Professional Documents
Culture Documents
13 O C T 16 PM 3:52
1
K IN G C O U N TY
2
S U P E R IO R C O U R T C LE R K
E -F ILE D
C A S E N U M B E R : 1 3 -3 -0 8 3 8 3 -7 SI
4
5
6
HONORABLE SUSAN AMINI
a
10
TWILA MARKHAM
Petitioner
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Respondent
19
20
CLAIMS
21
22
23
24
the events of their 33 year Alaskan marriage to the events of one unfortunate
25
26
evening of April 24, 2013. Whereas his motion is amply supported by Twilas
27
clear April 15, 2013 sworn admissions to a Kodiak domicile (which is clearly
28
29
i REPLY OF RESPONDENT
1
|
t.
I
|
!
recorded statement to police on that unfortunate night when she called them to the
2
house the parties maintain at 810 NE 58th Seattle for the times when they stay
airlines through ticket from Tucson to Kodiak which started on April 9, 2013.123*
Twila's counsel seeks to misdirect the focus of this court by attaching an
1 EX A Alaska Airlines receipt for Jerry (Twila possesses records showing she
traveled on an identical itinerary). Jerry7had previously been in Kodiak until
9
December 21,2012, then Seattle for 10 days and on to Tucson on December 31,
10
2013. He was joined there by Twila on January 6.2013. There they stayed in a
house they own in Green Valley (20 miles south of Tucson). Jerry stayed there
11
continuously December 31,2012 - April 9,2013. Twila returned to Seattle on
12 about January 1$ to be with the parties sick dog planning to return with him in a
week, however concerns about his recovery delayed that until about February714,
13
2013 when his vet felt it safe for him to travel. The parties then left Tucson
14
together with their dog on April 9,2013 stopping in Seattle on their through tickets
back to Kodiak.
15
2 See EX C the omitted first pages of said report which shows investigating
16
officers corroborated Jerrys claims that Twila was highly intoxicated (and that he
17 was sober and calm). Furthermore Twila and her sons affidavits conspicuously
ornit (but the police car video tapes of this incident reflect) he voluntarily reported
18
to police that his actions (which did not amount to an assault) were motivated by
1.9
his extreme concern for Twila w?hose levels of intoxication (with no threat of
2C violence on his part whatsoever) just four days before prompted his 911 call for
her care and resulted in an EMT response leading to her ambulance transport to
21
Virginia Mason Hospital. EX D. This relapse into intoxication Jerry asserts her
22 psychological and medical records will show* have been recent and motivated by a
combination of the serious illness of the parties dog, the friction that exists
23
between Jerry and her relatively recently divorced and more recently unemployed
son, and the lingering last illness of a close friend in Tucson who died on May 31,
24
2013. In deference to his concerns for Tw7ilas privacy no further explanation will
25
be offered until the hearing but in view of her recent allegations unless she is much
more forthcoming at the scheduled hearing (which she may wish to have in
26
camera) Jerry will be forced to seek both the EMT and medical records
27
surrounding this April 19, 2013 incident (EX D) as well as her psychotherapy
28
records and medical records for the proceeding years to refute her recent charges
8
Law O ffices
REPLY OF RESPONDENT
of
A ntho ny M. U r ie , PLLC
1 unfortunate evening which shows the parties had very different views of the
2
events. Nevertheless published the Seattle Municipal police policy (EX B) that
dictates that a response to a 911 call alleging domestic violence will result in an
arrest (despite the lack of any physical evidence of serious abuse here) lead to
Jerry's arrest and a misdemeanor DV charge. Twilas counsel then improperly
8
9
10
11
Then predicated on nothing more than this one unproven charge and her
12
(financially motivate) declaration and that of her (similarly motivated) 42 year old
13
son (by an earlier marriage) she claims Jerry s allegedly browbeat and berated to
14
executed her April 15, 2013 affidavit fraudulently against her will? This claim is
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
simply incredulous as it was drafted and independently notarized well before this
one allegation of domestic violence even arose.
Jerry will respond by establishing that Twila has a Bachelors degree in
psychology and credits toward her masters and that she has in the past spent time
in his office assisting him in litigation both with and against other attorney's many
of whom (including a Senior US District Judge) are her close friends. Moreover
that from his hard labors in his law practice he has amply provided the funds to
22
enabling her to purchase unencumbered stocks and bonds which she holds in her
23
24
25
26 of domestic abuse prior to this one April 24,2013 incident (devoid of evidence of
serious harm). Specifically in their 33 year long marriage there has not been one a
27
police call for a domestic disturbance nor had Twilas ever spoken to a physician
28
or therapist claiming Jerrys domestic physical violence.___________________________
29
REPLY OF RESPONDENT
3.
Moreover during the very times she alleges she was being coerced by him,
actively managing and trading those stocks and bonds online (without the
"7
8
9
10
11
12
other financial affairs. Additionally Jerry used his own separate funds to acquire to
three separate fully paid for homes in Anchorage, Seattle and near Tucson
respectively which he put in joint tenancy with her (in addition to making vast
improvements to another fully paid for Seattle home titled in her sole name).
The labors of his law practice also provided the funds to put her son (by a
prior marriage) through seven years of college (where he performed poorly barely
13
managing a BS degree in English with a 2.0 GPA after those 7 years) and that
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
thereafter he has since frequently had long period of unemployed (most recently
for about three years starting in 2010 and previously for almost five starting in
2001). And finally Jerry will prove that he has fully supported Twila throughout
their 33 years marriage and since their separation (as she was not employed outside
of the home) and her son as she raised him as well as putting him through college
without benefit of any financial aide. And later (as her declarations allege) he
helped her son now age 42 buy his home which is effectively virtually next door
22
28
3Which Jerry will establish he wras induced to enter by the written representations
of Twilas attorney that by doing so the parties could reunite and he could save
their marriage.EXE.
4 Jerry had possession of the statements from one of these accounts (showing a
balance of almost $1.1 Million) because she receives it (and all of her mail) at the
parties 211 Mill Bay residence in Kodiak. He does not have a copy of her second
(Ameritrade) account but has recently seen it in connection with preparing the
parties 2013 tax returns and will testify it exceeds $400K. Said accounts should be
viewed in camera and copies filed under seal.___________________________________
25
REPLY OF RESPONDENT
23
24
25
26
27
4.
1 to the house they maintain in Seattle. Unfortunately though Jerry1 has raised
2 Twilas son Adam and loved him as his own since he was seven years old taking
3
him fishing and hunting and trying to expose him to the wonders of Alaska, Adam
never really hook to Alaska or his step-father and his marginal performance in
school and in the work force to date coupled with his proximity to Twila and Jerry
when they are in Seattle has occasioned a good deal of friction between he and
Jerry over the last several years during which Adam both underwent a divorce of
8
9
10
11
12
13
his own and more recently lost his job. And this friction has in turn occasioned a
great deal of consternation between Twila and Jerry'.
As her declaration at pg. 2 f 3 reflects Twila dearly loves her son and
enjoys having him nearby as she perceives he
likewise his (out of work) availability, proximity, 42 year old age, size and strength
strongly mitigates against any claim that she was physically coerced into signing
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
her April 15, 2013 affidavit (or describing her Alaskan domicile in her statements
to and while in the protection of the police on the night of April 24,2013). On the
contrary as she further admits in her declaration at pg. 3 f 6 Jerry1insisted we be
domiciled on paper in Alaska! Selfish (or not when one understands the both
financial and wilderness benefits of an Alaskan domicile) this admission indicates
her awareness that in acceding to Jerrys (reasonable) wish she made a voluntary7
choice to an Alaskan domicile. See legal discussion infra. In point of fact, both
22
through her involvement in his law7 office and through Jerry, Twila w7as clearly
23
24
when over twenty years before she responded to another suit in which she and
25
Jerry7 raised their Alaskan domicile to defeat Washington jurisdiction over a suit
26
against them. EX F.
