Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Karlene Cole-Palmer,it is believed that the CPI in this complaint accessed the SDU, state disbursement
unit on February 3rd,2011 and February 4th 2011 to intercept child support payments, as indicated by a
SDU representative upon inquiry regarding a recent child support order, judgement, issued by Division 42,
Orange County, Florida, respondent and payor, Carlos Alberto Gonzalez. The CPI false allegations were
intended to intercept payments, indicative as a white collar economic crime, fraud. The CPI made this
intercept by deception on the court and fraud alleging that my children had been kidnapped as a dismissal
was entered agaiinst Felicia Handley, the CPI in this complaint on January 28th, 2011 after without a court
order or any documentation she not only harassed me in public, but violated the children's and my rights
the evening of January 27th, 2011 arriving at a convience store with the Orlando Police Department.
Felicia Handley's accompanying agent jumped out a gray yelling "it's over", 'its over" as witnessed by
Orlando Police Department. The incident occurred on the evening of Michyl Shaw's science night at
Ferncreek Elementary, whereas the parents and the children were transported by Orange County District
Schools to Ferncreek Elementary and then home again. Shortly after departing off the school bus and
walking over to the covenience store nearby our residence, the police and a gray car that Handley and the
accompanying agent were in, pulled up in front of the convience store and detained myself and my
children stating that they had a right to take the children that evening until court the following morning, and
that they had already contacted the fathers of the children prior to arrival which is where the children were
to be taken in to temporary custody without an order from the court until the hearing the following morning
on January 28th, 2011. At the hearing held in the judicial chambers of Judge Anthony Johnson, DCF
representatives, the CPI, Felicia Handley were informed that there would be a dismissal and the children
were to attend school, and until further notice of an eviction from the residential address, no action would
be heard.Felicia Hankley follows with a malicious, attrocious lie about missing children and kidnapping,
that both Michyl Shaw and Isis Shaw had been missing since February 3, 2011, which was false, and
verifiable by the children's primary doctor who had seen both children on the evening of February 3rd,
2011 while in the custody of the mother, myself. In addition, no staff members or persons of authority at
the residential dwelling had ever given such information to Felicia Handley. I am inquiring as to what
action under Florida and Federal Statute has been taken against Felicia Handley or the Department in
addition to further evidence of fraud on the court, intentional omission by DCF departmental attorneys
constituting attorney deciet and misconduct, of child support recovery proceedings in division 42 of which
the mother and the children were under representation druing which time there ware repeated "reserved
actions", and actions in the case regarding termination of parental rights which were unauthorized, not
consulted upon or actions that continued to delay recovery and collection from what is referred legal as
CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT, under federal recovery. Chapter 39 details what is referred to as a "threshold
of demonstrative illustration" by the noncustodical parent of financial support outside of any family support
or mental support in the interests of the children (PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO CHILDREN
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=00000099/0039/0039.html)
Sec. 411. Data collection and reporting
Social Security Act Title IV
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/programs/css/child_support_handbook_with_toc.pdf The
federal child support program wasestablished in 1975 under Title IV-D of the SocialSecurity Act.
cc: letter