Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecniche per i Processi di Insediamento, Politecnico di Torino, Viale Mattioli 39, 10125 Torino, Italy
Dipartimento di Ingegneria del Territorio dellAmbiente e delle Geotecnologie, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10121 Torino, Italy
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 27 January 2010
Received in revised form
12 October 2010
Accepted 24 October 2010
Aerial photogrammetric surveys are usually expensive and the resolution of the acquired images is often
limited. For this reason, different innovative systems have been developed and tested in order to perform
a photogrammetric survey in an inexpensive way, with high-resolution images. In this context, one of the
most promising acquisition techniques is represented by the use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)
equipped with a digital camera.
The paper deals with the acquisition and processing of low-height aerial imagery acquired by UAVs
and Remote Piloted Vehicles (RPVs), in order to provide large-scale mapping to support archaeological
studies: the pros and cons of these acquisition platforms are presented and discussed. These systems
carry out ights that are usually very different from the manned systems as their dimensions and their
light weights never allow the set course to be own; for this reason, the acquired images are often
affected by large rotations and small overlaps. Therefore, an ad hoc procedure has been implemented to
overcome these limits. In this work, two remote-controlled systems (a mini-helicopter and a mini xedwing plane) were tested over two different archaeological sites in order to provide Digital Surface Models
(DSMs) and large-scale maps (numeric maps and orthophotos). Finally, an accuracy evaluation of the
nal products is reported.
2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
UAV
Photogrammetry
Image acquisition
DSM
Multi-image matching
Archaeological survey
1. Introduction
The survey of archaeological areas is often carried out using
traditional techniques, such as topographic surveys, close-range
photogrammetry and terrestrial LiDAR acquisitions. Nevertheless,
the main drawback of these methods is the difculty involved in
acquiring reliable radiometric information of the complete
surveyed area, which can easily be obtained by means of traditional
aerial photogrammetric ights. Furthermore, the costs of aerial
photogrammetry are usually too high in relation to the limited
extension of the surveyed areas. Moreover, the ight altitudes of
aircraft equipped with aerial photogrammetric cameras are not
able to supply suitable images for the production of large-scale
maps (higher than 1:500) and the ight of motor aircraft over
archaeological sites is often forbidden. Another problem is that the
sites that have to be surveyed are sometimes in remote areas.
For these reasons, the use of low-aerial ying systems could
efciently be exploited to acquire metric and non-metric data in
698
Table 1
UAV classication e Subcategories of tactic UAVs (UAV association).
Subcategories of
Tactic UAVs
Acronym
Range
[Km]
Climb
rate [m]
Endurance
[hours]
Mass
[Kg]
Micro
Mini
Close Range
Short Range
Medium Range
Medium Range
Endurance
Low Altitude Deep
Penetration
Low Altitude Long
Endurance
Medium Altitude
Long Endurance
m (Micro)
Mini
CR
SR
MR
MRE
<10
<10
10e30
30e70
70e200
>500
250
150e300
3000
3000
5000
8000
1
<2
2e4
3e6
6e10
10e18
<5
150
150
200
1250
1250
LADP
>250
50e9000
0.5e1
350
LALE
>500
3000
>24
< 30
MALE
>500
14,000
24e48
1500
2. Historical framework
military purposes. They are currently employed in military and civil
elds for reconnaissance or monitoring operations, atmospheric
measurements, damage assessment and mapping of natural or
manmade hazards, monitoring in agriculture and forestry and coast
guard operations.
UAVs are classied on the basis of different specications; the
most effective classication has been drafted by the Unmanned
Vehicle Systems International Association (International Unmanned
Aerial System Community, 2008). According to this classication,
UAVs are split into three main categories under to their possible use:
Tactic, Strategic and Special Purpose. Each typology is divided into
subcategories, according to their features and performances: vehicle
ight range, maximum climbing rate, endurance weight, etc. The
rst category of UAVs is usually employed for photogrammetric
purposes: micro and mini-UAVs (Table 1) are employed in particular
since they are cheaper to construct than traditional manned
platforms.