27
Respondent will close this description of the facts with a brief word
28
29
REPL Y OF RESPONDENT
5.
greater number of days he has been present in Washington and that his doctors are
sessions of DV treatment here in her efforts to have this court ignore both o f their
substantial badges of domicile (of choice) and their mutual strong physical
connection with Alaska where Jem7 was bom, raised, returned immediately after
law school to practice Maritime personal injury7 law for now over 40 yearn and
9
10
REPLY OF RESPONDENT
6.
from where (despite Twilas protests that he works too hard and will make himself
2
3
ill) he continues to do so for the simple reason that he can not immediately give up
on his duty to his deserving (seriously injured) clients to finish the cases he has
4 begun for them and to the extent that he is drawn to entertain thoughts of
5
continuing to do so. his love of a profession in which he excels and is not easy to
quit!
II
12
13
14
Alaska subsistence fishing license available only to Alaskan rural (i.e. Kodiak
and similar small city) residents which he has regularly held since he w?as in high
school and that when they married he listed Twila (and when he lived with them
her son) as a resident beneficiaiy on that license thereby allowing him to gill net
any species of salmon and fish by any means for Alaskan Tanner crab and herring
15
' And these are only the badges that Jerry had on his possession at the time of his
17
arrest and what he had access in the meager records that he maintained in the
home the parties maintained in Friday Harbor (as the one trip he has been able to
make to Kodiak was made during the period that he was led to believe Twila
IS sought to reconcile hence he sought no need to obtain more). See EX E. One of the
20 biggest impediments to his prosecution of this motion (and this case in general) is
that as a result of the DV charge and resulting NO CONTACT ORDER Jem'
21
has been denied access to a substantial volume of the documents (including both
closed and open client files) that w7ould support this claim with him in the house
22
the parties maintain in Seattle wrhen he was arrested. Even if this court is
23
convinced by the documentation so far produced that Twila is an Alaskan
domiciliary, Jerry requests this court enter an order in the furtherance of its
24
determination allowing Jerry to lav the fullest record possible in support of his
2D
claim to subject matter jurisdiction at the conclusion of this hearing by directing
26 Twila to permit him accompanied by his attorney to enter the home the parties
maintain at 810 NE 58th and inspect and copy any and all documents there as they
21
are at the very least jointly his (and may well be the property of his clients) in
28
recognition of Twilas potential appeal of this issue.
j V
29
REPLY OF RESPONDENT
7.
(all unlimited in number) as he deems necessary for Jerry and Twilas subsistence
2 needs. He has been further unable to obtain proof that both he and Twila are
3
Halibut permit that allow them to take an similar unlimited number of Halibut and
other ground fish by way of a multi-hook subsistence ground line (or skate)* Or
8
9
10
11
that now that they have turned 65 they need not even personally catch those fish
but may designate others to catch them for them. Or that Twila has been the
recipient of those subsistence caught fish as recently as this summer!
But what paper he has is damning. First (in no particular order of
importance) he has responded to jury service in Kodiak (as has Twila) EX G. He
holds an Alaskan drivers license. EX H (as does Twila). He obtained resident tags
12
to hunted deer in Alaska in 2012 (as has Twila in the recent past). EX L He is
13
registered to vote there (as is Twila) and did vote absentee in the last Kodiak
14
17
18
1. 5
20
in Jerry domicile of Kodiak and as a result duly subject to the Kodiak Island
21
Borough personal property tax.. Jerry duly paid that tax until it was repealed in
22
2006. EX M. And shortly before Twilas Affidavit of April 15, 2013 declaring her
23
24
home in downtown Kodiak (where they raised their family) we see Jerry on March
25
2, 2013 similarly signing an affidavit (while he and Twila were together in Arizona
2o
and she was well aware he was doing so) claiming an over the age of 65 Alaskan
27
residence (while fully disclosing to Alaska DMV that their small pickup truck was
28
in Arizona which nevertheless under Alaska law entitled them to registered this
29
REPLY OF RESPONDENT
8.
truck titled in their joint names) tree of Alaskas significant fee, Twila shortly
thereafter accepted the benefit of that act by frequently driving that truck in
Arizona after receiving their free 2013 registration tabs well aware of how it was
4
obtained. See EX N. And certainly not least in Jerry paper documentation has
6
7
3
9
IQ
11
12
card (as does Twila), his pilots license show his residence to be Kodiak, he
13
receives his Medical insurance (as a state of Alaska PERS retiree) from Alaska
14
Care (as does Twila), is a member of the Alaska Airlines 49er Club allowing
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Alaska residents discount on flights which he has obtained (as is Twila and as she
likewise has), is a member of the Kodiak Post of the American Legion (as is
Twila), holds a Kodiak hunting license (as has Twila), participates in the Alaska
Organ Donor registry (as does Twila), purchased at 2013 Alaska King Salmon tag,
is registered with Wal-Mart Kodiak as having tax exempt senior status and of
course is an active member of the Alaska Bar Association (and was invited to
22
speak at the Alaska Admiralty Bar Association 2012 CLE on injured Seamans
23
24
28
8Which is not to suggest he remotely agrees with the derogatory assertions her
counsel has clearly drafted into Twilas declaration that she would (somehow):be
at a substantial disadvantage if wre had to litigate this divorce in Alaska. Jerry was
a prominent attorney in the town where we lived and was a former Assistant
Attorney General for the State of Alaska. This remark is a slap in the face of the
judiciary everywhere. It assumes (without proof) that Alaskan attorneys receive________
29
REPLY OF RESPONDENT
25
26
27
9.
I
is
2
3
makes clear a factual determination to the central Issue of this courts subject
6 authority. She does this because she has no credible defense on the law under
7
3
these fact. And her improper efforts go far beyond that by attempting to offer
inadmissihle evidence irrelevant to their adjudication.
admissible relevant evidence further in the course of discussing the applicable law
10
11
12
13
14
dismissed for not specifying with particularity the evidence on which he seeks to
15
16
rely? However the balance of that rule (which she quotes) makes clear that it refers
17
judicial favoritism and that one who briefly worked in its State Attorney Generals
Office for the first four years or his career (?) would receive more. When the
19
reality is that while attorneys and non-attorneys are in theory entitled to receive
equal justice under the law the fact is that every'jurist will review every'
20
attorneys actions more closely to see that he took no unfair advantage of his
21
spouse even though his wife (as Twila) may have worked in his law office and
know a great deal about the practice law? But the facts here will clearly show that
22
Twila voluntarily long chose the benefits of living with Jerry in Alaska and as a
23 result chose an Alaskan domicile but now seeks to enforce her claims against
property' in Alaska in Jerrys sole name that as recently as her April 15,2013
24
affidavit, she unequivocally asserted (prior to and ind ependent of these divorce
25
proceedings) she had no legal interest in? And in that connection she now clearly
wishes to subject Jerry and that property' to the laws of Washington before a jurist
26
who is likely to be unfamiliar with the laws of Alaska law where it is located and
27
which has the most interest in it and the parties relationship. See Rest. Conflicts 2nd
28 I
18
REPLY OF RESPONDENT
10.
only to documents (police tapes arent documents and in any event are very brief).
