Professional Documents
Culture Documents
95
r-~
'~~\~~AB'NNER DAY
~~>
-~\
FOR GOD
-~,
COLORADO ATHEISTS
ON THE MARCH
*************************************************************************************************
AMERICAN ATHEISTS
is a non-profit, non-political, educational organization dedicated to the complete and absolute separation of state
and church. We accept the explanation of Thomas Jefferson that the "First Amendment" to the Constitution of the
United States was meant to create a "wall of separation" between state and church.
American Atheists is organized to stimulate and promote freedom of thought and inquiry concerning religious
beliefs, creeds, dogmas, tenets, rituals, and practices;
to collect and disseminate information, data, and literature on all religions and promote a more thorough
understanding of them, their origins, and their histories;
to advocate, labor for, and promote in all lawful ways the complete and absolute separation of state and church;
to advocate, labor for, and promote in alllawful ways the establishment and maintenance of a thoroughly secular
system of education available to all;
to encourage the development and public acceptance of a human ethical system stressing the mutual sympathy,
understanding,
and interdependence
of all people and the corresponding
responsibility of each individual in
relation to society;
to develop and propagate a social philosophy in which man is the central figure who alone must be the source of
strength, progress, and ideals for the well-being and happiness of humanity;
to promote the stuclY.of the arts and sciences and of all problems affecting the maintenance, perpetuation, and
enrichment. of human (and other) life;
to engage in such social, educational, legal, and cultural activity as will be useful and beneficial to members of
American Atheists and to society as a whole.
Atheism may be defined as the mental attitude which unreservedly accepts the supremacy of reason and aims at
establishing a life-style and ethical outlook verifiable by experience and the scientific method, independent of all
arbitrary assumptions of authority and creeds.
Materialism declares that the cosmos is devoid of immanent conscious purpose; that it is governed by its own
inherent, immutable, and impersonal laws; that there is no supernatural interference in human life; that man finding his resources within himself - can and must create his own destiny. Materialism restores to man his dignity
and his intellectual integrity. It teaches that we must prize our life on earth and strive always to improve it. It holds
that man is capable of creating a social system based on reason and justice. Materialism's "faith" is in man and
man's ability to transform the world culture by his own efforts. This is a commitment which is in its very essence
life-asserting. It considers the struggle for progress as a moral obligation and impossible without noble ideas that
inspire man to bold creative works. Materialism holds that humankind's potential for good and for an outreach to
more fulfilling cultural development is, for all practical purposes, unlimited.
*************************************************************************************************
American Atheist Membership Categories
life
Sustaining
Couple/Family
Individual
Senior Citizen*/Unemployed
Student*
:
$500
$l00/year
$50/year
$4O/year
$20/year
$12/year
*Photocopy of 10 required
All membership categories receive our monthly "Insider's Newsletter," membership cardts), a subscription to
American Atheist magazine for the duration of the membership period, plus additional organizational mailings,
i.e., new products for sale, convention and meeting announcements, etc.
September 1986
American Atheist
A Journal
of Atheist
Editor's Desk
R. Murray-O'Hair
Director's Briefcase.
Jon G. Murray
25
Divine Discontent
John M. Allegro
Were religious rituals primitive man's
Valium? Was the origin of religion
simply a defense mechanism to keep
anxieties under control?
Ask A.A.
A foreign reader asking about the basics
of American Atheism triggers a full leeture, and a domestic reader who wishes
to see Chapter newsletters finds fundamental theories under it all.
Historical
Notes
33
.Nature's Way
Gerald Tholen
34
10
31
Poetry
37
Press Conference
Brian Lynch
38
"The Case
Me Too
41
42
Classified Advertisements
44
Name
Address
City
State
Effective Date:
Name
_
Zip
Address
City
_
_
_
-=-----;
State
Zip
Austin, Texas
September 1986
Page 1
American Atheist
Editor/R. Murray-O'Hair
Editor Emeritus/Dr. Madalyn OHair
Managing Editor/don G. Murray
Assistant Editor/Gerald Tholen
Poetry/Angeline Bennett, Gerald Tholen
Non-Resident Staff/John M. Allegro, Burnham
P. Beckwith, Margaret Bhatty, Nawal El Saadawi,
Merrill Holste, Lowell Newby, Fred Woodworth,
Frank R. Zindler
Production Staff/Laura Lee Cole, Christina Ditter' Shantha Elluru, Keith Hailey, Brian J. Lynch,
Jim Mills, John Ragland, Jes Simmons
Officers of the Society of Separationists,
Inc.
President/don G. Murray
President Emeritus/Dr. Madalyn O'Hair
Vice-President/Gerald
Tholen
Secretary/R. Murray-OHair
Treasurer/Brian J. Lynch
Chairman of the Board/Dr, Madalyn OHair
Members of the Board/Jon G. Murray (Vice
Chairman), August Berkshire, Herman Harris,
Ellen Johnson, Scott Kerns, Minerva Massen,
Robin Murray-O'Hair, Shirley Nelson, Richard C.
OHair, Henry Schmuck, Noel Scott, Gerald
Tholen, Lloyd Thoren, Frank Zindler.
Officers and Directors may be reached at P.O.
Box 2117, Austin, TX 78768.
Honorary
Members of the Board/Merrill
Holste, John Marthaler
The American Atheist is published monthly by
American Atheist Press, an affiliate of Society of
Separationists, Inc., d/b/a American Atheists,
2210 Hancock Dr., Austin, TX 78756-2596, a nonprofit, non-political, educational organization dedicated to the complete and absolute separation of
state and church. (Non-profit under IRS Code
501(c)(3).)
Copyright 1986 by Society of Separationists, Inc.
AUrights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in
part without written permission is prohibited.
ISSN: 0332-4310. Mailingaddress: P.O. Box 2117,
Austin, TX 78768-2117.
