You are on page 1of 80

TOD Phase I Pilot Projects

Corridor I:
NANGLOI - TIKRI KALAN

The Site in context

The Site in context

The Site in context


Mundka
Industria
l
Corridor

Rohin
i

Towards
Bahadurgarh

Shah Jahanabad

Delhi Border

Najafgar
h

India Gate
Dwark
a

The Site in context


Zone N

Zone M

Railway Line
Rohtak Road

Zone L

Zone KI
Existing
Total Area
Pop
Zone
(Ha)
(In Lakh)
L
22979
2.35
K-1
6515
5
M
5524
2.84
N
13975
3.5

ZDP Pop
(In Lakh)
20
12
9.8
24.17

Designed
Work force
(In Lakh)
6.4
4.56
3.82
9.42

Nangloi Railway
Station

Rajdhani
Park

Mundka

Proposed Station
1

Proposed Station
2

Proposed Station
3

The Site in numbers total area

8%

16%
76%

TOD Intense
Zone
- 342.5 Ha
TOD
Standard
Zone
- 662.5 Ha
NMT Zone
- 3181.6 Ha

The Site in numbers total area


Land Use
Residential (L)
Residential (K-1)
Residential (M)
Residential (N)

Area in Catchment ZDP density


(In Ha)
PPH
271.37
250.00
606.54
250.00
25.71
250.00
250.45
250.00

Workforce
ratio
0.32
0.38
0.39
0.39

Total Population

Land Use

Commercial
Public & Semi
Public
Industrial
(Predominantly
storage)

Area in
Catchment
(In Ha)

263.5
519.2

72.45

Total working
population
Utility
Recreational
Buffer
Agriculture

Total Pop.
67,842.50
151,635.00
6,427.50
62,612.50

Work Force
Population
21,709.60
57,621.30
2,506.73
24,418.88

2,88,517

1,06,256

Built up areas
(In Ha)
MPD- Total Built Up
(@40%)
FAR
(In Ha)
105.4 100.00
207.68 150.00

28.98 180.00

105.4

Total Pop.
(@10sq.m. Source:NBC
2005

105,400 per person)

311.52

(@15sq.m. Source:NBC
2005
207,680 per person)

52.16

(@30sq.m. Source:NBC
2005
17,388 per person)

4,13,085
61.79
273.14
328.58
37.52

12,90,800

The Site in numbers developed area

Developed
Land

2087.7Ha
55%

Virgin Land

1677.7
Ha
45%

The Site in numbers land utilization

Existing
dense
1233.5Ha

Existing
under-utilized
685.5Ha

Existing
green field
1677.7Ha

Restricted
168.7Ha

The Site in numbers character districts


Dense
Resi.
Urban
Village

Slum/
JJ
Colony

Banquet
Halls

Warehouses

Indust/
Utility

Railwa
y yard

Gree
n
field

Character district Dense residential


Dense
Resi.
Urban
Village

Slum/
JJ
Colony

Banquet
Halls

Warehouses

Indust/
Utility

Railwa
y yard

Gree
n
field

Character district Urban Villages


Dense
Resi.
Urban
Village

Slum/
JJ
Colony

Banquet
Halls

Warehouses

Indust/
Utility

Railwa
y yard

Gree
n
field

Character district Slum/ JJ Colonies


Dense
Resi.
Urban
Village

Slum/
JJ
Colony

Banquet
Halls

Warehouses

Indust/
Utility

Railwa
y yard

Gree
n
field

Character district Banquet Halls


Dense
Resi.
Urban
Village

Slum/
JJ
Colony

Banquet
Halls

Warehouses

Indust/
Utility

Railwa
y yard

Gree
n
field

Character district Warehouses


Dense
Resi.
Urban
Village

Slum/
JJ
Colony

Banquet
Halls

Warehouses

Indust/
Utility

Railwa
y yard

Gree
n
field

Character district Industrial/ utility


Dense
Resi.
Urban
Village

Slum/
JJ
Colony

Banquet
Halls

Warehouses

Indust/
Utility

Railwa
y yard

Gree
n
field

Character district Green field


Dense
Resi.
Urban
Village

Slum/
JJ
Colony

Banquet
Halls

Warehouses

Indust/
Utility

Railwa
y yard

Gree
n
field

The Site in numbers ZDP uses


Land Use}
Residential
Commercial
Public & Semi
Public
Industrial
(Predominant
ly storage)
Utility
Recreational
Buffer
Agriculture

Area in
Catchm
ent (In
Ha)
1,154
263
519

72
61
273
328
37

Existing building use

Predominant existing use zones

Update

Density & Social Infrastructure

Infrastructure provision

Accessibility & Movement ZDP Roads

Accessibility & Movement pedestrian accessibility

1.0
OPEN SPACE AND WATER STRATEGY

1.1. Zero Additional Run off


NATURE
10%
RUNOFF

NATURALISED CONDITION

10 %
RUNOFF

100% Permeable

URBANISED CONDITION
55 %
RUNOFF

50% Impermeable Surface


with detention areas.

80% Impermeable Surface

Slope Analysis

Lowest points (valleys) of the area

Open Space Structure of the Plan derived from Nature

Current ZDP greens are disconnected:


Do not allow water to be conveyed Naturally

Interconnected Open Space Network allows linking of Greens

Boston Emerald Necklace


Continuous infiltration & movement of Stormwater
Movement of people on foot & cycle.

