Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2, 2014, 95136
DOI 10.1179/0430877814Z.00000000031
96
Introduction
Bladdernut botany
European bladdernut (Staphylea pinnata L.) is a small shrub in the Staphyleaceae
family. It is the only species found in Europe, apart from its next relative, Staphylea
colchica, which is limited to the Caucasus region. The plant is a deciduous, mediumsized shrub reaching a maximum height and width of about 4 to 5 m, bearing pinnate
foliage, not unlike elder leaves, and contributing to the species epithet in its scientific
name.2 Usually during April and May, small white to slightly rose-tinted flowers
emerge in hanging panicles (Figure 1). It was most probably this shape of the inflorescence which inspired Pliny the Elder to call this shrub staphylodendron (grapetree) in his Naturalis Historia (Natural History),3 and which eventually led to the
plants modern genus name Staphylea. If pollinated, during summer the flowers
develop into bi- to trilocular bloated capsules4 of 3 to 5 cm in diameter (Figure 2),
usually containing two to four seeds (rarely up to seven, see below). The seeds themselves (Figure 3) vary in size between 1 and 2 cm, and have a smooth and robust seed
coat, usually nearly 1 mm thick. If shaken, the ripe seeds rattle inside the dried fruits.
The shrubs bark bears a conspicuous pattern not unlike snakeskin.
A FISTFUL OF BLADDERNUTS
97
gure 1 Flowering bladdernut shrub in April. Top: overview; bottom: detail of a ower
panicle.
Images: (top) A. G. Heiss; (bottom) K. Wanninger
98
A FISTFUL OF BLADDERNUTS
99
gure 3 Modern
bladdernut seeds,
gathered in the
Botanical Garden of
Karlsruhe in 2006.
Image: A. G. Heiss
100
BCE
BCE
CE
D, Bremen-Mahndorf
n.a.
n.a. (Germanic)
DK, Brnde
CE
third/fourth c.
n.a.
CE
third/fourth c.
end of second c.
Roman Period
eighthsixth c.
I, Masseria Mammarella
CZ, Tetice
BCE
n.a.
20301980
I, Lucone, Brescia
Country, Site
Prehistoric
Period
grave
grave
grave
grave
grave
grave
culture layer
culture layer
culture layer
culture layer
culture layer
culture layer
Context
Remain(s)
wood
1 seed
1 punched seed
11 seeds
2 wood fragments
2 seeds
TABLE 1
181
180
179
178
177
176
175
174
173
172
171
170
Ref.
A FISTFUL OF BLADDERNUTS
101
CE
CE
eighthtenth c.
CE
CE
CE
CE
seventeenth/eighteenth c.
seventeenth c.
beginning of sixteenth c.
CE
CE
B, Kortrijk
B, Mechelen
H, Kerek-Fehrk vra
CE
end of fifteenth c.
D, Kelheim
PL, Wrocaw
CE
CE
PL, Krakw
CZ, Brno
CZ, Lie
CZ, Mikulice
D, Kirchheim am Ries
D, Trossingen-Stohrenhof
Country, Site
n.a.
c. 1450
elevenththirteenth c.
tenthtwelfth c.
tentheleventh c.
c. 1100
CE
CE
CE
eighthtenth c.
680880
end of 7th c.
sixth c.
Period
refuse layer
cesspit
cesspit
cesspit
well
culture layer
culture layer
culture layer
culture layer
culture layer
culture layer
culture layer
grave
grave
Context
CONTINUED
TABLE 1
5 seeds
1 seed
3 seeds
1 seed
2 seeds
1 seed
6 seeds
3 wood fragments
Remain(s)
196
195
194
193
192
191
190
189
188
187
186
185
184
183
182
Ref.
102
ANDREAS G. HEISS et al.
A FISTFUL OF BLADDERNUTS
103
have their own pitfalls, the difficulty of the proper identification of a plant from a
written description alone being the most important. This is mainly due to the vastly
differing concepts of what is nowadays being considered a plant species, and how this
was (and might have been) regarded in the past.27 As we will see in the results, species
identification could not be completely verified in some older written sources and
remains inconclusive. Historical and contemporary texts containing possible mentions of bladdernut were consulted in a database of botanical literature from prior
work by the first author,28 compiled from extensive library searches, and based on
information from other experts in the field. In prior publications, other authors have
already assembled large amounts of ethnographic evidence for Staphylea pinnata
use for southern Poland,29 northern Moldavia,30 and Bohemia,31 which the current
publication is building on. In cases where historical plant names in foreign languages
are used, they are put in inverted commas, even when contrary to the common practice of using italics, with the aim of facilitating the discrimination between historical
vernacular names and modern botanical (scientific) names conforming to the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (ICBN).32 However, in the Tables, no
inverted commas were used in order to maintain legibility.
The data
Prehistory
Until a few years ago, finds of Staphylea pinnata from prehistorical periods were
either hardly available, badly dated, or did not allow for clear interpretations of the
plants potential use based on the archaeological context. Among these finds are, for
example, some charred seeds from the pile-dwelling settlement of Ripa in Bosnia33
dating approximately from the Neolithic to Iron Age period. They were found among
the remains of cultivated crops such as barley, peas, and lentils, and a multitude of
gathered fruits. More Staphylea finds come from a similar context in the Bronze Age
pile-dwelling settlement of Castione dei Marchesi in upper Italy.34 However, as the
bladdernut seeds from both sites have not been properly dated, and archaeobotanical
methodology for identifying plant remains was far from fully developed at the end of
the nineteenth century (when the above-mentioned finds were identified), as they
stand, these objects cannot contribute much to our understanding of past uses of
Staphylea pinnata. The situation at the early Bronze Age site of Masseria Mammarella in central Italy is quite different, however: as in the aforementioned cases, the
seeds originated from a culture layer (well dated this time) containing numerous
cultivated crops barley, emmer, chickpea, and broad bean as well as gathered
fruits such as acorns, wild grapevine, and brambles.35
Different interpretations are suggested by the finds context at the site recently
excavated in Lucone, close to Lago di Garda, Italy. The early Bronze Age culture
layers at the pile-dwelling settlement revealed an intact necklace composed of marble
beads and punched bladdernut seeds,36 rendering this object the oldest existing
evidence of the use of bladdernut seeds as botanical beads (Figure 5), and currently
the only find of its kind for this period.