The work presented in this paper is focused on some tests that
were performed by the Geomatics research group of the Politecnico
di Torino on UAV and RPV systems to evaluate their suitability for
archaeological surveys. A xed-wing platform and a mini-helicopter
were used: the rst one (Pelican) was employed over the Roman
archaeological site of Augusta Bagiennorum (Bene Vagienna, Piedmont, Italy), while the second one (Voyager G8 RR mini-helicopter)
was used in the Reggia di Venaria Reale (Venaria Reale, Piedmont,
Italy).
The rst platform can carry out photogrammetric ight courses
in a completely automatic way (excluding take-off and landing),
according to the ight plan specications; instead, the second
system cannot perform autonomous ights, and this is why it is
named RPV. Nevertheless, in both cases the performed ights are
Fig. 1. Aerial views of the Theatre (left) and of the Amphitheatre (right) (Augusta Bagiennorum area).
699
Fig. 2. Fontana DErcole: old drawing (left), aerial view (in the centre of the red circle), terrestrial view (right) (for interpretation of the references to colour in this gure legend, the
reader is referred to the web version of this article).
stairs on either side of the large basin, the fountain connected the
lower garden to the upper one.
In 1699, Garove suggested a transformation project of the
gardens (from an Italian style of garden to a French style of garden)
and the rst suggestion for the demolition of the Fontana DErcole
was made (Bruno and Vinardi, 1990). The fountain, broken up in
1726 by Tantarini, was permanently knocked down in order to reuse
the bricks for the construction of the new part of the main building
of the Reggia di Venaria Castle. Today, after the archaeological
diggings, the old fountain ruins can clearly be seen in the Gardens.
3. Theoretical background
The use of Photogrammetry and Computer Vision algorithms
were necessary for this work. The photogrammetric workow
(Marenchino, 2009; Lingua et al., 2009a) that is illustrated hereafter
shows the different phases of the orthophoto and drawing
production of the performed tests (Fig. 3).
3.1. Image acquisition
Image acquisition was performed according to the available
aerial platform and it is one of the main phases of the workow. The
results of the automatic DSM and orthophoto generation depend
on the quality of the acquired images. Therefore, a good image
acquisition should allow a double stereoscopic coverage (at least
three images of the same object) to be achieved over the surveyed
Table 2
Technical specications of the two cameras employed in the test areas.
Resolution [Mpixel]
Pixel Dimension [mm]
Focal length [mm]
Weight [g]
Dimensions [mm]
Fig. 3. Data acquisition and processing workow.
RICOH GR
8
2.19
5.90
200
107 58 54
8
2.69
6.10
470
113 82 75
700
Fig. 4. Original panchromatic image of the Amphitheatre (left) and the same image obtained applying the Wallis lter (right).
Table 3
Estimated interior orientation parameters of the RICOHGR camera.
Table 4
Estimated interior orientation parameters of the Nikon
Coolpix 8400 camera.
c (mm)
x0 (mm)
y0 (mm)
K1 (1/mm2)
K2(1/mm2)
K3 (1/mm2)
6.374
0.044
0.131
1.159E-03
3.259E-06
4.139E-08
701
Fig. 5. An example of DSM before (left) and after (right) applying the S2MF lter.
Fig. 7. Stereoscopic image acquisition of the Amphitheatre (left) and of the Theatre (right).
702
Fig. 8. Example of image acquired with the mini-helicopter (left). Image of 3 of the 40 targets positioned on the Fontana DErcole and used as GCPs for the photogrammetric process
(right).
Table 5
Standard deviations on the GCPs and the CPs of the photogrammetric blocks
(s0 10).
Amphitheatre
GCPs (13)
CPs (8)
sx [m]
0.025
0.040
Theatre
sx [m]
GCPs (9)
CPs (6)
0.015
0.022
sy [m]
sz [m]
0.019
0.034
0.023
0.038
sy [m]
0.020
0.027
sz [m]
0.018
0.031
703
Fig. 9. Amphitheatre ruins: results of the MIGC3 and S2MF algorithms (left); 3D visualization of the extracted points (blue) and edges (red) (right) (for interpretation of the
references to colour in this gure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 10. Final Amphitheatre TIN extracted and ltered with MIGC3 and S2MF algorithms.
