You are on page 1of 46

Constant Elasticity of Variance (CEV) Option

Pricing Model:Integration and Detailed Derivation


Ying-Lin Hsu
Department of Applied Mathematics
National Chung Hsing University
Co-authors: T. I. Lin and C. F. Lee
Oct. 21, 2008

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

1 / 46

Outline
Introduction
Transition Probability Density Function
Noncentral Chi-Square Distribution
The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model
Detailed Derivations of C1 and C2
Approaches to 2
Some Computational Considerations
Special Cases
Concluding Remarks

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

2 / 46

Introduction

CEV model
The CEV option pricing model is defined as
dS = Sdt + S /2 dZ,

< 2,

where dZ is a Wiener process and is a positive constant.

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

3 / 46

Introduction

The elasticity is 2 since the return variance (S, t) = 2 S 2 with


respect to price S has the following relationship
d(S, t)/dS
= 2,
(S, t)/S
which implies that d(S, t)/(S, t) = ( 2)dS/S.

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

4 / 46

Introduction

If = 2, then the elasticity is zero and the stock prices are lognormally
distributed as in the Black and Scholes model (1973).
If = 1, then the elasticity is -1. The model proposed by Cox and Ross
(1976).

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

5 / 46

Introduction

We will focus on the case of < 2 since many empirical evidences


(see Campbell (1987), Glosten et al. (1993), Brandt and Kang (2004))
have shown that the relationship between the stock price and its return
volatility is negative. The transition density for > 2 is given by
Emanuel and Macbeth (1982)

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

6 / 46

Transition Probability Density Function

Consider the constant elasticity of variance diffusion,


dS = (S, t) + (S, t)dZ,
where (S, t) = rS aS, and (S, t) = S /2 ,

0 < 2. Then

dS = (r a)Sdt + S /2 dZ.

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

7 / 46

Transition Probability Density Function

Let Y = Y (S, t) = S 2 . By Itos Lemma with


Y
= (2 )S 1 ,
S

Y
= 0,
t

2Y
= (2 )(1 )S ,
S 2

we have
i
h
1
dY = (r a)(2 )Y + 2 ( 1)( 2) dt + 2 (2 )2 Y dZ.
2

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

8 / 46

Transition Probability Density Function

The Kolmogorov forward equation for Y becomes


 n
 o
1 2
P
1 2  2
(ra)(2)Y
+
=

(2

)Y
P

(1)(2)
P .
t
2 Y 2
Y
2

Then f (ST | St , T > t) = f (YT | yt , T > t) | J | where J = (2 )S 1 .

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

9 / 46

Transition Probability Density Function

By Fellers Lemma with a = 21 2 (2 )2 , b = (r a)(2 ),


h = 12 2 ( 2)(1 ), x = 1/T , x0 = 1/t and t = = (T t), we have

f (ST | St , T > t) = (2)k1/(2) (xz 1 )1/(2(2)) exz I1/(2) (2(xz)1/2 )


where
k =

2(r a)
,
2 (2 )[e(ra)(2) 1]

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

x = k St2 e(ra)(2) ,

z = k ST2 .

Oct. 21, 2008

10 / 46

Transition Probability Density Function

Cox (1975) obtained the following option pricing formula:


x n
X
e x G n + 1 + 1/(2 ), k K 2
C = St e
(n + 1)
n=0

x n+1/(2)
X
e x
G n + 1, k K 2
r

Ke
,
n + 1 + 1/(2 )
n=0
r

R
where G(m, ) = ((m))1 eu um1 du is the standard
complementary gamma distribution function.

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

11 / 46

Noncentral Chi-Square Distribution

If Z1 , . . . , Z are standard normal random variables, and 1 , . . . , are


constants, then

X
(Zi + i )2
Y =
i=1

is the noncentral Chi-square distribution


with degrees of freedom
P
2
2
and noncentrality parameter = j=1 j , and is denoted as ().
When j = 0 for all j, then Y is distributed as the central Chi-square
distribution with degrees of freedom, and is denoted as 2 .

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

12 / 46

Noncentral Chi-Square Distribution

The cumulative distribution function of () is


2

F (x; , ) = P ( () x)
Z x

X
y
(/2)j
/2
y /2+j1 e 2 dy,
= e
/2
j!2 (/2 + j) 0
j=0

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

x > 0.