Some finds from the early Iron Age are documented from Italian Guglionesi
where eleven intact seeds were discovered in a culture layer.37 Much further to the
104
north-east, from roughly the same period, comes a find of several fragments of charred
bladdernut wood in Tetice, southern Moravia,38 with unclear interpretation of the
woods purpose. However, there is ample evidence of ritual use of Staphylea wood
in modern times (see below).
Currently, no pre-Roman finds from late Iron Age (La Tne culture) have been
discovered.
A FISTFUL OF BLADDERNUTS
105
above,43 describing a tree growing north of the Alps with wood resembling that of
maple, and bearing pods containing seeds that tasted like hazelnuts. Although this
description is still vague, it already exceeds accounts from Greek sources, and the
combination of characteristics makes identification as bladdernut at least feasible.
From the Roman period, we know of several archaeological finds documenting
what seems to have been the intentional deposition of S. pinnata as an item included
in human burials: bladdernut seeds are documented as a component of Roman grave
goods for a total of five sites across Europe (Table 1). In three cases the seeds were
used as parts of pendants, or bracelets (Figure 6). The most remarkable fact about all
these finds (in northern Poland,44 northern Germany,45 and Denmark46) is that they
are located far outside the supposed modern area of natural distribution of bladdernut (see introduction). Obviously, the seeds of this plant were important enough to
gure 6 Roman bladdernut objects from northern Europe. (a) Seeds on metal strings from
Pruszcz Gdaski, northern Poland; (b) Photograph of one of the seeds; (c) Illustration of
the bladdernut seed and two amber beads on the pendant from Vindinge, Denmark;
(d) Photograph of the same object.
Images: (a) M. Pietrzak and M. Tuszynska;166 (b) M. Lataowa; (c) D. E. Robinson;167 (d)
National Museum of Denmark
106
play a role in long-distance transport and trade and reach some of the most remote
Roman provinces.
We know far less about the uses of bladdernut among peoples who were contemporary with the Romans. Although G. Hegi claimed that the Celts had planted
Staphylea pinnata on their graves,47 he did not provide any direct evidence or sources
in support of this assertion. In fact, neither written sources (by the Romans) nor
archaeological finds from the La Tne period (the Celtic times) support this claim.
Unfortunately, Hegis statement has been reproduced uncritically in much of the
literature on historical uses of bladdernut.48 One author even states that the Celts
used them to make various adornments,49 ignoring the fact that up to now no
archaeological or written evidence on bladdernut use during the La Tne period
exists.
Some singular evidence for the use of Staphylea in Germanic funerary rites exists.
For example, charred bladdernut wood was found in a grave close to Nitra in Slovakia,50 although the exact significance of its presence remains unknown. As in the case
of the early Iron Age bladdernut wood from Tetice,51 we should point to various
kinds of folklore about bladdernut wood as recorded for modern times in Slovakia
(see below). However, the long interval of more than 1500 years between these
two sources provides a compelling caveat against simplistically equating any modern
evidence with its earlier counterpart.
A FISTFUL OF BLADDERNUTS
107
gure 7 Bladdernut pendant from the early Middle Ages, Kirchheim am Ries, BadenWrttemberg, Germany.
Image from Neuffer-Mller (1983), image courtesy: Regierungsprsidium Stuttgart,
Landesdenkmalamt
castle Fehrk in Kerek, south-western Hungary,63 may very well point to the
same direction as many previous finds: gathering of bladdernut seeds intended for
nutritional purposes.
Written evidence on Staphylea pinnata is much more difficult to interpret in spite
of an ample literary heritage from the High and Late Middle Ages. Most of the
consulted works on plants either make no mention of bladdernut, or are obviously
describing Pistacia vera (pistachio). Frequently, following the antique Dioscoridean
tradition, they simply fail to make any noticeable differentiation between pistachio
and the false pistachio Staphylea,64 thus making them rather unreliable sources of
information on bladdernut use.65
108
a cesspit in Mechelen in Belgium (sixteenth century ce),66 and five seeds from a cesspit in Arnstadt, Thuringia (seventeenth century ce).67 In contrast to the original
interpretation,68 the latter bladdernut assemblage may, nevertheless, derive from its
use as food, considering that these seeds were found together with other food plants
such as peach (Prunus persica), cherry (Prunus avium), plum (Prunus domestica),
pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo), walnut (Juglans regia), and hazelnut (Corylus avellana).
However, as both of these sites lie far outside the supposed natural area of Staphylea
distribution, this interpretation must be treated with caution. Another find far outside
the bladdernuts natural range was recorded in Kortrijk in Belgium and dates to the
seventeenth/eighteenth century ce. This singular example comprises the fragment of
a rosary, with a Staphylea seed as the centrepiece.69
As briefly alluded to above, a possible reason for the extremely scant written
evidence on bladdernut prior to the Renaissance herbals may be that Staphylea had
simply never been part of the great medicinal books of antiquity. In addition to the
tradition of translating and transcribing these ancient sources rather than conducting
their own research, most authors seem to have simply ignored plants not contained
in these works. During the Renaissance, with the emerging new ways of thinking, the
famous herbalists sought new objects of interest instead of relying solely on the old
traditions. The general situation for obtaining fresh insights into contemporary views
on plants improves considerably in this period. Although some herbals, such as that
compiled by Leonhart Fuchs, still do not mention Staphylea,70 quite a few others
include it in their lists (Table 2).
While Dodoens finds no use for bladdernut,71 Lonitzer attributes a wide range
of medicinal uses to the plant; however, making a common mistake, he equates it
with pistachio.72 A Bohemian manuscript mentioning a variety of magical (mostly
apotropaic) properties of bladdernut, as well as medical and veterinary applications
is the oldest source known to us.73 A herbal from Poland mentions the use of the
sweet-tasting nuts in rosaries, and the popular belief that they chase away demons.74
Modern times
Along with the rapid development of ethnography, ethnobotany arose as a scientific
discipline in the second half of the nineteenth century.75 The systematically gathered
ethnobotanical data changed the knowledge of bladdernut utilization quite dramatically. Throughout Europe, and with a marked focus on central and eastern Europe,
numerous records from these most recent periods were found. These related mainly
to folk medicine, magical beliefs and nutritional uses, and to technical uses to a much
lesser extent. They are listed in Table 2. Unfortunately, such sources tell little about
the temporal dimension of a certain purpose unless combined with their historical
and archaeological contexts. An attempt at interdisciplinary diachronical interpretations for each category of bladdernut utilization is presented in the following section.
A FISTFUL OF BLADDERNUTS
109
TABLE 2
USES AS FOUND IN WRITTEN SOURCES ON BLADDERNUT ACROSS EUROPE
The dates or periods given are to be regarded as termini ante quem, as of course the actual ages of
the listed uses cannot be determined. ABA: antibacterial, ado: antidote, APH: aphrodisiac, ARI:
antirheumatic, antiinammatory, ATR: apotropaic, CAL: carminative/laxative, CAN: cancer medicine,
CRP: carpentry, DEC: decoration (either the whole plant or the seeds in adornments other than
rosaries), DIU: diuretic, DOW: dowsing rod, DYE: dyeing, FUE: fuel, FUM: fumigant, HEM: hemostatic
use, HEP: hepatical disorders, INS: insectifuge, MED: general medical purposes, MEL: melliferous
ower, MEN: mental and nervous disorders, headaches, NUT: nutrition, PLA: against the plague,
QUA: settles quarrels and misunderstandings, REL: other religious uses than in rosaries, RES:
respiratory disorders, ROS: rosary beads, SKI: skin disorders, sym: sympathetic magic, TOX: warning
against toxicity, TUR: turnery, VET: veterinary uses, WEA: weather magic
Date/period
Region
Magical uses
Other uses
Note
Ref.
Modern Times
2012
Germany
ROS
197
2012
Notranjska
(Slovenia)
DEC (seeds)
198
2012
Croatia
199
2012
Vojvodina
(Serbia/Croatia)
MEL
200
2010
Germany
CAL, RES
homeopathy
201
2009
W-/S-Poland
202
20002009 Slovakia
203
2008
Bulgaria
MED
no particular use
mentioned
204
2007
Poland
ROS
205
2006
Germany
CRP, TUR
206
1999
Bulgaria
QUA (flower
decoction)
207
1996
onwards
S Germany
APH
208
1990s
E Bosnia
1986
W Balkans
1960
209
210
Bulgaria
211
1957
luknov
(Bohemia)
ROS
212
1948
Eifel region
ROS
213
1939
Bulgaria
QUA (flower
decoction)
as herbal tea
214
1935/1936
Silesia
SYM
215
110
TABLE 2
CONTINUED
Date/period
Region
Magical uses
Other uses
Note
Ref.
1935/1936
Bohemia
ATR, REL
CAL
216
early
twentieth
century
central France
ROS
217
1908
Slovakia
MEN
someone who is
unconscious is hit with
bladdernut twigs to wake
him/her up
218
1907
Austria
DEC (seeds)
219
1903
northern
Moldavia
220
1902
SE Hungary
ATR, SYM
221
18361900 Sweden
DEC (plant)
222
1879
Bohemia
INS
223
1857
Germany
DYE
224
1849
Belgium
225
1846
France
DEC (plant)
226
1839
France
227
1839
France
228
1836
Vojvodina
ROS
(Serbia/Croatia)
229
1827
Poland
230
1806
France
ROS
231
1800
France
no uses mentioned
232
1799
Poland
ROS?
233
1791
Germany
ROS
TOX (nausea,
headache)
234
Poland
ATR, ROS
(NUT)
235
1683
Scotland
DEC (plant)
236
1629
England
237
111
A FISTFUL OF BLADDERNUTS
TABLE 2
CONTINUED
Date/period
Region
Magical uses
Other uses
Note
Ref.
1605
central
APH
Mediterranean
238
1597
England
APH
239
1586
central/W
Europe
TOX (nausea)
240
1581
central/W
Europe
ROS
241
1586
central/W
Europe
TOX (nausea)
242
1560
Moravia
ATR
243
1557
central/W
Europe
no uses mentioned
244
1557
central/W
Europe
treated as equal to
Pistacia vera
245
central/W
Europe
APH
246
Middle Ages
148790
Antiquity
first c.
CE
central/E Medit. -
NUT?
247
first c.
CE
central/E Medit. -
ADO, CAL
248
249
fourth/third
c. BCE
E Medit.
no uses mentioned
Table 1) can safely be regarded as the oldest evidence of the plant as a food resource
in southern Europe. The early Iron Age finds from Guglionesi77 can be interpreted in
the same way. Of course, the finds from Ripa78 and Castione dei Marchesi79 may
point to similar uses, but due to the absence of exact dating methods, and the current
lack of precise identification as bladdernut, these remain of limited value.
Subsequent to the Guglionesi find, we observe a large temporal and spatial gap in
the evidence on human consumption of bladdernut seeds. The hiatus ends with a
series of bladdernut seeds found in cesspits and all kinds of other culture layers across
European sites. Such widely dispersed examples hail from Slovenia,80 to northern
Italy81 and from to Belgium82 to Poland83 spanning the periods from the seventh84 to
the seventeenth/eighteenth85 centuries. The contextualized provenance of these seeds,
found either as part of the refuse in cesspits, or amongst other food plants, suggests
their use as a foodstuff highly likely in these periods and regions.