2 Moreover any reading of that rule must be in connection with the paramount
3
followed regarding the burden of going forward when addressing this central issue
6
7
3
9
10
at the outset of a divorce action in which it is raised. This procedure is clearly set
out in the very modem case of In re Marriage of Robinson at pg. 168 supra
principally relied on in Jerrys motion which Twila conspicuously ignores holding:
Once acquired, domicile is presumed to continue until
changed."9 The burden o f proving a change in domicile rests upon
the one who asserts it, and the change in domicile must he shown
by substantial evidence.
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
23
29
REPLY OF RESPONDENT
It.
3
4
5
8
9
.10 Alaskan domicile found in her April 15, 2013 affidavit, the burden then shifts to
Twila to counter that evidence (and if she offers same then an opportunity must in
11
12
13
14
here). Then this court must decide whether Twila carried her ultimate burden of
15
persuasion on this issue. This court can clearly see based on the verified
16
documents on file that there exists (at least) a dispute of fact as to the true nature of
1?
at least Twilas domicile as set forth in the objective evidence in her April 15,
18
2013 affidavit to a domicile in the family home at 211 Mill Bay Rd in Kodiak
IS
(corroborate by her statements to the police) and now her admissions to (still)
20
having an Alaskan drivers license and voter registration and claims to substantial
21
22
23
involves an adjudication of her intent which her own pleading at pg. 5 H. 15-16
24
admit Strohmaier at 16 holds the parties may provide testimony and evidence
25
26
27
and documents but by adjudicating the facts and credibility of the parties.
Accordingly this
28
59
REPLY OP RESPONDENT
12.
Twila seeks to carry her burden by her self serving October 4, 2013
declaration (given in her efforts to escape her earlier admission) pg. 3
6 while at
the same time admitting that her sworn declaration of her domicile*residence and
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Bay Rd. Kodiak, Alaska in her earlier April 15, 2013 affidavit to her husbands
motion was prepared and filed in attempt to obtain a senior property tax exemption
on that residence. 10 Moreover that affidavit further declares this property was
13
14
28
10 Which was hardly fraudulent as her attorney drafts her declaration to recklessly
claim. Jerrys claim to that entitlement was based on his claim that the 211 Mill
Bay Road home was his an Alaskan primary residence and permanent place of
abode or domicile. AS 29.45.030(e) entitles real property so owned and
occupied by a resident who is 65 years of age or older to an automatic $150,000
property tax exemption (regardless of income) and speaks in terms synonymous
with domicile See Blacks Law dictionary defining residence, domicile, dwelling
and permanent place of abode. 3 AAC 135.085 and 3 AAC 135.120 (4) also
addressing this entitlement also defines permanent place of abode as used in AS
29.45.030(e) as a dwelling (i.e. domicile) this administrative interpretation too
is entitled to great weight. The Kodiak Island Borough instead denied Jerrys
claim based on its claim to have adopted an optional requirement found in. AS
29.45.030(f) that a claimant also meet the qualifications for the Alaska Permanent
fund or specifically a 185 day durational residence (or more accurately
presence in Alaska) test or justify his failure for absences pursuant to the
requirements of a complex set of regulation. Jerry never contended he met the 185
day durational presence test and both Jerry and Twila have found the effort
necessary' to justify their absences not worth the relatively small reward (under
$1000). This (suspect) test (wThich is vastly different from a determination of
domicile) permits a State to allocate its State resources and benefits under
circumstances that do not restrict its citizens US Constitutional right to travel.
29
REPLY OF RESPONDENT
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
13.
owned solely by Respondent acquired before their marriage and that she had no
was clearly not self-serving? Equally clearly it was also against her interests with
affidavit11 (before the alleged grounds for this divorce even occurred) is then one
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
See Zobel v. Williams. 457 U.S. 55, 102 S.Ct. 2309, 72 L.Ed.2d 672 (1982). Jerry
responded by claiming the Kodiak Island Borough had not validly adopt the
requirements of AS 29.45,030(1). The Borough disagreed and applied that 185 day
test and denied Jerry the exemption. Jerry has appealed that denial to the Alaska
Superior Court. Markham v. Kodiak island Borough 3AN-13-07658 where the
case awaits a ruling on some procedural motions prior to briefing. As noted in In re
Marriage of Robinson supra, the Superior Courts found that a wifes similar claim
at pg, 166 that her signature had been forced or coerced did not satisfy
Washingtons nine elements of fraud was pg. 167. As described in Angelo v.
Angelo. 142 Wn.App. 622, 6431106 175 P.3d 1096 (Wash.App. Div. 2 2008)
those nine elements of fraud are (1) representation of an existing fact, (2)
materiality of the fact, (3) falsity of the fact (4) the speaker's knowledge of the
falsity of the fact, (5) the speaker's intent that the fact should be acted on by the
person to whom the fact was represented, (6) ignorance of the facts falsity on the
part of the person to whom it is represented, (7) reliance on the truth of the factual
representation, (8) the right of the person to rely on the factual representation, and
(9) the person's consequent damage from the false factual representation, Twila
fails to satisfy al least 4-9.
21
28
11 Which Jerry will establish she freely did (totally outside of his presence or
influence before Richard Lee Rehm a public notary7(unknown to him) located in
the UPS Office atl037 65& St. in Seattle! His Notary book also reflects she signed
it as well presenting her Alaska drivers license for ID and listing her address as
211 Mill Bay Rd. Kodiak. EX Q Moreover later when on April 24, 2013 Jerry1wras
arrested and barred by court order from contacting Twila or being at her habitation
at 810 NE 58th (but before she filed this divorce action), despite her current claims
to signing against my will (see discussion infra) she then nevertheless assisted
her (big hurley) 42 year old son Adam Logghe in locating and delivering the
original of that affidavit to 66 year old Jerry who suffers from a serious heart_____
29
REPLY OF RESPONDENT
22
23
24
25
26
21
Law O ffices
14.
of
A nthony M. U r ie , PLLC
of the most credible of objective events to which Strohmaier supra speaks! Other
objective events are further found in her admissions in her recently filed
despite the intervention of over 5 months since the filing of her May 9, 2013
Petition for divorce her recent declaration further concedes she has yet to even
which
6 began to change. Rather she merely states: I do intend to change these? However
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
this, and her further declaration: I do not intend to reside in Alaska in the future
fail to pass the Strohmaier/Lassen test that:
,r[T]he intention to make a home must be an intention to make a
home at the moment, not to make a home in the future ."
The same may be said of Twilas claim that Jerry now resides in Friday
Harbor. The evidence in that regard was that Jerry commissioned the building of a
home on property he owned there in his sole name with the intent on retiring there
14
at some unspecified time in the future. But that time has simply not yet come.
15
Meanwhile he has maintained that home primarily as a place where he and his wife
16
17
18
19
20
to extend their otherwise brief Alaskan summer. The same may be said of their
Arizona house which allows them to escape both the depth of the Alaskan winter
and the Seattles cold rain. These parties present the (formerly) unusual situation
described in the Restatement of Torts 2nd 20 of having not merely two but*123
21
28
condition under circumstances when he was clearly could have had no physical or
psychological compulsion over her or her son whatsoever. See EX R.
12Also conspiously omitting in 2003 she practiced, tested for and received and
since renewed her Alaska permit to carry a concealed handgun requiring she be a
resident AS 18.65.705.
13And that she has regularly cast her vote for President and Alaskas Senator and
Representative in all National elections (including the last) and numerous Kodiak
Borough and City Elections in Kodiak for the entire period of the parties marriage!