The American Atheist is indexed in IBZ (International Bibliography of Periodical Literature, Osnabriick, Germany).
Manuscripts submitted must be typed, doublespaced, and accompanied by a stamped, selfaddressed envelope. A copy of American Atheist
Writers' Guidelines is available upon request. The
editors assume no responsibility for unsolicited
manuscripts.
The American Atheist Press publishes a variety of
Atheist, agnostic, and freethought material. A
catalog is available free upon request.
TRIVIALITIES
rayers at graduations, town meetings,
P
and football games; god on our currency and in our national motto; religious
emblems on city and county seals; creches
on public property; "Noels" strung across
city streets - all things activist, militant
Atheists have complained about and challenged in the courts and in public forums.
And all things theists and closet Atheists
have called "too trivial" for First Amendment advocates to fight.
The legal implications of such activities
are clear. The simplistic argument that
because "In God We Trust" is on our coins
the United States is a Christian nation has
been used too often in court decisions for
them not to be compelling symbols. But the
layperson either ignores or is ignorant of
such consequences of "secular religion."
But there is another, more insidious consequence of this "trivial" intrusion of the
religious into the public arena. That is the
exclusion of the Atheist from our culture.
The Atheist must remain the outsider while
symbolic affirmations of life, of Americana,
and of our culture transpire. While graduates are honored, the Atheist parent or student is made the freak. When collections of
citizens gather for their common good, the
Atheist is reminded of his or her "outsiderness." At a time of the year when all people
celebrate and come together for good cheer,
the Atheist's participation is mocked and
discouraged by religious intrusions into public life. Through these seemingly "trivial"
reaffirmations of theism, the Atheist is
denied full participation in our culture. The
Atheist is stripped of role models and
refused acceptance.
Other abused minorities have learned the
importance of symbolism. Remember when
all children played with white dolls? When all
leaders were referred to in the masculine
case? The message to Blacks and their
children in the toy store was clear enough: If
you were Black, you were not truly part of
the culture. The message to women was
plain and simple: Females are followers.
And the message to Atheists when confronted with public acceptances of religion
should be clear enough: Ifyou do not believe
in ghosts and goblins, you are not quite right.
Take graduations, for example. The
community gathers at graduations to honor
young persons who have completed a
course of study and to welcome them into a
September 1986
American Atheist
Austin, Texas
September 1986
Page 3
It was at the time of this first public meeting that the Commission made its first report
to Reagan and Congress which consisted
essentially of begging for more money. The
Commission asked for authority to issue
commemorative coins and medals to raise
funds and to raise the ceiling on taxdeductible donations to itself from $25,000 a
year to $250,000 a year for individuals and to
$1 million a year for businesses. In view of
the "privatization" of the Statue of Liberty
celebration, this is ominous. The Commission proposed that the bicentennial be celebrated over a three-year period beginning in
1987, to mark 1787 as the year of the writing
of the Constitution, 1788 as the year of its
ratification by the states, and 1789 as the
year of the establishment of our federal
government. The Commission also proposed that a onetime national holiday be
enacted by Congress on September 17,
1987, called "Constitution Day," since the
Constitution was signed on September 17,
1787.
It was not until the congressional Christmas recess of December 1985 that Congress finally voted $12 million in funding for
the Bicentennial Commission of the $20 million the Commission had sought in September of that year.
The fourth meeting of the Commission
was held February 2 and 3 of this year at the
University of San Diego. It was open to the
public, and those commissioners who did
attend heard five hours of testimony on how
to celebrate the bicentennial. Following that
Page 4
September 1986
February 1986 meeting, I can find no substantive press coverage on the Commission
until Chief Justice Burger made his retirement announcement on June 17 of this year.
Then suddenly the media was interested in
the Commission once again.
What's It All About?
Does it not strike you as a little odd that
the public knows so little about this Commission that has been assigned the task of
informing the public about the Constitution?
I have gleaned what little information I have
presented about the Commission thus far
from reading stacks of newspaper clippings
from major dailies around the country. Most
of you willonly know about what had transpired if you live in one of the cities in which
the Commission held one of its meetings.
Otherwise, you may have seen nothing at all
in your local papers about it or its activities.
Could it be that those on the Commission
really don't want rank and file Americans to
know all that much about the Constitution?
I, for one, am suspect.
After reading what I could about the
Commission, I started to correlate that
against other events of the same time period
while asking the question, "Why would a
Commission that is only on the surface in
existence to celebrate the writing of the
Constitution need to have the chief justice of
the Supreme Court as chairman?" and I
came up with a frightening theory. While this
Commission is getting geared up for its
campaign, the White House and the Justice
Department are setting up the ideological
underpinnings for an attempted overthrow
of the American republic as post-Civil War
generations have known it. The Commission may be an integral part of their scheme,
perhaps as a diversion.
At this point I can hear you say, "Jon
Murray has finally lost his mind!" Not so.
Hold on to your hats while I demonstrate
what I mean.
In July of 1985, during the same month
that Congress and Reagan were setting up
the Bicentennial Commission, Attorney
General Meese gave a very important
speech to the American Bar Association
annual convention. It was a speech that will
go down in history as being of equal importance as the "Iron Curtain" speech of Sir
Winston Churchill. Meese's speech contained such radical departures from established legal precedent that two Supreme
Court justices spoke out against it directly.
What he did in his speech to the Bar Association was to publicly announce the plans of
the conservative movement in this country
to challenge the basic way in which our
government now functions. We have all
been privy to the actions of the Reagan
administration, backed by the Fundamentalists, in the areas of school prayer, abortion,
American Atheist
Austin, Texas
September 1986
PageS
Page 6
tion was drafted in 1787 by thirty-eight delegates plus George Washington, which
makes thirty-nine. With twenty-three members on the Constitutional Commission
already and plus, say, the president, vice
president, and the Cabinet, we would be up
to the required count to keep a constitutional convention in line with "historical
precedent,"
in the words of Burger.