112
Written sources remain rather silent on this kind of Staphylea use. While Pliny
may be the earliest author implying bladdernut consumption,86 later sources from
medieval until early modern times do explicitly mention the possibility of eating
bladdernuts (mainly for medical reasons). Usually, these add warnings of side-effects
of the seeds consumption such as impending nausea or churning guts (Table 2) due
to their alleged toxicity. Such caveats were, however, completely unfounded as the
plant is by no means considered toxic nowadays.87
In general, the knowledge of the palatability of bladdernut (seeds, shoots, and flowers) seems to be most rooted and best preserved in eastern-central and eastern Europe:
the only two old historical sources we could find which explicitly state that even
excess consumption is regarded harmless come from Renaissance Moravia88 and from
Late Baroque southern Poland,89 respectively. Modern evidence for the consumption
of bladdernut is still abundant in these regions: in the western Balkans, the pickled
spring shoots eaten as a side-dish, and the roasted seeds mainly used as a sweet flourlike additive to bread and cakes continued into the twentieth century.90 In particular,
the use of roasted and ground bladdernut seeds as a basis for porridge and as a bread
additive is reported from eastern Bosnia during Yugoslavian Wars of the 1990s.91
Consumption of pickled blossoms is also reported from present-day eastern Georgia
and northern Armenia, although the consulted sources do not clearly differentiate
between Staphylea pinnata and S. colchica.92
Medicinal uses
Due to the nearly impossible task of differentiating medical uses from consumption
based on the archaeological evidence alone, sensible discussion of this issue is only
possible for periods for which written sources exist. And as mentioned above, plant
identification in written sources often makes it difficult to discern between the species
treated in a particular text. In the case of bladdernut, it is mainly the confusion
or amalgamation of Staphylea pinnata and Pistacia vera that is observed in the literature. In general, it is mainly the carminative or laxative effects which are expected,
often in connection with warnings of the seeds alleged but unfounded toxicity (see
above). Applications as antidote or against skin and respiratory disorders are also
found (Table 2). The use of bladdernut as an aphrodisiac, listed among the magical
properties, is discussed in a separate section. In general, the bladdernuts role in
folk medicine seems to have completely ended by the end of the eighteenth century,
giving way to mainly magico-religious and technical uses. The boundary between the
medicine and magic is not, however, always clear.
Surprising for some, perhaps, the very recent utilization of bladdernut in homeopathy is listed among the magical rather than the medicinal uses in Table 2. This
is due to the lack of any homeopathic effects beyond placebo as observed in major
studies and meta studies,93 and some serious clashes with well-known mechanisms in
physics and chemistry,94 placing homeopathy in esotericism rather than in medical
science. With roots in both the doctrine of signatures and the idea of similia similibus
curantur, the bloated fruits of bladdernut are believed to be an ailment against meteorism and pulmonary disorders,95 the latter perhaps also influenced by the tradition
of certain late medieval96 and early Modern texts,97 as already mentioned above.
A FISTFUL OF BLADDERNUTS
113
Technical purposes
Few records have been found on technical uses of bladdernut. In the nineteenthcentury literature on dyeing, the leaves and fruits of bladdernut are mentioned as a
source for red dye.99 Carpentry and turnery are also mentioned,100 with bladdernut
wood being used to produce small items like cigarette holders and pipes.101 The use
of the seeds as a source of oil is mentioned in several sources (Table 2). The purpose
of this oil is not usually clearly stated, although mention of lamp oil exists from
Poland.102
In Roman graves, finds of rattles are not uncommon.107 It is argued that these
idiophones (metal bracelets, vibrating bells, and the like) bearing apotropaic
properties108 may have served their purpose in the graves: either averting evil
spirits from the deceased, or protecting the living from the dead. Cases in
which rattles were not exposed to the fire in incineration graves (as were the
corpse itself and the regular grave goods), but were interred separately, may
accentuate their particular roles.109 Bladdernut seeds represent natural rattles
inside their ripe fruits. We therefore hypothesize that the Staphylea pendants
may not have been just adornments, but may have represented an artefactual
translation of their noise-making into an apotropaic idiophone (i.e. a strung
rattle or stick rattle110).
114
2.
The particular shape of the seeds may have played a role in the use of bladdernut in Roman funerary rites: the seeds bear resemblance to little heads with
their noses cut off, or little skulls (Figure 3). This resemblance is reflected in
some modern French and German local names, such as nez coup (cut nose),
Todtenkpfli (small skull),111 or Todtenkopfbaum (skull tree)112 and also
made its way into a legend recorded in Steyr, Austria (see below).113 Whether
the Romans also saw this resemblance and whether this sufficed for an association with death and to the underworld, we cannot know without further
evidence.
The latter issue may, however, have some general relevance to the use of bladdernuts
as beads: all archaeological finds of Staphylea from early Bronze Age northern
Italy114 to early medieval south-western Germany115 which had been transformed
into beads (see Table 1) have the holes drilled through the lateral faces of the seeds
at the right angle to the longitudinal axis (Figures 58). This is quite difficult to
achieve, and the easier way would be drilling through the soft attachment scar. It
may very well be that this method of manufacture was deliberately chosen during
prehistory and early history in order to preserve the view of cut noses.
A FISTFUL OF BLADDERNUTS
115
contain two to four seeds. However, in rare cases the seed number per fruit may go
up as high as seven (Figure 9). These were regarded as lucky seeds (Glcksnchen)
in Silesia and carried in the purse as a warrant for good luck and wealth.123
The numerous rhymes (most probably spells) involving bladdernut, as they are
documented from early twentieth-century northern Moldavia, are difficult to evaluate. Most of them refer to sick youths, either ending with their death or their healing.
One example from Mahala124 shall be given here:
116
gure 9 Histogram of seed counts per fruit as observed in 199 bladdernut fruits from
twenty stands in Lower Austria. X axis: seed count per fruit, Y axis: frequency of seed count:
93% of the observed fruits did not bear more than four seeds.
Diagram: K. Wanninger
Bladdernut in rosaries
The rosary, being basically a prayer mnemonic,125 unites in itself aspects of an adornment
and also of apotropaic properties (see above). This particular aspect of the use of bladdernut seeds shall be treated in a separate section.
