Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region III
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF AURORA
Sitio Hiwalayan, Brgy. Bacong, San Luis, Aurora

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: SONNY F. SOLIVEN
Position: Master Teacher I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: AURORA
Rating Period:

Name of Rater: RAUL A. SORIANO

Position: Principal I
Date of Review:
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

MFOs

KRAs

Objectives

Timeline

I. PROFESSIONAL
GROWTH AND
DEVELOPMENT

TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

Weight
Per KRA

Performance Indicator
(Quality Efficiency Timeliness)

35%

1.1 Participated at least

two seminar,
workshop, trainings
within a year

Year Round

10%

5 Participated 4 seminars,
workshops, trainings, within a
year
4 Participated 3 seminars,
workshops, trainings, within a
year
3 Participated 2 seminars,
workshops, trainings, within a
year

1.2 Participated in the

Year Round

10%

5 Received Division

ACTUAL
RESULTS

RATING
Q

SCORE
Ave.

district level
competition within a
year

Award/Recognition, within a year

4 Received District
Award/Recognition, within a year
3 Received District
Award/Recognition, within a year

1.3 Organized Homeroom

PTCA, Class or other
Organization

Year Round

15%

5 Organized and maintained

functional homeroom PTCA
4 Conducted at least 4
Homeroom PTCA meetings
during the year
3 Participates in the community
projects and in civic
organizations

II. INSTRUCTIONAL
COMPETENCE

45%

2.1 Performed 100%

required teaching loads
during the year

June to
March

10%

5 Performed required teaching

loads and two or more other
school activities or ancillary
services
4 Performed required teaching
loads and 1 or more other school
activities or ancillary services
3 Performed 100% required
teaching loads

2.2 Completed 100% of

June to

15 %

5 Increased more than 3% from

the required competencies

for the pupils in every
grading period

March

the target pupils performance

4 Increased 1% - 3% from the
target pupils performance
3 - Achieved at least 75% of the
pupils performance

2.3 Increased at least 5 - 8

% Nat Performance of
School

June to
March

20 %

5 Increased at least 7 - 10%

NAT Performance of school
4 Increased at least 5 - 8 % Nat
Performance of School
3 Increased at least 2 - 7% NAT
Performance of School

III. INSTRUCTIONAL
SUPERVISION

20%

3.1 Observed at least 75%

of the assigned teachers in
the school with post
conference every year

Year round

5%

5 Observed more than 100% of

the assigned teachers with post
conference
4 Observed 85% of the assigned
teachers during the year
3 Observed -75% of the
assigned teachers during the year

3.2 Conducted 2 teachers

mentoring/coaching
program in the school
within a year

Year round

10%

5 Mentored/coached 100% of
the assigned teachers during the
year
4 Mentored/coached 85% of the

assigned teachers during the year

3 Mentored/coached 75% of the

assigned teachers during the year

3.3 Evaluated 85% of the

assigned teacher
performance following the
RPMS framework cycle

Year round

5%

5 Evaluated 100% of the

assigned teacher performance
following the RPMS framework
cycle
4 Evaluated 85% of the
assigned teacher performance
following the RPMS framework
cycle

SONNY F. SOLIVEN
Ratee

3 Evaluated 75% of the

assigned teacher performance
following the RPMS framework
cycle
APPROVED:
ALBERTO P. SALUDEZ, Ph.D.
Schools Division Superintendent

RAUL A. SORIANO
Rater
OVERALL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISHMENT