Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 / 46
Outline
Introduction
Transition Probability Density Function
Noncentral Chi-Square Distribution
The Noncentral Chi-Square Approach to Option Pricing Model
Detailed Derivations of C1 and C2
Approaches to 2
Some Computational Considerations
Special Cases
Concluding Remarks
2 / 46
Introduction
CEV model
The CEV option pricing model is defined as
dS = Sdt + S /2 dZ,
< 2,
3 / 46
Introduction
4 / 46
Introduction
If = 2, then the elasticity is zero and the stock prices are lognormally
distributed as in the Black and Scholes model (1973).
If = 1, then the elasticity is -1. The model proposed by Cox and Ross
(1976).
5 / 46
Introduction
6 / 46
0 < 2. Then
dS = (r a)Sdt + S /2 dZ.
7 / 46
Y
= 0,
t
2Y
= (2 )(1 )S ,
S 2
we have
i
h
1
dY = (r a)(2 )Y + 2 ( 1)( 2) dt + 2 (2 )2 Y dZ.
2
8 / 46
(2
)Y
P
(1)(2)
P .
t
2 Y 2
Y
2
9 / 46
2(r a)
,
2 (2 )[e(ra)(2) 1]
x = k St2 e(ra)(2) ,
z = k ST2 .
10 / 46
R
where G(m, ) = ((m))1 eu um1 du is the standard
complementary gamma distribution function.
11 / 46
X
(Zi + i )2
Y =
i=1
12 / 46
F (x; , ) = P ( () x)
Z x
X
y
(/2)j
/2
y /2+j1 e 2 dy,
= e
/2
j!2 (/2 + j) 0
j=0
x > 0.
13 / 46
X
j=0
(/2)j e/2
j!
P (2+2j x).
2
14 / 46
X
( 1 )j
2
j!
j=0
(x+)/2
X
e
2/2
j=0
p2+2j (x)
x/2+j1 j
.
(/2 + j)22j j!
15 / 46
1 x (2)/4
1
p2 () (x) =
exp ( + x) I(2)/2 ( x), x > 0,
2
2
where Ik is the modified Bessel function of the first kind of order k and
is defined as
j
k X
z 2 /4
1
z
.
Ik (z) =
2
j!(k + j + 1)
j=0
16 / 46
= C1 C2 .
17 / 46
18 / 46
= er (x/k )1/(2)
exw (x/w)1/(42) I 1 (2 xw)dw
2
y
Z
= er St e(ra)
exw (w/x)1/(42) I 1 (2 xw)dw
2
y
Z
C1 = e
19 / 46
C2 = Ke
x 42 w(12+22)/(42) exw I
= Ker
exw (x/w)1/(4) I
1
2
1
2
(2 xw)dw
(2 xw)dw.
20 / 46
1
(x/)(2)/4 I(2)/2 ( x)e(+x)/2
2
= P (x; , ).
p2 () (x) =
Let Q(x; , ) =
21 / 46
C1 = St e
= St e
= St e
Z
Z
e(x+w)/2
w 1/(42)
(x +w )/2
2y
1
2
!1/(42)
Q(2y; , x ),
2
a
= St e Q 2y; 2 +
, 2x ,
2
2 xw dw
1
2
1
dw
2 x w
2
22 / 46
= Ker
C2 = Ke
e(x
x 1/(42)
w
+w )/2
2y
= Q 2y; 2
exw
2
, 2x
2
x
w
1
2
!1/(42)
2 xw dw
I
1
2
1
2 xw
dw
2
23 / 46
Thus,
C = St ea Q(2y; 2 +
2
2
, 2x) Ker Q(2y; 2
, 2x).
2
2
24 / 46
P (2y; 2, 2k)dk
=
=
n=0
n=0
1 X
ezk (z/k)1 kz
ez z n+1
(n + )
n=0
k
n
e k
(n + 1)
(zk)n
dk
n!(n + 1 + 1)
dk
g(n + , z)G(n + 1, y)
g(n + 1, z)
g(i, y).
i=1
25 / 46
G(n, y) =
ek kn1
dk
(n)
kn1 k
de
(n)
y
Z n2 k
k
e
y n1 ey
+
dk
=
(n)
(n 1)
y
n
X
y i1 ey
=
(i)
=
i=1
n
X
g(i, y).
i=1
26 / 46
=
=
=
=
=
Q(z; , k)
Z
p
1 y (2)/4
ky e(k+y)/2 dy
I 2
2
2
k
z
(2)/2 X
Z
(ky/4)n (k+y)/2
1 y (2)/4 1 p
e
ky
dy
2 k
2
n! +2n
z
2
n=0
+2n
n 1 n Z
X
ey/2 y 2 1
k/2 k
2
e
dy
1 (+2n)/2
+2n
(n + 1) z
n=0
2
2
n Z
(+2n)/2
X
+2n
(1/2)
(k/2)
ey/2 y 2 1 dy
ek/2
+2n
(n + 1) z
2
n=0
ek/2
n=0
(k/2)n
Q(z; + 2n, 0),
(n + 1)
27 / 46
where
(1/2)(+2n)/2 y/2 +2n 1
e
dy
y 2
+2n
z
2
Z
+2n
1
y 2 1 dy
=
+2n e y
z/2
2
= G (n + /2, z/2) .
