Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Results:
The mass of the empty beaker is 34.20g
The mass of the beaker with the product is 42.36g
The mass of the product is = 42.36g 34.20g = 8.16g
1 mole of Cu(NO) produced 1 mole of Cu(C5H7O2)2
Copper(II) nitrate
copper(II) acetylacetone
=
=
mass of Cu(C5H7O2)2 =
=
mass of Cu(C5H7O2)2
relative molecular
mass of Cu(C5H7O2)2
mass of Cu(C5H7O2)2
63.5+2(12(5)+1(7)
16(2))
mass of Cu(C5H7O2)2
261.5g mol-1
6g x 261.5 g mol-1
241.5g mol-1
6.497g theoretical mass of product
100%
= 125.60%
Question:
1. Draw the structure of the complex.
100% ;
2. Describe the structure by mentioning the ligating atoms of the ligand and its
geometry.
The ligands for this complex are acetyl acetone. The two acetyl acetone(s) arranged
themselves neatly beside both sides of the copper (II) ion. With that, the two acetyl
acetone(s) can share their electrons with the copper (II) ion. The two oxygen atoms
each from the two acetyl acetone(s) donate their lone pairs of electrons to the copper
(II) ion which facilitates the pairs of electrons in its empty 3d orbital shells.
Discussion:
Note that copper is a transition element and it forms complex ions by acting as the
central metal atom which accepts pairs of electrons donated by ligands which are nonmetallic ions or molecules (Tan 2013) to form dative covalent bonds. Copper(II) nitrate is a
coordination compound that can still undergo certain reactions to form new coordination
compound. In this experiment, copper (II) acetylacetonato was synthesised from copper (II)
nitrate by exchanging the ligands through several steps.
A mass of approximately 6g of solid copper (II) nitrate was measured using the
weighing balance. When the copper (II) nitrate (Cu(NO 3)2.3H2O) was added into 60cm3 of
distilled water, copper (II) hexaaqua complex was formed as a pale blue solution.
Cu(NO ) (aq) + 3H2O (l) [Cu(H2O)6]2+ (aq) + 2NO3- (aq)
3 2
copper (II) nitrate
1:1 ammonia was then added into the hexaaquacopper (II) complex (pale blue
solution) to form copper (II) hydroxide solution. In this reaction, the insufficient amount of
ammonia was not able to displace the high concentration of water molecules which were
bonded to copper (II). Instead, the ammonia acted as a base which helped to pull hydrogen
ions off of the hexaaquacopper (II) complex (Clark 2003) to form copper (II) hydroxide
which was also a pale blue solution.
[Cu(H2O)6]2+ (aq) + NH3 (aq) [Cu(H2O)5(OH)]+ (aq) + NH4+ (aq)
As shown in the equation above, the equilibrium shifted to the right to produce more
complex ions (according to Le Chateliers principle). It was much easier for ammonia to react
against the hexaaqua ions than hydrogen ions as there are more hexaaqua ions present (Jim
Clark, 2003).
[Cu(H2O)5(OH)]+ (aq) + NH3 (aq) [Cu(H2O)4(OH)2] (s) + NH4+ (aq)
As more ammonia was added, precipitate was formed ([Cu(H 2O)4(OH)2]). The
equilibrium again shifted to the right as ammonia reacted with hydrogen ions or reacted with
the complex ([Cu(H2O)5(OH)]+).
The precipitate formed dissolved if excess ammonia was added. From here, we can
see that hexaaquacopper (II) complex is actually acidic as it dissociated to give away
hydrogen ions which might have formed ammonium ions with ammonia.
2+
2
6
hexaaquacopper (II) complex
[Cu(H O) ] (aq) + NH3 (aq) Cu(OH)2 (aq) + NH3 (aq) + 4H2O (l) + 2H+ (aq)
copper (II) hydroxide
or
[Cu(H2O)6] (aq) + NH3 (aq) Cu(OH)2 (aq) + NH4+ (aq) + 4H2O (l)
2+
As more ammonia was added into the solution, there were enough amount of
ammonia to displace hydroxide ions to form tetraaminediaqua copper (II) complex. The
solution then turned dark blue.
[Cu(H2O)6]2+ (aq) + 4NH3 (aq) Cu[(NH3)4(H2O)2]2+ (aq) + 4H2O (l)
hexaaquacopper (II) complex
When acetyl acetone was added into the solution, copper (II) acetylacetonato was
formed.
Cu[(NH3)4(H2O)2]2+ (aq) + 2C5H8O2 (aq) Cu(C5H7O2)2 (aq) + 4NH3 (aq) + 2H2O (l) + 2H+
acetylacetonato copper (II)
(aq)
The dry mass of the product needed to be obtained for the calculation of the
percentage yield. But first, the solution must be filtered while being washed with water (using
suction filtration). Hence, it was filtered using Bchner funnel and Bchner flask where
liquid was contained. As liquid was filtered off from the product, the product was collected
into a beaker and sent into the oven to dry. After drying, the product was weighed once again
and an actual mass of the product was obtained (8.16g).
In order to calculate the theoretical mass of the product, we assumed that 1 mole of
copper (II) nitrate reacted to produce 1 mole of acetylacetonato copper (II). A theoretical
mass of 6.497g was calculated, and the percentage yield of acetylacetonato copper (II) is
125.60%. This may be due to the product still having certain amount of fluid contained
within it, and hence the mass of the product was accumulated to 8.16g.
When handling hexaaqua copper (II) and copper (II) hydroxide solutions, direct
contact was avoided as they are acidic. When suction filtration was being conducted, the
layer of filter paper place inside the Bchner funnel was drenched with distilled water to
prevent the solution that is to be filtered from being filtered through the funnel into the
Bchner flask. Moreover, the filtered product was washed with water to remove impurities. It
should also be dried to obtain the accurate actual dry mass of the product itself, but for this
experiment we might not have completely dried the product in the oven even though it was in
powdery form.
Conclusion: The percentage yield of acetylacetonato copper (II) complex is 125.5%.
Reference:
1. Clark, 2003. Copper. [Online]. Available at:
http://www.chemguide.co.uk/inorganic/transition/copper.html [Accessed 3 February
2015]
2. Tan, L., L., H., 2013. Ace Ahead STPM Text Chemistry Second Term. Selangor Darul
Ehsan: Oxford Fajar.
3. Yip., 2013. Pre-U STPM Text Chemistry Term 2. Selangor Darul Ehsan: Pelangi.