Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s00231-003-0474-4
793
Abstract This paper reports the numerical modeling of
turbulent flow and convective heat transfer over a wavy wall
using a two equations eddy viscosity turbulence model. The
wall boundary conditions were applied by using a new
zonal modeling strategy based on DNS data and combining
the standard ke turbulence model in the outer core flow
with a one equation model to resolve the near-wall region.
It was found that the two-layer model is successful in
capturing most of the important physical features of a
turbulent flow over a wavy wall with reasonable amount of
memory storage and computer time. The predicted results
show the shortcomings of the standard law of the wall for
predicting such type of flows and consequently suggest
that direct integrations to the wall must be used instead.
Moreover, Comparison of the predicted results of a wavy
wall with that of a straight channel, indicates that the
averaged Nusselt number increases until a critical value is
reached where the amplitude wave is increased. However,
this heat transfer enhancement is accompanied by an increase in the pressure drop.
Nomenclature
xi
general non-orthogonal coordinate system
J
Jacobien of the coordinate transformation
/
time averaged variable
Ci
convection term
D/ i
diffusion term
S/
source term
dij
Kronecker delta
0
0
ui uj
Reynolds stress tensor
u0j h
turbulent heat flux
k
turbulent kinetic energy
Gij
turbulent transport coefficient
Prt
turbulent Prandtl number
Sij
mean rate of strain
Received: 21 October 2002
Published online: 17 October 2003
Springer-Verlag 2003
A.Z. Dellil
Faculte des sciences, Universite dOran Es-senia, Algerie
A. Azzi
Faculte de Genie-Mecanique, Universite des Sciences et de la
Technologie dOran, Algerie
B.A. Jubran (&)
Sultan Qaboos University, Department of Mechanical
and Industrial Engineering, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman
E-mail: bassamj@squ.edu.om
mt
Cl
e
ll, le
j
fl
Ry
q
H
am
k
Us
Re
1
Introduction
Wavy wall flows occur under a wide variety of engineering
applications and have, consequently, received considerable
attention [12]. One of the most important applications is
the heat transfer enhancement in heat exchangers. The
physical process of enhancing heat transfer in such
application is to introduce some geometrical modifications
on the wall in question in order to break the boundary
layer that forms on the exchanger wall and replace it by a
fresh fluid from the free stream flow [3]. In real applications, engineers are also interested in the additional
pressure drop caused by such techniques. So, the best
solution is that provides the least pressure drop and the
largest heat transfer rate. Other parameters such as simplicity, manufacturability, maintenance, etc., are also
important parameters in the design phase [3].
Wavy wall heat transfer enhancement technique has
been used extensively in the design of compact heat
exchangers as can be seen from the numerous experimental and numerical investigations reported in the literature. One of the important observations in this field is
that in the laminar regime, where wavy passages provide
significant heat transfer enhancement when the flow is
unsteady. However, for steady flow, the enhancement is
insignificant. Wang and Vanka [3] conducted a numerical
investigation for laminar steady and unsteady cases with
wavy wall. They reported a heat transfer enhancement
factor of about 2.5 for the unsteady case compared with
that for a parallel-plate channel case. However, for the
steady case with wavy wall the heat transfer rate is only
slightly improved. The transition occurs at a Reynolds
number of around 180 for the geometrical configuration
studied by Wang and Vanka [3].
794
Cij @ T
Prt @xj
2
3
where mt is known as the isotropic eddy viscosity, e represents the rate of dissipation of k, and Cl stand for a
model constant. The distributions of k and e are determined from the conventional model transport equations of
Jones and Launder [9], and standard values can be
assigned to the model constants. In this flow region the
turbulent Prandtl number is usually fixed at 0.9. In the one
equation model, the eddy viscosity is made proportional to
a velocity scale determined by solving the k-equation, and
a length scale ll prescribed algebraically. The dissipation
rate e is related to the same velocity scale and a dissipation
length scale le, also prescribed algebraically [7]. Such
Where / is the considered time-averaged variable, J is the model has the advantage of requiring considerably fewer
Jacobian of the coordinate transformation, Ci, Di/ repre- grid points in the viscous sub-layer than any pure Low
Reynolds scheme. Also, because of the fixed length-scale
sent respectively the convection and the diffusion terms
distribution near the wall, these models have been found
to give better prediction for adverse pressure gradient
Table 1. Form of terms in the individual equations
boundary layer than pure ke models.