Fiske v. Fiske. 48 Wn.2d 69, 290 P.2d 725 (Wash. 1955) holds voting is a major
consideration._____________________________________________________________
29
REPLY OF RESPONDENT
22
23
24
25
26
27
Law O ffices
15.
of
A nthony M. Ur ie , PLLC
multiple houses (Kodiak, Anchorage, Friday Harbor, Seattle and Arizona). As that
authority describes the task for this court is deciding which of their many
residences is their domicile which the law expressly permits they may chose
Jerry has already generally addressed in passing at fh. 6 supra the Twila"s
counsel"s erroneous claim that he (now) lacks of medical treatment in Alaska14 and
that all of his recent medical treatment has been in Washington supports her claim
that he too is a Washington resident but nothing could be further from the truth.
Similar law pertains to his recent presence in Washington to attend court hearing
1.0
on his domestic violence charge and more recently to meet the requirement he
11
12
13
Seattle for several court hearing only being allowed by the court in May to be
Alaska) but he was required to return in August. Thereafter to avoid the stress on
16
his wife of a trial (and with the promise of reconciliation if her underwent anger
17
18
19
20
him to report to her every 30 days (and be out of state no more than 45).
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
j
29
14 Jerrys long treating doctor (Halter) retired in 2007 and Kodiak has neither a
cardiology unit, an orthopedic surgeon or virtually any other specialists to treat his
or Twilas serious medical conditions. As a result its not uncommon for virtually
all rural Alaskans to travel to Seattle which is know to be far more competent and
virtually no less inconvenient than the relatively smaller city of Anchorage to
receive their specialized care. And this is the major reason that the parties maintain
a (second) home in Seattle.
REPLY OF RESPONDENT
16.
Shoreline, WA 98133-4536
(206) 542-4066
of which is evidence of domicile. Hence clearly Twila can not support her
claims by this.
Petitioners fall back defense is to assert that even if she was not a
domiciliary of this state (and her statement in her Petition for dissolution to the
contrary was false) even if this court had no jurisdiction at that time it can
7
8
9
10
11
to point out at 169-170. 248 P2d 532. 535 If 20 Mr. Robinson made no such
12
argument that he had an intention make Washington his home! For this court to
13
then blindly apply this dicta in Robinson out of the context in which it was made In
14
i, /
18
19
For such a claim is not only contrary to the law generally but Washingtons
specifically. As stated in 24 Am Jur 2nd Divorce and Separation 174 b, Domicile
and Residence pg. 379-80:
i if
The jurisdiction is determined at the time the suit is filed.
Thus, where the family domicile is in Greece, the mother leaves
20
22
28
15Wavs was addressing the controversial issue of whether and under what
circumstances a state might permit a non-domiciliary to divorce specifically then
RCW 26.09.030 which permitted a nondomiciliary member of the armed forces
stationed in Washington to obtain a dissolution of marri age which it further
determined meant he must be stationed here for 90 days after the filing of his
petition.
16See for example Cook v. Mayfield. 886 S.W.2d 840 (Tex.App. Waco 1994)
holding in the face of a claim that by the time the matter might be decided the
residency requirement would be met and the claim would be moot, that such a
result would deny any adequate remedy at law and encourage forum shopping.
Twila has clearly not satisfied this states domiciliary requirement and despite her
29
REPLY OF RESPONDENT
22
23
24
25
26
27
17.
1
2
Greece with her two children and seven days after arrival in
Washington state, she files a petition for dissolution of marriage and
for custody of the children, the Washington court lacks jurisdiction.
ATTORNEY FEES
4
5
attorneys fees in bringing this motion and for that reason alone it should be
dismissed. He relied on her clear voluntary sworn admission that she was an
10
11
12
13
14
CONCLUSION
For the reasons stated herein after an evidentiary hearing on this
issue Twila Markhams Petition for dissolution should be dismissed.
15
16
17
18
19
ANTHONY M
20
WSBA#11711
21
22
23
24
28
representation there is no proof here that she ever will. On the contrary because her
presence has been compelled by her treatment for her heart condition it is
debatable whether she even can. This is not a harsh result. She purposefully chose
an Alaskan domicile and freely maintained that choice both immediately prior and
long after this suit was filed through to the present. If there are any allegations in
this matter that are fraudulent, they are those in her petition for divorce!___________ _ _
29
REPLY OF RESPONDENT
25
26
27
18.
j
I
C E R T IF IC A T E O F S E R V IC E
3
4
I h e r e b y d e c la r e u n d e r th e p e n a lt y o f p e r ju r y u n d e r t h e la w s o f th e S ta te o f
W a s h in g t o n th a t I h a v e s e r v e d a t r u e a n d c o r r e c t c o p y o f th e fo r e g o in g , e x c e p t w h e r e
n o t e d , u p o n th e in d iv id u a l( s ) lis t e d b y th e f o llo w in g m e a n s :
5
R E P L Y O F R E S P O N D E N T
6
8
9
10
11
12
f ]
[ X
[
[ X
[
[X ]
C o u n s e l fo r D e fe n d a n t
K a m r a Z a ik e
11300 R o o s e v e l t W Ta y N E
S u i t e 300
S e a t t l e W A 98125
U .S . P o s t a l S e r v ic e ( F ir s t C la s s )
] F a c s i m i l e t o 206- 363-8067
] U .S . P o s ta l S e r v ic e E x p r e s s M a il
] H a n d D e liv e r y
] V ia L e g a l M e s s e n g e r f o r s e r v ic e b y
V ia e m a il: k a n n a @ la w g a t e .n e t
!
1
|
j
13
14
D a t e d : O c t o b e r 16, 2013
15
16
/ s / A n th o n y M . U r ie
17
T it le : A t t o r n e y f o r P la in t if f
18
19
20
Z1
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
L aw O ffices of A nthony M . U r ie , PLLC
29
REPLY OF RESPONDENT
19.
B y : ^ A n th o n y M . U r ie _ _ _
EXHIBIT A
Tue, Apr 9
Keep F light
jchange F lig h t
?C ancel F lig h t
F light
D eparts
A rrive s
Alaska 113
First
Seattle (SEA)
10:30 am Fri, Nov 1
Anchorage (ANC)
1:05 pm Fri, Nov 1
1ft>>^IPin
. . . . .
0>wy*
ijfJ*1, ; 1^
**f
W 5?
'
Keep F light
C hange F lig h t
; Cancel F lig h t
F lig h t
Departs
A rrive s
Alaska 49
First
Anchorage (ANC)
3:25 pm Fri, Nov 1
Kodiak (ADQ)
4:25 pm Fri, Nov 1
Search Preferences
Shop fo r
Refundable First
Si
Quir
FomiName: ReissuesStart
EXHIBIT B
r ~ ..........................................i
g S e atll'e.gov /D ThisD epaffi^
m m s m i cm m m
m axm ?m m
::-Sfit)
'Sugel;;!
aig?MJ^Lee::
Police Personnel
I
Patrol W ork
9-1-1 Center
!
In ve stig a tio n s
Forensics
5
Narcotics
Domestic Violence
Sexual Assault and Child Abuse
om estic violence situations pose particularly com piex challenges fo r law enforcem ent. F o ra variety o f reasons
ij Dstem
m ing from fear, dependence, embarrassment o r self-blame, many dom estic violence victims fail to report abuse, to
take preventative measures, or to follow' up on actions against th e perpetrators. Until the 1980s, police responding to
- dom estic violence scenes handled them with mediation and In fo rm s w arnings, but after a 1984 M inneapolis study
showed that arrests of abusers led to a significant drop In post-charge violence, slate laws were changed to make
arrests m andatory fo r dom estic violence assaults. After the law was changed, ttfef Departm ent went from 386 dom estic
> violence arrests in 1984 lo an average of 2,700 per year.