(Twenty-three Commission members, fourteen Cabinet members, the president, and
the vice president comes to thirty-nine.
God, working in mysterious ways, started
our nation with 39 men and may just end the
republic with that same number - 39.)
No, Thanks!
These are sobering prospects that I think
all of us as Atheists have to keep in mind and
follow very closely with an inquisitive mind. I
am not a conspiracy buff, and I think that the
Mae Russell mentality is way out in left field,
but I have come to an understanding of the
extent to which the religious mind will go.
Symbolism and magic numbers have played
a traditionally powerful role in the motivation of Christian groups. The right-wing religious zanies in our country are capable of
just about anything for what they perceive as
direction from their "god." We may never
make it to the 1988 elections. Ifwe do, I think
that we need an Atheist candidate for that
race. The Democrats are finished, and their
cowardice-inspired mediocrity will prevent
them from backing a candidate who is sufficiently distinct from the Republicans to provide the needed polarization to defeat the
rightists. Perhaps nothing willcome of all of
these "coincidences,"
but perhaps we
should keep our bags packed, wallets out, or
our guns loaded, depending on one's point
of view, just in case. ~
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
A second generation Atheist,
Mr. Murray has been the Director
of The American Atheist Center
for ten years and is also the Managing
Editor of the American Atheist. He
advocates "Aggressive Atheism."
"Just between 40u and me ... I don't trust the gU4 ... he's olwous reading
something. "
September 1986
American Atheist
ASK A.A.
Austin, Texas
September 1986
Page 7
Joe David
in public class-
Chicago Tribune
March 3, 1983
faced currently in educaThetionproblems
are not because god was removed
Page 8
September 1986
American Atheist
Austin, Texas
John Dewey, who has infuenced American (and Russian) education since the
1920s, and whose ideas have significantly
affected education, seems to grasp in My
Pedagogic Creed an understanding of what
Dr. Peikoff was saying. "Through education
society can formulate its own purposes, can
organize its own means and resources, and
thus shape itself with definiteness and economy in the direction in which it wishes to
move." It is understandable - in view of this
- why the government is interested in the
"spiritual strengths of our people" rather
than the intellectual and moral strengths. By
creating public church schools, our government hopes to hurl us back into the Dark
Ages by taking complete control of the
American mind and freezing it in ignorance.
~
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Joe David's writings have appeared in
many magazines, newspapers, and
journals. He is the author of the novel
about public education, The Fire
Within. This article is from his latest
book entitled Glad You Asked, which
has been published by Books For
All Times.
SIC
Yc:AH?
'WeLL. JUST
RE.MEf1I8EA: 7HERE. AR.E NO
ItrH~/5T~ IN FOXHOLES.'"
Ofl
versial ideology directly into the plastic, unformed minds of children ... by
means of seizing a country's educational system and turning it into a vehicle for indoctrination. In this way,
one may capture an entire generation,
and thus, shortly, a country, without
intellectual resistance, in a single coup
d'ecole.
September 1986
Page 9
September is the month of school opening, and - if you are an Atheist hoping to
graduate from grade or high school at the
end of this school year - your thoughts
should be focused on June 1987. That is
when the action willbe.
From time immemorial, the old saw goes,
Atheist students have been graduating from
high school and have been met by religious
ceremonies, including but not limited to
both benedictions and prayers, at the graduating exercises. When confronted by such
planned religious ceremonies, the question
exercise. The class president began, "Father, we pray for each of our continued successes .... Bless us abundantly that we may
bless others abundantly." Trapped in the
audience, he dared not raise an objection for
he did not want to mar the graduation
ceremonies for the young people to whom it
all was directed. He could only watch as he
saw his son sit down, head up, when the
graduates were asked to stand and bow
their heads. Immediately after the graduation, he wrote to the Superintendent of
Schools for Los Angeles. The superintendent's first response was dated August 1,
1984.
The voluntary nature of graduation
ceremonies, the wide discretion given
to senior classes in developing their
commencement programs ... are factors which must be considered. While
I fully understand your personal belief
and position in this matter, ... as a
matter of law senior classes of the District may schedule invocations as part
of their commencement programs.
Little or nothing could be done at the time.
William had graduated and Brodhead's
younger son, Daniel, was not due to graduate for another two years. But, as the time
approached for the second Brodhead graduation, father and son talked it over and
decided that what had occurred at the graduation of William was not what either of
them wanted for Daniel to endure. On
March 27, 1986, Brodhead contacted the
Van Nuys High School superintendent asking him again to review the legal precedents
and this year direct the principal and the
senior class advisor to schedule the 1986
graduation to be non-religious. He had, in
the interim period, talked extensively with
The American Atheist Center and had
obtained from it a copy of the case of Collins
v. Chandler Unified School District, 644
F .2d 759 (9th Cir. 1981), having to do with an
Atheist mother protesting religious invocations at school assemblies in a Phoenix,
Arizona, high school. Upon contacting an
attorney for the district, the superintendent
again reported back to Brodhead that
because students largely plan their own graduation ceremonies and attendance is voluntary, the constitutionally dictated separation of state and church did not apply to the
Page 10
September 1986
American Atheist
Austin, Texas
t.~f!:::J~
~
7?
~
September 1986
Page 11
Page 12
September 1986
American Atheist
The following is the text of an op-ed article which appeared in the "Focus"
section of the Daily News on June 8, 1986. The author is Carol Sobel, a staff
attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union in Los Angeles.