D/i
S/
/
Ci
The present two-layer model is a re-formulated version
of the so-called v2 velocity-scale based model (TLV)
i
1
b jqvj
0
0
proposed by Rodi et al. [7]. In a recent study Azzi and
j
i j
k
1J @x@ j pbk
bij qvj
lJ Bij @v
vk
@xj bj xk
Lakehal [8] re-incorporate k1/2 as a velocity scale instead
l
i
i @k
PK qe
rk J Bj @xj
k
b jqvj
v2 1=2 and ll and le are re-scaled on the basis of the same
DNS data of Kim et al. [10]. This model will be call
2
@e
e
bijqvj
rlek J Bij @x
Ce1 ke Pk Ce2 q ek
j
hereafter as TLV model and defined as follows:
j
p
Bij cofactor of J @yi =@xj ; Bij bil bl
Cij mt Cl kll
5
j
lt
l @mj
n @ml
m @mj
n @ml
2
The mathematical model
The mathematical model consists of the RANS, the twoequation eddy viscosity ke turbulence model and the
energy equation. The governing equations for steady,
turbulent, incompressible flows in non-orthogonal coordinates using Cartesian velocity components can be
written in a generalized form as follows:
1 @
Ci / D/i S/ ;
1
J @xi
xk bk @xl ; Pk
bj
@xn
bl
@xm
bj
@xn
e k3=2 =le
are 4k and 2k in length respectively. For the inlet conditions, a similar procedure to that used by Patel et al. [2] is
q
applied here. The distributions of velocity and turbulence
1
fl
0:116 R2y Ry
8 parameters in a fully developed flow at sufficiently large
32
distance from the entry of 80H straight channel, which are
independent of the initial conditions and invariant with
jCl3=4 y
9 distance, are used as inlet conditions for wavy-wall calle
3=4
2 17:28= fl Ry jCl
culations. The Reynolds number was set as in DNS computations [6] at Re(HU/m) = 6760. The turbulence intensity
p
10 is assigned a value of 5% and the turbulence dissipation is
Ry q ky=l
calculated based on a turbulent viscosity equal 50 times
Where j = 0.4 and Cl = 0.082. The outer and the near-wall the laminar viscosity. At the outflow boundary, zero-gramodel are matched at the location where fl = 0.95, indi- dient conditions are imposed for all dependent variables.
cating that viscous effects become negligible. More details
can be found in [8], where the model is tested for a fully 2.3
developed channel and applied for a film cooling config- Grid mesh
uration.
The quality of a computational solution is strongly linked to
the quality of the grid mesh. So a highly orthogonalized,
nonuniform, fine grid mesh was generated with grid nodes
2.1
considerably refined in the near-wall region. The normalNumerical procedure
The numerical procedure used to calculate the test case is ized y+ values at the near wall node are less than unity, and
based on a finite-volume approach for implicitly solving care is taken so that the stretching factors are kept close to
the incompressible Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes
unity. Figure 1 shows a close-up of the computational grid
equations (RANS) on arbitrary non-orthogonal grids,
used for the case with am = 0.10 H. The grid adopted for the
employing a cell-centred grid arrangement. The momen- computations was obtained after a series of tests and contum-interpolation technique of Rhie and Chow [11] is used sists of 42,100 grid nodes (disposed on a global array 421
to prevent pressure-field oscillations and the pressure100 nodes in x, and y directions). For the parametric study,
velocity coupling is achieved using the SIMPLEC algoseveral grids were generated, where the wave amplitude was
rithm of Van Doormal and Raithby [12]. The resulting
varied from 0.0 to 0.10 by a step of 0.02.