Fig. 11. Theatre ruins: results of the MIGC3 and S2MF algorithms (left); 3D visualization of the extracted points (blue) and edges (red) (right) (for interpretation of the references to
colour in this gure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
704
Fig. 12. Final Theatre TIN extracted and ltered with MIGC3 and S2MF algorithms.
4. Experimental section
4.1. Data acquisition e Augusta Bagiennorum test site
The UAV Pelican (Bendea et al., 2008) was employed for the
Augusta Bagiennorum test area. This UAV is a low-cost platform
which is capable of performing photogrammetric ights in an
automatic way. The UAV was developed by the Department of
Aerospace (DIASP) at the Politecnico di Torino in cooperation with
the ITHACA (Information Technology for Humanitarian Assistance
Cooperation and Action) association, in order to carry out photogrammetric ights in remote areas affected by natural or manmade
hazards. Three platforms in wood and carbon bre and equipped
with digital sensors are currently available. Each platform weights
10 kg and can carry a payload of 2 kg onboard. The optimum range
limit is 30 min at a cruise speed of 15 m/s. The wing span of 2 m and
the possibility of assembling the main component of the platform
make the UAV easy to maneuvre and it can be transported on
normal aircraft and used in the eld by a couple of operators.
The platforms currently available are equipped with two video
cameras (frontal and nadiral views) for navigation operations. They
Table 6
Standard deviations on the GCPs and the CPs of the photogrammetric block
(s0 10).
FontanadErcole
sx [m]
sy [m]
sz [m]
GCPs (22)
CPSs (10)
0.009
0.011
0.008
0.016
0.015
0.018
705
Fig. 13. High altitude ight over the Fontana DErcole: results of the MIGC3 and S2MF algorithms (left) and TIN (right).
during the ight, a Nikon Coolpix 8400 camera was used in this
work for image acquisition and remotely-controlled shots were
taken; moreover during mini-helicopter ight, it is possible to see
the area that is being imaged and to arrange the ight attitude in
order to acquire the area to be surveyed.
Some images of the Fontana DErcole were only acquired for
photographic documentation purposes, while several stereoscopic
images were acquired for the photogrammetric process (Fig. 8 left).
Five images were taken at a ight altitude of 50 m (high ight
altitude) and twenty images at a ight altitude of 15 m (low ight
altitude); a large number of GCPs was necessary in order to perform
the photogrammetric process, for this reason, forty targets were
homogeneously positioned on the area to be surveyed (Fig. 8 right).
The position of the targets was determined using a total station and
referring to a local coordinate system xed to reference points that
already existed in the area that was surveyed.
4.3. Data processing e Augusta Bagiennorum test site
Two aerial triangulations were performed on the Theatre and
the Amphitheatre using the Leica Photogrammetric Suite 9.2 software, three images were oriented over the Theatre using 9 ground
control points and 6 check points; in the case of the Amphitheatre
Fig. 14. Low altitude ight over the Fontana DErcole: results of the MIGC3 and S2MF algorithms (left) and TIN (right).
706
Table 7
Statistical accuracy check of the Amphitheatre orthophoto.
sCP,E,N[m]
95CP[m]
RMSEOP[m]
CE95OP[m]
CE95EN [m]
TEN 1:500 quick [m]
TEN 1:500 ordinary [m]
0.02
0.05
0.10
0.18
0.19
0.26
0.17
four images were oriented using 13 GCPs and 7 CPs, the achieved
standard deviations of the GCPs and CPs (reported in Table 5) show
the high quality of the bundle block adjustment.
The selected images were processed with the algorithms
implemented by the authors. First, the images were pre-processed
in order to remove the geometrical distortions and to enhance the
707
Fig. 17. Theatre: DSM (left), orthophotho (centre) and 2D drawing (right).
Fig. 18. High altitude ight over the Fontana dErcole: orthophotho (left) and 2D drawing (right).
sCP,E,N[m]
CE95CP[m]
RMSEOP[m]
CE95OP[m]
CE95EN [m]
TEN 1:500 quick [m]
TEN 1:500 ordinary [m]
0.02
0.05
0.09
0.14
0.15
0.26
0.17
planimetric step of about 0.15 m. The nal TIN (Fig. 12) was regularized with the Kriging technique (0.10 m step).
