Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fig. 1. Sampling sites and paleomagnetic poles with confidence ellipses for upper Cretaceous
(65-100 Ma) of stable Africa. Also shown is the polygonal from which data were selected. Mollweide equivalent projection.
5) Sites Polygonal Area: vertices in geo
graphical coordinates of a polygonal area
enclosing the sampling sites. The polygonal
vertices can also be read from an external
file in which their latitude and longitude are
listed
6) Paleopoles Circular Area: center in geo
graphical coordinates and radius in
kilometers of a circular area enclosing the vir
tual geomagnetic poles
7) a-95: range of values for the a-95 pa
rameter of Fisher statistics
8) K: range of values for the k parameter
of Fisher statistics
9) D P and DM: range values for the lengths
of the semiaxes of the 95% ellipse of confi
dence along the great circle path from site to
pole and the perpendicular to this path, re
spectively
10) Rock Type: four possible key words
can be used for searching: extrusives, intrusives, sediments, and metamorphics. They
can also be followed by other terms such as
limestones, redbeds, basalts, andesites, gabbro, granite, etc.
11) Treatment: laboratory procedures for
specimen demagnetization (A=AF, T=Thermal, H=Chemical and N=No treatment)
12) Publication Yean year interval (for ex
ample 1970-1980)
13) Author
14) Continent
15) Formation
16) Formation Stratigraphic Age: for exam
ple, A=Archaeozoic, PT=Proterozoic; where
appropriate, they are followed by 1,2,3 to in
dicate lower, middle, and upper
17) Field Tests: for example, F=Fold Test,
F*=Synfold Test, Fs=Fold Tests + strain re
moval. Where appropriate, these are
followed by ( + ) or (-) to indicate the test was
positive or negative and by ( o ) to indicate it
was inconclusive
18) Laboratory and Analytical Procedures:
for example, 0=no demagnetization, l=only
pilot demagnetization on some samples,
2=all samples treated, blanket treatment only
19) Nation
20) Minimum Number of Sites and/or Sam
ples for Site
T o better illustrate the features of our pro
gram, two examples of possible use are given
below. All responses can be typed in capital
or small letters. W e illustrate the selected
data by plotting them on a cartographic pro
jection; users can use their own plotting
software for these purposes.
The first example refers to the search of
upper Cretaceous (65-100 Ma) African data
for which sampling sites fall inside a "StableAfrica" polygonal area previously designed
(user's answers are typed in bold face):
set host 40302 (for users over Decnet net
work)
username ingeodb
password please
Welcome to PEEK,
software for the complete management of
the ABASE
ASCII version of the World Paleomagnetic
Database
C/v>
T a b l e 1.
Q
N.res
U
B
96
186
Locality
Formation
Cape Verde
East Maio Island Volca
South Africa, Lesotho Monastery and Lesotho
6
26
41
SLat
S L o n Plat P L o n
Dp
D m A g e m i n A g e m a x A n a Tests Treat C
70
84
90
92
3
3
M
M
AT
A
Example of an output table (paleomagnetic data). Q=quality index; N.res=number of the result
(reference code in the ABASE files); N=number of sites; n-number of samples; Slat andSlon=geographic coordinates of the sampling site; Plat and Plon=geographic coordinates of the virtual geo
magnetic pole; Dp andDm=values for the semi-axis of the 95% ellipse of confidence; Agemin
and Agemax=magnetization age interval; Ana=laboratory and analytical procedures; Treat=demagnetization treatment; C=presence of comments (indicated by a *).
[Lock and McElhinny, 1991].
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica, Rome-Italy.
MAGNETIZATION AGE UNCERTAINTY
MAGNETIZATION AGE
References
Harbert, W . , Paleomagnetic Database search
possible, Eos, 74, 100, 1993.
Lock, J., and M. W . , McElhinny, The Global
Paleomagnetic Database: Design, installation,
and use with ORACLE, Surv. Geophys., 12,
317, 1991.
Physics of Iron:
Showdown in
Colorado Springs
PAGES 237, 238
The Second Ironworkers Convention was
held at an international conference in Colo
rado Springs, Colo., from June 28 to July 2,
1993. It was convened by the International As
sociation for High Pressure Research and
Technology. Papers on the physics of iron
were presented by 51 authors and were spon
sored by the University of California's IGPP,
the American Physical Society, and Study of
the Earth's Deep Interior.
As this meeting affirmed, there has been
an upswing of interest in iron melting and the
equation of the state of iron since publica
tion of the Proceedings of the 1989 First
Ironworkers Convention (see JGRSolid
Earth, December 1990).
Vigorous discussions were held at the
meeting, indicative of a field in which consid
erable room remains for speculation before
consensus can be reached.
The surge of interest in physics of iron
stems from technological advances in both