SWAT
The Seattle Police Departm ent established its D om estic Violence Unit in 1994, with a focus on both victim safety and
offender accountability. Since then it has been a regional and national leader in the law enforcem ent community in
developing innovative approaches and responses to dom estic violence. Through dedicating internal resources and
securing external grant funding, the Department has consistently been on the cutting e dge of dom estic violence issues
and re-assesses its response to the problem frequently.
O ver the last decade, the Departm ent has developed specialized expertise in the areas o f stalking, elder abuse,
i custodial interference, and abuse in the homeless and sexual m inority communities. Recognizing the correlation
I
between dom estic violence and animat abuse, the DV Unit established a partnership with Animal Control to ensure
\ mutual notification of re c o v e re d abuse, VST and ail precincts have anim al carriers to remove anim als from situations as
|
needed. Anim al control will keep these anim als free o f charge fo r up to tw o w eeks,
j
;
j
I
j
i Partnerships have also been created with the victim outreach com m unity, local hospitals, prosecutive agencies and
j: business com m unities. One very successful partnership effort is through the V ictim Support Team (VST) program that
f w orks directly w ith citizen volunteers. VST volunteers work as a team of tw o and are trained to respond after a dom estic
j violence scene has been secured to provide crisis intervention, and em ergency resources referrals to domestic violence
; victims. Through VST, the Department created the Safety inn program to provide hotel and motel rooms to victims when
; shelters are full, and a partnership with Verizon W ireless recycles donated cellphones programmed to have im m ediate
; access to emergency hotlines.
I
j
jj
I
I
j
ii
|
|
;;
In 2005 the Department worked w ith the Municipal C ourt and the City Attorney's Office to implement a Domestic
Violence Firearms Project, increasing police officers attention to firearm s at the scene of a dom estic violence incident,
Site Disclaimer: The Seattle Police Department's website was developed to provide general information. Data
contained at this location is -generally not reviewed for legal sufficiency, SPD documents displayed are for
reference purposes only. Their completeness or currency are not guaranteed. Links or references to other
information or organizations are for reference only and do not constitute art endorsement.
!--------S A T T t ^ T O t r C E
! N8VB e ^ R T M E N T
:
* s ll f e lm ^ A
M
J
P
u w
Living in Seattle
Visiting Seattle
City Services
of 2
-----------------
8nu8r t 's0,"
D y ni;1'
,
City Departments
............
We're Here to Help...
Questions / Complaints
FAQs
Employee Directory
City Customer Service
Call (20$) $84-CITY (2489)
Follow Us
Quick Links
CityLink Blogs
Social Media Sites
Data.seattle.gov
;
!
!
Mew! My.Seattle.Gov
News Releases
Traffic Conditions
My Neighborhood Maps
Seattle Channet
10/15,'13 11:59 A
EXHIBIT C
-- j
Ik
S E A TTLE
PO LIC E
D EPARTM EN T
GENERAL OFFENSE #
13-137730
RACE/SEX/DO& -
jiim f r
WEIGHT
BUILD
Markham, Twila Y
W/F/04-22-1948
|5*02"
170
medium
.... " - P
P 'C A U v f
...........T O R A I D .................
(CHECK A lp 1 \
APPLIC ABlspoXES)
H Y S TE R IC A L
6>% q
D o m e s t ic V io l e n c e In c id e n t
S upplem ental R e po r t
TREATMENT
m N O N E I R E FU S E D
YES
PREGNANT
N /A
NO
YES
- H f H E S IT A N T ........................
C O N FU S E D .......
OTHER
NERVOUS
NO
P A T SCENE
w r it t e n s t a t e m e n t o b t a in e d
O YES
PUNK
O P E R S O N A L P H Y S IC IA N
D T R A N S P O R TE D T O HOSPITAL
VICTIM WHO. BE STAYING AT TEMPORARY ADDRESS/ PHONE
m YES
NO
NO
IF Y E S , ATTACH MEMO
EMERGENCY CONTACT PERSON FOR VICTIM {NAME & PHONE OF SOMEONE WHO PREFERABLY DOES NOT LIVE WITH THE VICTIM)
Markham, Gerald W
SUSPECT AERg
^ ED
(CHECK A ty r A
APPLICABLE Si JXES)
SUSPECT IN id *ED
_
U -*S Y E S
...... T ? 3
ANGRY
IR R A TIO N A L
R elationship
NO
w-r S
/*
N ERVO US
H UPSET
NO
UNK
RELATIONSHIP
^ T s p OUSS(Check All
Q FORMER RESIDING
Applicable Boxes)
YES
DYES
JmSSTS*ENT
NO
D IS T A N T HYSTERICAL
VI OL ENT
POTHER
N O N E /R E F U S E D
P E R S O N A L PHYSICIAN
A T SCENE
YES
[ DAT1NG1ENGAGED
I C H ID IN COMMON
D FORMER SPOUSE
RESIDING TOGETHER
UNIT
6910
r f C R Y IN G
PREVIOUS DV ARREST
E l NO
SERIAL
g ] C O N TR O LLIN G
CAt J &
- O APO LO G ET76
TR A N S P O R TE D TO HOSPITAL
CITY/STATE
S NO
PARENT/CHIU>
ESTRANGED SPOUSE
FORMER DATING
OTHER (Describe)
LENGTH OF RELATIONSHIP
35 years
1
13 TE S
_________________ i_________________________________________
NO
O UNK
NO
UNK
Firearm
S fc-1-
YES
NO
to p a s t In s ta n c e s ? Y E S ] f NO
I f Y e s ', describe;
A, If y e s to # 3 , and th e fjreem ns(s) Is {a re ) present and under toe vksilms c o n tra , d o you w ant S P P to rem ove th e fifeao3{s)? D Y E S
F ire an n (s) taken? Y E S
NO
0N O
Q N /A
YES
sex
DOB
NO
CHILD PRESENT
DURING INCIDENT?
m N /A
DOSS THE CHILD HAVE USABLE
TESTIMONY?
CHILD'S INJURIES?
C .
YES
NO
YES;
NO
YES
ONO
YES
NO
YES
ONO
YES
NO
Court
NQ
, ^
yes
TYPE OF
O R D ER S)
'
E 3no
RESPONDENT SERVED
{H
unk
ri
N 0 C O N T A C T O R D ER
O T H ER (D escrib e)
yes
NO
PR O TEC TIO N O R D E R
R E S TR A IN IN G O R D ER
Q A N T I-H A R A S S M E N T ORDER
SEATTLE
PO LICE
DEPARTM ENT
D o m e s t ic Vi o l e n c e In c id e n t
S upplem ental R e po r t
GENERAL OFFENSE
13-137730
_____________________________________ .
ending
(bom
and
1 understand that the purpose o f th is disclosure is to assist in a crim inal investigation and/or
prosecution.
73
INFORMATION TO BE RELEASED
SU M M AR Y O F M E D IC A L H IS T O R Y /T R E A T M E N T
P N U R S E /D O C T O R N O T E S .....
