Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CHAPTER -1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Type of NBFCs
1.2 Regulations of NBFCs
1.3 Guideline for new deposits
1.4 Responsibilities
1.5Current Scenario
CHAPTER-2 Literature review
2.1 Importance of NBFCs
2.2 Role of NBFCs
2.3 On Global Crisis
CHAPTER-3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 RESEARCH DESIGN
3.2 Objective
3.3 Scope of the study
3.4 Data collection
3.4.1 PRIMARY DATA
3.4.2 SECONDARY DATA
3.5 Field Work Plan
Chapter-4 MAJOR PLAYER AND SELECTED COMPANY OF STUDY
4.1 SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LTD
4.1.1 Economic Review & commercial vehicle industry overview
4.1.2 STFC Introduction
4.1.3 Financial performance
4.1.4 Recent NCD
4.1.5 Issue Objective
4.1.6 SWOT
4.2 L&T FINANCE HOLDING
4.2.1 Indian Economy
4.2.2 L&T Finance holding structure
4.2.3 Financial performance
4.2.4 IPO Issue & Utilization of Fund
4.3 India Infoline investment services Limited.
3
6
7
10
12
50
1|J BI M S
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
21
21
21
21
22
22
22
23
24
24
27
29
32
33
34
36
36
38
39
48
60
63
65
67
70
75
76
2|J BI M S
79
81
82
85
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
97
99
Executive Summary
The study presents a comparative study of NBFCs in India. There are almost 13000 registered NBFCs
in India. The study is aimed to provide an holistic view of the NBFC industry. NBFC fulfills the financial
gab by providing loan at a lower rate of interest. The major player of each field.
1. Shriram Transport Corporation Ltd
2. L&T Finance holding Ltd
3. India infoline investment services limited
4. Housing Finance Industry: LIC Housing Finance
The study also compare the Indian Banks V/s NBFC. It was found that even at the time of the economic
slowdown NBFC was more profitable. Porters five forces was also used to analyze the industry and to
find the competitiveness in the industry. The industry is not tightly regulated as there are many regulatory
bodies. Hence there was an important need to study the NBFC as the industry plays an important role in
the financial service market of INDIA.
It is encouraging that the NBFC sectors importance is finally being acknowledged across FS market
constituents as well as the regulators. However, the importance attached to the scoter is often
transcending into misplaced exuberance. Over simplified and vague drivers for NBFC valuation such as
strategic fit and customer base, can never substitute dispassionate business analytics. A rational
assessment of the intrinsic value of NBFCs factoring issue such as past performance, structural
3|J BI M S
4|J BI M S
CHAPTER-1
INTRODUCTION
5|J BI M S
A Non Banking Financial Company (NBFC) is a company registered under the companies Act, 1956 and
is engaged in the business of loan and advances, acquisition of share/stock/bonds/debentures/securities
issued by Government of local authority or other securities of like marketable nature, leasing, hirepurchase, insurance business, chit business but does not include any institution whose principal business
is that of agriculture activity, industrial activity, sale/purchased/ construction of immovable property. A
non banking institution which is a company and which has its principal business of receiving deposits
under any scheme or arrangement or any other manner, or lending in any manner is also a non-banking
is also a non-banking financial company (Residuary non-banking company)
NBFCs doing function akin to that of bank; however there are few differences:
An NBFC cannot accept demand deposit.
an NBFC is not a part of the payment and settlement system and such an NBFC cannot issue cheque
drawn on itself; and
Deposit insurance facility of Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation is not available for
NBFC depositors unlike in case of Banks.
1.1TYPES OF NBFCS
Originally, NBFCs registered with RBI were classified as:
Equipment leasing company;
Hire purchase company;
Loan company;
6|J BI M S
All NBFCs are not entitled to accept public deposit. Only those NBFCs holding a valid Certificate of
Registration with authorization to accept public deposit can accept / hold public deposit besides having
minimum stipulated Net Owned fund (NOF) should also comply with the directions such as investing part
of the funds in liquid assets, maintain reserves, rating etc. issued by the Bank.
Yes there is the ceiling on acceptance of public deposits. An NBFC maintaining required NOF / Capital
to risk assets Ratio (CRAR) and complying with the prudential norms can accept public deposits as
follows:
8|J BI M S
4 times of NOF
As has been notified on June 17, 2008 the ceiling on level of public deposits for NBFCs accepting public
deposits but not having minimum net Owned Fund of Rs 200 lakh is revised as under:
Category of NBFC having NOF more revised Ceiling on public than Rs 25 Lakh but less than Rs.200 lakh
deposits AFCs maintaining CRAR of 15% without credit rating and equal to NOF, AFC with CRAR of
12% and having minimum investment 1.5 times of NOF grade credit rating.
