Professional Documents
Culture Documents
- POLITICAL LAW
PUBLIC
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
RED NOTES
- POLITICAL LAW
PUBLIC
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
8. State and explain some provisions of the Philippine Constitution, which concern
International Law?
Art. 1 (National Territory); Art. 11 (2) Incorporation, (4) defense of state,
(7) independent foreign policy, (8) freedom from nuclear weapons; Art.
111(6) liberty of abode; Art. IV Citizenship; Art. VI (23) state of war; Art.
VII (21) treaty; Art. VIII (5) cases affecting ambassadors; Art. XII(2)
ownership of lands and exploration of resources; Art. XVIII (4) treaties
(25) foreign military troops.
9. Is the individual personally liable for international crimes?
Yes, an individual may be a subject of international law (terrorism, war
crimes, etc. Bin Laden, Nuremberg judgement and International Tribunal for
Bosnia and Rwanda)
10. In case a national statute is in conflict with a treaty, which should prevail? Is your
answer the same with respect to the constitution in conflict with treaty?
Depends on what court is deciding: Domestic Tribunal constitution
prevails; regulatory statutes further to police power prevails; ordinary
legislative statute and a treaty may repeal each other depending on
which issuance was later. International Tribunal treaty prevails
11. Who has the power to recognize a State or Government? May said recognition of a
state be withdrawn? Executive Head - Political act; Recognition of State is
permanent
12. Is there an obligation of the Government to recognize? No Why? Political Act,
purely discretionary and a matter of foreign policy
13. What is the Tobar or Wilson Doctrine? (Must show stable government and people
support) The doctrine precludes recognition of government established by
revolutionary means until the constitutional reorganization by the free election
of representatives.
14. What is the Estrada Doctrine? (A country dealing with representatives of the
government in actual control of another country for the protection of its
citizens in the territory of the latter state does not necessarily mean the
recognition of the said government)
15. What are the legal consequences of recognition of a state and belligerent
communities?
(1) diplomatic relations
(2) right to sue in courts of recognizing state
(3) immunity from jurisdiction
(4) entitlement to property of state within recognizing state
(5) recognition being retroactive, validates past acts of recognized state or
government (i.e., act of state and sovereign immunity covers past,
present and future acts)
16. What are the conditions for recognition of a belligerent state?
(1) Organized civil government having control and supervision over the
armed struggle
(2) Serious and widespread struggle
(3) Occupation of a substantial portion of the national territory
(4) Willingness on the part of the rebels to observe rules/customs of war
- In the absence of any of above conditions no belligerency but
only a state of insurgency, which is rarely recognized because
this will be intervention in the domestic affairs of another state.
RED NOTES
- POLITICAL LAW
PUBLIC
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
RED NOTES
- POLITICAL LAW
PUBLIC
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
29. What is the procedure for international claims of aliens? (Exhaustion of local
remedies - State as party claimant; diplomatic intervention, arbitration,
international Court of Justice by agreement)
30. Explain the Archipelagic doctrine. (Draw baselines around islands to form one
unit)
Archipelagic states (coastal/mid-ocean)
- group of islands,
interconnecting waters and other features, closely interrelated that they
form an intrinsic geographical, economic, and political entity or which
historically has been regarded as one. Straight baselines are drawn to
connect the outermost points of outermost islands and drying reefs.
Territorial Sea shall be measured from the baselines.
31. What is the extent of jurisdiction over maritime territory ?
UN Convention on the Law of the Seas
Internal waters (i.e. rivers, lakes, canals, bays, gulfs) absolute
jurisdiction
Territorial sea (12 nautical miles from low water mark or
archipelagic baselines) full jurisdiction except innocent
passage. Passage is innocent if it is not prejudicial to the peace,
good order, or security of the coastal state. Innocent passage not
applicable to airplanes.
Contiguous zone (12 nautical miles from limits of the territorial
sea or 24 nautical miles from the low water mark or archipelagic
baselines) - limited jurisdiction (only for enforcement of
Customs, Immigration, Fiscal, and Sanitation laws)
Exclusive Economic Zone (200 nautical miles for low water mark
or archipelagic baselines) only for exploitation of natural
resources
Continental shelf - same as EEZ
High seas no jurisdiction except over universal crimes and
events on board ship
32. What are internal waters of an archipelagic state? (All waters inside the
baselines)
Phil. Sovereignty extends to these archipelagic waters subject to the
right of Innocent passage and archipelagic sea lane and air route
passage. Innocent passage through archipelagic waters may be
suspended by the state but the same must first be published.
33. What is the Exclusive Economic Zone. (200 nautical mile to be devoted for
economic purposes of the State and is free for international navigation. Not
part of the territory of coastal state, but has jurisdictional rights over artificial
islands, environmental protection and maritime scientific research facilities
thereat.)
Sovereign rights for exploitation -living and non-living resources
Give other states access to surplus of living resources
RED NOTES
- POLITICAL LAW
PUBLIC
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
34. What is the doctrine of hot pursuit? (State authorities can pursue an offender up
to high seas until he enters the territorial sea of another State)
Pursuit must commence from Internal Waters, Territorial sea, or
Contiguous Zone, of pursuing state
Uninterrupted pursuit
Conducted by warship, military aircraft, or government ships authorized
for the purpose.
35. What is meant by the deep sea as part of the common heritage of mankind?
(Resources of the deep seabed owned by all States. All rights to the resources
of the area are vested in mankind as a whole. The Enterprise (organ of the
Deep Sea Bed Authority) shall explore and exploit the area.)
36. Explain the legal basis of the claim of the Philippines over the Kalayaan Group. (PD
1596 - History, indispensable need, occupation, control and exercise of
jurisdiction)
37. As a mode of acquiring territory, discovery merely gives an inchoate title that
must be perfected by effective occupation and exercise of jurisdiction.
38. What is the aerial domain of the State? (Up to a certain height but depends on
the capacity to control by the State. 3 theories are the Satellite Test,
Theoretical Limits of Air Flights, Functional Approach)
39. What do you mean by Jurisdiction of State?
Power, authority, sovereignty or legal control exercised by a state over
land, persons, property, transactions, and events in its territory.
40. Has the State jurisdiction over its nationals residing abroad? (Generally no except
in nationality law theory (i.e. Art. 15, Civil Code; Art. 2, R. P. C.; Taxation of
citizens even abroad)
41. Criminal jurisdiction under the Visiting Forces Agreement Exclusive jurisdiction over US personnel
-Offenses punishable under Phil laws but not under US laws
Philippines
-Offenses punishable under US laws but not under Phil laws - US
Concurrent jurisdiction
-Phil authorities shall have primary right to exercise jurisdiction over all
offenses committed by US personnel except:
a) violations of US military laws;
b) Offenses punishable under US laws but not under Phil laws;
c) Offenses solely against the property or security of the US or
against the property or person of US personnel;
d) Offenses arising out of any act or omission done in
performance of official duty.
*in abcd above the US Military authorities have primary jurisdiction.
The authorities of either government may request the authorities of the
other government to waive the primary right to exercise jurisdiction in a
particular case.
Upon request by the US, Phil authorities may waive primary jurisdiction
over offenses committed by US personnel except cases of particular
importance to the Philippines such as violations of the Heinous Crimes
Act, Anti-Drugs Law, Anti-Child Abuse Law.
42. The constitutionality of the VFA was upheld in Bayan vs. Zamora, as it
complied with the 3 requirements of Sec 25, Article XVIII of the Constitution-
RED NOTES
- POLITICAL LAW
PUBLIC
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
(a) must be a treaty; (b) concurred in by the senate and, when required by
congress, ratified in a national referendum; (c) recognized as a treaty by the
other contracting state. The third requirement was met notwithstanding that
there was no concurrence by the US senate as in a case of a treaty. For as long
as the US accepts or acknowledges the VFA as a treaty, and binds itself further
to comply with its obligations under the treaty, there is marked compliance
with the mandate of the constitution.
43. Explain the extent of Jurisdiction of a state over other states and foreign embassies
and consulates.
Doctrine of sovereign immunity- equality and independence, state is
immune from the exercise of jurisdiction by another.
- Syquia v. Lopez; US v. Ruiz; Sanders v. Veridiano; Jusmag v.
NLRC ( security assistant support personnel- Illustrator ll)
sovereign functions, immunity recognized;
- U.S. v. Guinto (barber shop); US v. Rodrigo (cook) - proprietary
functions, immunity waived.
Act of state doctrine - Underhill v. Hernandez - The courts of one
country will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of
another country done within the latters territory.
- Republic v. Marcos - Acts of torture, execution, and disappearance were
clearly acts outside of presidents authority not protected by the act of
state doctrine.
Diplomatic Immunity- Customary international law granting immunity in
favor of diplomatic persons to uphold their dignity and to allow the free
and unhampered exercise of their functions (Vienna Diplomatic
Convention).