Oct. 21, 2008

13 / 46

Noncentral Chi-Square Distribution

An alternative expression for F (x; , ) is


F (x; , ) =

X
j=0

(/2)j e/2
j!

P (2+2j x).
2

The complementary distribution function of () is


Q(x; , ) = 1 F (x; , ).

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

14 / 46

Noncentral Chi-Square Distribution

The probability density function of () can be expressed as a


mixture of central Chi-square probability density functions.
p2 () (x) = e/2

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

X
( 1 )j
2

j!

j=0

(x+)/2
X
e

2/2

j=0

p2+2j (x)

x/2+j1 j
.
(/2 + j)22j j!

Oct. 21, 2008

15 / 46

Noncentral Chi-Square Distribution

An alternative expression for the probability density function of () is





1  x (2)/4
1
p2 () (x) =
exp ( + x) I(2)/2 ( x), x > 0,

2
2
where Ik is the modified Bessel function of the first kind of order k and
is defined as
j
 k X

z 2 /4
1
z
.
Ik (z) =
2
j!(k + j + 1)
j=0

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

16 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Following Schroder (1989) with the transition probability density


function, the option pricing formula under the CEV model is


C = E max(0, ST K) ,
= T t
Z
= er
f (ST | St , T > t)(ST K)dST
Z
ZK
r
r
= e
f (ST | St , T > t)dST
ST f (ST | St , T > t)dST e K
K

= C1 C2 .

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

17 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Detailed Derivations of C1 and C2

Making the change of variable w = k ST2 , we have


dST = (2 )1 k 1/(2) w(1)/(2) dw.
Let y = k K 2 .

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

18 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Detailed Derivations of C1 and C2

exw (x/w)1/(42) I 1 (2 xw)(w/k )1/(2) dw


2
y
Z

= er (x/k )1/(2)
exw (x/w)1/(42) I 1 (2 xw)dw
2
y
Z

= er St e(ra)
exw (w/x)1/(42) I 1 (2 xw)dw
2
y
Z

exw (w/x)1/(42) I 1 (2 xw)dw,


= ea St
r

C1 = e

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

19 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

C2 = Ke

Detailed Derivations of C1 and C2

x 42 w(12+22)/(42) exw I

= Ker

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

exw (x/w)1/(4) I

1
2

1
2

(2 xw)dw

(2 xw)dw.

Oct. 21, 2008

20 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Detailed Derivations of C1 and C2

Recall that the probability density function of the noncentral Chi-square


distribution with noncentrality and degree of freedom is

1
(x/)(2)/4 I(2)/2 ( x)e(+x)/2
2
= P (x; , ).

p2 () (x) =

Let Q(x; , ) =

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

p2 () (y)dy. Then letting w = 2w and x = 2x.

Oct. 21, 2008

21 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

C1 = St e

= St e

= St e

Z
Z

e(x+w)/2

 w 1/(42)

(x +w )/2

2y

Detailed Derivations of C1 and C2

1
2

!1/(42)

Q(2y; , x ),


2
a
= St e Q 2y; 2 +
, 2x ,
2

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)


2 xw dw
1
2


1
dw
2 x w
2

Oct. 21, 2008

22 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

= Ker

C2 = Ke

e(x

 x 1/(42)
w

+w )/2

2y

= Q 2y; 2

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

exw

Detailed Derivations of C1 and C2

2
, 2x
2

x
w

1
2

!1/(42)


2 xw dw
I

1
2


1

2 xw
dw
2

Oct. 21, 2008

23 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Detailed Derivations of C1 and C2

Thus,
C = St ea Q(2y; 2 +

2
2
, 2x) Ker Q(2y; 2
, 2x).
2
2

It is noted that 2 2/(2 ) can be negative for < 2. Thus further


work is needed.

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

24 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Detailed Derivations of C1 and C2

Using the monotone convergence theorem and the integration by


parts, we have
Z

P (2y; 2, 2k)dk

=
=

n=0

n=0

1 X
ezk (z/k)1 kz

ez z n+1
(n + )

n=0
k
n
e k

(n + 1)

(zk)n
dk
n!(n + 1 + 1)

dk

g(n + , z)G(n + 1, y)
g(n + 1, z)

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

g(i, y).

i=1

Oct. 21, 2008

25 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

G(n, y) =

Detailed Derivations of C1 and C2

ek kn1
dk
(n)

kn1 k
de
(n)
y
Z n2 k
k
e
y n1 ey
+
dk
=
(n)
(n 1)
y
n
X
y i1 ey
=
(i)
=

i=1

n
X

g(i, y).

i=1

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

26 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Detailed Derivations of C1 and C2

Next, applying the monotone convergence theorem, we have

=
=
=
=
=

Q(z; , k)
Z  
p 
1 y (2)/4
ky e(k+y)/2 dy
I 2
2
2
k
z
(2)/2 X

Z  

(ky/4)n (k+y)/2
1 y (2)/4 1 p
e
ky
dy
2 k
2
n! +2n
z
2
n=0

+2n

n 1 n Z
X
ey/2 y 2 1
k/2 k
2
e

 dy
1 (+2n)/2
+2n
(n + 1) z

n=0
2
2

n Z
(+2n)/2
X
+2n
(1/2)
(k/2)
 ey/2 y 2 1 dy
ek/2
+2n
(n + 1) z
2
n=0

ek/2

n=0

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

(k/2)n
Q(z; + 2n, 0),
(n + 1)

Oct. 21, 2008

27 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Detailed Derivations of C1 and C2

where
(1/2)(+2n)/2 y/2 +2n 1
 e
dy
y 2
+2n
z
2
Z
+2n
1
 y 2 1 dy
=
+2n e y
z/2
2
= G (n + /2, z/2) .

Q(z; + 2n, 0) =

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

28 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Detailed Derivations of C1 and C2

Furthermore
Q(z; , k) =
=

n=0

n=0

g (n + 1, k/2) G (n + /2, z/2)





2
g (n, k/2) G n +
, z/2 .
2

Hence
Q(2z; 2, 2k) =

n=0

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

g (n, k) G (n + 1, z) .

Oct. 21, 2008

29 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Detailed Derivations of C1 and C2

Again
Q(2z; 2, 2k)
= g (1, k) G (, z) + g (2, k) G ( + 1, z) + g (3, k) G ( + 2, z) +

= g (1, k) [G ( 1, z) + g (, z)] + g (2, k) [G ( 1, z) + g ( + 1, z)]


+g (3, k) [G ( 1, z) + g (, z) + g ( + 1, z) + g ( + 2, z)] +

= G ( 1, z) + g (, z) + g ( + 1, z) [1 g (1, k)]

+g ( + 2, z) [1 g (1, k) g (2, k)] +

X
g ( + n, z) g ( + 1, z) [g (1, k)]
= G ( 1, z) +
n=0

g ( + 2, z) [g (1, k) + g (2, k)] +

= 1 g ( + 1, z) [g (1, k)]

g ( + 2, z) [g (1, k) + g (2, k)] .

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

30 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Detailed Derivations of C1 and C2

We conclude that
Q(2z; 2, 2k) = 1
And

n=1

g (n + , z)

n
X

g (i, k) .

i=1

P (2z; 2, 2k)dk = 1 Q (2z; 2( 1), 2y) .

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

31 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Detailed Derivations of C1 and C2

Thus
C2


2
, 2w dw
= Ke
P 2x; 2 +
2
y


2
r
= Ke Q 2y; 2
, 2x
2


2
r
= Ke
1 Q(2x;
, 2y) .
2

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

32 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Detailed Derivations of C1 and C2

We obtain
a

C = St e

2
, 2x) Ker
Q(2y; 2 +
2


2
, 2y) ,
1 Q(2x;
2

where y = k K 2 , x = k St2 e(ra)(2),


k = 2(r a)/ 2 (2 )(e(ra)(2) 1) and a is the continuous
proportional dividend rate.

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

33 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Detailed Derivations of C1 and C2

When > 2 (see, Emanuel and MacBeth (1982), Chen and Lee
(1993)), the call option formula is as follows:


2
2
r
a
, 2y) Ke
, 2x) .
1 Q(2y; 2 +
C = St e Q(2x;
2
2

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

34 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Approaches to 2

We consider that the noncentral Chi-square distribution will approach


log-normal as tends to 2. Since when either or approaches to
infinity, the standardized variable
2

() ( + )
p
2( + 2)

tends to N(0,1) as either or .