LCs / IC with CRAR of 15% and having minimum investment Equal to NOF grade credit rating
Presently, the maximum rate of interest an NBFC can offer is 12.5%. The interest may be paid or
compounded at rates not shorter than monthly rests.
The NBFC are allowed to accept / renew public deposits for a minimum period of 12 months and
maximum period of 60 months. They cannot accept deposits payable on demand.
9|J BI M S
10 | J B I M S
11 | J B I M S
12 | J B I M S
1.4RESPONSIBILITIES.
The NBFCs accepting public deposits should furnish to RBI
i. Audited balance sheet of each financial year and an audited profit and loss account in
respect of that year as passed in the annual general meeting together with a copy of the report of
the Board of Directors and a copy of the report and the notes on accounts furnished by its
Auditors;
ii. Statutory Annual Return on deposits NBS1;
iii. Certificate from the Auditors that the company is in a position to repay the deposits as and
when the
claims arise;
13 | J B I M S
15 | J B I M S
Chapter-2
Literature review
16 | J B I M S
18 | J B I M S
19 | J B I M S
CHAPTER-3
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
20 | J B I M S
21 | J B I M S
22 | J B I M S
CHAPTER-4
MAJOR PLAYERS AND SELECTED COMPANY
FOR STUDY
23 | J B I M S
24 | J B I M S
25 | J B I M S
The Industry witnessed a healthy growth during the first half of the 2009-10, post which the CV sales
started declining at high rate. This can be primarily attributed
indicators, resulting in drop in freight availability, and restricted credit availability. However, in the
fourth quarter, the industry witnesses the slight
driven by stimulus packages provided by the government. The key steps taken include reduction in excise
duty and provision of accelerated depreciation to benefit CV buyers. In addition to this, the government
also undertook measure to improve liquidity for NBFCs and provide financial assistance to state
Transport Undertakings for purchasing buses under the Jawaharlal Nehru national urban mission.
26 | J B I M S
2. Higher replacement demand: Higher CV sales over the last few years were also supported by
replacement demand which stemmed from stricter regulations on overloading and emissions. The
Supreme Court, in the November 2005, banned overloading of goods trucks and trailers in
excess of prescribed gross vehicle weight to reduce pollution, the automotive research.
3. OWNERSHIP TREND IN CVS: Shriram Transport caters to small truck operators (STO-owning
less than 5 trucks) and first time users (FTU), and is currently the only organised player
financing this segment (others are private financiers). STOs and FTUs control around 75% of
the total truck fleet; however, they have poor freight origination skill and are therefore dependent
on brokers for a majority of their contracts.
Our company was incorporated in the year 1979 and is registered as a Deposit taking NBFC
with Reserve Bank of India under section 45IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act 1934.
27 | J B I M S
New
Owned Fund
Average core lending business yields 1516%
Securitization
Average back-stop funding-Net spread:
5-6%
Target
T
Segment
Market
share
Performance
28 | J B I M S
7-8%
Vehicles
sold during
FY06-11
Particular
LCV
MHCV
Total
FY06
2,07,446
1,43,237
3,50,683
FY07
2,75,600
2,47,040
5,22,640
FY08
2,71,045
2,50,361
5,21,406
FY09
1,83,541
2,00,581
3,84,122
FY10
2,87,776
2,44,503
5,32,279
FY11
3,53,621
3,22,749
6,76,370
STFCL is a major player in the domestic CV finance segment, with assets under
management of Rs.361.83 billion as on March 2011. It is the leader in the pre-owned CV
finance segment, with a market share of around 25 per cent. STFCL has also improved
its market position in the new CV finance segment, with a market share of around 8 per
cent. The company lends predominantly to the single-road transport operator (SRTO)
segment, which accounts for more than 95 per cent of its outstanding portfolio.
29 | J B I M S
30 | J B I M S
The company's profits have grown significantly over the past few years; the return on assets stood at
around 4.96 per cent for the year ended March 31, 2011. STFCL has also maintained its stable asset
quality, supported by its well-established origination, valuation, and collection mechanisms aligned to
the prevailing business practices in the SRTO segment. The company's gross non-performing assets, at
2.6 per cent as on March 31, 2011, as against 2.8 per cent as on March 31, 2010, compares well with the
industry average levels in the CV finance segment. However, STFCL's resource profile is average; while its
cost of funds declined in 2010-11 (refers to financial year, April 1 to March 31) from that in 2009-10, it
remains higher than that of its peers. Increase in interest rates and removal of priority-sector benefit on
loans to non-banking financial companies.
31 | J B I M S
The company had revenues of Rs. 5, 42,965 Lac and a net profit of Rs. 1, 22,988 Lac in the last
fiscal, a decent profit margin of 22.70%, and in the last 5 years the net income has grown at a CAGR
of 40%, and profits have grown at a CAGR of 47%. They have a NPA (Non Performing Loans) to Net
Asset Ratio of 0.43%. Their CAR (Capital Adequacy Ratio) was 20.53% against a RBI mandated
12.00%. Like the IIFL NBFC, the Shriram City Union NBFC also draws on the brand and the ecosystem
of their parent to grow their customer base. The promoters hold 53% of their stock.
I
II
Annual
Annual
Rs. 10,000/- (10 NCDs) (for all options of NCDs, namely Options
I and Option II either taken individually or collectively)
Face Value of NCDs (Rs./ NCD) Rs. 1,000 (1 NCD)
Rs. 1,000 (1 NCD)
Mode of Interest Payment
Through
Various Through
Various
options Available
options Available
Coupon (%) for NCD Holders in 11.10% per annum
11.00% per annum
Category I and Category II
Coupon (%) for NCD holders in 11.60% per annum
11.35% per annum
the Reserved Individual Portion
Coupon (%) for NCD holders in 11.35% per annum
11.10% per annum
the
Unreserved
Individual
Portion
Effective Yield (per annum)
For NCD holders in the For
NCD
holders
in
Reserved Individual Portion the Reserved
Individual
11.60%For NCD holders in the
Portion 11.35%
Unreserved Individual Portion
11.35%
11.10%
11.10%
For all other NCD holders
Put and call option
Exercisable at the end of Nil
48 months from the Deemed
Date ofAllotment
Tenor
60 Months* (5 Years)
36 Months (3 Years)
Redemption Amount (Rs./NCD) Repayment
of
the
Face Repayment of the Face
Value plus any interest that may Value plus any interest that
33 | J B I M S
date
of
at
the
early Date.
34 | J B I M S
35 | J B I M S
4.2
L&T Finance Holdings is a financial holding company offering a diverse range of financial products and
services across the corporate, retail and infrastructure finance sectors, as well as mutual fund products
and investment management services, through our direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries. Our
Company is registered with the RBI as a Systemically Important Non-Deposit Taking Non-Banking
Financial Company and has applied for registration as a Core Investment Company.L&T Finance Holdings
is promoted by L&T as a part of its corporate strategy meant to give a distinct identity to the financial
services business.
India's population is estimated to be approximately 1.176 billion with a GDP, on a purchasing power
parity basis ("PPP"), of approximately US$ 4,447.758 billion (` 198,325.5 billion). In the past, India has
experienced rapid economic growth, with its GDP growing at an average growth rate of 8.8% between
Fiscal Year 2003 and Fiscal Year 2008.Iin Fiscal Year 2009, with the growth rate of India's GDP
decelerating to 5.8% in the second half of Fiscal Year 2009, compared to 8.9% in Fiscal Year 2008.
36 | J B I M S
Countries Name
United States
Japan
United Kingdom
China
India
Brazil
Real GDP
Projected
Actual
2009
-2.60
-6.30
-4.90
9.20
6.80
-0.60
2010
2.80
3.90
1.30
10.30
10.40
7.50
2011
2.80
1.40
1.70
9.60
8.20
4.50
2012
2.90
2.10
2.30
9.50
7.80
4.10
The table above illustrates that in 2010 all the above mentioned countries registered positive real GDP
Growth, with India displaying a strong growth rate of 10.4%. According to the IMF World Economic
Outlook Update, April 2010, there have been four principal factors that have supported Asia's recovery:
firstly, the rapid normalization of trade, following the financial dislocation in late 2008, benefited Asia's
Export-driven economies; secondly, the bottoming out of the inventory cycle, both domestically and in
Major trading partners such as the United States, is boosting industrial production and exports; thirdly, a
resumption of capital inflows into the region has created abundant liquidity in many economies; and
Fourthly, domestic demand has been resilient, owing to strong public and private companies in many of
the region's economies. The IMF believes that, in both China and India, particularly, strong domestic
demand will support the recovery. In India, the growth in real GDP will be supported by rising private
demand, with consumption strengthening as a result of improvements in the labor market, and a boost
to investment brought about by strong profitability, rising business confidence and favorable financing
conditions.