4.4. Data processing e Reggia di Venaria Reale test site
Two approaches were followed for the Fontana DErcole case:
three images from the high altitude ight were employed to
produce a 1:200 representation (22 ground control points and 10
check points), while ve images from the lower altitude ight were
used for the generation of a Solid True OrthoPhoto of a portion of
the Fontana DErcole, the results of the aerial triangulation (high
ight altitude) are reported in Table 6, the achieved standard
deviations of the GCPs and CPs show the high quality of the bundle
block adjustment.
The DSM generation was carried out as in section 4.3, two
different DSMs were realized, one for each of the aforementioned
sets of images, Fig. 13 shows the results obtained using the high
ight altitude images: a very high number of points/knots were
extracted over the entire surveyed area, with a satisfactory point
density per square meter.
The high discontinuities of the object in the low altitude ight
(Fig. 14) caused some problems in the automatic 3D point/edge
extraction, especially in the areas near the walls, where there was
a high rate of occlusion. In fact, only 28.3% of the points extracted by
the Forstner/Canny operators were matched and about 50% of them
were gross errors. Nevertheless, a high number of points/knots
708
Fig. 19. Low altitude ight over the Fontana dErcole: orthophotho (left) and 2D drawing (right).
Table 9
Time-consuming comparison for the two tests (two operators for the topographic
survey, one operator for the other phases).
Processing steps
Augusta
Bagiennorum
test site
(Theatre)
[hours]
Augusta
Bagiennorum
test site
(Amphitheatre)
[hours]
Fontana
DErcole
test site e
high ight
[hours]
Fontana
DErcole
test site e
low ight
[hours]
Topographic survey
Image Acquisition
Image pre-processing
Aerial triangulation
DSM generation
DSM editing
Digital Plotting
and editing
Orthophoto
production
Platform cost
7
2
0.5
4
4
e
8
6
2
0.5
4
4
1
8
6
2
0.5
4
4
e
8
1
0.5
3
3
2
6
25,000 Euros
8000 Euros
reported in Table 8, and they conrm the suitability of the orthophotos for a 1:500 map scale.
4.6. Orthophotos, solid true OrthoPhoto and digital plotting e
Reggia di Venaria Reale test site
A different approach was followed in the case of the Fontana
DErcole. The high altitude ight images were employed to obtain
an orthophoto and a digital plotting at a 1:200 scale map, Fig. 18
shows the orthophoto and the traditional drawing; moreover
a Solid True OrthoPhoto was created using the images from the low
altitude ight and the manually edited DSM, ve images were
resampled and merged using the true orthoprojection approach
implemented in the SirIo software. The nal STOP was suitable for
a 1:100 map scale representation (Fig. 19).
The accuracy of both orthophotos was evaluated, as in the
former test, considering several control points displaced on
the whole area: the circular error (CE95EN) was compared to the
tolerances limits (TEN) and showed the suitability of the higher
ight for a 1:200 map scale and the suitability of the higher ight
for a 1:100 map scale.
5. Conclusions and future work
The use of UAV and RPV systems for archaeological documentation purposes has been reported in this paper. The tests carried
out with the Pelican UAV and the remote-controlled mini-helicopter have underlined the suitability of mini-UAV platforms for
the production of orthophotos and digital plottings, which can be
very useful for archaeological documentation purposes for medium
and large-scale maps. The main advantages of these systems, for
archaeological surveys, are the low-cost and the quickness of the
data acquisition at a large scale, even in areas with small extensions. Depending on the data acquisition devices and the ight
height, it is possible to obtain metrically correct products with scale
maps ranging from 1:500 to 1:100, a level which could be suitable
for many archaeological surveys. The availability of the rigorous
spatial and radiometric information provided by the orthophotos
and Solid True Orthophotos allows detailed analysis (3D
measurements and photo-interpretations) to be performed in
a quick and easy way. The photogrammetric process can be performed in a semi-automatic way using the feature extraction and
image matching techniques proposed in this paper. A multi-image
acquisition allows the potential of the MIGC3 and the S2MF to be
709
Chiabrando, F., Piatti, D., Rinaudo, F., 2008. Sperimentazione sullutilizzo di un UAV
per il rilievo elle emergenze archeologiche. In: Proceedings of XII Conferenza
nazionale Asita, LAquila, pp. 719e724.