Austin, Texas
September 1986
Page 13
gents, employees and all persons acting in cooperation with them that, in
an invocation or similar message at a
graduation ceremony of the District
schools, the District will not permit,
sanction or authorize any language or
other behavior that constitutes a religious observance or practice and will
so inform all graduation program
speakers in advance.
The District further pledged that it would
"make a good faith effort to comply ... with
respect to graduation exercises scheduled"
in June. Since these were eminent, "there
may be some difficulty in complying fully"
but "in any event, graduation speakers
scheduled for this year's commencement
exercises at Van Nuys High School willbe so
notified."
Brodhead was ecstatic:
We are very pleased because we
feel now, in the second largest city in
the United States, we have established a principle that Atheists have as
much a right to freedom from religion
in a public place as religious people
have to practice it.
But, yet, he added, "I think it is good and
fair. I'm sorry we had to go through allthis to
get what should have been common sense."
His son agreed, "It was my dad's idea to go
to court, but I supported it because it was
the only way to go. It turned out pretty well."
The Van Nuys High School graduation
ceremonies were duly held on June 18, 1986,
and the new Los Angeles Unified School
District policy was put into effect: The
ceremonies contained no mention of god.
But, overhead, a small plane hired by an
Anaheim minister pulled a banner which
read, "GOD BLESS THE GRADUATES
'86." Several hundred students and spectators cheered and applauded the banner as
the plane circled the school's football field
during the ceremony's opening. Outside of
the school a handful of pickets from the
Culver City Bible Church picketed the
ceremony together with some who were
supporting the new policy. Armed security
guards were stationed around the school
and barred some would-be spectators from
entering the graduation without a ticket.
With more than five hundred students
graduating, the senior class vice president
read an "inspirational" message that made
no mention of god but credited help and
guidance "from all sources" for the success
of the graduating seniors.
William Brodhead, now age twenty-one,
Page 14
was there to see his younger brother graduate without the insulting prayers which he
had endured two years earlier.
Finally it was over, and there was Daniel
Brodhead, saying, "It's great." His father,
asked about the airplane and the trailing
sign, replied honestly and to the point, "It
was a bit tacky." His brother, William, aimed
at the base, "As long as it [the plane with its
banner] is not paid for by the school district," it is fine. The minister, chairman of a
local group of the national Traditional
Values Coalition, disclosed that his group
had paid $350 for the airplane and banner
because, "We feel what is happening here
today is a denial of the free expression of
religion." The roving reporter was there
also, obtaining opinions, as usual, "in
twenty-five words or less."
Graduating senior, age eighteen: "It [removing religion from the ceremony] is an
extremely important victory for proponents
of the separation of church and state."
A friend of Daniel's, age seventeen: "I
would not take the prayer out. If he feels
strongly against religion, he doesn't have to
listen."
Resource specialist for the school: "This
campus has many, many religions. We can't
mention all the religions. That would take
three or four hours. So an invocation of
neutrality is the best way."
Teacher, government and history, age
twenty-six: "A neutral vote is a vote against
religion. I would have allowed the student
body to decide. It's their graduation."
A religious student, age seventeen: "That
banner was a disgrace, and Ibelieve in God."
Senior Class President: "It gave us a bad
name. It made us look like we were praying
around school. Like we were monsters,
when there was nothing going on."
Meanwhile, the attorney for the school
board was busy weaseling, answering the
reporters that the new policy was not meant
to ban all mention of religion but only officially sanctioned religion. "It does not prohibit a speaker from making what is clearly a
personal statement regarding God or religion." He cited the El Camino High School in
Woodland Hills, California, where the principal read aloud a letter received from the
father of a student who had died during the
school year. The letter contained references
to god.
Brodhead had written a lengthy letter to
the Los Angeles Times newspaper (daily circulation about 1,080,0(0) during the final
negotiations with the school board. When
an agreement was reached on June 3, that
newspaper printed the letter, in full, on its
"op-ed" page in the June 4 issue. And, Brod-
September 1986
American Atheist
Austin, Texas
September 1986
Page 17
Page 18
September 1986
American Atheist
Austin, Texas
Upper Peninsula.
Iowa
In 1985 a federal district judge in Iowa had
ruled the exact opposite. There a twodecade-long practice of including both an
invocation and a benediction conducted by
a minister had been challenged. The court
found a clear violation of each of the three
parts of the entanglement test under Lemon. Attendance at the graduation was voluntary and the invocation and benediction
were brief. "This finding ... is supported ...
by the undeniable truth that prayer is inherently religious" (Graham u. Central Community School District of Decatur, 608
F.Supp. 531, D.C. Iowa 1985). To date,
neither the U.S. Supreme Court, the twelve
federal courts of appeals, nor any of the fifty
state courts of last resort have handed down
rulings on the question, leaving few guideposts for either lower court judges or school
officials.
Virginia & Pennsylvania
In two other lower federal court decisions
the judges declined to bar invocations at
graduation, most notably in Grossberg u.
Deusibio, 380 F.Supp. 285 (Eastern District,
Virginia, 1974); Wood u. Mount Lebanon
Township School District, 342 F.Supp. 1293
(Western District, Pennsylvania, 1973); and
in the state court, in Weist u. Mount
Lebanon School District, 457 Pa. 1966,
(1974).
Rationale
The rationales of the decisions against
barring of the prayers are: (1) The practice
has been a long-standing custom throughout the state; (2) the graduation is optional;
(3) the commencement exercises are not
part of the regular school day; (4) the invocation is generally brief.
The questions are endless. The U.S.
Supreme Court has given every indication
that it considers students in primary and
secondary education levels to be "impressionable" children, while those same students just months later in a college or university setting are "mature adults." Many of
the lower courts have considered the age of
the graduates, particularly when an eighthgrade graduation is involved. Closely married to this factor is that of peer group pressure for teenagers.
