Professional Documents
Culture Documents
on
DETERMINATION of AVERAGE LIGHTING POWER DENSITIES
for
COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS
prepared for
By
Brian Reilly
Booth and Reilly
Consulting Engineers
Brisbane
6 May, 2002
ABCB Office
SYNOPSIS
This report considers the average lighting power densities inherent in basic lighting design
for commercial buildings. It is predicated on the lowest practicable cost solution, within the
constraints of AS1680. The lighting power densities do not take into account any power
savings which would result from a life cycle cost analysis.
It is based on lighting design where minimum installed cost is the sole determinant.
The report also considers probable future developments in energy efficiency in commercial
lighting within the next few years.
External lighting (facade floodlighting) is also considered in general terms.
ASSUMPTIONS
Luminaires Considered
The following luminaires have been selected on the basis of being the most probable
selections for a spec builder and being available throughout the country. This was
determined by surveying wholesalers as to their perception of the most cost effective fittings
in the various categories.
2/36W budget troffer, K12
Thorn BTN236HHS
Thorn BTN236HHS
Thorn BTN236HHS/LOU
Pierlite ET236QS
Pierlite ET236QS
Pierlite ET236QS/S
Harcroft TB236Q/K12
Harcroft TB236Q/K19st
Harcroft CR236Q
For commercial building applications in the mid range lighting levels, where uniformity
requirements dictate a higher installed flux than is necessary to meet the base lighting
requirements of AS1680, single lamp fixtures would obviously offer energy saving benefits.
However, the capital cost of recessed single lamp luminaires far exceeds that of the
ubiquitous twin lamp fittings, and they therefore not relevant in an installed cost only
analysis.
For lower lighting levels (160 lux and below) it was considered that surface mounted fittings
with wrap around diffusers, and recessed compact fluorescent downlights, may offer cost
advantages over the standard recessed twin lamp fluorescent troffers. It was found that the
costs of standard commonly used luminaires of these types varied little. It was therefore
decided, for this analysis, to select typical middle of the road luminaires as follows.
Thorn CBDN236
Thorn CBDN136
RLM 13910
RLM 126103
April 2002
2 / 12
ABCB Office
General
Room reflectances
70/50/20
lamp lumens
Ballast
Starter
Other
0.9
0.9
0.76
0.76
Luminaire
0.9
0.95
Room surfaces
0.95
0.95
Based on the above, maintenance factors were selected as follows :Luminaire type
Enclosed luminaire
0. 78
0.65
0.81
0.68
In developing the maintenance factors, it has been necessary to consider the intent of
AS1680 and to recognise that a speculative builder is not constrained by maintenance
issues. In essence, such a builder could decide on any maintenance regime to suit their
purposes. The factors therefore lean more to a commercial reality, the sort of factors a
luminaire manufacturer would employ when providing a lighting layout, under tender
conditions, for such a development.
April 2002
3 / 12
ABCB Office
>19
16 - 19
<= 16
April 2002
4 / 12
ABCB Office
Due to the requirement to comply with a 1200x600 ceiling grid, averages are considered the
most appropriate representation, to eliminate extremely high figures purely as a result of
room dimensions.
A room index of 1.5 was chosen as the demarcation point between large and small rooms.
RI1.5 represents a 6m x 6m room at 2.7m ceiling height.
April 2002
5 / 12
ABCB Office
Typical Luminaires
Comment
Waiting rooms
160
0.7
22
8.74
5.2
staff canteens
160
0.7
22
8.74
5.2
food preparation
240
0.9
22
16.33
13.15
K12 cheapest
training rooms
240
0.7
19
16.33
13.15
K12 cheapest
320
0.7
19
16.47
13.15
320
0.7
16
17.15
13.51
400
0.7
19
18.76
13.5
Drawing boards
600
0.9
16
26.53
21.61
600
0.7
16
25.9
20.83
colour matching.
600
0.9
19
26.58
18.32
K12 cheapest
Fine inspection
800
0.9
19
33.76
23.96
K12 cheapest
1200
0.9
19
48.18
35.36
K12 cheapest
April 2002
K12 cheapest
6 / 12
ABCB Office
Typical Luminaires
Comment
Waiting rooms
160
0.7
22
8.77
4.5
staff canteens
160
0.7
22
8.77
4.5
food preparation
240
0.9
22
16.33
13.5
K12 cheapest
training rooms
240
0.7
19
13.36
10.35
K12 cheapest
320
0.7
19
15.39
10.7
320
0.7
16
14.91
12.05
400
0.7
19
17.82
12.24
Drawing boards
600
0.9
16
25.9
20.83
600
0.7
16
25.64
21.6
colour matching.
600
0.9
19
26.3
18.25
K12 cheapest
Fine inspection
800
0.9
19
33.51
23.93
K12 cheapest
1200
0.9
19
47.34
35.09
K12 cheapest
April 2002
K12 cheapest
7 / 12
ABCB Office
Typical Luminaires
Comment
Waiting rooms
160
0.7
22
7.63
5.39
staff canteens
160
0.7
22
7.63
5.39
food preparation
240
0.9
22
11.41
7.72
K12 cheapest
training rooms
240
0.7
19
11.23
7.51
K12 cheapest
320
0.7
19
14.1
9.87
320
0.7
16
13.93
11.58
400
0.7
19
17.34
12.14
Drawing boards
600
0.9
16
25.56
21.67
600
0.7
16
27.16
21.92
colour matching.
600
0.9
19
25.47
17.92
K12 cheapest
Fine inspection
800
0.9
19
32.52
23.61
K12 cheapest
1200
0.9
19
47.58
35.01
K12 cheapest
April 2002
K12 cheapest
8 / 12
ABCB Office
Lamps
Tri-phosphor lamps
T5 lamps
April 2002
9 / 12
ABCB Office
Control Zones
April 2002
10 / 12
ABCB Office
Therefore, in arriving at a schedule of watts per square metre of facade, we have made
some very broad assumptions; in essence we have used a rule of thumb solution.
Consequently, the results would generally err on the conservative side.
For an energy responsible approach to facade lighting, it is considered that there should be
a limit on the allowed lighting power density. However, such a limitation should not prohibit
minor floodlighting of signs and/or business names.
Consequently floodlighting of a small area, say 10m2 on each building face, could be allowed
without having to adhere to lighting power density requirements.
This would then allow a more realistic LPD limitation of say 3.5 watts per m2 of facade to be
specified for all buildings.
April 2002
11 / 12
ABCB Office
SCENARIO
INCANDESCENT
TUNGSTEN
HALOGEN
MERCURY
FLUORESCENT
METAL
HALIDE
HIGH
PRESSURE
SODIUM
20
5.29
3.53
1.06
0.71
0.71
0.58
MEDIUM
35
9.26
6.17
1.85
1.23
1.23
1.01
DARK
LOW
50
13.23
8.82
2.65
1.76
1.76
1.44
BRIGHT
HIGH
50
13.23
8.82
2.65
1.76
1.76
1.44
BRIGHT
MEDIUM
100
26.46
17.64
5.29
3.53
3.53
2.89
BRIGHT
LOW
150
39.68
26.46
7.94
5.29
5.29
4.33
surrounds
surface
Illumination
reflectivity
Lux
DARK
HIGH
DARK
ASSUMPTIONS
12
18
60
90
90
110
UTILISATION FACTOR
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
MAINTENANCE FACTOR
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
April 2002
12 / 12