system of the algebraic difference equations is solved using
the Strongly Implicit Procedure (SIP) of Stone [13]. The 3
convection fluxes are approximated by employing the
Results and discussion
QUICK scheme for all variables applied in a scalar form by
means of a deferred-correction procedure and bounded by 3.1
the Van-Leer Harmonic function as limiter. The diffusive Comparison with DNS data
fluxes are, however, approximated using second-order
In order to validate the code the first run was done with
central differences. Convergence was in all cases deterflow characteristics that are the same as those used by
mined based on a drop in normalized mass and momen- Maa and Schumann [6]. Figures 2 and 3 compare the
tum residuals by four orders of magnitude. A global mass normalized mean velocity and turbulent kinetic energy
balance algorithm was employed after each iteration to
profiles with DNS data. The comparison is done until the
correct the mass fluxes at the outflow. More details of the middle of the channel and at four streamwise locations of
mathematical formulation, which are now a standard
the seventh wave that correspond to the divergent, trough,
material and well known to most investigators, can be
convergent and crest positions, respectively (x/H = 0.304,
found in the following references [1415].
0.492, 0.804 and 0.992). The figures show reasonable
agreement for the mean velocity profiles. The reverse flow
occurring in the first half of the wave (x/H = 0.304 and
2.2
0.492) is clearly captured by the computations. However,
Computational domain and boundary conditions
The computational domain consists of 10 waves preceded the turbulent kinetic energy is globally underpredicted. As
and followed by upstream and downstream flat sections
for flow adjustment and recovery, respectively. This geometrical configuration was used previously by Patel et al.
[2] and seems to be more exact than using one wave length
of channel and applying periodic conditions. According to
Patel et al. [2] the periodic boundary conditions cannot be
established without prior knowledge of the flow, particularly with regard to the turbulent quantities and calculations of the type performed here.
The wavy and the flat plate are placed with a mean
spacing (H = 1). The amplitude and the wavelength of the
lower sinusoidal wavy wall are (am = 0.05H) and (k = H), Fig. 1. Close-up of the computational grid for the case with 0.1 H
respectively. The upstream and downstream flat sections of amplitude
ll jyCl3=4 fl
795
796
Fig. 2. Comparison of normalized mean streamwise velocity with
3.2
Influence of the wave amplitude
The effect of geometric parameters is investigated by
varying the amplitude wave from zero (flat plate) to 0.1 H
by a step of 0.02 H. The friction and the pressure coefficients distributions for trough one wave in the fully
developed region are plotted in figures 5 and 6, respectively. Comparing the results for flat plate (am = 0) with
that obtained for the wavy wall, it can be seen that there is
a decrease in the values of friction coefficient in the trough
and an increase in the values in the crest. Except for very
small amplitude (am = 0.02 H), the shape of the distribution curves is highly deformed with a tendency to
increase values even in the trough. The separation and the
reattachment points where the friction coefficient vanishes
are plotted in figure 7. Separation and reattachment points
correspond to locations where the friction coefficient
vanishes. For (am = 0.5 H) they are at 0.13 k and 0.58 k,
respectively. In DNS computations [6], they were located
at 0.14 k and 0.59 k, respectively. The agreement is completely satisfying. It is also obvious from the figure that the
797
waves
798
wave
wave
References
1. Vijay KG; Maji PK (1988) Laminar flow and heat transfer in a
periodically converging diverging channel. Int J Numer Meth
Fluids 8: 579597
2. Patel VC; Tyndall Chon J; Yoon JY (1991) Turbulent flow in a
channel with a wavy wall. J Fluids Eng 113: 579586
3. Wang G; Vanka SP (1995) Convective heat transfer in periodic
wavy passages. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 38(17): 32193230
4. Hudson JD; Dykhno L; Nanratty TJ (1996) Turbulent production
in flow over a wavy wall. Exp Fluids 20: 27265
5. Cherukat P; Na Y; Hanratty TJ (1998) Direct numerical simulation
of a fully developed turbulent flow over a wavy wall. Theor
Comput Fluid Dynam 11: 109134
6. Maa C; Schumann U (1996) Direct numerical simulation of
separated turbulent flow over a wavy boundary. In: Hirschel EH
(ed) Flow simulation with high performance computers notes on
numerical fluid mechanics, 52: 227241
7. Rodi W; Mansour NN; Michelassi V (1993) One equation nearwall turbulence modelling with the aide of direct simulation data.
J Fluids Eng 115: 196205
8. Azzi A; Lakehal D (2002) Perspectives in modelling film-cooling of
turbine blades by transcending conventional two-equation turbulence models. ASME J Turbomach 124: 472484
799