E M E R G E N C Y R O O M R EC O R D S
l
Q R A D IO LO G Y R E C O R D S / FILM S
7/
I understand that th e inform ation in m y health record may indude inform ation relating to sexually transmitted disease, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
(AIDS), or human immunodeficiency virus (HiV). M y health record may also include inform ation about behavioral o r mental health services and treatmentfor
alcohol and drug abuse. By checking the box at the end of this sentence, I choose to exclude the more sensitive inform ation about behavioral or m ental health
services-and treatm ent fo r alcohol and drug abuse. I understand th a t} m ay be charged an additional fee to rem ove this inform ation. D
Health inform ation sha ll be released to the Seattle Police Departm ent In addition, m edical facility sta ff may discuss my m edical condition and any treatm ent with
the assigned detective Or th e ir designee. 1 understand that this authorization expires in ninety (90) days unless otherwise specified and that the disclosed
inform ation is protected under State and Federal Law (42 CFR Part 2 and RO W 70.24). Please be aware that once the Health Care Provider named above
discloses hea&h care inform ation pe r your instructions the inform ation is subject to re-disclosure and m ay no longer be protected. I reserve the right to revoke
authorization (in w riting) at any tin e prior to the ninety (90) day period expiration, except to the extent that the fa cility which is to release information has already
taken action in accordance w ith 1 I understand I do not have to sign this authorization in order to obtain health care benefits (treatm ent, payment or enrollment).
Signature of P atient
Reporting O fficer
!
'
Date
FOR POLICE USE ONLY
Mark the location of any visible injuries. Use arrows to point to areas of non-vistbte injury or complaints of pain.
Use additional Supplemental Reports to document injuries if more than two persons are injured.
Victim injuries
Suspect injuries
EXHIBIT D
MewSearch[SFDHune
tvt;
Alarm Level:
D ispatched
Arrived
In-Service
E16
M16
18:56
18:56
19 :0 )
19:00
19:21
1926
BVDOP REPORT
Page 1 of 1
Incident Report
Incident Report
IN C ID EN T# F130037534
INCIDENT DATE: 4/19/2013
Agency SFD
Jurisdiction: SFD
18:55:38 hrs
Incident Overview
In itia l L o ca tio n :
Same as Final
F inal L o ca tio n :
810 Ne 58th St
C ity:
Seattle. WA 98105
in itia l P roblem
Type:
F inal Problem
Type:
In itia l A larm
Level:
F inal Alarm
Level:
U nits A ssig n e d :
E16M 16
Response A rea:
Battalion 6
D is p o sitio n :
Call Completed
Taken By:
Location Information
Location Name:
Map R eference:
24C
C ross S treets:
C all Back
Phone:
(206)-528-0648
Call-Taking Info
Taken By:
Term inal
EMD
18:55:38
18:56:12
SP102
14/2
Dispatcher Comments
1. 64 YOFEMALE CP
Units Assigned
18:56:13
E16
m
a
( * Primary Unit)
U n it A ssigned
A rrive d
T ra n sp o rt Trans.
C om plete
C om plete
C ancel ETA
Reason
18:56:18
18:57:08
19:00:06
1921:08
2:28
M16* 18:56:18
18:56:55
19:00:08
19:2823
2:06
D isp. Almond,
By: Jr, Hilton
R
SFD ID Name
Rank
E16
1365
Forslund. Gregg D
FF
E16
1580
Jindrich, Heidi G
LT
E16
1202
FF
FF
E16
1461
Owen, Jill L
M16
0812
FF
M16
2097
W allace, Michael B
FF
*****
END OF REPORT
*****
http://sfdcadweb2/CADview/incidentDetailReportasp?id=l 162123
08/12/2013
EXHIBIT E
of
mfo@kwgate.net
Attorneys
Michael'SBugni
Nathan Cuber
lmOS3TEfSRNCoiB={ffi
Kpj$nmM.lARc
CaRLsasEA. Maows
JsfW
.NfifF
YvetteSam-OConnell
LuAnhePerry
May 13,2013
BnxSOLTO5'Qt.MAff.
Da'pnSyk '
KarmaL & jke
Mr. Markham
May 13,2013
Page 2
can arrange a four-way meeting (parties and their lawyers) and hopefully agree
upon the terms of separation at that time. Specifically, you need to deposit
sufficient funds into the joint account, per normal, as the account will drop
dangerously low after this month's payment of joint credit card bills and
household expenses.
If the finances do not remain status quo pending a fair negotiation of the issues, then I
will have to address the i ssue of temporary attorney fees and temporary spousal
maintenance by way of a hearing in late May. I am hoping to avoid that expense and
keep the costs down for both sides.
I look forward to working cooperatively with you and your counsel toward a swift and
acceptable resolution of the issues.
Yours truly.
Karma L, Zaike
KLZ:nkb
Enclosures
CC: Client
EXHIBIT F
W PP
07
'
1
2
THE
SEATTLE
KING
D I S T R I C T COURT FOR
COUNTY, WASHINGTON
3
TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS ,
NO,
IN C .,
32 03841
4
P lain tiff,
6
7
COMPLAINT
v s .,
GERALD MARKHAM a n d JAKE DOE MARKHAM, )
h is w ife,
D efen d an ts,
1.
The D e fe n d a n t(s)
a t a l l tim es r e le v a n t h e re to have been
resid en ts o f
. KING _____________ __ _______ _ __C o u n t y , W a s h i n g t o n .
2.
P l a i n t i f f has p aid a l l
fe e s due th e S ta te ?
and i s d u ly
l i c e n s e d a n d b o n d e d , a s r e q u i r e d b y ROW 1 9 , 1 6 . 2 6 0 .
3.
The C la im l i s t e d below i s d u e and ow ing t o t h e P l a i n t i f f f o r
P R I N T I N G OF LEGAL DOCUMENTS
___ ____________ , w h i c h r e m a i n s u n p a i d i n
t h e a m o u n t o f
.......~
4.
c o l l e c t i o n , by
COCKLE P R I N T ING CO.________ _ ___ ,__ ______ ______,__ , a n d a c o p y
o f s a id assig n m en t is a tta c h e d h e re to .
w ith
t h e sum o f $ 5 / 0 2 8 . 4 6
?o sts, and r e a s o n a b le a t t o r n e y 's
fees.
A t 1 o r n e y T ? o r P l a i n t i f f ( s )
D i n a L , Y u n k e r , .,,16 889
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
)ss
COUNTY OF KING
)
20
oa f h
___ DINA L . YUNKEk ________ __________ _ __ ___, b e i n g f i r s t d u l y s w o r n o n o,
d e p o s e s and s a y s :
2 am t h e A t t o r n e y f o r t h e P l a i n t i f f ; I h a v e r e a d
t h e f o r e g o i n g c o m p l a i n t , know t h e c o n t e n t s t h e r e o f , a n d b e l i e v e t h e
sam e t o be t r u e and c o r r e c t .
a
21!
22
before
me
th is
1s
y! )
23
L?t,h
d '*V o t
J
v/
(
a
M arch
:
t.
N o t a r y P u b l i c ia and :or
the S t a t e ot t^ush i not on,
r e s i d i n g at B*a I Xe v u e
Expires:
6/9 3
24
25
26
VOttTMAN A HUNSUVIN
27
28
< /-/?
i. i\ . i I t x ?jU s ij S15
WASHINGTON
4
TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS,
IN C .,
)
}
)
)
5
P la in tiff,
6
92-03841
vs.
7
ANSWER
}
)
)
)
No.
!
... j
)
10
COME
11
12
i M arkham,
co m p lain t),
14
tio n
15
1992,
as
D efendants,
G erald
W.
M arkham,
and
T w ila
( e r r o n e o u s l y d e s i g n a t e d J a n e D oe M a r k h a m i n P l a i n t i f f ' s
13
and
NOW
pro
to
per,
answ er
and
to
sp ecially
P la in tiff's
appear
to
co m p lain t
co n test
dated
fo llo w s:
16
1.
Para.
17
2.
D e f e n d a n t s h av e no k n o w le d g e o f t h i s a l l e g a t i o n
P ara.
18
1 is
denied.
3.