34

35

Disconnected open spaces are hindering formation of ecological corridors as


well as natural systems that could be used for storm water management.

Connected Open Spaces to move Water and People!

1.4. NMT network & open space structure

4.2. ZDP- Road Network

4.2. Proposed- Road Network

4.2. NMT along ZDP Roads

4.2. Proposed augmentation of NMT Network

3.0
EQUITY in CONNECTIVITY

4.2. Access to Public Transport for Slum/ JJ Colonies

New boulevard Connections

4.2. Major Civic Boulevard connecting communities

Everyone lives on Akbar Road!

1.4. Democratic Boulevards

Everyone lives on Akbar Road!

Imli (Tamarind) Trees on Akbar Road in April & February. (Source: Trees of Delhi)

4.2. Reinventing UER

UER

Buffer

Park along road

UER

Buffer

Proposed

Existing

2.0
DENSIFICATION vs. SPRAWL

2.1. Urban Sprawl as per ZDP

2.1. Densification as per TOD regulations

Giving the City a Regional Public Park

Golden Gate
Park, SF

Central
Park, NY

India Gate,
Delhi

Proposed Regional
Park, Mundka

Scale comparison: Golden Gate Park

Japanese Tea garden

Scale comparison: Golden Gate Park

Children's Park

Scale comparison: Golden Gate Park

Renzo Piano Museum

Scale comparison: Golden Gate Park

Stow Lake

An Urban Forestway

4.0
PROGRAMMING CONSIDERATIONS

4.1. Impact of ZDP- Learning From The Past


Slum/ JJ
colonies
along
ecological
areas

Future land
prices
might
result in
encroachment along
sensitive
areas

4.1. Gated Communities- Patparganj

4.1. Gated Communities- Patparganj

Civic Buffer with Open Space & Water bodies

4.1. Gated Parks

4.1. Unused Parks

Inequity due to Gated Communities

Streets as incidental Public Spaces & Play


Areas
7
KEY PLAN

4.1. Future Trends


Slum/ JJ
colonies
along
ecological
areas

Future land
prices
might
result in
encroachment along
sensitive
areas

4.1. Lal Dora villages

4.1. Lal Dora villages

The way forward

Influence Zone Plan Preparation

An Influence Zone Plan 4 critical components


A Detailed Influence Zone Plan shall be prepared by the Planning Authority to set the Vision
for development of the area, based on various site characteristics.

1. Urban Design Framework


2. Transport Impact Assessment & Mitigation Strategies
3. Decentralized Infrastructure and Sustainability Plan
4. Economic Viability and Implementation Model - Ensuring Equity

An Influence Zone Plan 4 critical components


2. Transport Impact Assessment & Mitigation Strategies:
a. Achieving the desired modal shift, in particular mode shift for short trips
b. Street network improvement through assessment of existing capacity and
augmentation of network as required through new linkages, alternate routes,
junction designs etc for all modes with priority for public transport, pedestrians,
cyclists / NMT.
c. Integrated strategy for Public transport, Pedestrian and Cycle access
d. Determining the optimum mix of uses to mitigate negative impact on surrounding
land uses and transport networks
e. Parking Strategy as a Demand Management Tool
f. Mitigation strategies for traffic noise and vibration

An Influence Zone Plan 4 critical components


3. Decentralized Infrastructure and Sustainability Plan:
a. Water and Waste Water management strategy including recycling and re-use of
waste water. To include strategy for both potable and non-potable water.
b. Rain water strategy, to be integrated with the Landscape and Public Open Space
Strategy
c. Solid Waste Management Strategy
d. Energy Strategy maximising use of renewable sources
e. Integrated Infrastructure and Services Systems Plan indicating space requirements
for all infrastructure

An Influence Zone Plan 4 critical components


4. Economic Viability and Implementation Model :
a. Determining a financially profitable mix of uses based on the current demand and
supply, coupled with the projected land values for the TOD zone. To include cost
delivering of Social and Physical infrastructure

b. Determining a financial model and delivery mechanism for affordable housing,


public infrastructure and public transport facilities through mechanisms of cross
subsidy, FAR benefits or any other possible benefit that the TOD authority can give.
c. Strategy for revenue collection from the TOD zone based on the benefits enjoyed
by a piece of land lying within the TOD zone. To determine total profit generated
from the TOD Zone in a phased manner for individual owners, consortiums and TOD
administration.
d. Determining appropriate mechanisms for land-pooling by individual plot holders to
avail the benefits of TOD, based on the specific characteristics of the site.
e. Determining the structure of the administrative body of the TOD zone and the cost
of operation of the body.
f. Strategy for implementing the TOD policy in the TOD zone through the principle of
award and penalty.

Influence Zone Plan Preparation 3 months


1. With the aim to prepare a robust and deliverable Influence Zone
Plan and draw conclusive policy recommendations, UTTIPEC has
put-together a multi-disciplinary expert team of professional
consultants for Transport Impact Assessment, Sustainable
Infrastructure provision and Economic Feasibility to augment inhouse skills and capacity
2. Detailed proposals from the best consultants from both within &
outside the country
3. Request for sponsorship from Corporate Houses, Institutions and
other Public bodies due to paucity of time

4. Letter of appeal
5. GSDl data & analysis

You might also like