37 | J B I M S
L&T Finance
Holding Limited
Corporate
Finance
group
Retail
finance
group
Construction
Equipment
Finance
Rural
Product
Finance
Transportation
Equipment finance
Distribution
of Financial
Products
Corporate
Loans and
Leases
Microfinance
Capital
Markets
Finance
Infrastructure
Finance group
Project Finance
and corporate
Loans
38 | J B I M S
Supply Chain
Finance
Equity
Investment
Financial Advisory
Services
On a consolidated basis, L&TFH has an outstanding loan book of Rs179.43bn as on 31st Mar 11 as
against Rs114.46bn in the previous year, recording a magnificent 57% y-o-y growth. The Company had
income from operations of Rs20, 864mn and PAT of Rs3, 926mn during FY11 as against Rs14, 056mn and
Rs2,630mn during FY10, recording a 48.4% and 49.3%of y-o-y growth respectively.
39 | J B I M S
40 | J B I M S
In 2008, a little after the sub-prime crisis, Indian policy makers had to offer liquidity support to the NBFC
sector, driving home the risks inherent in the business model of some of these firms. That was prompted
also by the fact that many banks lend to NBFCs, which could mean risks being transferred to banks as
Major borrowing were from the Banks, Banks' exposure to NBFCs at the end of June this year was
16,9321 crore, which was over 50% of its total lending. The RBI has mandate the regulation, NBFCs has
to follow all the rule, Bank will not finance to NBFCs due to risky business model so NBFCs in the last six
months have been on a fund-raising spree. India's top five NBFCs have raised over 5,000 crore through
debt instruments.
Retail finance group provides financing to retails costumers for the acquisition of income generating
assets and activities that compromise construction equipment finance, transpiration equipment finance,
rural products finance and microfinance. At the end of the FY-11, retail group accounted for Rs.56.8bn
(37%) of the total loan book of L&TFH. Out of which, ~91% of the retail loans are secured. Its contribution
towards income from operations was 48% in FY11. As on 31st Mar 11 the companys exposure to
microfinance segment stood at Rs4.45bn, which accounts for 6.8% of the total loans of Retail Finance
group. Out of this 50% are accounted by Andhra Pradesh, which may pose a threat to the asset quality.
41 | J B I M S
Corporate Finance Group offers financial products and services to corporate clients, and comprises the
segments of corporate loans and leases (in the form of asset-backed loans, term loans, receivables
discounting, short-term working capital facilities and operating and finance leases), supply chain finance
(which includes vendor and dealer finance products) and capital markets products. At the end of FY11,
corporate group accounted for Rs35.8bn (~20%) of the total loan book of L&TFH. Out of which, ~71% of
the corporate loans are secured. Its contribution towards income from operations was Rs3.7bn during
FY11 (~18%).
42 | J B I M S
RETURN RATIOS.
43 | J B I M S
NPA RATIOS.
45 | J B I M S
46 | J B I M S
PAT MARGIN
RETURN RATIO
47 | J B I M S
Utilization of fund
There will be 2 main uses for the funds raised from this IPO. They are going to pay off some of their
parents loans, and strengthen the capital base of the subsidiaries. In the prospectus, L&T Finance say
that they are going to raise Rs. 15,750 million, and use it to recapitalize, and pay off parent companys
debt in the following ratio
So, about a fourth of the money is going to repay debt from the promoter which is probably a good thing
since this debt is at a relatively high 9% interest rate
48 | J B I M S
49 | J B I M S
IIISL, a subsidiary of India Infoline Limited (IIFL) is registered with Reserve Bank of India as a Non Banking
Finance Company Received RBI license for undertaking NBFC activities and commenced business In 2005,
IIISL became a public limited company - IIISL acquired Money line Credit Limited, an NBFC and
commenced consumer loan business in 2007. Acquired registration for Housing Finance business from
NHB - Mr A K Purwar, ex-SBI chairman joined the Board and appointed as Chairman of IIISL - Preferential
Allotment to Orient Global Tamarind Fund Pte. Ltd Singapore, an FII in 2009. Launched Gold loans in
2010. Launched Medical Equipment financing in 2011.
PRODUCT PORTFOLIO
Home Loan, Loan against Property
Tenure: home loans up to 20 years, loans against property up to 15 years
Upto 80% of value available for home loans, 65% for loans against property
Repayment through EMIs, or other specially customised repayment schemes
Balance transfers of existing loans obtainable, with additional cash in hand
50 | J B I M S
Gold Loan.