Several courts pretend not to know if
prayer at the graduation ceremony should
be considered an extension of the public
September 1986
Page 19
Page 20
September 1986
a:
I
c,
<{
a:
<.9
w
-'
w
>-.
FORD RD
American Atheist
Colorado Chapter members made Atheism's sensitivity for women known in the protest for women's rights during the June 14
March for Women's Lives sponsored by the National Organization for Women. Over 4,000 persons participated in the march.
Austin, Texas
September 1986
Page 21
Page 22
September 1986
American Atheist
Austin, Texas
September 1986
Page 23
FORTUNATELY,
C.OMMUNlCA1"ION
HP-S IMPROVEI>
TEC-HNOL.OGY
IN '2.000 YEARS._.
;:.
::
DIAL-AN-ATHEIST
The telephone listings below are the various services where you may listen to short comments on state/church
issues and viewpoints originated by the Atheist community.
Tucson, Arizona
San Francisco, California
South Bay (San Jose), California
God Speaks
Denver, Colorado
Greater DC
South Florida
Atlanta, Georgia
Northern Illinois
Lexington, Kentucky
Boston, Massachusetts
Detroit, Michigan
Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
Northern New Jersey
Page 24
(602)
(415)
(408)
(408)
(303)
(703)
(305)
(404)
(312)
(606)
(617)
(313)
(612)
(201)
623-3861
668-8085
377-8485
257-1486
692-9395
280-4321
474-6728
662-6606
506-9200
278-8333
969-2682
721-6630
566-3653
777-0766
separation
(505)
(914)
(718)
(518)
(702)
(614)
(503)
(215)
(412)
Austin, Texas
(512) 458-5731
DIAL-THE-ATHEIST __
Houston, Texas
Outspoken Voice of Freedom
Salt Lake City, Utah
September 1986
884-7360
338-0162.
392-0556
346-1479
972-8203
294-0300
771-6208
533-1620
734-0509
(713) 664-7678
(713) 527-9255
(801) 364-4939
American Atheist
John M. Allegro
DIVINE DISCONTENT
of religious loyalties has
Thebeendivisiveness
disastrous for humanity, as we
Austin, Texas
September 1986
uniquely prolonged infancy. The male needed to be continually attracted to his mate,
not merely for the few hectic days around
her period of ovulation.
In looking across at these forms of family
and social grouping among living primates,
we may recognize elements in each reflecting the human situation. It is true that no
species of the larger apes adequately represents man's nonestral pair-bonding arrangement for the care of the newborn or
approaches the human potential for creative
thought. Nevertheless, with care it is possible to supplement the sparse fossil and
archaeological information on the social
behavior of our forebears with observations
of our primate cousins in the wild.
As far as numbers are concerned, it is
reasonable to assume that small groups of
hominids would have stood a better chance
of survival in times of drought and widely
dispersed food supplies than larger populations foraging together. The African hominid
Australopithecus ("Southern Ape") probably lived in communities of no more than
twenty or thirty, grouped around home
bases consisting of simple stone windbreaks.
If, in times of extreme heat or cold, they
sought out caves or overhanging cliffs for
shelter, it would probably be only in daytime,
for the caves were also the lairs of more
efficient killers, and, until the invention of
fire, the hominids would have fared better in
the open.
The older males, by virtue of their superior strength and mobility, must have provided the first line of defense and have been
individually responsible for the welfare of
each family. The prime role of the females
would have been dictated for them by the
overriding demands of motherhood, although, in this pre-hunting situation, both
sexes would have been equally adept at food
collection, in grubbing for roots and capturing slow game.
More important for our study are the psychological consequences of the continuous
presence within each family group of a single
dominant male, on the assumed lines of a
gibbon-gorilla type of paternalism. This must
have given rise to a number of potential
areas of stress between parents and their
young, especially between the father and his
male offspring. The infant would have found
himself torn between wanting to keep close
to his mother, as the prime source of food
Page 25
Page 26
male patients to an overwhelming fear during their formative years that their love for
their mother would incur their father's
retribution.
Freud's basic assumptions, methods, and
the validity of his patients' revelations under
psychoanalysis have all been brought seriously into question, especially in recent
years. But the neurotic symptoms with
which the master of psychoanalysis tried to
deal are real enough, and it may well be that
many of our modern sexual neuroses have
their origins in this formative period in
hominid psychological development. Our
ancestors were trying to move away from a
large, baboon-like pack grouping into a
smaller, family-based arrangement of living.
The adult male had become an integral part
of the family circle, continually attracted
sexually to his mate, and sharing in the
upbringing of their offspring. He had to be
able to assert his authority in times of
danger, and yet to relax his jealous aggressiveness in the interests of domestic harmony and the rearing of his young. Small
wonder if this change in a long-established
behavioral pattern at such a crucial time in
hominid development should have left its
mark in human psychology.
Freud suggested that his "Oedipus complex" was not only one of the most important sources of obsessional guilt among neurotics, but that man may have acquired his
sense of guilt generally from the deep-seated
trauma. He even saw it as the prime source
of religion and morality. There is, of course,
far more to religion than a sense of guilt, but
we have to agree that the sources of man's
"divine discontent" are as deep in the human
psyche as the peculiar evolutionary circumstances that have produced in Homo sapiens our strangely ambivalent attitudes to
parental love and human sexuality. For what
religious man came eventually to think of as
"conscience" is simply the faculty that
enabled his hominid ancestors to inhibit
their programmed responses to stimuli in
the interests of some longer-term advantage. "Guilt" is the unease that accompanies
and sometimes motivates that control, and
"god" is the idealist projection of the conscience in moral terms. Through his religions man both dramatizes the conflict and
seeks its resolution. Unhappily for our peace
September 1986
American Atheist
Austin, Texas
September 1986
Page 27
Page 28
September 1986
American Atheist
Austin, Texas
September 1986
state, some areas of the brain become sensitized and receptive, while others may
suffer strong inhibition, amounting even to
paralysis. Thus, on the one hand, the subject
may feel himself divinely inspired and credit
every random impression received from
without, or projected from his own subconscious, as a "revelation" of eternal truth,
and, on the other hand, become inured to a
level of pain that would be otherwise well
beyond his normal threshold of tolerance. In
every case, the usual processes of the mind
are disturbed, critical faculties suspended,
and the believer is suddenly freed from the
burden of his own individuality. He can
resign himself to being "taken over" by the
god or controlling spirit, and achieves thereby a wonderful sense of inner peace.