A FISTFUL OF BLADDERNUTS
117
118
gure 10 Modern
bladdernut rosaries.
(Top) object from
central France (made
in the rst half of
twentieth century ce)
with polished
Staphylea seeds;
(bottom) object from
southern Poland (kept
in the Botanical
Garden Museum of
the Jagiellonian
University, Krakw.
Specimen number:
44/47, inventory
number:
O/2008/1962),
manufactured in 2008
in the Michalici
monastery of Miejsce
Piastowe.169 Both
objects show holes
drilled through the
attachment scars.
Images: (top) A.-M.
Stamper; (bottom)
Sikora-Majewska
which would have been preserved in this way. For rosaries which often feature skulls
as a kind of memento mori141 this would seem a plausible strategy. However, since
up to now the Kortrijk fragment represents the only known archaeological bladdernut rosary, we cannot argue that this manufacturing method was once deliberately
used for rosaries.
A FISTFUL OF BLADDERNUTS
119
aphrodisiac use of bladdernut dates back to the Roman period143 and that according to a Roman legend, the shrub was nearly eradicated due to its virility-boosting
properties.144 Alas, no ancient Roman author mentions anything of the like, and only
a very few later authors do so: the earliest explicit mentions of the bladdernuts
use as an aphrodisiac come from the late sixteenth/early seventeenth century,145 but
neither bear any reference to the Roman legend.
The reasons for and origins of this apparently recent tradition of using Staphylea
seeds are still unclear. To the authors, there seem to be three possible and rather
plausible explanations why the plant is now being perceived (i.e. bought and sold) by
some as a source of love potions. One reason might stem from the doctrine of signatures passed down since antiquity, which interprets nature in a most anthropocentric
way: an organisms characteristics shape, colour, and the like signal its
medicinal properties for humans.146 In the case of bladdernut, the inflated capsules
do have a striking resemblance to body parts such as the scrotum, reflected in folk
names such as klootzakkenboom in Flemish Brabant,147 or kochi madi (= ram
testicles) in Bulgaria.148 Likewise, analogies to breasts or buttocks149 have been
drawn in the literature, and the Bulgarian folk name skutlik (= womb)150 ought also
to be mentioned in this context. All these similarities may have served as an inspiration to Renaissance and modern-day quacks.151 A second possible explanation is that,
beginning with the earliest probable references from Ancient Greek sources, bladdernut has often been confused or equated with, pistachio (Pistacia vera), the seeds
of which have been regarded as an aphrodisiac since that period. Bladdernut might
thus have acquired properties associated with true pistachio in the literature. The
third possibility is only plausible for the German-speaking parts of Europe, as it may
be rooted in a misconception of the onomatopoetic word pimpern (also see below).
In modern southern German dialects, including most Austrian ones, pimpern
is a slang expression for sexual intercourse,152 not unlike the English to shag. All
three reasons may have influenced modern recommendations of bladdernut as an
aphrodisiac.
Bladdernut legends
A few legends deal with bladdernut, two of which shall be mentioned here:
Austrian ethnologist M. Kautsch153 recounts a narrative possibly related to the cut nose
of the bladdernut seeds, and possibly referring to the Napoleonic wars around 1805.154
During an invasion by the enemy who were about to enter an (unnamed) convent, the
nuns cut off the tips of their noses to protect themselves from being molested. Later, so
the legend continues, a bladdernut shrub sprouted from the very same place where the
nuns had buried their cut-off noses. Rhinotomy, or amputation of the nose, has long
associations as a punishment for adultery and other legends also relate that nuns used the
practice in the hopes of avoiding rape.155
The second legend deals with the Galgen- und Hhnerwunder (the gallows and
chicken miracle), documented in numerous altar pieces across Switzerland, the oldest
ones dating to the early seventeenth century. The son of a family on their pilgrimage
from Switzerland to Santiago de Compostela is tricked by a landlord, then wrongly
accused of theft, and hanged. The parents, shocked and distraught, continue with
their pilgrimage, but then hear a voice telling them their son was still alive. When
120
they return to the place of execution, they discover that their son has been supported
and kept alive on the gallows by none other than the patron of the pilgrimage, St
James himself. They report this to the judge (or, alternatively, the bishop), accusing
the landlord of deceitful behaviour. At that moment, as a divine proof, three roast
chickens on a spit become alive and whole again, and fly away, which subsequently
leads to the condemnation and execution of the landlord. The father cuts a staff from
a bladdernut (it is not said whether he does this in Spain or back in Switzerland),
plants it, and the staff sprouts into a tree.156
A note on toponyms
In Slavic-speaking countries, numerous toponyms which at first sight derive
from bladdernut names are known. An extensive list covering Slovakia, the Czech
Romanian*
Bulgarian
Slovak
Slovenian
Croatian
Serbian
Flowers
Fruit shape
(div
(kochi madi
margarit = wild
= ram testicles),
chrysanthemum),
(skutlik = womb)
(mekishovina = similar to Acer
tataricum, Tatar maple)
SLAVIC LANGUAGES
Similarity to
pistachio
TABLE 3
Seed shape
kloko, klokoka
divji leshniki (=
wild hazelnuts)
(kloko), (klokoikovina),
(klokoevina),
(klokoika), (klokoina)
(kalkoch), (klikoch),
(klochina),
(zaichi leshnitsi =
(klokoch), (klokochina), rabbit hazelnuts)
(klokochka),
(kurkotik), (skokotitsa)
Fruit rattling
(visulka
= pendant)
Use in rosaries
and adornments
(Gorchovitsa = wife
of a man called
Gorcho)
Others
256
255
253
252
251
250
Ref.
