Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FLOWS
Fluid
Mechanics
II
Dr. M. Khosravy
Dr. M. Khosravy
l Flows
Dr. M. Khosravy
Dr. M. Khosravy
Pipe
roughness
VibraJons
Upstream
uctuaJons,
disturbances
(valves,
elbows,
etc.
that
may
disturb
the
ow)
1
U m = !! u dA
A A
Um
Um
Dr. M. Khosravy
V1
V2
2
1
Dr. M. Khosravy
1
v (y) = lim
T !" 2T
$ v(y, t)dt
#T
Dr. M. Khosravy
l Hence,
Dr. M. Khosravy
Poiseuille Flow
10
the radius direcJon with the origin at the center of the pipe.
Dr. M. Khosravy
p1
p2
Poiseuille Flow
11
( p1 ! p2 )! y 2
acJng
on
the
faces
of
the
cylinder
be
equal
to
the
shear
stress
2
!
yb
"
acJng
on
the
circumferenJal
area,
hence
( p1 ! p2 )" y
!=
2b
Dr. M. Khosravy
du
! (y) = !
dy
Poiseuille Flow
12
Therefore:
du
dy
du ( p2 ! p1 )! y ! dp y
=
=
dy
b
2 b dx 2
(p ! p )
b
Upon
integraJon:
2
"
%
p1 ! p2 2
1
dp
y
u(y) = !
R ! y2 = !
C
!
4 b
dx $#
4 '&
1 dp 2
u(y) = !
R ! y2 )
(
4 dx
Poiseuille Flow
13
The
velocity
distribuJon
is
parabolic
over
the
radius,
and
the
maximum
velocity
on
the
pipe
axis
becomes:
1 dp 2
um = !
R
4 dx
l
Therefore,
u
y2
= 1! 2
um
R
1 dp 2
Q = " u(y)2!ydy = " #
R # y 2 )2!ydy
(
4 dx
l The
volume
ow
rate
is:
! dp 4 1
Q=#
R = um!R 2
8 dx
2
Dr. M. Khosravy
Poiseuille Flow
14
The
ow
rate
is
proporJonal
to
the
rst
power
of
the
pressure
gradient
and
to
the
fourth
power
of
the
radius
of
the
pipe.
Um =
dp 8
= 2 Um
dx R
l This
soluJon
occurs
in
pracJce
as
long
as,
Dr. M. Khosravy
Hence,
Q
! R2
D
Re = U m < 2300
v
Poiseuille Flow
15
The
relaJon
between
the
negaJve
pressure
gradient
and
the
mean
velocity
of
the
ow
is
represented
in
engineering
applicaJon
by
introducing
a
resistance
coecient
of
pipe
ow,
f.
f =
l
dp f 1
=
!U m2
dx D 2
2D 8U m
32
=
!U m2 R 2
!U m2 R
Dr. M. Khosravy
f=
64
Re
Poiseuille Flow
16
l At the wall,
du
dp 2y
! w = !
= !
dy y=R
dx 4
l So,
y=R
R dp
=!
2 dx
2! w
dp f 1
=!
=
"U m2
R
dx D 2
l As
a
result,
the
wall
fricJon
coecient
is:
Cf =
Dr. M. Khosravy
!w
1
"U m2
2
f 16
=
4 Re
! p "U m2
given
by
#
+
+
gy
$&
where
the
correcJon
factor
is
2
"!
%
dened
as,
"
! =!
u 2 "u dA
! m2
mU
with
m
!
=
!
Q
being
the
mass
ow
rate
and
A
is
the
cross
secJonal
area.
Dr. M. Khosravy
#p
& #p
&
U2
U2
m2 + gy (
h = % 1 + " m1 + gy ( ) % 2 + "
lt % !
1 2
1( % !
2 2
2(
$
' $
'
h =h +h
lt
l
lm
Dr. M. Khosravy
p1 ! p2
hl =
+ g(y1 ! y2 )
!
l And
if
y1=y2,
p1 ! p2 "p
hl =
=
!
!
Dr. M. Khosravy
dp "p
32 U m
!
=
=!
dx L
D2
!p 32L U m
64 L U m2 64 L U m2
hl =
=
=
=
2
!
D
!U m D D 2
Re D 2
l Hence
Dr. M. Khosravy
L U m2
hl = f
D 2
Dr. M. Khosravy
l Therefore,
!p = !p ( D, L, e,U m , !, )
l Dimensional analysis,
"
!p
L e%
= "1 $
, , '
2
!U m
# !U m D D D &
hl =
!p
h
L e%
"
( l 2 = "1 $ Re , , '
#
!
!U m
D D&
hl
L !
e$
=
!
Re,
&
2#
U m2 / 2 D "
D%
Dr. M. Khosravy
!
"
e$
D%
2
!
L
U
! $ m$
hl = f # & # &
" D% " 2 %
Diagram.
Dr. M. Khosravy
Moody Diagram
24
Dr. M. Khosravy
l In
l The most widely used formula for the fricJon factor is that due to
Colebrook,
"e / D
1
2.51 %
= !2 log $
+
f
Re f '&
# 3.7
l This
Dr. M. Khosravy
' ! e / D 2.51 $ *
fo = 0.25 ) log #
+ 0.9 & ,
Re % +
( " 3.7
-2
l That
produces
results
within
1%
in
a
single
iteraJon
Dr. M. Khosravy
Minor Loss
27
KU m2
hlm =
2
where
the
loss
coecient,
K,
must
be
determined
experimentally
for
each
case.
l
2
! Le $ ! U m $
hlm = f # & #
" D % " 2 &%
Minor Loss
28
Dr. M. Khosravy
Minor
Losses
29
l Total
i pipe
sections
j
components
Dr. M. Khosravy
30
Dr. M. Khosravy
31
Dr. M. Khosravy
Non-Circular Ducts
32
Pipe flow results sometimes can be used for noncircular ducts or open channel flows to estimate the
head loss
Use Hydraulic Diameter, Dh =
4A
P
2
4
D
/4
D
=
=
D
For a circular duct, h
4
ab4
aAr
=
=
For rectangular duct, D
h
2
(
a
+
b
)2
(
1
+
Ar
)
Non-Circular Ducts
33
Ar=1
a=b
n
b
a
Dh2a
Dr. M. Khosravy
Pipes
in
series
l Volume
ow
rate
is
constant
l Head
loss
is
the
summaJon
of
parts
Pipes
in
parallel
l Volume
ow
rate
is
the
sum
of
the
components
l Pressure
loss
across
all
branches
is
the
same
Dr. M. Khosravy
34
A and B
l Since
p
is
the
same
for
all
branches,
head
loss
in
all
Dr. M. Khosravy
35
Dr. M. Khosravy
36
Dr. M. Khosravy
37
Dr. M. Khosravy
O p e r a J n g
p o i n t
i s
t h e
intersecJon
of
supply
and
demand
curves
39
Dr. M. Khosravy
40
Dr. M. Khosravy