It is this psychiatry that motivates the revivalist meeting and the political convention.
The hellfire speaker and the ranting demagogue can so stir their audiences into a state
of extreme emotion that the more susceptible souls present will pass into a hypnoid
condition, where they are easily persuaded
into adopting beliefs and attitudes they
would otherwise reject or ignore. Such
"conversions" may not be so sudden as they
seem, for the stresses and anxieties that
brought their subjects to the mission or convention may have been building up for some
time previously; it needed but the mounting
excitement and the hypnotic effect of the
speaker's words uttered in an atmosphere of
tense expectancy to trigger the release
mechanism. The wave of emotion breaks,
and the "convert" responds unreservedly to
the call of the Master. His doubts and personal misgivings are swept aside, for now he
is a child of his god (or the State), his sins (or
deviation isms) are forgiven, and he knows
the "peace which passeth all understanding." This sense of well-being may not last
long; it is likely that a new set of inhibitions
will gather around him, encouraging fresh
doubts and building up another head of
emotional steam that willneed some further
climactic release.
The increased suggestibility of a hynoid
subject is a factor that the practicing psychoanalyst watches carefully. It is too easy
for the patients repeatedly treated in this
way to suffer what the Freudians call a
"transference situation," in which. in his
Page 29
Page 30
September 1986
American Atheist
PROTESTANT RELIGION
AND MEDICINE
When the first installment of a regularly scheduled, fifteen-minute, weekly American Atheist radio
series on KTBC radio (a station in Austin, Texas, owned by then-president Lyndon Baines Johnson) hit
the airwaves on June 3, 1968, the nation was shocked. The programs had to be submitted weeks in
advance and were heavily censored. The regular production of the series ended in September 1977,
when no further funding was available.
The following is the text of American Atheist Radio Series program No. 92, first broadcast on April
13,1970.
been exploring with you the history
Iofhavemedicine
and religion, particularly the
Austin, Texas
September 1986
Page 31
Page 32
September 1986
American Atheist
HISTORICAL NOTES
100 Years Ago ...
1986 may have presidential candidate Pat
Robertson, but 1886 had the "God-in-theConstitution" party, as this excerpt from the
September 4,1886, Truthseeker shows:
"The God-in-the-Constitution party held
a convention at Saratoga last month which
was well attended and markedly enthusiastic and vigorous. The sole reason for the
existence of this party is to extend the Christian features of our government, and particularly to put the names of God and Christ
into the Constitution, At the Saratoga convention addresses were made by Miss
Frances E_Willard, president of the Woman's Christian Temperance Union, and
other theologico-political workers, Jo Cook
wrote his sympathy with the movement, and
Daniel Webster was eulogized to the skies
for his erroneous declaration, in the Girard
willcase, that Christianity was a part of the
common law of the land.
"It is commonly accepted as an American
principle that government derives its just
powers from the consent of the governed_
But our Christian oppressors hold that
government derives its powers from 'God,'
an extraneous personage having no property or voting interest in this world, and consequently no sympathy with the people of
the United States, Christ, another superfluous office-holder, they claim is the rightful
king of nations. The assumption made by
the Christians for these two alleged beings
does not, however, in our opinion, entitle
them to rule the United States, The true
meaning of the National Reform people is, as
we have before pointed out, that the earth
and the fullness thereof belongs to the Lord
and his saints, and that the Christians, being
the saints, desire to enter at once into possession. This is something that is not at all
likely to come to pass so long as a reasonable degree of vigilance is exercised, but that
the Christians are becoming more and more
aggressive, and determined to have the
earth, is plainly to be seen. They are seeking
to hand this government over to a foreign
power, for themselves to run, and no one
can doubt the substantial benefits that
would inure to the church should they succeed. Our children would be taught to reverence this foreign power above the people's
chosen officials; they would learn in school a
system of religion that is false; free speech
would be a thing of the_past, and every citizen would be compelled to pay taxes to
support the worship of this foreign power,
and for the maintenance of his ministers.
The God-in-the-Constitution party, therefore, is preaching treason.
Austin, Texas
September 1986
Page 33
Page 34
been done in the way of refutation by philosophical procrastinators is to offer loquacious diatribes and counterclaims. I have
stated many times in previous articles that
philosophical differences cannot be resolved
by philosophical arguments. Differences of
opinion can only be resolved by material
evidences. To determine what is and what is
not possible cannot be left to the whims of
imagination or speculative "guessology."
So, here, let's explore the task of publishing the Bible from a purely technical viewpoint. Let's assume for a moment that you
and I own an early Eurasian print shop.
Although we have no electricity, no printing
press, no typewriters, or other modern facilities and accoutrements, no wire service,
perhaps not even an adequate mail delivery
system through which we might send and
receive information in a relatively timely
manner, we still manage to piece together
fairly decent volumes suitable to the times.
No matter how scrupulously we attend
our trade, whether we are conscientiously
discrete in our publications, or whether we
prefer to follow the literary "rag" practices of
National Enquirer, there is one thing which
we, indeed, which all printers, must have: It
is called, in the industry, "copy." Yes, we
must have material in the form of handwritten (or otherwise transcribed) information
that we can scribe, typeset, or prepare in
some mechanical way in order to produce a
book - whether that book is to be published on ordinary bond paper, vinyl acetate,
parchment, or on the walls of a cave! The
point is that words are the basic ingredient
essential to any printing shop. It does not
matter whether we are ancient Egyptian
scriveners chiseling a Rosetta stone or
whether we perhaps may be the heads of a
laser printer operation for the Washington
Post - we must have "copy" to print.
The question is, where and how do we get
this copy so that we can publish our Bible?
Remember now, the first thing in the morning we have to hand our scribes some material - something in writing - so that they
willbe able to hand us back a few laboriously
drawn pages that can be gradually accumulated in order to finally calendar and collate
them into our desired masterpiece.
My first discussion willpertain to the problems faced in the acquisition of copy for the
New (Christian) Testament, although problems are by no means limited to the Chris-
September 1986
American Atheist
Austin, Texas
September 1986
Page 35
,.
To
ttUUl 9AIT'lA"TS
~f"'O Me"'EY io 1:
'f\~
<.".,
iU'(
1V 1'\M f. SD ~
TE.\..\. I"\ORf "OP1.f"'{1)
~e~",Mole
11tY
"AN ~e"'I)
~}*'w~
~~
RE\.\G-'D\l5 TV SHowS
Page 36
September 1986
American Atheist
POETRY
CONVERSION TO REALITY
RUDIMENTARY THEOLOGY
FOR SAINTS AND OTHERS
"to the shame of Christ a man of Jewish origin
was come to occupy the chair of St. Peter"
St. Bernard
Robert R. Hentz
Austin, Texas
September 1986
Page 37
Page 38
September 1986
u.s. Immigration
The church leaders, in their efforts to
"sell" the Sanctuary movement to the American public, have attempted to rewrite history. They claim that they are only continuing a tradition - extending a hand to "your
tired, your poor, your huddled masses
yearning to breathe free, ... " or running an
"underground railroad to freedom." Since
U.S. immigration laws have never been
intended to grant freedom, and since
churches were not significantly involved in
opposing slavery, a brief history lesson is in
order.
Immigrants were brought to the United
States by the millions in the 1800s to satisfy
the demands of robber-baron capitalists
who needed cheap labor. The fact that most
of the immigrants spoke no English, and
knew no one, made them easy to exploit and
control. In fact, the least desirable qualities
for immigrants were a broad education and a
knowledge of English. Many immigrants
were refused admission because they did
not appear physically capable of performing
hard work for long hours. A steady supply of
new labor kept wages low and profits high.
Quotas were established to balance the
desire for cheap labor with the costs of controlling an exploited citizenry. Too many
immigrants out of work or too many immigrants in one place with common ethnic
roots would threaten the power structure.
As a "divide and conquer" tactic, some
groups were granted police power or positions in local government. Members of other
groups seized power when their numbers
grew to sufficient size in U.S. cities. The Irish
and other ethnic groups who spoke English
were occasionally promoted into positions
of power with the rise of managerial (rather
than owner) capitalism. In areas where large
groups of persons with common ethnic ori-
American Atheist
Austin, Texas
September 1986
Page 39
Page 40
J---.J --
'-~CJ ; .:~
ictlJiS/C =:J~~
. =-
=;.-=: '
.!,-~~~.~!
.JIii!f/~~ .~-
=--.;..' .
_ ..
"I tell uou, I've been on the force twentq ueors, but the next time 1hear
someone soq 'Ood's wm' or 'The Lord works in mqsterious woqs' about
something like this, 1swear I'll shoot."
September 1986
American Atheist
ME TOO
"Me Too" is a feature designed to
showcase short essays written by readers in response to topics recently covered by the American Atheist or of
general interest to the Atheist community.
Austin, Texas
September 1986
O. Locks
California
Page 41
New Zealand
I write to confirm that the material delivered at your 1985 Convention about religious affairs in this country by Mr. Jones of
the Auckland Rationalists is very accurate in
my opinion. The later data ["New Zealand New Era," February 1986] he supplied in
another issue of the results of a public opinion poll relating to the stance of the general
public here to our own equivalent of the
"Moral Majority" lobbies is even more
deadly accurate to real sociological currents
of religious observances than the numerous
spurious claims being made by orators.
The church/state separation issue has
been significantly dramatized of late by a
private member's billby the parliamentarian
Fran Wilde. This bill, which is loosely called
the "Homosexual Law Reform Bill" here,
has led to some weird demonstration antics
outside Parliament buildings by right -wing
fundamentalists that came over on our television like one corner of a Nuremburg rally
with leaping fundamentalist zealots and
national flag troopings. Donnybrooks broke
out among fundamentalists in grotesque
costumes, gays, constables, and civil libertarians.
But large blocks of mainline churches
have opposed the antics and tactics of some
of these churches (or enclaves within these
churches), and radio newsreaders here
lately speak of "the radical right" or "the
militant right" instead of "moral majority."
Brian Bell
New Zealand
Page 42
September 1986
Bible Criticism
In the May 1985 issue of your magazine
there was an article entitled "Slavery And
The Bible." The author, Merrill Hoste, said:
"In this day of science and high technology,
there are many people who still believe the
Bible to be the very word of a god. More
people should read that book. They would
find that it contains myths, fables, legends,
and a little one-sided history written by
priests to promote their particular interests."
First of all, the line "more people should
read that book" doesn't jive with the American Atheist Bible sticker that says, "Warning: Thinking people have determined that
this book is dangerous to your mental
health." Secondly, people who have been
told all their lives not to question "the word
of God" are not likely to question anything
they read in the Bible, no matter how
absurd. It therefore does no good to advise
people to look for absurdities in the Bible unless they have not had any religious
indoctrination.
Robert M. LaFrana
Michigan
He Will Return!