A FISTFUL OF BLADDERNUTS
121
Flowers
Dutch
wilde Pistacien -
German
GERMANIC LANGUAGES
Hungarian
FINNO-UGRIC LANGUAGES
Sorbian
Polish
Czech
Similarity to
pistachio
Blasenbaum
(= bladdertree),
Blasennu
(= bladdernut)
hlyagfa
Fruit shape
pimpernoten
Klappernu, Pemmanissl,
Pimpernoele, Pimpernlein,
Pimpernuss, Pumpernu,
(pimpernusa)**
klukoina
Fruit rattling
CONTINUED
TABLE 3
Todtenkopfbaum
(= skull tree),
Todtenkpfli
(=small skull)
Seed shape
Perlenbaum
(= bead tree),
Rosenkranzbaum
(= rosary tree)
Use in rosaries
and adornments
Sint Antuenis
nootkens (= St.
Anthony nuts)
Zirbelnsse (referring
to Pinus cembra
seeds)
sicomorna,
sycomorus
Others
262
261
260
259
258
257
Ref.
122
ANDREAS G. HEISS et al.
pistachio
salvatico,
pistacchio falso
Italian
French
ROMANIC LANGUAGES
wilde Pistacia
English
Swedish
Danish
Flemish
Similarity to
pistachio
Flowers
bladdernut
Blrend (= bladdernut)
klootzakkenboom
(= scrotum tree)
Fruit shape
pimpernd
Pimpernd
pimpernoot
TABLE 3
Fruit rattling
CONTINUED
nez coup
(= cut nose)
Seed shape
baguenaudes
patrenostres
(= rosary beads),
patenotier,
patentrier
Others
lacrime di Giobbe
(= Jobs tear)
S. Antonies nuts
Bennd (= bone
nut), Jobs Taarer
(= Jobs tear)
paternosterbollekesboom (= rosary
bead tree)
Use in rosaries
and adornments
268
267
266
265
264
263
Ref.
A FISTFUL OF BLADDERNUTS
123
Fruit rattling
Seed shape
Use in rosaries
and adornments
Others
272
271
270
269
Ref.
* Although of course not being a Slavic language, Romanian is mentioned in this group, as the vernacular Romanian name for staphylea is a Slavic loan word. Besides, due to the characteristics
of rattling fruit, staphylea pinnata in Romanian shares the same name with rhinanthus (rattleweed) species, requiring some caution in identifying the plant in literature.
** Likewise, the Bulgarian pimpernusa is a German loan word, thus not listed among Bulgarian vernacular names, but rather among German eponyms.
(kolytea)
follicularis, nux
vesicaria, vesicaria
Fruit shape
staphylodendron
(latinized)
Flowers
(pistachion)
GREEK
pistacia agrestia,
pistacia
germanica,
pistacea
sylvestris,
pistacia silvestris
fistici,
Latin
Similarity to
pistachio
CONTINUED
TABLE 3
124
ANDREAS G. HEISS et al.
A FISTFUL OF BLADDERNUTS
125
Conclusions
The data compared here provides a surprisingly diverse picture of views and uses of
the rare shrub Staphylea pinnata. The richest historical and ethnographical evidence
comes from eastern Europe, although archaeological evidence clearly demonstrates
that the shrub was also significant in central and northern Europe, as far back as
prehistoric times. The following interim conclusions are suggested.
Consumption of bladdernut seeds is fairly well documented for the early Bronze
Age, for the early Iron Age, and then continuously from the seventh century ce until
today. However, the record contains millennium-wide gaps between these three periods, and, since their provenance spans an area from southern Italy to central to southeastern Europe, it robustly challenges claims for any alleged continuum. However,
the existing evidence is not unimportant for a plant of such rare occurrence, and it is
quite reasonable to suggest a general habit of people eating Staphylea (mainly the
seeds, but also other parts) where available throughout Europe. It is to be expected
that further archaeological clues on the past role of bladdernut in human nutrition
will become available in the future.
Until the Renaissance, written evidence on bladdernut in medicinal use is very rare,
and such evidence as there is hardly differentiates it from pistachio (Pistacia vera).
And even in later periods, indications of pistachio seem to have played a role for
medicinal views on bladdernut. A question that could not be answered concerns the
unfounded toxicity myth occurring now and then in written sources from western
and central Europe.
Ritual uses are best documented for modern times due to methodological reasons.
Some of the diverse traditions recorded in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries date
back as early as the late Middle Ages/early Modern Times, and many may indeed be
based in some distant past not covered by written sources, although this hypothesis
is of course difficult to prove. One particular ritual use, the habit of using bladdernut
seeds (as well as adornments made thereof) as grave goods is currently only documented for a rather short spell: evidence for this exists from the second until the
126
fourth centuries ce, as for the sixth and seventh centuries. All known find contexts
either lie at the very limit of the supposed natural Staphylea distribution (south-western Germany), or far beyond it (northern Germany, Denmark, northern Poland),
raising the question of what made these seeds a merchandise worth transporting
hundreds of kilometres. Apart from decorative reasons, apotropaic attributions are
also suggested.
The data on its use in rosaries is indeed scanty, but can at least be precisely dated
from the sixteenth century onwards, which is about the period when the rosary
emerged in its modern shape long preceded, however, by earlier forms of prayer
beads since at least the twelfth century.165 Given its very rare appearance and a strong
concentration of the evidence only from the twentieth (!) century onwards, the widely
accepted hypothesis that bladdernut provided raw material for rosaries during history cannot be said to have been fully refuted, but it is very probable that Staphylea
was never the first choice for this purpose.
Abstract
An interdisciplinary approach combining archaeological, historical, and ethnological
data is used in the attempt to draw a general image of the role of bladdernut
(Staphylea pinnata) in past societies. The purposes encountered in this literature study
extend from nutritional and medicinal uses to particular ritual/religious aspects,
incorporating apotropaic and sympathetic magic, the use in grave goods, and the role
of bladdernut in rosaries. In the two latter purposes, the cut nose aspect of the seeds
is suggested to be an important symbolic factor.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Claudia Kinmonth (Leap, Co. Cork), Ingeborg Gaisbauer (Stadtarchologie Wien), Aldona Mueller-Bieniek (Polska Akademia Nauk, Krakw),
Elena Marinova-Wolff (KU Leuven), Marianne Kohler-Schneider (BOKU Wien), and
Inge Schjellerup (Nationalmuseet, Kbenhavn) for valuable suggestions about further
research possibilities and cooperations. For their support with literature, we thank
Sabine Karg and Anne Margrethe Walldn (Kbenhavns universitet), Magorzata
Lataowa and Katarzyna Piska (Uniwersytet Gdask), Romuald Kosina (Uniwersytet
Wrocawski), and Lorenzo Costantini (Istituto Italiano per lAfrica e lOriente, Rome).
We are greatly indebted to Clodagh Doyle and Jennifer Goff (Irish National Museum), Franz Kirchweger (Kunsthistorisches Museum Wien KHM), Aurlie Vertu
(Muse de Cluny), Reinhard Gratz (Dommuseum zu Salzburg), Inja Smerdel, Bojana
Rogelj kafar, and Janja agar Grgi (all Slovenski Etnografski Muzej, Ljubljana),
and Heike Krause (Stadtarchologie Wien) for their time, and for their great helpfulness in making their collections and finds accessible to the authors. Further thanks go
to Brigitte Cooremans (Vlaams Instituut voor Onroerend Erfgoed, Brussels), AnneMarc Stampfler (Ville dIvry-sur-Seine), Jacek Madeja (Jagiellonian University in
Krakw), Jutta Ronke (Regierungsprsidium Stuttgart, Landesamt fr Denkmalpflege), and Peter Steen Henriksen (Nationalmuseet, Kbenhavn) for their support with
additional information on bladdernut rosaries and for kindly allowing us to publish
A FISTFUL OF BLADDERNUTS
127
their images. We also thank Ruth Haerktter (Hamburg) for her research in her
fathers manuscripts, Roy Vickery (South London Botanical Institute) for the data on
the introduction of Staphylea pinnata in the UK and in Ireland, and Nada Prapotnik
(Prirodoslovni muzej Slovenije, Ljubljana) for information on Slovenian folk names.
Our thanks also go to Angelika Holzer (Gesundheit sterreich GmbH, Wien) for
toxicological information of Staphylea. We are most grateful to the SFLS for their
invitation to their 2012 Manchester conference, without which none of this would
ever have happened.
Notes
1
2
3
10
11
Andreas G. Heiss, Von alten Amuletten und abgeschnittenen Nasen die Pimpernuss in Archologie und Geschichte, in Die Pimpernuss (Staphylea
pinnata L.), ed. by G. Schramayr and K. Wanninger.
Monografien der Regionalen Gehlzvermehrung
RGV 4 (St. Plten: Amt der N Landesregierung,
Abteilung Landentwicklung, 2010), 1922.
Latin pinnatus = feather-like.
John Bostock, Pliny the Elder. The Natural History
(London: Taylor and Francis, 1855), Book XVI,
69.
As the capsules which are typical of the genus Staphylea do not open in S. pinnata, morphologically
they actually correspond rather to what some
authors might call a carcerulus see R. W. Spjut,
A Systematic Treatment of Fruit Types, Memoirs
of The New York Botanical Garden (New York;
New York Botanical Garden, 1994).
Hermann Meusel and Eckehart Jger, Vergleichende Chorologie der Zentraleuropischen
Flora. Text und Karten, 3 (Stuttgart/New York/
Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1992), 515 and 43
48.
Friedrich Ehrendorfer, Woody Plants Evolution
and Distribution Since the Tertiary (Wien/New
York: Springer, 1989).
Thomas Raus, Found and Lost: Staphyleaceae in
Greece, Willdenowia, 36.1 (2006), 311.
Ladislav Mucina, Georg Grabherr, and Susanne
Wallnfer, Die Pflanzengesellschaften sterreichs.
Teil III: Wlder und Gebsche (Jena: Gustav
Fischer, 1993).
edomil ili, Atlas drvea i grmlja (Sarajevo:
Zavod za izdavanje udbenika, 1973); Ljubia
Grli, Enciklopedija samoniklog jestivog bilja
(Zagreb: August Cesarec, 1986).
Hermann Meusel and Eckehart Jger, Ecogeographical differentiation of the Submediterranean
deciduos forest flora, Plant Systematics and
Evolution, 162 (1989), 31529.
Hermann Meusel, Eckehart Jger, Stephan W.
Rauschert, and Erich Weinert Vergleichende
Chorologie der Zentraleuropischen Flora. Text
und Karten, Volume 2 (Jena: VEB Gustav Fischer,
1978).
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
128
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Century ad in Northern Poland, Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 3.2 (1994), 12125.
Helmut Kroll, Literature on Archaeological
Remains of Cultivated Plants (1992/1993), Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 4 (1995), 5166;
Helmut Kroll, Literature on Archaeological
Remains of Cultivated Plants (1994/1995), Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 5 (1996), 169
200; Helmut Kroll, Literature on Archaeological
Remains of Cultivated Plants (1997/1998), Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 8 (1999), 12963;
Helmut Kroll, Literature on Archaeological
Remains of Cultivated Plants (1998/1999), Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 9 (2000), 3168;
Helmut Kroll, Literature on archaeological
remains of cultivated plants (1999/2000), Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 10 (2001), 33
60.
Lataowa (1994).
See e.g. Ann-Marie Hansson and Andreas G. Heiss,
Plants used in Ritual Offerings, and in Festive
Contexts: Introduction, in Plants and People:
Choices and Diversity through Time, ed. by A.
Chevalier, E. Marinova, and L. Pea-Chocarro,
Early Agricultural Remnants and Technical Heritage (EARTH): 8,000 Years of Resilience and
Innovation 1 (Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2014),
31134.
Andreas G. Heiss, Hans-Peter Stika, Nicla De
Zorzi, and Michael Jursa, Nigella in the Mirror of
Time: A Brief Attempt to Draw a Genus Ethnohistorical Portrait, in Von Sylt bis Kastanas. Festschrift fr Helmut Johannes Kroll, ed. by C. von
Carnap-Bornheim, W. Drfler, W. Kirleis, J.
Mller, and U. Mller, Offa 60/70 (Kiel: Wachholtz Verlag, 2013), 14769; Cozette GriffinKremer and Andreas G. Heiss, Common Plant
Names, Now and Then The Botanical Viewpoint, in Plants and People: Choices and Diversity
through Time, ed. by A. Chevalier, E. Marinova
and L. Pea-Chocarro, Early Agricultural Remnants and Technical Heritage (EARTH): 8,000
Years of Resilience and Innovation 1 (Oxford:
Oxbow Books, 2014), 36163; Hansson and Heiss
(2014).
Heiss et al. (2013), 16064.
Gostyska (1962); ukasz uczaj, Bladdernut
(Staphylea pinnata L.) in Polish folklore, Rocznik
Polskiego Towarzystwa Dendrologicznego, 57
(2009), 2328.
Niculi-Voronca, Datinele i credintele poporului
romn adunate i aezate n ordine mitologic
(Cernui: Tipografia Isidor Wiegler, 1903).
Reprint, Colecia PLURAL M (Bucureti: Polirom,
1998), p. 461.
Hendrych (1980).
John R. McNeill, Fred R. Barrie, Herv Maurice
Burdet, Vincent Demoulin, David L. Hawksworth,
Karol Marhold, Dan Henry Nicolson, Jefferson
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
A FISTFUL OF BLADDERNUTS
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
129
130
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
A FISTFUL OF BLADDERNUTS
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
131
132
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
A FISTFUL OF BLADDERNUTS
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
133
134
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
Notes on contributors
Andreas G. Heiss, after completing his PhD in Biology (focus Archaeobotany) at the
University of Innsbruck in 2008, continued his research at the University of Natural
Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU) and the Vienna Institute for Archaeological Science (VIAS). His focus is the analysis of plant macroremains (seeds and
charcoal) as well as historical botany, and the information they hold on palaeoecology and human-plant interactions. He teaches courses in General Botany, Plant
Anatomy, and Archaeobotany. Apart from participating in national and international
congresses and publishing in various journals and books, he has co-edited the threevolume EARTH Book Series under the lead of Patricia C. Anderson and Leonor
Pea-Chocarro.
Correspondence to: Dr. Andreas G. Heiss, Universitt Wien, Vienna Institute for
Archaeological Science (VIAS), Althanstrae 14 Geozentrum, 1090 Wien, Austria.
Email: andreas.heiss@erbsenzaehler.at
Dragana Filipovi is a researcher at the Institute for Balkan Studies in Belgrade,
Serbia. Her primary research interests are macrobotanical remains and the study of
plant use and crop husbandry in the past. She completed her PhD at the University
of Oxford (2013); her doctoral thesis focused on the plant economy of Neolithic
atalhyk in central Anatolia. She has analysed botanical remains from various
A FISTFUL OF BLADDERNUTS
135
prehistoric sites in Serbia and is currently working on projects in central Anatolia and
the Balkans.
Correspondence to: Dr. Dragana Filipovi, Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti
(SANU), Balkanoloki institut, Knez Mihailova 35/IV, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia. Email:
drfilipovic12@gmail.com
Anely Nedelcheva earned her PhD from the Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski,
where currently she is Associated Professor and teaches courses in Pharmaceutical
Botany, Medicinal Plants and Ethnobotany. Her research focuses on ethnobotany in
the Balkans and Southeastern Europe, and she has published on wild food plants,
medical ethnobotany, folk botanical nomenclature, plants in the folk meteorology,
and wild plants used in the traditional handcrafts. She is author of two Utility
Models based on her studies in the traditional herbal products. She is editor of the
EurAsian Journal of BioSciences.
Correspondence to: Dr. Anely Nedelcheva, Sofiiski Universitet Sv. Kliment
Ohridski, Biologicheski fakultet, Blvd. Dragan Tzankov 8, 1164 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Email: anely@biofac.uni-sofia.bg; aneli_nedelcheva@yahoo.com
Gabriela Ru-Popa holds a Masters degree from the Department for Prehistoric and
Early Historic Archaeology at the University of Vienna. Her diploma thesis deals with
early Iron Age objects made of skin, leather and fur from the prehistoric Hallstatt salt
mines. She also engages in museum education, university tutoring and experimental
archaeology projects addressing the question of prehistoric tanning techniques and
leather processing. She has investigated the leather remains from Austrian prehistoric cemeteries (mainly of Migration Period and early Middle Ages), joined prospection activities in the Alps and participated in archaeological excavations at Hallstatt
(Austria), Bibracte (France) and Dietsttt (Germany). Currently Gabriela Ru-Popa
is a recipient of a doctoral research grant from the Austrian Academy of Sciences. For
her dissertation she analyses skin, leather and fur objects from the Iron Age salt mines
of Drrnberg, Austria and Chehrabad, Iran.
Correspondence to: Mag. Gabriela Ru-Popa, sterreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften (AW), Institut fr Orientalische und Europische Archologie (OREA),
Fleischmarkt 20-22, 1010 Wien, Austria. Email: gabriela.russ-popa@oeaw.ac.at
Klaus Wanninger is managing partner and project manager at the landscape planning
office LACON, and vice-chairman of the NGO Regionale Gehlzvermehrung
(Propagation of Regional Woody Plants), an initiative for the conservation, propagation and promotion of autochthonous woody plants in Austria. He is an expert in
nature conservation, biodiversity management, phenology and science communication, and co-author of several plant monographs.
Correspondence to: Klaus Wanninger, Bro LACON Landschaftsplanung &
Consulting, Austria, Lederergasse 22/8, 1090 Wien, Austria, Email: kwann@lacon.at
Georg Schramayr is an expert in nature education/presentation and trainer for nature
guides, focusing on wild and domesticaed fruit trees/shrubs, herbalism, dye plants,
landscape ecology and geobotany. He is a key player in the NGO Regionale
Gehlzvermehrung in close cooperation with local authorities such as the federal
state of Lower Austria, landscape planning offices such as LACON and local initiatives, promoting the use of autochthonous woody plants, and knowledge of their
136