Colomina, I., Aigner, E., Agea, A., Pereira, M., Vitoria, T., Jarauta, R., Pascual, J.,
Ventura, J., Sastre, J., Brechbhler de Pinho, G., Derani, A., Hasegawa, J., 2007.
The uVISION project for helicopter-UAV photogrammetry and remotesensing. In: Proceedings of the VII International Geomatic Week, Barcelona,
Spain, pp. 16e22.
Eisenbeiss, H., 2009. UAV Photogrammetry. Thesis Diss. ETH No. 18515, Technische
Wissenschaften ETH Zurich, IGP Mitteilung N. 105.
Eisenbeiss, H., Zhang, L., 2006. Comparison of DSMs generated from mini UAV
imagery and terrestrial laser scanner in a cultural heritage applications. In:
ISPRS Archives Vol. XXXVI-Part5. Commission V Symposium, Image Engineering and Vision Metrology, Dresden, Germany, pp. 90e96.
Eisenbeiss, H., Lambers, K., Sauerbier, M., Zhang, L., 2005. Photogrammetric documentation of an archaeological site (Palpa, Peru) using an autonomous model
helicopter. In: ISPRS Archives Vol. XXXIV-5/C34. CIPA, Torino, Italy, pp.
238e243.
Everaerts, J., 2008. The use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVS) for remote sensing
and mapping. In: ISPRS Archives Vol. XXXVII. ISPRS Congress, Beijing, China, pp.
1187e1192.
Forstner, W., 1986. A feature based correspondence algorithm for image matching.
In: Proceedings of, the Symposium from Analytical to Digital. Rovaniemi,
Finland, 150e166.
Fotinopoulos, V., 2004. Balloon photogrammetry for archaeological surveys. In:
ISPRS Archives Vol. XXXV-B5, XX ISPRS Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, pp.
504e507.
Fraser, C.S., 1997. Digital camera self-calibration. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry
and Remote Sensing 52, 149e159.
Gesadis, S., Kambourakis, A., Karras, G.E., Lymperopoulos, E., Madani, M., Mavrelis,
G., Mavromati, D., 1999. Digital orthophotography in archaeology with lowaltitude non-metric images. In: ISPRS Archives Vol. XXXII, Part 5/W11, pp. 8e11.
Hartley, R., Zisserman, A., 2000. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision.
Cambridge University Press.
International Unmanned Aerial System Community, 2008. Unmanned Aircraft
System. The Global Perspective 2008/2009.
Kemper, G., Celikoyan, T.M., Altan, M.O., Toz, G., 2003. Balloon-photogrammetry for
cultural heritage. In: Proceedings of 4th International Symposium Remote
Sensing of Urban Areas, Regensburg, Germany, pp. 397e399.
Kraus, K., 2007. Photogrammetry, Geometry from Images and Laser Scans. Walter de
Gruyter, Berlin New York.
Lingua, A., Marenchino, D., Nex F., 2009a. Automatic Digital Surface model (DSM)
generation procedure from images acquired by Unmanned Aerial Systems
(UASs). Proceedings of the congress GeoCad 09, Alba Iulia (Romania), pp.
198e208.
Lingua, A., Marenchino, D., Nex, F., 2009b. Performance analysis of the SIFT operator
for automatic feature extraction and matching in photogrammetric applications. SENSORS 9 (5), 3745e3766. doi:10.3390/s90503745.
Lowe, D.G., 1999. Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In:
Proceedings of the international conference in Computer Vision, Corfu, Greece,
pp. 1150e1157.
Lowe, D.G., 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision 60 (2), 91e110.
Marenchino, D., 2009. Low-cost UAV for the environmental emergency management. Photogrammetric procedures for rapid mapping activities. Ph.D thesis
Politecnico di Torino.
McGlone, C., Mikhail, E., Bethel, J., 2004. Manual of Photogrammetry, fth ed.
ASPRS.