In a childish search for a supernatural
blanket, the Christian develops on his mental boob tube a fuzzy mirage that he calls
"god," who/which is out there somewhere/
someplace and is someone/something with
headquarters in a place called "heaven,"
American Atheist
B. R. Hill
Ohio
Louis Werner
New Jersey
Austin, Texas
September 1986
So That's It
The other day while enjoying my American Atheist magazine, a thought came to
mind that I would like to share with the other
readers:
God doesn't work in strange ways. God
works in strange people.
Jim Radebaugh
New York
P.S. Congratulations on the excellent job
you are doing with the American Atheist
magazine. It is the only voice of sanity in my
life.
NOTICE
"Letters to the Editor" must be
either questions or comments of
general concern to Atheists or
Atheism. Submissions should be brief
and to the point. Space limitations
allow that each letter should be two
hundred words, or preferably, less.
Please confine your letters to a single
issue only. Mail them to:
American Atheist
P.O. Box 2117
Austin, TX 78768-2117
Page 43
CLASSIFIED ADVERTISEMENTS
Classified Rates: 25 per word, $6.00 minimum. No boxes available.
Frequency Discount: (For classified) 10%
for three insertions, 20% for six.
Payment: Classified ads must be paid in
advance.
Publication policies: The American Atheist reserves the right to reject or cancel any
advertisement at any time for any reason.
No advocacy advertising will be accepted.
Samples of products may be requested.
Tear-sheets of ads willbe sent to all clients.
We require street addresses for all advertisers using box numbers.
Organizations
American Atheist Addiction Recovery
Groups, Inc.: America's only alternative to
M faith healing. Publishers of the world's
only monthly newsletter for Atheist alcoholics and other addicts and their families and
friends. Membership/subscription:
12 issues/$25. Sample/25. AMRG!, P.O. Box
6120, Denver, CO 80206-0120.
IA'PI
American Gay Atheists - AGA membership is restricted to Atheists and only Atheists. Membership rates set at $15/year.
Write: P.O. Box 66711, Houston, TX 77266,
or P.O. Box 248, Vlg. Sta., NYC, NY 10014.
Outspoken Voice of Freedom: (713)527-9255.
Publications
Why I Am An Atheist by Madalyn O'Hair.
A explanation of what an Atheist is or ought
to be. Includes definitional statements and a
survey of the classic arguments for the
existence of a god. Also gives a short history
of materialism. 39 pp. $4.25 postpaid. Write
AAP., P.O. Box 2117, Austin, TX 78768.
Atheist Anarchists will be interested in
The Match, called "The Apex of Atheistic
Anarchism." Available at the astonishingly
low price of only $6/year. Write: The Match,
P.O. Box 3488, Tucson, AZ 85722.
Back Issues of the American Atheist are
available. $1.50/copy. For a complete list
write: Back Issues, American Atheist, P.O.
Box 2117, Austin, TX 78768-2117.
READER SERVICE
(Please print)
City
State
Zip,
*By taking advantage of this special gift subscription offer, you save
$5.00. You may send the American Atheist magazine to anyone in the U.S.
for $20.00 for a period of one year. (For orders outside of the U.S. add $5.00
for postage.)
TO SUBSCRIBE TO AMERICAN
A THEIST MAGAZINE OR TO RENEW
YOUR PRESENT SUBSCRIPTION!
Name_~--~~------------~----------------(Please print)
Address
City
_
Zip,
1 year subscription
Page 44
o Life, $500
o Couple Life**, $750
o Sustaining, $l00/year
o Couple**/Family, $50/year
o Individual, $40/year
Enter your name and address (or attach your old magazine
label) here:
State
Products
Missionary Boiling Alive in kettle over
bamboo fire is 8Y:/', handmade ceramic,
simmering potpourri to fillyour home with
delightful fragrance. $26 ppd. includes potpourri pkg. and 10 candles (at my cost).
Wendy Tobler, 13555 Bunton Rd:, Willis,MI
48191.
To send a special gift subscription* of American Atheist rnagazine, enter the name and address of the recipient here:
Name __ ~ __ ~~
~
_
Address
_
_
City
State
_
Zip
September 1986
Exp. Date
_
_
_
American Atheist
Beyond Tomorrow
A Rational Utopia
by
Burnham P. Beckwith
Cut and Mail to: American Atheists, P.O. Box 2117, Austin, TX 78768-2117
D Yes, I want
copy(ies) of Beyond Tomorrow at
$10.00 each, including postage and handling.
(Texas Residents please add 5%%sales tax.)
D MasterCard
Name
Address
Bank No./Letters
Ci~
State
_
_ Zip
Expiration date
Signature
AMENDMENTI
CONGRESS
SHALL
tTl
-l
C/J
:E
--l
co
t"""
tr:
ir:
C/J
3:
:r::
<t:
r>--l
co
<t:
~
U
<t:
~
0..
~
-l
0..
o
~
tTl
'z
--l
Some men look at constitutions with sanctimonious reverence, and deem them like the
ark of the covenant, too sacred to be touched.
They ascribe to the men of the preceding age
a wisdom more than human, and suppose
. what they did to be beyond amendment. I
knew that age well; I belonged to it and
labored with it. It deserved well of its country.
0..
~
:r::
r-
u,
o
r:r::
o
eG
~
:r::
reG
'ij
~
tTl
t"""
-o-
'z
o
~
'"0
~
-:r::
~
--l
'z
--l
Thomas Jefferson
The Writings of Thomas Jefferson
Paul L. Ford, Editor
r:/)
ir:
~
eG
0..
~
:r::
r.::10~O 'H:J33dS .::10WOa33~.::I 3H.L aNIaaI~HV
:r::
tTl
'ij
~
tTl
tTl
><
m
~
C/J
t'i1
~O ~.::I03~3H.L