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

35 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Approaches to 2

lim

lim

() ( + )
p
2( + 2)

2k ST2 ( + )
p
2( + 2)

2r ST2 (1 ) 2 (er (2) 1) 2r St2 er


= lim

2
2 (er (2) 1)
s
2 (er (2) 1)/(2 )

(1 ) 2 (er (2) 1) + 4r St2 er (2)


=

(2)

ln ST [ln St + (r 2 /2) ]

where r = r a.
Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

36 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Approaches to 2

Thus,
ln ST | ln St N (ln St + (r a 2 /2), 2 )

as 2 . Similarly, it also holds when 2+ . And we also obtain


the same result for > 2.

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

37 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Some Computational Considerations

First initialize the following four variables (with n = 1)


gA =

ez z
= g(1 + , z),
(1 + )

gB = ek = g(1, k),
Sg = gB,
R = 1 (gA)(Sg).

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

38 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Some Computational Considerations

Then repeat the following loop beginning with n = 2 and increase


increment n by one after each iteration. The loop is terminated when
the contribution to the sum, R, is declining and is very small.


z
gA = gA
= g(n + , z),
n+ 1


k
= g(n, k),
gB = gB
n1
Sg = Sg + gB = g(1, k) + g(n, k)
R = R (gA)(Sg) = the nth partial sum.

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

39 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Some Computational Considerations

As each iteration, gA equals g(n + , z), gB equals g(n, k) and Sg


equals g(1, k) + + g(n, k). The computation is easily done.

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

40 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Some Computational Considerations

Using the approximation


2

Q(z; , k) = P r( > z)
!
2

z
= Pr
>
+k
+k

!
h

h
2
z

>
= Pr
+k
+k


h
z
1

hP
[1

h
+
0.5(2

h)mP
]

+k

p
=
,
h 2P (1 + mP )

where h = 1 23 ( + k)( + 3k)( + 2k)2 , P = ( + 2k)/( + k)2 and


m = (h 1)(1 3h).
Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

41 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Q(z, 1, k) =

Special Cases

fY (y)dy

= 1 FY (z)

= 1 P (Y z)

= 1 P (z + )2 z

= 1 P (|z + | z)

= 1 P ( z z + z)

= 1 [N ( z ) N ( z)]

= N ( z k) + 1 N ( z k)

= N ( k z) + N ( k z).

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

42 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Q(z, 3, k) = Q(z, 1, k) +

= Q(z, 1, k) +
= Q(z, 1, k) +
= Q(z, 1, k) +
= Q(z, 1, k) +
= Q(z, 1, k) +

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Special Cases

1 X (k/4)j z j+ 2
 e(k+z)/2

2 j=0 j! 21 + j + 1
2j+1

2 1 X (kz)1/2

e(k+z)/2
2 k j=0 (2j + 1)!

X
1
( kz)2j+1 (k+z)/2

e
k 2 j=0 (2j + 1)!



1
1
1
e kz e kz e(z+k)/2
2
2
k


1
1 (k+z)2 /2
1 (kz)2 /2
e
e
2
2
k

i
1 h
N ( k z) N ( k + z) .
k
Oct. 21, 2008

43 / 46

The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model

Special Cases

Q(z; 5, k)

i
= Q(z; 1, k) + k1/2 N ( k z) N ( k + z)

+(k1 z k3/2 )N ( k z) + (k1 z + k3/2 )N ( k + z)

= Q(z; 1, k) + (k1/2 k3/2 + k1 z)N ( k z)

(k1/2 1 k1 z)N ( k + z)

= Q(z; 1, k)
h

i
3
+k 2 (k 1 + kz)N ( k z) (k 1 kz)N ( k + z) .

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

44 / 46

Concluding Remarks

The option pricing formula under the CEV model is quite complex
because it involves the cumulative distribution function of the
noncentral Chi-square distribution Q(z; , k).

Some computational considerations are given in the article which


will facilitate the computation of the CEV option pricing formula.

We can use the function pchisq(q, df , ncp) in free software R to


calculate the cumulative distribution function of the noncentral
Chi-square distribution, where q is the quantile, df is the degree of
freedom which non-integer values are allowed and ncp is the
noncentrality parameter.

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

45 / 46

Concluding Remarks

THE END.
Thanks For Your Attentions!

Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)

Oct. 21, 2008

46 / 46

You might also like