Cash against gold in 5 minutes flat.
Loans from ` 10,000 to 1,000,000.
Attractive interest rates.
Choice of EMIs, or interest service options.
Flexible tenure, according to your requirements
Despite the rapid growth of the financial services, India remains an under-penetrated market in terms of
credit Penetration. India has a large and rapidly growing middle class with increasing levels of
discretionary income available for consumption and investment purposes. As investments among Indian
consumers increase, the available credit in India has correspondingly increased. The last five years have
seen not only a great expansion of the Indian economy but also a great expansion of consumer lending.
Previously, Indian consumers were averse to the concept of using credit to fund purchases and preferred
to save prior to spending. Today, with a variety of consumer credit products being widely available,
Indian consumers are more willing to acquire assets through The consumer credit market in India has
51 | J B I M S
4. Legislative changes that offer greater protection to lenders against fraud and potential default
increasing the incentive to lend.
5. Growth in assignment and securitization arrangements for consumer loans has enabled non-deposit
based entities to access wholesale funding and compete in the market based on ability to originate,
underwrite and service the consumer loan.
Despite high loan growth in consumer financing, it remains an under-penetrated market. We believe
demand for consumer loans will increase going forward in view of household gearing remaining low and
disposable income continues to rise rapidly.
HOUSING FINANCE SECTOR.
Opportunity in the mortgage market remains very large. Mortgage loans/ GDP ratio stands at 9% in
FY10 (Source: IMF, European Mortgage Federation). There is significant opportunity to grow this market
driven by huge demand and supply mismatch for dwelling units, rising income levels and favorable
affordability. Mortgage market has sustained over 25% CAGR over the last 10 years.
52 | J B I M S
53 | J B I M S
3. Rise in property prices and higher saleable area leading to increase in average ticket size
According to CRISIL Research, Average Ticket Size (ATS a function of price per sq ft, area per unit and
the loan to- value (LTV) ratio) increased by 10-11 per cent in 2009-10. The ATS is estimated to have risen
to ` 1.59 million from ` 1.42 million a year ago. The top five players in the industry who constitute around
45 per cent of the overall disbursements saw an increase in ATS of 14 per cent in 2009-10. Rise in
property prices along with higher saleable area in the second half of the year led to increase in ATS. The
affordability of customers improved in the first half of 2009-10, as builders were offering reduced prices
as well as lower area per unit on account of impact of global slowdown in 2008-09. As the volumes grew
and economy recovered, builders started increasing property prices post September 2009, as was evident
in the markets like Mumbai and Delhi, which account for 28-30 per cent of the overall housing finance
disbursements. Consequently, builders launched many new projects with larger sq ft area, targeted at
the high-end segment.
55 | J B I M S
37%CA
GR
44%
Source: IMaCS
Key demand drivers of gold loans
High Levels of indebtedness: The NSSO 2003 survey on situational assessment of farmers indebtedness
in the country estimated that 60.4 % of rural households were farmer households, and of them 48.6 %
56 | J B I M S
Policy Focus: Government views gold loans as effective means to meet the potential micro-finance
demand in India. In 2006-07, Government of Tamil Nadu set a target of jewel loans worth ` 60 billion
(75% of the total loan disbursement target) for co-operatives in Tamil Nadu (source: IMaCS).
Increasing interest of the lenders in the segment: Given the recent rise in default rates in the personal
loan category, banks have started focusing on the gold loans segment, as the segment offers attractive
returns (though lower than personal loans) with very low levels of defaults.
Changing customer attitudes and preferences: Indian customers are experiencing changing
psychographics (debt averse psychology) promoting creation of assets through growth in financial
liabilities which is reflected in an annual growth of more than 35-40% in retail credit over the FY02-10
(source: IMaCS). There is a strong view that gold loans market can be expanded to Northern and
Western regions of India, if one were to launch a targeted promotion and consumer education
campaign. Several large Finance companies started expansion efforts in these regions and the initial
response has been favourable
57 | J B I M S
58 | J B I M S
59 | J B I M S
When you look at thses segments you realize that while almost all their loans are secured, they are
secured against assets that have volatile prices. Stocks are very volatile, and with the current Greater
Noida issue going on you cant be too sure of property either.
.
