFUL REBATE FILING


1. Know who is eligible
2. Understand all funding angles
3. Compare programs to maximize $$$
4. Invest engineering expertise upfront
5. Specify proper configuration

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

80

13 TIPS FOR SUCCESSFUL REBATE FILING


6. Ensure specs remain rebate-eligible

13 TIPS FOR SUCCESSFUL REBATE FILING


6. Ensure specs remain rebate-eligible
7. Fine-tune specifications

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

81

13 TIPS FOR SUCCESSFUL REBATE FILING


6. Ensure specs remain rebate-eligible
7. Fine-tune specifications
8. Verify accurate input by 3rd parties

13 TIPS FOR SUCCESSFUL REBATE FILING


6. Ensure specs remain rebate-eligible
7. Fine-tune specifications
8. Verify accurate input by 3rd parties
9. File as early as possible

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

82

13 TIPS FOR SUCCESSFUL REBATE FILING


6. Ensure specs remain rebate-eligible
7. Fine-tune specifications
8. Verify accurate input by 3rd parties
9. File as early as possible
10. Document changes

13 TIPS FOR SUCCESSFUL REBATE FILING


11. Connect purchases with incentive approvals

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

83

13 TIPS FOR SUCCESSFUL REBATE FILING


11. Connect purchases with incentive approvals
12. Monitor the measurement and verification (M&V)
process

13 TIPS FOR SUCCESSFUL REBATE FILING


11. Connect purchases with incentive approvals
12. Monitor the measurement and verification (M&V)
process
13. Align all interests

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

84

FOLLOWING THE TIPS SAVES $$$


o

Tip #3 turned a $100K rebate into $400K once $50K


M&V was added

Tip #6 could have avoided loss of a $40K rebate due


to non-compliant equipment

Tip #7 could have saved $17K in rebates and $49K


in operating expenses over 10 yrs.

Tip #10 could have preserved a $70K rebate

8. SDG&E PROGRAMS

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

85

SDG&Es REBATES
Energy Efficiency Business Rebates (Express Efficiency)
http://www.sdge.com/business/rebatesincentives/programs/energyEfficiency.shtml

Food Service Rebates


http://www.sdge.com/business/rebatesincentives/programs/foodService.shtml

High Tech Rebates


http://www.sdge.com/business/rebatesincentives/programs/highTech.shtml

SDG&Es NO-/LOW-COST IMPROVEMENTS


Mobile Energy Clinic
http://www.sdge.com/business/rebatesincentives/programs/mobileClinic.shtml

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

86

SDG&Es CUSTOMIZED SAVINGS PLANS


Energy Efficiency Business Incentives (SPC)
http://www.sdge.com/business/rebatesincentives/programs/standardPerformanceContract
.shtml

Energy Savings Bid


http://www.sdge.com/business/rebatesincentives/programs/energySavingsBid.shtml

Premium Efficiency Cooling


http://www.sdge.com/business/rebatesincentives/programs/energySavingsBid.shtml

RCx Retrocommissioning Program


http://www.sdge.com/business/rebatesincentives/programs/rcxRetrocommissioning.shtml

BENCHMARKING REQUIREMENT
http://www.sdge.com/business/rebatesincentives/benchmarking/

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

87

http://www.sdge.com/documents/business/savings/SDGEBenchmark.pdf

ENERGY EFFICIENCY BUSINESS REBATES


http://www.sdge.com/business/rebatesincentives/programs/energyEfficiency.shtml

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

88

ENERGY EFFICIENCY BUSINESS REBATES


o

Rebates to businesses to retrofit or upgrade


equipment to higher efficiency

One rebate application

Rebate levels are consistent statewide

New products added:


o

LED fixtures, LED case lighting, T8-to-T8, Motors

Many lighting base cases extended

Removed most CFLs

Lighting products require collection of wattage and


technology info for existing and new lamps

ENERGY EFFICIENCY BUSINESS REBATES (contd)