Mihajlovic, D., Mitrovic, M., Cvijetinovic, Z., Vojinovic, M., 2008. Photogrammetry of
archaeological site Felix Romuliana at Gamzigrad using aerial digital camera
and non-metric digital camera. In: ISPRS Archives Vol. XXXVII, ISPRS Congress,
Beijing, China, pp. 397e399.
Nex, F., Rinaudo, F., 2009. New integration approach of Photogrammetric and LIDAR
techniques for architectural surveys. In: Proceedings of Laserscanning 2009,
Paris.
Patias, P., Saatsoglou-Paliadeli, C., Georgoula, O., Pateraki, M., Stamnas, A., Kyriakou,
N., 2007. Photogrammetric documentation and digital representation of the
macedonian palace in Vergina-Aegeae. In: ISPRS Archives Vol. XXXVI-5/C53,
XXI CIPA Symposium, Athens, Greece.
Patias P., Olga G., Charalampos G., Anastasios G, Tassopoulou M., 2009. Photogrammetric documentation and digital representation of excavations at Keros
island in the Cyclades. In: ISPRS Archives Vol. XXXVIII-3/W8, XXII CIPA
Symposium, Kyoto, Japan.
Remondino, F., Gruen, A., Von Schwerin, J., Eisenbeiss, H., Rizzi, A., Sauerbier, M.,
Richards-Rissetto, H., 2009: Multi-sensors 3D documentation of the Maya site
of Copan. In: ISPRS Archives Vol. XXXVIII-3/W8, XXII CIPA Symposium, Kyoto,
Japan.
Rousseeuw, P.J., Leroy, A.M., 1987. Robust Regression and Outlier Detection. Wiley
Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. Wiley, New York, NY, USA.
Skarlatos, D., Theodoridou, S., Glabenas, D., 2004. Archaeological surveys in Greece
using radio-controlled helicopter. In: Proceedings of the FIG Working Week
2004. International Athenaeum Athens, Athens, Greece, pp. 1e15.
Spatalas, S., Tsioukas, V., Daniil, M., 2006. The use of remote controlled helicopter
for the recording of large scale urban and suburban sites. In: Proceedings of the
scientic conference in Culture of Representation, Xanthi, Greece.
710
Theodoridou, S., Tokmakidis, K., Skarlatos, D., 2000. Use of radio-controlled model
helicopters in archaeology surveying and in building construction industry. In:
ISPRS Archives Vol. XXXIII-B5, XIX ISPRS Congress, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands, pp. 825e829.
Tokmakidis, K., Skarlatos, D., 2000. Mapping Excavations and Archaeological Sites
Using Close Range Photos. In: Proceedings of the ISPRS Commission V
Symposium, WG V/4, Corfu, Greece, pp. 200e204.
Vallet, J., Skaloud, J., 2004. Development and experiences with a fully-digital
handheld mapping system operated from a helicopter. In: ISPRS Archives Vol.
XXXV-B5, XX ISPRS Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 791e796.
Verhoeven, G.J.J., 2009. Providing an archaeological birds-eye view - an
overall picture of ground-based means to execute low-altitude aerial
photography (LAAP) in Archaeology. Archaeological Prospection 16 (4),
233e249.
Wallis, R., 1976. An approach to the space variant restoration and enhancement
of images. In: Proceedings Of: Symposium on Current Mathematical
Problems in Image Science. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey CA, USA,
pp. 329e340.
Wendel, J., Meister, O., Schlaile, C., Trommer, G.F., 2006. An integrated GPS/MEMSIMU navigation system for an autonomous helicopter. Aerospace Science and
Technology 10, 527e533.
Zhang, L., 2005. Automatic Digital Surface Model (DSM) generation from linear
array images. Thesis Diss. ETH No. 16078, Technische Wissenschaften ETH
Zurich, IGP Mitteilung N. 90.
Zischinsky, T., Dorfner, L., Rottensteiner, F., 2000. Application of a new model
helicopter system in architectural photogrammetry, ISPRS Archives Vol. XXXIIIB5/2, XIX ISPRS Congress, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp. 959e965. http://
www.isotc211.org/ (accessed 17.09.10).