60 | J B I M S
61 | J B I M S
62 | J B I M S
The company has increasing revenue and control over the administrative expenses. Company has been
able to maintain to earn increasing interest margin. IIISL has been efficiently managing the NPA that
effect in the PAT. PAT has been showing increasing trends over the years. IIISL has increasing debt/equity
ratio which bad for the company but it has not yet crossed the danger level. Still company has the
efficiency to pay out the interest cost on regular basis. Return on Assets is decaling for a movement but it
is assured by the other performance that this will improve over the period of time as company is
managing its PAT incremental.
The issue has been rated AA- or Stable by ICRA, and CARE AA- by CARE.
The prospectus says that while a cover of 1.10 is needed to be made on this issue as this is a secured debt
issue, there will be other creditors who will have pari passu charge over the security that they provide.
This means that other creditors may also have equal rights on the security provided by the company for
this issue, and thats a definite risk.
The India Info line NCD will have three options for investors with different maturities and rate of
interests. Two of them will pay interest every year, while a third will pay a lump sum at the end of the
maturity period.
64 | J B I M S
66 | J B I M S
67 | J B I M S
68 | J B I M S
Around 91% of the loan portfolio derived from the retail segment and the rest from large
corporate clients
Registered & Corporate Office at Mumbai with 6 regional offices, 13 Back Offices
1352 Direct Sales Agents (DSAs), 7085 Home Loan Agents (HLAs) and 777 customers.
Relationship Associates (CRAs) comprise its pan-Indian marketing network.
More than 10, 00,000 satisfied customers across the country since inception.
Improved return on net worth by 267 basis points to 23.80 percent in 2008-09.
Interest income from housing loans increased 34.90 percent from Rs. 2036.79 crore in 2007-08 to Rs.
2747.65 crore in 2008-09. The net interest income grew by 31.97 percent from Rs.553.94 crore in
70 | J B I M S
71 | J B I M S
72 | J B I M S
The asset quality of the corporate loan book is good with the gross non-performing assets from this
segment at 0.08 per cent as on October 31, 2010. This is lower than the gross NPAs from the retail
segment which stood at 0.84 per cent. LIC Housing Finance has managed to keep its NPAs under 1 per
cent for more than nine consecutive quarters. As on September 30, the net NPAs of the company stood at
0.21 per cent.
Operations:
Funds mobilized grew 49.38 percent from Rs. 7489.70 crore in 2007-08 to Rs.11,188.33 crore in
2008-09.
Sanctions (Ind.+Proj.) increased 26.46 percent from Rs. 8617.88 crore in 2007-08 toRs. 10898.47
crore in 2008-09.
Disbursements (Ind.+Proj.) grew 23.90 percent from Rs. 7071.48 crore in 2007-08 toRs. 8762.01
crore in 2008-09.
Loan portfolio grew 26.18 percent from Rs. 21936.41 crore in 2007-08 to Rs.27679.28 crore in
2008-09
Margins:
73 | J B I M S
Net interest margin improved by 10 basis points from 2.85 percent in 2007-08 to 2.95percent in
2008-09.
Return on equity grew by 267 basis points from 21.13 percent in 2007-08 to 23.80percent in
2008-09.
Net profit margin improved by 49 basis points from 17.82 percent in 2007-08 to 18.31percent in
2008-09
On funds
On the performance of the Company: In the turbulent times when Housing sector was passing
through rough patch, LIC Housing Finance largely could manage the environment well, in spite of
various global as well as domestic economic challenges and was successful introducing good
business growth by its inherent strength in meeting difficult challenges through unceasing and
untiring efforts. The Company has not only ensured consolidation of the gains achieved in the
past years, but also ensured further growth and increased profitability. The year 2008-09 has
been a year of further containment of defaults and NPA levels when compared to previous years
Lending operations.
The main thrust continues on individual loans with a growth of 25 percent as against 20percent
in the previous year. However, project loans were also given due weightage resulting in a modest
growth of 20 percent over previous year. During the year, the Company sanctioned 67,886
individual loans for Rs. 8,186.02 crore and disbursed 67,237 loans for Rs.7, 351.09 crore during
2008-09. Individual retail loans constitute 75.11 percent of the total sanctions and 83.94 percent
of the total disbursements for the year 2008-09 compared to the last years figure of 75.84
percent and 83.47 percent respectively. The retail (individual) loan portfolio grew by over 22
percent from Rs. 20,618.78 crore as on 31st March, 2008 to Rs.25, 252.87 crore as on 31st
March, 2009. The cumulative sanctions and disbursements since the incorporation, in respect of
74 | J B I M S
75 | J B I M S
76 | J B I M S
Threats (bottlenecks)
Impact of legal charges and documentation fees there are taxes / duties / fees payable to the state at
the construction stage. There are two aspects of the cost namely:
i) Monetary cost and :
ii) Cost in terms of time devoted in obtaining various permissions and clearances.
The number of permissions and documentation required can be quite large. Further, permissions have to
be taken from different departments and that too sequentially. This delays the process of housing
construction and occupation. The actual fees imposed by the government are not necessarily high but
the time taken to obtain requisite permissions is very long, procedures cumbersome and sometimes
involves extra payments to facilitate the movement of files and getting the transaction through, is
significant vis--vis the statutory fees. The delays highlight the sluggishness of the market by increasing
the gap between change in demand and the market response to it.
Future Outlook:
It is estimated that the housing finance industry will be able to maintain a higher growth in fresh
origination of residential home loans over next three to five years mainly due to increased affordability of
the borrower i.e. ratio of average property price to average annual income, on account of the falling loan
interest rates and decrease in property prices. The average age of borrowers has declined over the years,
while the number of double-income households has grown significantly thereby enabling them to borrow
higher loan quantum due to increased affordability and repayment capacity. The growth drivers will
continue to increase demand for self-occupied residential housing; Revival of economy will certainly lead
77 | J B I M S
78 | J B I M S
CHAPTER-5
INDIAN BANKS V/S
NBFCS
79 | J B I M S
80 | J B I M S
Profitability
Ratio
(2010-2011)
NBFCs
Profitability
Ratio (20102011)
Indian Bank
18.31%
Bank of India
Axis Bank
Union Bank of India
15.92%
17.12%
11.25%
16.11%
25.78%
17.14%
7.65%
17.86%
25.92%
Among the 17 public sector banks, the highest profitability was reported by Indian Bank and Bank of
India at 18.31 per cent and 15.92 per cent respectively. Out of the private sector banks the top positions
were occupied by Axis Bank and Yes Bank at 17.12 per cent and12.46 per cent respectively, among
others. The 7 NBFCs, aggregate total income grew by a whopping 57.3 per cent to Rs.28, 208.72 crore in
FY10 from Rs.17, 906.84 crore in the previous fiscal. However, the aggregate total income of 29 banks
have increased by 25.3 percent from Rs 2,69,055 crore in 2007-08 to Rs 3,37,206.9 crore in 2009-10.
Year-on-year performance of the 29 banks regarding net profit to total income ratio at the aggregate
level showed a marginal decline during FY09 with 10.08 percent as against FY08 recorded at 10.52 per
cent, while in the case of 7 major NBFCs, the ratio declined during 2008-09 at18.90 per cent as against
21.80 per cent in FY10.
81 | J B I M S
Banks
NBFC's
Permitted
Not Permitted
Permitted subject to
limitation, but the term of
deposit is at least 1 year.
Permitted
No Limit
Operating Lease
Treated as a non-Financial
business, not permitted
Securitization
Functional restrictions
Licensing restrictions
82 | J B I M S
It is comparatively much
easier to get registration as
on NBFC Besides, there are
some 30000 NBFC's
currently registered, many of
which may be available for
sale.
Indian ownership
Foreign ownership
Up to 74% Capital in
banking companies may be
acquired for foreign owners.
Basic norms
Provisioning
As much as 12 months
overdue is permitted in case
of lease and hire purchase
transaction 6 months in case
of loans and other exposures.
83 | J B I M S
Sectoral exposures
84 | J B I M S
85 | J B I M S
Barriers to entry
Product differentiation is very difficult: As most of the NBFCs offer similar types of loans which
caters to same market. Innovation of a product plays a very important role in the market.
Licensing requirement: There are already 13000 registered NBFC. So, the licensing requirement
is also low. The regulations are not that stringent as that of a Bank.
Threat of substitute:
86 | J B I M S
Money Lenders: Small NBFCs cater to the rural areas where there is already a very strong
presence. They dominate the market in the rural areas and its mostly the unorganised market they
tap in
RBI rules and regulations: RBI rules and regulations are not as stringent as of Banks. NBFCs
are governed by many bodies. E.g. RBI, FIDC, NHB etc
87 | J B I M S
Undifferentiated services
Threat of competitors
Large no of NBFCs
Undifferentiated services
88 | J B I M S
Rivalry among competitors is very fierce in Indian Non Banking Financial Industry
The services NBFCs offer is more of homogeneous which makes the Company to offer the same service
at a lower rate and eat their competitor markets share. Market Players use all sorts of aggressive selling
strategies and activities from intensive advertisement campaigns to promotional stuff. Even consumer
switch from one bank to another, if there is a wide spreading the interest. Hence the intensity of rivalry is
very high. The no of factors has contributed to increase rivalry those are.
A large no of NBFC serving similar loan products: There is so many NBFCs and nonfinancial
institution fighting for same pie, which has intensified competition
High market growth rate: India is seen as one of the biggest market place and growth rate in
Indian financial industry is also very high. This has ignited the competition.
Homogeneous product and services: The services banks offer is more of homogeneous which
makes the company to offer the same service at a lower rate and eat their competitor markets
share.
Undifferentiated services: Almost every NBFC provides similar services. Every bank tries to copy
each other services and technology which increase level of competition.
89 | J B I M S
90 | J B I M S
CHAPTER-7
FINDINGS &
MANAGERIALIMPLICATIONS
91 | J B I M S
92 | J B I M S
93 | J B I M S
7.1.2 Cost of Funding - Shot up during the crisis due to short tenure borrowings, stabilized now &
expected to be less volatile due to larger proportion of long term funding.
Many NBFCs took advantage of the lower interest rate regime at the shorter end of the yield curve by
borrowing short term funds (3months 1 year) at lower rates and lending for maturities ranging from 3-4
years at higher rates. However the level of mismatches differed between NBFCs and those with higher
mismatch faced not only liquidity pressure, but their cost of funding also increased during this period due
to inversing of the yield curve and a general rise in interest rates. Average borrowings costs1 (on an
aggregate basis for CARE rated NBFCs) increased from around 9.5-10.0% in FY08 to 11.5-12.0% in
FY09. This shows the severity of the impact as financial crisis affected funding costs in the second half of
FY09and led to a 200 bps increase for the entire year. The response by NBFCs was to gradually replace
short term funding with long term sources. This is a significant structural change in the borrowing
profiles that will bring more stability in profitability of the sector. However spreads will also be lower
compared to historical levels due to this change. During the 9MEFY10 cost of borrowing reduced from
the average of 11.5-12.0% of FY09 to 10.2 10.5% for the 9 month period and is expected to remain
94 | J B I M S
95 | J B I M S
CHAPTER-8
RECOMMENDATIONS ANDCONCUSION
96 | J B I M S
8.1 Recommendation:
Domestic Financial markets can be integrated by making NBFCs Channel partners to Banks. It
will help in better allocation and funds availability. It will also help in better management of
financial services sector in India
Enhancing the credit delivery mechanisms: The credit delivery mechanism needs to be more
transparent and hassle free. There should be more stringent norms for the defaulters.
Strengthening the professionalism of NBFC sector through education and training: NBFCs are
organized players. Regulatory body needs to educate people about
8.2 Conclusion
It is encouraging that the NBFC sectors importance is finally being acknowledged across FS market
constituents as well as the regulator. However, the importance attached to the sector is often
transcending into misplaced exuberance. Over simplified and vague drivers for NBFC valuations such as
strategic fit and customer base, can never substitute dispassionate business analytics. A rational
assessment of the intrinsic values of NBFCs factoring issues such as past performance, structural
weaknesses of the sector (for instance funding disadvantages), along with an identification of real
97 | J B I M S
98 | J B I M S
R EF ER E N C E S
http://www.rediff.com/money/2004/jan/07rbi.htm
http://www.scribd.com/doc/22498809/Porters
-Five-Forces-Model-of-Competition
http://www.financialexpress.com/news/Column---Why-NBFCs-may-not-want-to-bebanks/614492/http://www.stockwatch.in/nbfcs-offering-high-dividends-yet-again25964http://www.livemint.com/2010/04/30204917/IDFC-seeks-infrastructureNBFC.htmlhttp://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-143176307.htmlhttp://mba-bbadissertations.blogspot.com/2010/05/capital-structure-of-indiabullsnbfc.htmlhttp://www.nbfc.rbi.org.inhttp://www.rediff.com/money/2007/jul/20nbfc.htmhttp://www.th
ehindubusinessline.com/2009/11/14/stories/2009111451870100.htmhttp://indiabudget.nic.in/es9899/chap35.pdf http://www.banknetindia.com/finance/fbanking.htmhttp://www.mydigitalfc.com/news/
nbfcs-again-doling-out-higher-dividend-fy10-732www.livemint.com/2008/.../The-multiplicity-ofregulation.htmlhttp://www.coolavenues.com/know/fin/svs_nbfc_1.php3www.thehindubusinessline.co
m/.../2005022800330800.htm
Annual Reports:
1)
2)
3)
4)
99 | J B I M S
100 | J B I M S