Para
20
4.
D e f e n d a n t s h a v e no k n o w le d g e o f t h e a l l e g a t i o n s
para.
i/*) tX^2 2
Attorney At law
424 Marine VV*> ?<205
was
2'i ^
W * ^ ^ 2 3
m *; 1^ TO
^
-X
s r 24
,. C
O w
C w>.
2 5
'v
^
26
4.
3 is
attach ed
alleg atio n s
to
th e
copy
atten tio n .
in
th is
30
of
th e
in
no c o p y o f t h e a s s i g n m e n t
co m p lain ts
A cco rd in g ly ,
th a t
came
to
D efendants
deny
th e
affirm ativ e
defenses:
paragraph.
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
D efendants a lle g e
1.
F ailu re
2.
L atches.
29
d enied.
D efendants'
27
28
in
2, a n d t h e r e f o r e d e n y s a m e .
19
21
17,
of
th e
fo llo w in g
co n sid eratio n .
Vi
th is
3.
M istak e.
4.
Im proper
5.
In su fficien cy
of
P rocess.
6.
In su fficien cy
of
S ervice
7.
Lack
Venue.
of
Ju risd ictio n
of
over
Process.
th e
S u b ject
m atter
of
su it.
8.
Lack
of
ju risd ictio n
over
th e
person
of
th e
be d i s m i s s e d ,
and
D efen d an ts.
9.
Forum n o n - c o n v e n i e n s .
WHEREFORE D e f e n d a n t s p r a y
th at
th ey
be
fees
allo w ed
aw arded
them
at
th e ir
law o r
co sts
in
th is
and
\c n u rc h il\a n s w e r. coc
by
reasonable
th is
/ 3-
th is
.. C - i- V
G e r a l d W. M a r k h a m , p r o p e r
w ho may b e s e r v e d w i t h
f u r t h e r p le a d in g s in t h i s
m a t t e r a t PO Bo x B 0 6 ,
K o d ia k , Ak.
99615
any
eq u ity
S ubm itted
su it
-;.
day
atto rn ey
C ourt.
of
A p ril,
.....
1992.
T w ila M arkham, p r o p e r
who may b e s e r v e d w i t h f u r t h e r
p le a d in g s in t h i s m a tte r a t
PO Box 8 0 6 , K o d i a k , A k . 9 9 6 1 5
EXHIBIT G
GERALD W. MARKHAM
ATTORNEY AT LAW
Practice lojaited to Maritime personal Injury
and Wrongful Death and other personal injuries
or Wrongful Death Occurring in Alaska
Jury Clerk
Alaska Trial Court
204 Mission Road
Kodiak, Ak 99615
Seattle, Wa 98105
(206) 527-1485
Fax (206)52?~01Q1\
(907) 486-4194
Fax (907) 486-5822
2201 Romig PI* Ho.205
Anchorage, Ak. 99503
(907) 276-0336
Fax (907) 276-4681
** jy sx summons **
GERALD MARKHAM
518 MARIKE WAY #205
KODIAK, AK 99615
JURY CALL-IN NUMBER:
YOUR GROUP NUMBER:
486*1601
2S.
YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to serve as a juror in thefcrinl courts for the State of Alaska, in the City of Kodiak, beginning the
FIRST day of JUNE 2005. Please follow the directions below before
coming to court.
5/6/2005
Tami Starr
JURY CLERK
DIRECTIONS
This court uses a "call-in* system to inform jurors when their
services will be required,
You must do the following if this
system is to work;
1,
Each
juror
must
cal 1
the
telephone
2 0 05
number noted
above
If you are excused from service on that date, you should not
come in.
However, call the number again when instructed to
do so.
3,
4,
5,
EXHIBIT H
EXHIBIT I
PRSTSTD
U ,$ . Postage
PAID
perm it #106
Anchorage, AK
Alaska Departm ent of Fish and Game (ADFG) General Season Deer
Harvest Report Reminder
Hunt: GD000
Year: 2012
Reporting No. 0414551
EXHIBIT J
7 M
t'p M ?
O F F IC IA L A B S E N T E E B A L L O T
TO BE O PENED O NLY BY
REVIEW BOARD
Additional
Postage
Required
...
VOTERS S,fONATURE:
VOTERS tn ENTiFIER;
Voter Number
afurs:
' ft
-i/.r-., ft.
|2 E ?
ZZZ
v -;
r ji Markham
G erald
*? y
.OR.
YOUR
SIGNATURE
MUST BE
WITNESSED
BY ONE (1)
OPTION
PROVIDED
Date of Birth
City, State:
[ ]Purged
m
\
Sp%
%
%
>
>
O ii
_Zl L Z
.OR
( | Count Full
[ J No Count
Coimiente;___
Date:
Review Board Use Only
Voter#,,
Reg. DlstfPrec..
.Balks Issued: B
__
__
__
OFFICIAL
ELECTION PAMPHLET
The po lls w ill be open
7 a.m . to 8 p.m.
O F F IC IA L E LE C TIO N
P AM PH LE T
CITY OF KODIAK
MUNICIPAL ELECTION
OCTOBER 1, 2013
The polls w ill be open
7 a.m. to 8 p.m.
P ublished b y the
K odiak C ity C le rk's O ffice
710 M ill Bay R oad , Rm. 216/217
Kodiak, A la ska 99615
EXHIBIT K
Carol Arnold
(800) 225-2752, Prompt 4
www.alaskacanio.com
EXHIBIT L
W ishingyou birthday
cheer a n d a successfulyear.
Jerry Markham
211 Mill Bay Road
Kodiak AK 99615
09/09
EXHIBIT M
t 'c . c
*o & -~
v * *
k p i
I 'ln r . r . n
r i
r*r r
i u r v < ib
AIRCRAFT DATA
Manufacturer: BEECH
Jurisdictiott/TCA: ^ l ____
SMOH:
Price Paid: $0
! Model: A23
| # Engines: J_ _
! TBO:
New/Used;
s & IT ,O 0O ____\Jqjbd^
Comments:
. (date)
:_________
L (signature)
DO SOLEMNLY
SWEAR THa TTHJS STPWERENT IS?X COMPLETE1'LI SI NG OF THE PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED OR HELD BY
ME. AS OF JANUARY 1, 200$. I AM AWARE THAT FAILURE TO PROPERLY LIST MY ASSETS AND FILE BY THE
DEADLINE MAY SUBJECT ME TO PENALTIES AS PROVIDED FOR IN STATE LAW,
EXHIBIT N
STATE OF ALASKA
DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES
ERX552
1FTCR14U7RPC38650
1994
FORD_________
Year
Make
COURIER
Model
PK________________
TEA
Body Style
Color
age or older as o f January 1st o f th is year and I am applying fo r a tax exemption for one m otor vehicle subject to
registration, per Alaska Statute 28.10.411, J am the registered owner, either solely or joirrtJy, o f the vehicle described
above. I understand that this exemption may be used on o n ly one vehicle a t a tim e and that I have no other vehicles
registered with this exemption.
My date o f birth is:
SEPTEMBER 9,1947
M y
0184904
I sweanundfir the penalty of perjury that the statements above are true.
(SEAL)
-3 /z /jf*
Signature [Sign in front of
Representative o r Notary}
me this
SubscribecLaod sworn to
Date
s?cf
,2Q/-S
dayof /2 m J L
M onth
Jean M. McGaughey
Notary Public - Arizona
Pima County
My Commission Expires
June as, 2016
Year
Alaska.gov/dmv
Additional Information:
* if you have claimed a senior citizen exemption on another vehicle, you are not eligible for a
second one.
