Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Why did you write a book on Victoria Woodhull? What made her
unique?
When I began my graduate studies, and was working as a TA for a
womens history class, the professor mentioned Woodhull as the first
woman who ran for president, but also showed a highly-negative
depiction of Woodhull from the 1870s. I am interested in the history of
visual culture, and was intrigued about representations of powerful
women in popular culture. I was also amazed that Id never heard of
Woodhull before.
How did Victorias early life affect her future?
She grew up in poverty and in a rather chaotic household. Her father
had a reputation as an unsavory character, and her mother was a kind
of visionary. It was a close-knit family, and Victoria was in some ways
the leader of her siblings (and to some extent her parents). She carried
on that role throughout her life. I guess you could say that early life
made her unafraid of public scorn, and willing to fight things out in public
in ways that respectable women simply could not attempt.
What are some of the topics she wrote about in Woodhull and Claflins
Weekly?
The paper focused on social freedom (freedom to divorce, to end
relationships, etc), on the rights of women and workers, and a wide
variety of other subjects. Woodhull was the editor, and did not write her
own articles (though she was sometimes interviewed extensively in the
paper). There is some question of whether she could read and write:
certainly many of her speeches were written by her male supporters,
Col. Blood (her husband) and Stephen Pearl Andrews (her mentor),
among others.
What was peoples original reaction to the newspaper?
Thats a very difficult thing to determineone of the hardest questions
historians tackle. Until rather recently, people generally didnt record
their impressions when they read something, so we have to make some
assumptions. There was some scathing commentary in mainstream
women in public office. Its difficult for women, even now, to express a
desire to take on leadership for its own sake; usually they couch it in
terms of helping others. Being ambitious is even now considered
unfeminine. So it can be helpful to be able to point to an ambitious
women in the midst of the Victorian period, when women were taught to
be the Angel of the Hearth, guardians of the private sphere (ie., the
home), rather than to venture into public life. Opening the brokerage
firm, editing a major reform paper, lecturing in public on controversial
subjects, running for presidentall of these activities required courage
as well as conviction, and she possessed both.