- Holy See v. Rosario - sale of parcel of land not commercial in
nature.
Clothed with governmental character immunity
recognized.
- A Foreign state may acquire property in receiving state for
diplomatic mission.
- Immunity of diplomatic envoy from civil jurisdiction of receiving
state over any real action relating to immovable property which
the envoy holds in behalf of sending state for purposes of the
mission. With more reason that the sovereign itself should be
entitled to immunity.
Immunity of UN specialized agencies/International Organizations/and
officers. shall
enjoy such privileges and immunities as are
necessary for the independent exercise of their functions (i.e. legal
processes (search, requisition, confiscation, expropriation or any other
form of interference); taxation on salaries; national service obligations;
immigration restrictions; generally same rights as diplomats of
comparable rank;
- In International Catholic Migration v. Calleja; Lasco v. UN
Revolving Fund; SEAFDEC v. NLRC; DFA v. NLRC; Callado v.
IRRI, observance of the immunity in favor of these international
organizations was necessary:
-To secure legal and practical independence in fulfilling
duties;
and
-To shield affairs from political pressure or control by the
host country and to ensure the unhampered performance of
functions;
RED NOTES
- POLITICAL LAW
PUBLIC
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
44. What is the jurisdiction of a State over foreign vessels within its territory? (English
and French Rule) it has jurisdiction if commission of the offense affects the
peace and order, interest, security of the coastal state. No jurisdiction if it
affects only the internal affairs of the ship.
45. What is meant by the Territoriality Principle? (Can only prosecute crimes within
the State); Nationality Theory? (Can prosecute citizens even outside territory);
Protective Principle Theory? (Can prosecute crimes committed outside territory
for protection of vital interests and national security); Universality Principle?
(Any state has jurisdiction over universal crimes committed anywhere)
46. How is nationality acquired? (Art. IV, Constitution, birth, naturalization, marriage,
etc.)
47. May a state deprive its nationals of citizenship? (No, until another one is acquired
except in cases of denaturalization)
48. Explain the rules on dual or multiple nationality. Constitution abhors dual
allegiance but not dual nationality.
Local GC- dual citizenship means dual allegiance.
- Mercado vs. Manzano
49. In Co vs. HRET, the doctrine of implied election was applied for the purpose of
classifying Mr. Ong as a natural born Filipino. As a Filipino by derivative
naturalization, it would have been absurd to require Mr. Ong to make the
formal election prescribed by law. Thus, by his affirmative acts manifesting his
resolve to be considered a Filipino, he was considered a natural born citizen
pursuant to Section 2, Article IV of the Constitution). But in In re: Vicente
Ching, it was held that the person required to elect must make a formal
election by filing a sworn declaration and an oath of allegiance before the Civil
Registrar, as he cannot be favored by the rule of implied election. It may be
concluded then that the doctrine of implied election will apply ONLY if the
elector has already become a Filipino at the time of reaching the age of
majority by the other modes of acquiring citizenship and the only issue is
whether or not he can be considered a natural born citizen. If the issue is
whether or not he is a Filipino by election, the doctrine of implied election will
not apply.
50. Explain the rules governing Statelessness. (Same rights as aliens; Convention on
Statelessness)
51. Who are the citizens of the State?
Convention of 1930)
RED NOTES
- POLITICAL LAW
PUBLIC
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
52. How is the citizenship of women married to aliens determined? (Art. IV, Sec. 4.
Moya Lim Yao Case an alien woman married to a Filipino shall ipso facto
acquire Philippine citizenship provided she has none of the disqualifications. It
is opined that she can prove she has none of the disqualifications in an
administrative proceeding for cancellation of her alien certificate of
registration)
53. What do you mean by diplomatic intercourse? Right to legation? (To establish
diplomatic mission; send and receive diplomatic representatives)
54. Who has the power to conduct foreign relations?
government)
(Executive branch of
55. What are the functions of Ambassadors? (Represent heads of the State; to
promote relations, protect own national and make reports)
56. What is the extent of diplomatic privileges or immunities?
* Privileges and Immunities
1.) Personal Inviolability - not liable to any form of arrest or detention.
R.A. 75 penalizes a person who assaults, strikes, wounds, offers
violence to the person of an ambassador (in addition to RPC penalties and
subject to the rules of reciprocity)
- except self-defense
- reasonable physical restraint
2.) Inviolability of premises and archives
- premises occupied by the mission
- private residence of diplomatic agent
RED NOTES
- POLITICAL LAW
PUBLIC
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
RED NOTES
- POLITICAL LAW
PUBLIC
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
extraditable too). Under the attentat clause, the killing of a head of state shall
be classified as a political offense.
63. Extradition treaty may be applied retroactively; it is not a criminal legislation
subject to the ex-post facto rule.
64. State the procedure for extradition. (Judicial and diplomatic process of request
and surrender)
PD 1069
(1) Request through diplomatic representative with:
(a) decision of conviction
(b) criminal charge and warrant of arrest
(c) recital of facts
(d) text of applicable law designating the offense
(e) pertinent papers
(2) DFA forwards request to DOJ
(3) DOJ files petition for extradition with RTC
(4) RTC issues summons or warrant of arrest to compel the appearance of
the individual
(5) hearing (provide counsel de officio if necessary)
(6) appeal to CA within ten days whose decision shall be final and
executory
(7) Decision forwarded to DFA through the DOJ
(8) Individual placed at the disposal of the authorities of requesting state
costs and expenses to be shouldered by requesting state.
* A state may not compel another state to extradite a criminal without going
through the legal processes provided in the laws of the former.
due process requirement complied at the RTC level upon filing of petition
for extradition. No need to notify the person subject of the extradition
process when the application is still with the DFA or DOJ
Extradition is not a criminal proceeding which will call into operation all the
rights of an accused provided in the bill of rights.
For the provisional arrest of an accused to continue, the formal request for
extradition is not required to be filed in court- it only needs to be received
by the requested state in accordance with PD 1069.
65. Define non-refoulment. (Refugee should not be returned to the State that
persecutes him; Mutual assistance in criminal matters - US authorities)
No contracting state shall expel or return a refugee to the territories
where his life or freedom would be threatened
66. What is a treaty? Who has the power to enter into a treaty? (Art. VII, Sec. 21. formal agreements where rights and obligations arise; executive branch)
A treaty is(1) an international agreement concluded between states
(2) in written form and governed by international law
(3) whether in single or in two or more related instruments
(4) whatever its particular designation
- Although the Vienna Convention and the Law of Treaties requires
agreements to be in writing, the following are the effects of an
unwritten treaty:
(a) has legal force
(b) convention rules on matters governed by international
law independently of convention shall apply
10
RED NOTES
- POLITICAL LAW
PUBLIC
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
11
RED NOTES
- POLITICAL LAW
PUBLIC
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
exercise of the veto vote twice (in the classification and on the merits) the
measure will not be passed.
76. What is the Enforcement Action? (Power of Security Council to resist danger to
international peace and security) Arts. 45-48 of Charter.
77. What is the jurisdiction of the UN on member States? (No jurisdiction on domestic
affairs)
Even the UN is precluded from intervening in matters essentially within
the domestic jurisdiction of a state, unless necessary to remove and
prevent threats to the peace, breaches or acts of aggression.
78. May a neutralized State be a member of the UN? (Yes) A neutralized state may
not be able to comply with the obligations under the UN Charter particularly an
enforcement action. However, Switzerland was admitted as a member of the
UN.
79. Are the resolutions and declarations of the UN General Assembly sources of
International Law? (No, unless recognized for a long period by majority)
UNGA is not a legislative body it can only recommend.
80. What are the peaceful means of settling international disputes? (Art. 33 UN Charter
- negotiation, mediation, arbitration, judicial method, inquiry, conciliation)
81. Distinguish between an arbitration body and the International Court of Justice. (ICJ
is a permanent body, arbitration is only for one case but both are judicial and
binding)
82. What is the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice and how is it conferred?
Jurisdiction: decide issues referred to it (consensual)
(a) interpretation of treaty
(b) question of international law
(c) existence of fact constituting a breach of international
obligation
(d) nature or extent of the reparation to be made for the
breach of an international obligation
83. Who enforces decisions of the International Court of Justice? (State parties, good
faith of parties; Security Council)
84. Is the principle of stare decisis observed in the ICJ? (No, Art. 59, Statute)
85. May the International Court of Justice render advisory opinions?
request of any organ or agency)
(Yes, upon
86. What are the forcible means resorted to by the State short of war? (Retorsion,
Reprisal, Freezing of assets; Boycott; Embargo; Preventive Self-defense)
87. Distinguish between retorsion and reprisal?
Reprisal is illegal; Retorsion by legal means)
12
RED NOTES
- POLITICAL LAW
PUBLIC
INTERNATIONAL
LAW
13