o

Browse the Product Catalog for eligibility

Benchmark your facility

http://www.sdge.com/business/benchmarking/

Calculate rebate

Non-lighting projects: Complete Rebate Product


Information table

Lighting measures: Complete the lighting worksheet

Calculate and submit Annual Hours of Operation


Worksheet

Submit Rebate Application and supplemental forms,


if applicable

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

89

ENERGY EFFICIENCY BUSINESS REBATES


http://www.sdge.com/documents/business/savings/express/EEProductCatalog.pdf

ENERGY EFFICIENCY BUSINESS REBATES


http://www.sdge.com/documents/business/savings/express/EERebateWorksheet.pdf

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

90

ENERGY EFFICIENCY BUSINESS INCENTIVES


http://www.sdge.com/business/rebatesincentives/programs/standardPerformanceContract.shtml

ENERGY EFFICIENCY BUSINESS INCENTIVES


(SPC)
o

Incentive payments for energy-efficient projects


involving the installation of new, high-efficiency
equipment or systems gas or electric

Incentives based on amount of documented energy


saved

Lighting: $0.05/kWh $100/Peak kW

A/C & Refrigeration: $0.15/kWh $100/Peak kW

Other (motors, fans, etc.): $0.09/kWh $100/Peak kW

Natural gas: $1.00/therm

Program open to all commercial, industrial, agricultural


customers

Address questions to eebi@semprautilities.com

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

91

ENERGY SAVINGS BID


http://www.sdge.com/business/rebatesincentives/programs/energySavingsBid.shtml

ENERGY SAVINGS BID


http://www.sdge.com/business/rebatesincentives/programs/energySavingsBid.shtml

Customers can propose incentive amounts for


nonresidential energy-saving retrofit projects

Projects may include a single customer or a


combination of customers at multiple sites

Receive large incentives for projects that produce


energy savings of at least 500,000 kWh annually or
25,000 therms

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

92

ON-BILL FINANCING
http://www.sdge.com/business/rebatesincentives/programs/onbillfinancing.shtml

OBF PROCESS FLOW CHART


http://www.sdge.com/documents/business/savings/obf/OBFCustomerProcessFlow.pdf

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

93

ON-BILL FINANCING
http://www.sdge.com/business/rebatesincentives/programs/onbillfinancing.shtml
http://www.sdge.com/documents/business/savings/obf/OBFFactSheet.pdf

Customer must receive a rebate or incentive through


an SDG&E energy-efficiency program

Customer must have had an active SDG&E account for


the past two years for the same business

Customers SDG&E account must in good standing

Rebates/incentives for non-comprehensive (i.e., two or


more end uses) are reduced by 10%

Loan term calculated based on estimated annual


savings; cannot exceed max loan term

Loan max per meter, with minimum of $5K:

$100K for business customers; 5-year max

$250K for taxpayer-funded customers; 10-year max

9. TAX INCENTIVES

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

94

TAX INCENTIVES

o
o
o
o
o

Depreciation
Interest
Commercial Buildings Deduction
State and local tax incentives
Other

THE IMPACT OF EPACT 2005


o Deductions versus
Credits
o Section 1331,
Commercial Buildings
Deduction
o Section 1337, Solar
Energy Tax Credit

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

95

THE EMERGENCY ECONOMIC


STABILIZATION ACT OF 2008
(HR-1424)
o Approved and signed on October 3, 2008
o Extends the benefits of the Energy Policy Act
of 2005 through December 31, 2013

THREE PATHS TO SECTION 1331


o Whole Building Deduction

Reduce entire building by 50% vs. 90.1-2001

Max deduction is $1.80/SF

o Partial Deduction (Lighting, HVAC or Building Envelope)

Upgrade one system, achieve cost savings of 20%, 20% or


10% (for lighting, HVAC/hot water, and bldg. envelope,
respectively) compared to Standard 90.1-2001 Reference
Building

Max deduction is $0.60/SF

o Interim Lighting Rules

Upgrade lighting, achieve LPD savings of 25-40% (or 50% if


warehouse) compared to tables in 90.1-2001

Max deduction is $0.30 to $0.60/SF (or $0.60/SF)

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

96

INTERIM LIGHTING RULES

www.efficientbuildings.org

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

97

www.efficientbuildings.org
(frequently asked questions page)

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/
printable_versions/tax_commercial.html

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

98

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/
qualified_software.html

www.energytaxincentives.org

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

99

www.efficientbuildings.org

www.efficientbuildings.org

(frequently asked questions page)

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

100

www.lightingtaxdeduction.org

http://www.lightingtaxdeduction.org/faq.html

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

101

http://www.lightingtaxdeduction.org/standard.
html

10.

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

FORMULATING COMPELLING
VALUE PROPOSITIONS

102

Value is created by the


compression of time.
- Peter Drucker

EPAs CASH FLOW OPPORTUNITY CALCULATOR

o
o

Confirming financial viability


Estimating the cost of project delay

o
o

Waiting for cash


Waiting for a lower interest rate

Results are often counter-intuitive!


Particularly useful for persuading public sector
decision-makers to approve a project now rather
than waiting.

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

103

EPAs CASH FLOW OPPORTUNITY CALCULATOR

http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=assess_value.financial_tools

The quality of
your outcome is
directly related
to the quality of
the questions
you ask.

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

104

ASK BETTER QUESTIONS.

o
o

What is the projects Net Present Value?

Which project has the lowest Life-Cycle Cost? (when

What is each projects Modified Internal Rate of


Return? (when ranking non-mutually exclusive alternatives)
choosing between two or more mutually exclusive alternatives)

ASK BETTER QUESTIONS


What is our cost of capital?

o
o
o

What is our hurdle rate for energy projects?


Could we justify reserving capital for EE projects?

Overcome priority given to manuf./mktg. projects


Elevate EE projects to mandatory or compliance-driven
Link to CSR goals, GHG-reduction targets, etc.
Include the value of future carbon credits, etc. in analysis
Monetize other benefits (e.g., hiring/retention; productivity)

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

105

ASK BETTER QUESTIONS

In Landlord/Tenant settings, how are the costs and


benefits allocated between the parties?

Are there other reasons to fund this EE project?

o
o
o
o

Addressing tenant comfort/convenience issues?


Improving tenant attraction/retention?
Acquiring ENERGY STAR label, LEED certification, etc.?
Fulfilling portfolio-wide commitments re: CSR, GHG, etc.

What would the impacts be on Net Operating Income


(NOI) and asset value?

How would those impacts improve the projects return?

ASK BETTER QUESTIONS

o
o

What depth of audit are we prepared to undertake?

o
o
o
o

What is our cash position?

Do we have in-house skills/bandwidth, or do we need


to outsource?
How important is minimizing the transaction cost?
Does the project have to be off-balance-sheet?
Could we monetize the value of tax benefits?

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

106

ASK BETTER QUESTIONS

o
o

How quickly would we like to do the project?

o
o
o

Do we need to fund soft costs as well?

Have we convinced management to look beyond


Simple Payback Period?

Is there any advantage to classifying the project as


capital budget or operating budget?
What is our appetite for performance risk?
Have we aligned all of our internal stakeholders to
ensure a successful team effort?

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

107

Value is created by the


compression of time.
- Peter Drucker

Value is created by the compression of time


- Peter Drucker

Assume 10 upgrade projects


(five 4-year SPP & five 2.5-year SPP)

Scenario A
10 projects this year

Scenario B
2 projects per year

Total Cap Ex

$1,681,000

$1,764,503

PV of Investment

$1,681,000

$1,241,656

IRR

27.2%

19.3%

NPV

$1,016,071*

$578,366

NPV of avoided cost of delay

$437,705

*75% higher NPV helps build shareholder value faster

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

108

Thank you!
Mark Jewell
President
EEFG, Inc.
mjewell@eefg.com
215-880-8173 cell
Every winning strategy needs a winning mechanism.
- Jim Collins, author of Good to Great

Copyright 2010 Mark Jewell. All rights reserved.


mjewell@eefg.com 215-880-8173 cell

109

You might also like