Q(z; + 2n, 0) =
28 / 46
Furthermore
Q(z; , k) =
=
n=0
n=0
2
g (n, k/2) G n +
, z/2 .
2
Hence
Q(2z; 2, 2k) =
n=0
g (n, k) G (n + 1, z) .
29 / 46
Again
Q(2z; 2, 2k)
= g (1, k) G (, z) + g (2, k) G ( + 1, z) + g (3, k) G ( + 2, z) +
= G ( 1, z) + g (, z) + g ( + 1, z) [1 g (1, k)]
X
g ( + n, z) g ( + 1, z) [g (1, k)]
= G ( 1, z) +
n=0
= 1 g ( + 1, z) [g (1, k)]
30 / 46
We conclude that
Q(2z; 2, 2k) = 1
And
n=1
g (n + , z)
n
X
g (i, k) .
i=1
31 / 46
Thus
C2
2
, 2w dw
= Ke
P 2x; 2 +
2
y
2
r
= Ke Q 2y; 2
, 2x
2
2
r
= Ke
1 Q(2x;
, 2y) .
2
32 / 46
We obtain
a
C = St e
2
, 2x) Ker
Q(2y; 2 +
2
2
, 2y) ,
1 Q(2x;
2
33 / 46
When > 2 (see, Emanuel and MacBeth (1982), Chen and Lee
(1993)), the call option formula is as follows:
2
2
r
a
, 2y) Ke
, 2x) .
1 Q(2y; 2 +
C = St e Q(2x;
2
2
34 / 46
Approaches to 2
() ( + )
p
2( + 2)
35 / 46
Approaches to 2
lim
lim
() ( + )
p
2( + 2)
2k ST2 ( + )
p
2( + 2)
2
2 (er (2) 1)
s
2 (er (2) 1)/(2 )
(2)
ln ST [ln St + (r 2 /2) ]
where r = r a.
Ying-Lin Hsu (NCHU)
36 / 46
Approaches to 2
Thus,
ln ST | ln St N (ln St + (r a 2 /2), 2 )
37 / 46
ez z
= g(1 + , z),
(1 + )
gB = ek = g(1, k),
Sg = gB,
R = 1 (gA)(Sg).
38 / 46
39 / 46
40 / 46
Q(z; , k) = P r( > z)
!
2
z
= Pr
>
+k
+k
!
h
h
2
z
>
= Pr
+k
+k
h
z
1
hP
[1
h
+
0.5(2
h)mP
]
+k
p
=
,
h 2P (1 + mP )
41 / 46
Q(z, 1, k) =
Special Cases
fY (y)dy
= 1 FY (z)
= 1 P (Y z)
= 1 P (z + )2 z
= 1 P (|z + | z)
= 1 P ( z z + z)
= 1 [N ( z ) N ( z)]
= N ( z k) + 1 N ( z k)
= N ( k z) + N ( k z).
42 / 46
Q(z, 3, k) = Q(z, 1, k) +
= Q(z, 1, k) +
= Q(z, 1, k) +
= Q(z, 1, k) +
= Q(z, 1, k) +
= Q(z, 1, k) +
Special Cases
1 X (k/4)j z j+ 2
e(k+z)/2
2 j=0 j! 21 + j + 1
2j+1
2 1 X (kz)1/2
e(k+z)/2
2 k j=0 (2j + 1)!
X
1
( kz)2j+1 (k+z)/2
e
k 2 j=0 (2j + 1)!
1
1
1
e kz e kz e(z+k)/2
2
2
k
1
1 (k+z)2 /2
1 (kz)2 /2
e
e
2
2
k
i
1 h
N ( k z) N ( k + z) .
k
Oct. 21, 2008
43 / 46
Special Cases
Q(z; 5, k)
i
= Q(z; 1, k) + k1/2 N ( k z) N ( k + z)
(k1/2 1 k1 z)N ( k + z)
= Q(z; 1, k)
h
i
3
+k 2 (k 1 + kz)N ( k z) (k 1 kz)N ( k + z) .
44 / 46
Concluding Remarks
The option pricing formula under the CEV model is quite complex
because it involves the cumulative distribution function of the
noncentral Chi-square distribution Q(z; , k).
45 / 46
Concluding Remarks
THE END.
Thanks For Your Attentions!
46 / 46