Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit I, II
www.msubbu.in
Solution Thermodynamics
ww
w
.m
sub
bu
.in
Dr. M. Subramanian
Associate Professor
Department of Chemical Engineering
Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering
Kalavakkam 603 110, Kanchipuram (Dist)
Tamil Nadu, India
msubbu.in[AT]gmail.com
Jan-2012
Contents
UNIT I: PROPERTIES OF SOLUTIONS
Partial molar properties, ideal and non-ideal solutions, standard
states definition and choice, Gibbs-Duhem equation, excess
ww
properties of mixtures.
w
.m
sub
bu
.in
Criteria for equilibrium between phases in multi component nonreacting systems in terms of chemical potential and fugacity
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
Introduction
Most of the materials of the real world are not pure substances
with all atoms or molecules identical but rather are mixtures of
one type or another.
The pure substances from wwhich
a solution may be prepared are
ww
.m
called components, or constituents,
of the solution.
sub
bu
.in
Solutions are not limited to liquids: for example air, a mixture of
predominantly N2 and O2, forms a vapor solution. Solid solutions
such as the solid phase in the Si-Ge system are also common
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
Multicomponent system:
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
Composition
Mole fraction
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
Properties of Solutions
The properties of solutions are, in general, not additive
properties of the pure components.
The actual contribution to any extensive property is designated
as its partial property. The term partial property is used to
designate the property of awwcomponent
when it is in admixture
w.m
with one or more other components
sub
bu
.in
Because most chemical, biological, and geological processes
occur at constant temperature and pressure, it is convenient to
provide a special name for the partial derivatives of all
thermodynamic properties with respect to mole number at
constant pressure and temperature. They are called partial
molar properties
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
Water: 18 mL/mol
Ethanol: 58 mL/mol
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Volume before mixing = (1 mole) (18.0 mL/mole) + (1 mole) (58.0 mL/mole) = 76 mL
Volume after mixing = (1 mole) (16.9 mL/mole) + (1 mole) (57.4 mL/mole) = 74.3 mL
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
1 liter of ethanol and 1 liter of water are mixed at constant temperature and
pressure. What is the expected volume of the resultant mixture ?
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
w.m
Ethanol-Water:
sub
bu
The volume of 1 mole pure ethanol
is 58.0 ml and the volume
.in
of 1 mole pure water is 18.0 ml. However, 1 mole water
mixed with 1 mole ethanol does not result in 58.0 ml + 18.0
ml, or 76.0 ml, but rather 74.3 ml.
When the mole fraction is 0.5, the partial molal volume of
ethanol is 57.4 ml and the partial molal volume of water is
16.9 ml. (non-ideal solution)
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
Gibbs-Duhem Equation
This equation is very useful in deriving certain relationships
between the partial molar quantity for a solute and that for the
solvent.
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
w.m
dM = x1 d M 1 + M 1 dx1 + x 2 d M s2ub+ M 2 dx 2
bu
.in
Const. P and T, using Gibbs/Duhem equation
dM = M 1 dx1 + M 2 dx 2
x1 + x 2 = 1
dM
= M1 M 2
dx1
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
M 1 = M + x2
dM
dx 1
M 2 = M x1
dM
dx 1
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
Example Problem
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
x1
H (J/mol)
H-ideal
(J/mol)
600
600
420
600
0.1
581.98
580
419.44
600.04
0.2
563.84
560
417.92
600.32
0.3
545.46
415.68
601.08
0.4
526.72
412.96
602.56
0.5
507.5
0.6
ww 540
w.m
520
sub
H1bar
(J/mol)
H2bar
(J/mol)
410
605
487.68
b
500 u.in
480
407.04
608.64
0.7
467.14
460
404.32
613.72
0.8
445.76
440
402.08
620.48
0.9
423.42
420
400.56
629.16
400
400
400
640
700
650
H (J/mol)
600
550
ww
500
H-mix
H-ideal
H1bar
H2bar
w.m
sub
bu
.in
450
400
350
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
x1 (-)
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
0.8
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
x1
avgMW
Videal
Vmix
m3/kmol
m3/kmol
m3/kmol
786.846
32.042
0.040722
0.040722
0.00000000
0.1162
806.655
30.41032
0.037699
0.038088
-0.00038867
0.2221
825.959
28.92327
0.035018
0.035687
-0.00066954
0.2841
837.504
28.05267
0.033496
0.034282
-0.00078631
0.3729
855.031
ww
26.80574
0.032269
-0.00091829
0.4186
864.245
0.031233
-0.00095908
0.5266
887.222
.m 0.031351
s0.030274
ub
26.16402
bu
.in
24.64748
0.027781
0.028785
-0.00100419
0.6119
905.376
23.4497
0.025901
0.026851
-0.00095055
0.722
929.537
21.90368
0.023564
0.024355
-0.00079116
0.8509
957.522
20.09366
0.020985
0.021433
-0.00044816
0.9489
981.906
18.71755
0.019062
0.019212
-0.00014922
997.047
18
0.018053
0.018053
0.00000000
Vmix = V - Videal
0.045
0.04
V-ideal
0.035
0.03
Volume (m /kmol)
ww
0.025
w.m
sub
bu
.in
0.02
0.015
0.01
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
x1
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
0.8
0.00E+00
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
-2.00E-04
Vmix
-4.00E-04
-6.00E-04
-8.00E-04
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
-1.00E-03
-1.20E-03
x1
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
0.8
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
wt%
H2SO4]
H
(kJ/kg)
x1
Hmix
(kJ/mol)
Hmix Model
(kJ/mol)
278
0.0000
18.00
5.00
20
85
0.0439
21.51
1.83
-3.3516
-3.3818
40
-78
0.1091
w
26.73
-2.08
-7.5264
-7.4880
60
-175
0.2160
-6.17
-12.0446
-12.0692
80
-153
0.4235
.m 35.28
sub
bu
51.88
.in
-7.94
-14.6412
-14.6637
90
-60
0.6231
67.85
-4.07
-11.5746
-11.5736
100
92
1.0000
98.00
9.02
ww
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
avgMW
H
(kJ/mol)
Hmix = H - Hideal
10.00
H (kJ /mol)
6.00
2.00
ww
-2.00 0.0
0.2
w.m
sub
0.4
bu
.in
-6.00
-10.00
x1
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
0.6
0.8
1.0
Redlich-Kister Model
Also known as Guggenheim-Scatchard Equation
Fits well the data of Mmix vs. x1
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
0
0.00
-2
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
-4
Hmix
-6
-8
-10
-12
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Data
RK Model fit
-14
-16
x1
ao
-55.9287
a1
27.0094
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
Gibbs
Josiah Willard Gibbs (1839 1904)
Gibbs greatly extended the field of thermodynamics, which
originally comprised only the relations between heat and
mechanical work. Gibbs was instrumental in broadening the field
w
to embrace transformationswwof
.m energy between all the forms in
which it may be manifested, besuthey
thermal, mechanical,
bb
electrical, chemical, or radiant. u.in
He is considered to be the founder of chemical
thermodynamics.
He is an American theoretical physicist, chemist, and
mathematician. He devised much of the theoretical foundation
for chemical thermodynamics as well as physical chemistry.
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
applied to a single-phase fluid in a closed system wherein no
chemical reactions occur.
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
T P ,n
P T , n
i ni
P ,T , n j
bu
i
.in
n
i
P ,T , n
j
d ( nG ) = ( nV ) dP ( nS ) dT + i dn i
i
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
When n = 1,
dG = VdP SdT + i dx i
G = G ( P , T , x1 , x 2 ,..., x i ,...)
ww
G
V =
P T , x
w.m
sub
bu Gibbs energy is expressed as a
The
.in
function of its canonical variables.
Solution properties, M
Partial properties, M i
Pure-species properties, Mi
i Gi
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
G
S =
T P , x
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
w
d ( nG ) = ( nV ) dP ( nS ) dT + iwdn
w.mi d ( nG ) = ( nV ) dP ( nS ) dT + i dn i
sub
i
i
bu
.in
nM = ( nM ) + ( nM )
d ( nG ) = ( nV ) dP ( nS ) dT + i dn i + i dn i
i
Mass balance:
dn i = dn i
i = i
Multiple phases at the same T and P are in equilibrium
when
chemical
potential of each species is the same in all phases.
Jan-2012
M Subramanian
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Entropy Change
The second law of thermodynamics
For an isolated system
For systems that are not isolated it will be convenient to use the criteria of
reversibility and irreversibility such as in the following equation:
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
To carry out the mixing process in a reversible manner, the external pressure P on
the right piston is kept infinitesimally less than the pressure of B in the mixture; and
the external pressure P on the left piston is kept infinitesimally less than the
pressure of A in the mixture.
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
iig G i ig = G iig + RT ln y i
G iig = i (T ) + RT ln P
ww
w.m
sub
iig = i (T ) + RT ln y i P bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
Residual Property
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Fugacity of a component i
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
bu
.in
fi = fi = ... = fi
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
= M M ig
M iR = M i M iig
G i R = G i G i ig
i i (T ) + RT ln fi
ww ig = (T ) + RT ln y P
w.m i
i
i
sub
bu
fi
ig
.
i
n
i i = RT ln
yi P
( nG )
i
= Gi
n i P ,T , n
j
Gi = 0
R
f
i = i = 1
yi P
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
fi = y i P
fi
G i R = RT ln i
i
yi P
The fugacity coefficient of species i
in solution
w.mRT ln x i f i
G i = i (T ) +
id
Gi E
fi
= RT ln
xi f i
fi
i
xi f i
G i E = RT ln i
G i R = RT ln i
c.f.
Jan-2012 M Subramanian
sub
bu
.in
G i = 0,
i =1
fi
i =
=1
yi P
Gi = 0
R
fi = yi P
ww
w.m
sub
fi
i
xi f i
Gi E = RT ln i
bu
.in
fi
G i G isat = RT ln
ln
fi
f i sat
1
=
RT
f i sat
Pi
sat
Vi dP
Gi G
sat
i
ww
Pi sat
Vi dP
(isothermal process )
w.m
sub
bu
.in
ln
fi
fi
sat
Vi l ( P Pi sat )
=
RT
f i = isat Pi sat
Vi l ( P Pi sat )
exp
RT
ww
w.m
sub
bu
.in
Jan-2012 M Subramanian