* You must have been 65 on January 151of this year to qualify for this exemption.
* ORIGINAL requests for senior exemptions cannot be processed over the internet. You will be
able to renew your registration using this service.
* When requesting the exemption through the mail, you MUST have your signature witnessed by
a notary or a DMV representative.
> ^
/ A
P U ^ -
Items to mail:
* * :f * * * ^
r
Mail to:------:
State of Alaska
Division of Motor Vehicles
ATTN: MAI LOUTS
1300 W Benson Boulevard STE 200
Anchorage AK 99503-3600
Z
r Z fe
j-o r
lJ * 4
( /^ e/7 i j o
////3
c k S tn y V C C c ^ 2
tX y ty o / / c
7
-
A <J A
^ A ~~
</<*/*
sTec
<=*. c - o ^ e r C./JL
/ i
/ >
j f J
^ n' . f
f le i& L .
-------------------------- ,
C K r f ' / i ^ . S '* A *
A,
ve.
A
__/ A la
k a ,c i# /f & f/d n ieW . c X _ 4 , ^ l
r sAlaska.g
. z
C / cj
/>*
A ir
/W ^v Te eV/ JV/bc'e
JV/>
LICENSE
ERX552
READ INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE
BODY
COL(
WEIGHT
PK
TE
3000
FEB 2015
OW NER
S IG N
v
41
UNIT NO-
MODEL
MAKE
1994
FORD
HO
OWNER
MAIL
ADDRESS
REGISTRATION
(A$28.10.421)
$180.00
TAX
$40.00
(AS38.10.431)
INDICATE
CHANGED
ADDRESS
HERE
RESIDENT
ADDRESS
$0.00
zm )
1111
The owner certifies that there is a liability insurance policy for this
vehicle if required by AS 28.22.011 and this policy wilt be maintained
during the entire registration period; the address shown is my true legal
address; if this is a commercial motor vehicle, I certify that I am fam iliar
with and haw knowledge of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations,
Federal Hazardous Material Regulations and Alaska Administrative Code
17 AAC 25,200; and all information is hue and correct.
YEAR
CLASS
1FTCR14D7RPC38650
$220.00
LIENHOLDER
B 1 5 ffc K T A F V B /2 0 1 2
Please provide the driver license number for ail registered owners o f this vehicle. This information will
allow DMV to more efficiently update future address changes.---- --------- - -------------
RRN: 29761876
LICENSE
BODY
READ INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
ERX552
PK
COLOR
FEB 2015
WEIGHT
TEA
CLASS
1FTCR14U7RPC38650
add r ess
YEAR
MAKE
1994
FORD
UNIT NO.
3000
OWNER
41
MODEL
WO
INDICATE
CHANGED
ADDRESS
HERE
- -
{AS38.10.421)
fc.-i-RT i t -
$180.00
TAX
,
(ASZ8.1G.431)
$40.00
r v w (AS28.10.421id>)
$0.00
INDICATE ^
CHANGED ADDRESS
HERE-.
LIEN HOLDER
$220.00
EXHIBIT 0
From :
S u b je ct:
Date:
To:
Cc:
Hi Jerry,
Diane Fogler is our membership person theses days, but Hi be darned if I cans her email right at the m om ent i'i! pass
your questions on to her and Pam Murray, the treasurer who should be able to answer your dues question.
Thanks for the other info. Hope aii is well with you.
Cheers,
Jay
Sent from m y iPhone
On Sep 11, 2013, at 6:44 AM, Gerald Markham < Qmarkham@nwgink.com> wrote:
Dear Jay:
Darlene W ilson is my cousin. Her phone # is 907-486*6217. I spoke to here several tim es this summer and she often
answers it but messages are not often returned. She may also be reached through her daughter and son in law Geti
and Kevin Arndt 486-5556 (hom e); 486*3755 (work), 539-2500 Cei). She lives next door to them and they are helping
her with her affairs.
Also does the Pioneers issue m em bership cards? I've lost m ine? if so could you mail another to me at 198 Journeys
End way, Friday Harbor, 98250 where I plan to be through December?
if not could you please send an emai! reflecting how long I've been a member. Finally are my dues current and if not
where do l send them now that our faithful Micky is gone to O regon?
Thanks
Jerry Markham
if you know these folks' current e-m ail addresses, please let me know, thanks!
Mona Johnson;
Darlene Wilson; and
Annie Koppang.
Thanks!
Jay
p.s. If you would rather not receive e-m ails about Kodiak Pioneers, just reply with remove.
G r a n d I g l o o K o d ia k is
JUST ONE-YEAR AWAY!
As we enter our fall-winterspring meeting season, we also
start the one-year countdown to
hosting the Grand Igloo Conven' tion in 2014. Igloo IS President
Walt Loewen put it best at the last
jm eeting when he said we will all
need to pitch in to make the event
a success. Several members are
already elbow-deep in preplan
ning, and I hope all of us will be
rieck deep in it one year from
now. We have members at the
G rand Igloo in Juneau this
m onth, who will surely bring
Iback ideas for our convention, I
;.look forward to hearing them
and planning our event.
/s
$1,864.83
Convention Fund
$1,988.40
Above Combined
$3,853,23
$19,875,95
$24,637,63
1
September 2013
September 2013
EXHIBIT P
'mmm
CITY OF KOOfAK
SENIOR CITIZEN
SALES TAX EXEMPTION
-:-.. Its
Gerald Markham
W h o s e p ic tu re is a ffix e d h e re to is
v?
e x e m p t fro m p a y m e n t o f s a le s ta x
o n re n ts , re ta il p u rc h a s e s a n d
s e rv ic e
**-X\,1.V . ;--V'. Vi
, .W
S.- ; yK^:
illilll1111,1IJilf
^ :'-M:;
Mmi
f.lir 5t
. *.
\ '
V:
jj.
****
K-Stifff
. .V\
.....
.vf. ; v'
. . x
'
a^R/iLD w
:
'S IJ-CEh .0^.1984
8'634 i 94 ;
:
M ile a g e P ly i f
G erald W. M arkham
A ctive MEMBER 2013
Authorized Signature
Your WanlMifshiuCSrd is accepted at pitf-clpaiing Saleway inc. and Cans stores.
This card baiongsto Safeway !i>?. and must to EsriwAMd on ><% *&- By ustnu It'Scaidiftar^M
lilH
PC Box 89
Pleasanton. CA 5458B
I ii
46010327078
UA PATWI(5A>1A ,
W
W
VV
AttuLTlPJJVKHETWCRK
Ikt&L
O ppo
Out of
i t i t
f i J ). i i
[i.' i i
. \
I hereby certify (hat all of the iiifcrraalion on the reverse side is true anti cor
rect. f further certify that 1 meet the provisions of the applicable, Alaska Stat
utes, AS 16.05.400(b) or AS 16,05.341. 1 understand this information is
subject to public disclosure^
Signature:
Conor Signature
This card rairit'bc in vour possession while engaging in the authorized activi
ties is described on the front. This card is not valid if residency requirements
per AS. 16j05,940 and AS 16,05,415, and veteran requirements, if
applicable, per AS 16.05.341, are not maintained.
T s s A w w te w w iriiiiw # ' tTpUtonsite 1ST
Ipis
f it f lf
js i
A business (Coda 1) may purchase tax exempt tom s only lor RESALE.
State Law requires ua to collect Sales Tax on supplies and other Items that
ere used In the business.
'
EXHIBIT Q
D E m tH O ID EN TIFICATIO N O F IN D IVID U AL
NOTARY
FEE
$
2
$
12
14
EXHIBIT R
from: