Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S. Sherrit, X. Bao, D.A. Sigel, M.J. Gradziel, S.A. Askins, B.P. Dolgin, and Y. Bar-Cohen
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech, Mail Stop 82-105, 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA, 91109-8099
I. INTRODUCTION
High power density ultrasonic transducers are used in
a variety of devices for drilling[1], cleaning[2], welding
[3], filters[4], and novel transformers[5]. In general
driving piezoelectrics at high power levels introduces nonlinear and thermal effects that need to be understood in
order to accurately measure and control the transducer. In
the small signal regime piezoelectrics are typically linear,
isothermal, and adiabatic. When the same materials are
driven at higher drive levels the thermal conditions can
change considerably. In this paper we describe a test
system for determining the response of the piezoelectric at
and off resonance.
II. EXPERIMENTAL
The test system is shown in Figure 1 and allows for the
simultaneous determination of the Field E, electric
displacement D, temperature T, and the strain S. An AC
voltage is applied across the combination of the sample
and an adjustable high power resistor (1-1000 ). The
resistor value is chosen to maximize the current signal
while keeping the ratio of the voltage across the resistor to
the voltage across the sample small. In low frequency
measurements (<1kHz) a resistor (R = 100-1000 ) or a
large integrating capacitor is typically used to determine
Channel 5800
100
2.6
Motorola 3203HD
100
7.8
0.59
3.2
0.032
0.36
III. DISCUSSION
In order to investigate the thermal hysteresis and
the frequency shifts in the admittance plots or properly
evaluate the properties of the resonator one has to look at
the dissipated power and the heat flows in the sample under
test and the resultant temperature distribution. When
driving a piezoelectric material off resonance the power
dissipated in the sample is primarily due to the dielectric
loss (tan). The average power dissipated is
(1)
PD = LAfE 2 tan
where f is the frequency, E is the electric field amplitude
and is the real permittivity L is the sample thickness and
A is the electrode area. At frequencies below resonance
the power is dissipated evenly throughout the sample. At
resonance the power dissipation is primarily due to the
mechanical loss and proportional to the square of the strain
distribution. Since the current and voltage are in phase we
can determine the average power dissipated from
2
(2)
PM = VRMS
Y ( fS )
where VRMS is the root mean square voltage across the
sample and Y(fS) is the admittance at the resonance
frequency fs. Unlike the off resonance case however the
power dissipation can be shown to have a spatial variation
in the sample that is proportional to square of the strain
distribution. For a plate sample of thickness L and area A
centered at x = 0 the power distribution as a function of x
is
x
(3)
P( x) = 2 PM cos 2
L
2T =
q( x)
k
(4)
P L cos 2 (x L ) x 2 1
T ( x ) = M
2 + + T1
4
L
2
2kA
(5)
P L
(6)
T ( x) = D x 2 + T1
2kAL 2
(10)
+T
T1 ( ) =
0
ki
(11)
Acoustic Power
Radiated
PR
To
Electrical Power
Delivered PE
To
T1
Ti(x)
T1
Heat Flow
dQ/dt =PD
Figure 8. A schematic diagram of a transducer control volume after
reaching thermal equilibrium.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The research at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), a
division of the California Institute of Technology, was
carried out under a contract with the National Aeronautics
Space Agency (NASA).
REFERENCES
[1]Stewart Sherrit, Yoseph Bar-Cohen, Benjamin P. Dolgin,
Nathan Bridges, Xiaoqi Bao, Zensheu Chang, Albert Yen,
Ronald S. Saunders, Richard A. Rainen, Stephen F. Dawson,
Dharmendra Pal, Jason Kroh, Tom Peterson, Sample
Acquisition and In-Situ Analysis Using the Ultrasonic/Sonic
Driller/Corer (USDC) and Robotic Platforms Proceedings of the
The 6th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence,
Robotics and Automation in Space (i-SAIRAS-01), Montreal,
Canada, June 18-21, 2001
[2] J.A. Gallego-Juarez, New Technologies in High-Power
Ultrasonic Industrial Applications, Proceedings of the IEEE
Ultrasonics Symposium, Cannes, France, pp. 1343-1352, 1994
[3] Jiromaru Tsujino, Tetsugi Ueoka, Tsutomu Sano, Welding
Characteristics of 27 kHz and 40 kHz Complex Vibration
Ultrasonic Metal Welding Systems, Proceedings of the IEEE
Ultrasonics Symposium, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, pp. 773-778, 1999
[4] John D. Larson, Richard C. Ruby, Paul D. Bradley, Joe Wen,
Shong-Lam Kok, Allen Chien, Power Handling and
Temperature Coefficient Stucies in FBAR, Duplexers for the
1900 MHz PCS Band, Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics
Symposium, San Juan Puerto Rico, pp. 869-874, 2000
[5] Torsten Bove, Wanda Wolny, Erling Ringgaard, Klaus
Breboel, New Type of Piezoelectric Transformer with Very
High Power Density, Proceedings of the IEEE International
Symposium on the Application of Ferroelectrics, Honolulu,
Hawaii, pp.321- 324, 2000
[6] S. P. Leary, S.M. Pilgrim, Harmonic Analysis of the
Polarization Response in Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3 based Ceramics- A
Study in Aging IEEE Trans. on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and
Frequency Control, 45, (1), pp. 163-169, 1998
[7] S. Sherrit, B.P. Dolgin, Y. Bar-Cohen, D. Pal, J. Kroh, T.
Peterson "Modeling of Horns for Sonic/Ultrasonic Applications,"
Proceedings of the IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium,
Lake Tahoe, CA, October 1999, pp. 647-651
[8] Ralph S. Woolett, Charles L. LeBlanc, Ferroelectric
Nonlinearities in Transducer Ceramics, IEEE Trans on Sonics
and Ultrasonics, SU-20, pp. 24-31, 1973
[9] Shasshank Priya, Dwight Viehland, Alfredo Vazquez Carazo,
Jungho Ryu, Kenji Uchino, High power resonant measurements
of piezoelectric materials: Importance of elastic nonlinearities
Journal of Applied Physics, 90, pp. 1469-1479, 2001
[10] D. A. Berlincourt, D.R. Curran, H. Jaffe, Chapter 3Piezoelectric and Piezomagnetic Material and their Function in
Transducers, pp. 169-270, Physical Acoustics-Principles and
Methods, Volume 1-Part A, ed. W.P. Mason Academic Press,
New York, 1964.
[11] K. Uchino, S. Hirose, Loss Mechanisms in Piezoelectric
Ceramics: How to Measure Different Losses Separately IEEE
Trans. on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, 48,
(1), pp. 307-321, 2001